| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Teen Mega World
(4)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Huge network of sites which give you access to over 3000 videos and their accompanying photosets.
+They have an excellent selection of young Eastern European models.
+They update once a day and all content is dated.
+They have a very good search engine that allows searches based on keywords or the models name.
+There is a synopsis of each scenes content.
+There is a lot of variety in their sex scenes which includes b/g, g/g b/g/g and solo
+Most of the models have multiple scenes. |
| Cons: |
-The vast majority of the sites are now dead and no longer updating.
-They keep adding new sites but then stop adding new content within a few months.
-They recently altered their update schedule where now they release the photoset first and the videos is only released in the follwing day or days.
-Many of the models have more than one scene but sometimes there is not a lot of difference between each of them.
-The older content is not aging well and I don't belive that they plan on remastering any of those scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*These guys recently fixed an issue with their preview site and I'm one of those people that was complaining about that so I thought I should check the site out again. Not much as changed since my last time except to say that the content seems to have improved. I suspect that they have found other sources to fill the void left by Russia's change in policy in regards to shooting porn. That is good news because I was a little distraught the last time.
*Their choice of model is still excellent and the porn is usually well shot, well lit and the action quite good. My only negative is that the male performers are not always as good as they should so the scene does not reach the potential it could have with a better male performer.
*My one big issue with the network, and this is an old one, is that they keep adding new sites to the network all the while stopping to update those that were already quite good. Not to mention that the new sites are not'necessarily that good and even if they are then they will also stop updating it within a very short amount of time.
**I truly hope that their new update schedule has less to do with lack of new content on their part and more some kind of gimmick to make it appear as though they have a brand new scene each day.
**I'm giving the network is better score this time because they have started to add some good content. |
|
05-20-13 09:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
2
|
Porn Fidelity
(1)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and they add a new scene each week.
+You get access to teen fidelity as well.
+All videos can be downloaded in at least 480p which they increased to 540p in 2008 and most of the videos after that date are also offered in 720p
+The 100 more recent videos are now also offered in 1080p.
+They offer a B.T.S video of each shoot.
+All scenes have an photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution is approximately 900x600.
+Their selection of performers is top notch.
+You can stream the videos online and you can even jump to a specific part of the scene based on keywords.
+They have a playlist editor where you can create your own clips of the scenes.
+You can search based on whether a performer has natural breats or implants. |
| Cons: |
-There is very little not to like about the site except that the number of enhanced performers significantly outnumber the natural ones.
-Another negative is that a good portion of the models have tattoos.many of the models
-The only two performers are Kelly and her husband Ryan.(not an issue for me but could be for some). |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they keep putting out some of the best porn I've seen. There's very little that I don't like. That's not to say that all the scenes are as good as the others but there is a certain consistency in regards to quality. They even do some scenario based scenes from time to time which is a nice bonus for people like me who like their porn with a story.
*I didn't find anything really wrong with the site except that I would love to see two or more updates per week as opposed to just one. I know I'd be willing to pay more for that since it would mean a lot more of what I like.
**The only reason why I'm not giving the site a perfect score is because I want to see them hire a few more natural models. |
|
05-13-13 06:32pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
3
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and they fill a niche that is poorly represented.
+You get access to 20 hetero/lesbian sites and also 2 gay sites.
+They are remastering their older content.
+You can search by model name to find all the videos she shot for the different sites.
+They now update their Blacks on Blonde site with 2 videos per week as oppose to just one.
+They update with about 3 videos per week.
+They list the upcoming updates for each site and give the date on which content will be uploaded.
+They still manage to hire some really hot looking performers who always do great scenes. |
| Cons: |
-Only about half a dozen of the 20 or so sites are still regularly updating with brand new content.
-They started to offer some older content in HD (their term) but the source material is of a lower resolution and the finish product is not really HD and they had to reduce to size of the video in the process.
-This is Interracial porn so if you aren't into this then that is amajor con for you.
-They do not tag their scenes and the synopsis is not always accurate so you may have to view part of the video prior to downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this network of sites and I'm never disapointed with the content. I'd be happier if the join price was lower and they may have to drop their price one day or suffer a drop in paid members. If they had multiple sites all updating with actual brand new content then I could understand why they charge a lot more than many other sites but the reality is that only a couple of sites are still updating on a weekly basis while most of the others offer remastered content. You still get the never before seen video but those are getting to be rare for me and I suspect the same for any returning members.
*In case some of you have never read another review and don't plan to do so then this network is dedicated to interracial porn. In this case it's almsot exclusively black men/women with white men/Women. It would be nice to see some white men with black women and maybe that will happen but if thats what you want then skip this network.
**The one great new thing that's different from the last time I was a member is that their site Blacks on Blondes is now updating twice a week as opposed to only once per week. I'm adding an extra point to my score this time for that reason. I don't know if that will be enough for people interested in this type of content but it was for me. |
|
05-06-13 06:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Cathy's Craving
(1)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+The content is primarily all hardcore with an emphasis on IR, creampies, gang bangs, facials, double vaginal, anal and dp.
+They keep remastering older scenes so you get some better resolution on some excellent scenes.
+You can download the photosets for most of the scenes as a single zip file and best resolution is 1200x900.
+No watermakr on videos or photosets.
+You can download the videos in multiple clips or as a single video file.
+The videos are broken into various categories often based on the number or males with cathy.
+Navigation is simple and you always have the option toreturn to Cathy's main page. |
| Cons: |
-I believe the site is no longer updating with actual new content since the last new scene seems to be in 2011.
-Although most of the scenes are offered as a full video file. They are often broken into two seperate segments.
-They have many remastered scenes but the original material was not very good so the end product is also not as good as could be.
-The camera work tends to feel very amateurish.
-Editing could be better.
-Although Cathy is a good looking older blond. She may not be everyone's cup of tea.
-If creampies and facials are not your thing then that will significantly reduce the amount of cointent you will save. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I receive regular newsletters from Cathy and I thought it was time I tried the site again to see if there truly was as much new content as the letter claimed. Sadly there is very little new for me. Of course anyone who's never been a member will find plenty of great porn as long as IR, gangbangs, and creampies is your thing. Otherwise you may find that there is very little for you or you ill have to do a lot of editing.
*Cathy is a 40 + year old dark blond woman with an all natural body who loves to have sex with as many people as she can. She's a swinger and she makes no qualms about it. Many of her scenes are quite good but they tend to all feel amateurish in nature. The vast majority of the videos are filmed by her husband or another cameraman so very little POV or tripod shots(if any). The camera work is where it's often annoying because there is a lot of shaking, panning and not as ideal shots. There is very little editing and that adds to the amateurish feel of the content. Mind you I suspect that is something that a fan of amateur porn wants to see.
*I still think that this is a great site for anyone who has never been a meber before and the join price is only 15$ so you should get more than your money's worth. Returning members should beware because you may not find all that much that is worth saving.
**I debated whether I should drop my score a little because of the lack of truly new content but there is still so much great stuff already here and the join price is more than reasonable that I'm staying with the score I gave them in my last review. |
|
03-31-13 11:47am
Replies (2)
|
Review
5
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+They have an excellent selection of Europeans models.
+All content is dated and they add a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download videos in multiple resolutions from 852x480 to at least 1280x720 for almost all the videos.
+They also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (over 300).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best resolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job in tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+They offer the ability to select the surfing language from 6 possible choices.
+They offer a wide selection of fetishes like latex, watersports, toys and spanking to name a few. |
| Cons: |
-Probably my biggest con and this is subjective is that there isn't necessarily a lot of actual penetration sex on the site.
-Most of the scenes are broken into 2 or more long episode.
-The lighting could be better in some of the videos. The action is hard to see because of that.
-The camera work could also be imoroved.
-They could work on their editing because they tend to cut a scene and then restart after the performers have changed position and the camera is setup elsewhere. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I have been a member of this site before and I they haven't chnaged much since the last time. I still find that there isn't as much content as I care to save to disk. That's not to say that the content is bad or anything but that it's not my cup of tea.
*These guys tend to offer a lot more fetishes than most similar sites and that is both a good thing and a bad thing. Good if the fetish in question is what you like but bad if you don't because that is a lkot of content that you will never download.
*I really enjoy the fact that they hire not just Eastern European models but British and French one as well. That is a nice because you tend to get some different body types this way. Mind you even if they didn't then they would still offer plenty of amazing models anyway.
*This site is produced by the same people as the other DDF sites so the same issues with editing, camera work and lack of imagination are present. That may not be an issue for most but I found it annoying at times. I highly recommend that you visit the site first to see if the site offers enough of the types of fetishes you like before joining. Many are covered but the quatity varies a lot from fetsih to fetish. |
|
03-27-13 05:55pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
6
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+You get to see an excellent selection of young hot looking Eastern European models have hardcore sex.
+All content is dated and they appear to upload with a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download the videos in various resolutions from 640x480 to at least 1280x720 for the videos dated from 2006 to now.
+They now also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (approximately 150).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best reolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job of tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+The ability to select the sites language out of 6 possible choices. |
| Cons: |
-The date on the content is often misleading because they use remastered scenes as new content.
-I'm also pretty sure that they use content from some of their other sites to fill this site's library.
-Some of the scenes could use better lighting and better camera work.
-The porn is rather repetitive and editing is not very good.
-The older videos are split into multiple clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
*There is very little that DDF does wrong so it's no surprise that this site is so good. Their selection of models includes many of the top Eastern European models of the last 10 years and most of them either have hardcore b/g, g/g, b/b/g or g/g/b sex or all of them.
*They do such a good job at tagging their scenes and there are so many keywords attached to them that it's easy to find all of the ones that include a specific fetish, body shape or hair color.
**The one negative thing and this is common for many Eastern European sites and it is that the scenes tend to lack imagination. Too many of the them look like paint by the number porn where there is no variation and little imagination. I also found that the editing is badly done so that there is no natural transition from one shot to the next.
**This is an excellent site but since the cost of the network is so close to this site then it's probably better to join the ddf network for a couple of dollars more and get access to so much more content. |
|
03-23-13 05:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
7
|
Kelly Madison
(1)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are so many photosets that I couldn't count them all but there are at least 2500 that star Kelly and countless more that star a variety of different models.
+All the photosets can be donwloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1728x1152 is common.
+The videos and photosets are a mixture of b/g, g/g and solo sex scenes, some glamour shots and a variety of other types.
+There is a rather small logo located on the top left of the screen which I found easy to overlook.
+You can get a full access 3 dat trial for 9$ so a real bargain |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against the site is in regards to desgn.
1-A 1/4 of the screens are used up by a blue background that serves no purpose and limits the viewing options.
2-There is a search window to find content but there are only a few pre-selected keywords and the same scene will come up under more than one of those words.
3-The only way to know what is inside the videos is if you go through the pic section.
-Many of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips/sections.
-Kelly only has b/g sex with her husband(not a con for me but maybe for others).
-There are multplie phototsets and videos of other female performers but no search options so you have to go page by page to find the ones you want. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The first thing I noticed when I got on the site is how badly designed it is and how different it looks from the preview sections. That was quite a shock for me because Kelly's other two sites which are Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity are some amazing sites that I was sure her's would be just as good. It isn't and that is too bad because there is some excellent content here and Kelly is one hot looking 40+ years old woman with large all natural breast and an amazing sexual appetite.
*I don't know if they plan on improving the site but if they aren't then they really should. It's not like they don't already have two great sites to use as template. Even some some basic tweaking would be an improvement. Especially if they fix that stupid 1/4 section of the screen wasted on a blue background and also if they work on the video setion of the site.
*This is an easy site to recomment to anyone who thinks Kelly is hot and is more into sofcore to midcore porn and can overlook the design.
*You may want to avoide joining if you are only interested in kelly's hardcore scenes because you may be disapointed. There is some great stuff but maybe not enough to satisfy your needs. |
|
03-16-13 10:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
First Anal Quest
(3)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of the content is exclusif.
+They have 209 scenes and they add one new scene each week.
+These guys still manage to get the first anal from some really hot Eastern European girls.
+The scenes are well lit, well shot and offer a variety of angles in which to see the action.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 versions from 580x328 1000kbps, 800x450 2500kbps and 1280x720 4000kbps.
+They offer photosets of all the scenes and these can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from 680x1024 up to 1280x854.
+You get access to 4 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The only bonus site with any kind of decent content is double view casting but the content and performers are almsot all the same as FAQ so you aren't really getting anything different.
-The other bonus sites have very little content and most of it was not of any interest to me.
-Some of the older content doesn't appears to be exclusif. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a site that I keep joining because they are one of the few Eastern European site that doesn't seem to have any problem finding new girls willing to do anal. It also doesn't hurt that they shoot some really great scenes and tend to avoid doing circus acts. Now that's not to say that verything is perfect because sometimes there is very little heat between the players but I find that those are on the rare side.
*This site's name tells you everything you need to know about the content so if you want to see young hot Eastern European women have anal sex than you have to join this site. You can visit the bonus sites but I don't know if you will download a lot of the content on these sites. I know that I only downloaded a couple.
**The bonus sites are:
Double View casting: This is basically the same type of anal themed porn as FAQ except that you can download a special viewer which then allows you to view the action from two different angle. The downside is that you have to also download the two version of the same scene to be able to do that and that will eat up a lot of Gig space rather quickly. There are 83 scenes which are dated and they update with about 1-2 new scenes per month.
Jizz on teens: This is basically a two girl on one guy oral sex themed site. Content is not dated but based on the performer for some of the more recent stuff then they are still updating. I' just can't say how often and what the amount is. There are only 24 scenes.
Fuck N Drive: This is basically a site where the girls have sex near, on or inside somekind of vehicle. There are 35 scenes on the site and they were updating wih one new scene about once a month but the last update was in January.
Wanted GFS: This appears to be a mostly photoset only site where the content is largely softcore with some mild midcore as well. I didn't recognize all the girls but some are professional performers. Content is not dated so no way of knowing if and when they update. There are over 210 sets at the moment.
**I increased my score vs my last review by two because these guys have managed to stay on track with their update and they have also managed to introduce so many new girls to us.** |
|
03-09-13 08:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
9
|
Janet Exposed
(1)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get a discount in Janet's store for her dvd's and other articles.
+The site is still updating(more or less).
+You have about 170 different video scenes.
+This is the only place where you can see Janet do anal or a dp. |
| Cons: |
-Most of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips and way too many of them have 4 clips and more.
-The photosets are mostly stills from the videos and they are also broken into 2 or more sets. Not to mention that you can't actually download them as a single zip file.
-Navigation basically consist of choosing video page, photo page or store page and then scrolling up or down those pages to see what's on them.
-There is no page break on the video page so you have to scroll a very long way up or down to see all of the available videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Janet is a hot red head older woman who simply loves hardcore interracial sex and creampies but unless you want to download most of her videos in multiple clips then you are mostly going to be joining this site to get the discount in her store.
*You would think that anyone who has a personal site would actually have some personal stuff in it but this where you would be very wrong. This is basically a promotional site where you get to sample what is available in Janet's store. That would be fine if the site was free but it is 25$ to join and the only advantage is that you can download her videos in multiple clip format and where the older stuff looks awfull. You don't even get the chance to download complete photosets.
*I wish I could say that there is one single thing that makes joining this site worthwhile but I honestly can't. The 20% off her dvd's is not bad but unless you plan on buying more than 5 dvd's than it's cheaper to simply go on the guest part of her site and purchase her dvd's for 25$ instead of 20$.
*I can't really recommend this site to anyone except anyone that falls under the above comment* |
|
03-06-13 06:45pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
10
|
The Classic Porn
(2)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.
*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.
*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.
**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.
**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site |
|
03-03-13 09:15am
Replies (4)
|
Review
11
|
Teens Analyzed
(2)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to about 19 sites.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+You can downoad the videos in WMV and MP4.
+They offer each video in HD 1920x1080.
+Most of the videos have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution appeas to be about 1200 x 800 fo most pics.
+Each scene is tagged with some key words so it's possiible to search using those one or more of those keywords. |
| Cons: |
-Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
-The site isn't really updating all that often anymore.
-A large part of the content is leased material which is available on many other sites.
-They mention access to first anal date but if you try the site then you are sent back to teens analyzed because they used all the content on first anal date to fill this site.
-They have a general search system but I tried using different keywords or names of performers and the results were bad to awful. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The reason why I joined this site is because my membership gave me access to a bunch of sites that I've had my eye on for a few years now and there was no way I could pass up the opportunity to try them. Of course what often happens is that anticipation is never really satisfied and this time was no different. The vast majority of the sites have either badly shot, badly lit or downright crappy porn. There is an abundant amount of leased material aas well. Some of the sites don't have all that much content and they haven't actually updated in years.
*Now it's not all bad because I did find a few videos that were worth keeping and maybe someone else who is maybe less picky can find stuff that they want but be forwarned that expectation may need to be lowered.
*It's hard to say who will be happy with the content on this site or the other ones because it's quite possible that you already have some of their scenes from similar sites out there. I think that if you aren't too picky and prefer a certain amateur feel to your porn then you might find some nice gems here. |
|
02-11-13 06:54pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
12
|
Oldje
(2)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership. |
| Cons: |
-They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.
*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.
*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.
**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**. |
|
02-02-13 10:53am
Replies (8)
|
Review
13
|
18 Pussy Club
(1)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A nice selection of 251 Eastern European models between the ages of 18 and 20 years old.
+Nearly 950 photosets to view online or dowloand.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution varies from 800x1200 to 1067x1600.
+All the content is dated. |
| Cons: |
-Only 195 videos and most of these are broken up into 3 or more small clips.
-The vast majority of the content is solo with the odd toy use and a few b/g scenes.
-Site is now dead because the last update is in 2008.
-I'm not sure how much of the content is exclusif (if any) but I know that some of it is leased.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are usually known under.
-There is a search box but I tried different things and the results were not very good.
-Some of the models have only photosets while others have only videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Let me first say that I got access to this site through my teens analyzed membership and I am glad that I didn't actually fork any money over for this unimpressive site.
*Here are the things they do right. They have a wide selection of mostly teen models that should please most peoples taste. The bulk of the content is solo teasing with a very nice mix of clothed to all nude with an emphasis on showing the entire body rather than concentrating on just a few parts. Some of the models have more than one set or video so that can be great if she is one of your favorites.
*Here are the things they do wrong. Most of the models only have one or two phototsets and/or videos so unless you luck in then you are not going to get much out of this site. Part of the content is leased material and quite old now. Renaming models is so annoying because it makes finding their more common name much harder.
**The bottom line is that this is a very poor stand alone site even for the most ardent fan of softcore porn and this is made worse by the fact that it's pretty old and contains some leased material.
**I can't recommend to anyone unless the content from the other sites you get appeals to you and my score is based on that reason. |
|
01-20-13 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
14
|
Bang My Teen Ass
(1)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have some cute Eastern European models.
+Part of their content is exclusif.
+Videos can be dowloaded in 1280x720 resolution. |
| Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only 32 videos and not really updating with new content.
-The content is dated but they must change the date on a regular basis because the oldest scenes is dated in 2012 but the site has been active since 2009.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on amny other sites.
-They have a search option but since they don't have tags or do not name any of the models so I'm not sure what you would search.
-The site is cluttered with third party advertising and there's no way to escape it no matter on which page you are. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to this site with my teen analyzed membership and am I glad I did because this was always a site on my possible join list and I would have been royally pissed if i had paid any amount for this unimpressive site.
*This is not a very good site but they do have some nice videos and the girls are all pretty cute. of course you probably already have them if you are member of Eastern European pon sites but even if you don't then you probably have a similar scene with the same girl.
**There is very little to recommend this site. If you like the girls on the preview section than join TMW and you will probably get the same videos or very similar for less money and better quality.** |
|
01-16-13 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and is from a niche that is not really represented.
+They add one new scene a week and all content is dated.
+You can view material online.
+You can download the videos in both WMV and MP4 and each versions is offered in normal resolution as well as HD.
+They have a very nice selection of models to choose from and they have started to add some Europeans to the mix.
+Membership to one site gives you discount on the other sites.
***Current membership also gives you access to bound gangbang*** |
| Cons: |
-I'm going to put this in the con because it's important that people be aware that this is an intense site and the content is definetely not for everyone.
-The site is quite tiny with only 14 scenes. You do get access to BGB(that adds another 35 scenes) but I don't know if that is going to change in the near futur or if maybe they will incorporate some or all of the content into this one. Clearly they don't need two sites with almost identical content.
-There are pics but this is primarily a video only site so they aren't really worth talking about.
-This is a small con but two of the performers on this site have done scenes for BGB so you aren't really getting much of anything new. |
| Bottom Line: |
*If you know Kink then you have a good idea of their business practices. If you don't then it's important to know that they take the well being of their performers to heart so although the shoots are quite intense. At no time is the girls in any danger to their health. The before and after interview makes that quite obvious.
*I'm going to stay on the fence for now and say that the content has potential. I sort of like the idea behind the site and the women do appear to really be into it but this is still forceable gangbangs so there is play acting done from all the players and it can be a little disturbing. That's why I don't know if I will join as often as I might for some of their other sites because I think they are too intense for my taste. The slapping, chocking and spitting are not my cup of tea and sadly most of these are in all of their shoots. I don't care if the performer is okay with any of these things because I'm not and I'm the one paying.
*I also can't help but feel that the scenarios get close to rape and that is a little hard for me to enjoy even though it's all fake. Mind you BGB wasn't much different than this one but it sometimes felt a little less intense.
**This site will appeal to anyone who enjoyed bound gangbang or was interested in joining that site. I would highly recommend that anyone who prefers more passion filled porn avoid this site because there is none of that here.**
***The score has less to do with my feelings in regards to the content and more to do with the site's potential. I may not have enjoyed myself as much as I could have but that doesn't mean that they don't do an excellent job producing the videos.*** |
|
01-13-13 11:04am
Replies (6)
|
Review
16
|
Jules Jordan
(2)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to over 127 movies or 620 scenes.
+All the content is dated.
+They appear to update with one new scene every 2 days or so.
+All the videos can be downloaded in at least 640x480 resolution but at least 150 of them can also be downloaded in 1080p.
+You can view all the pics online and they offer 3 possible rseolution: 1024x680, 1280x852 and 1600x1060.
+You can download all the photosets in a single zip file and they aoffer the same resolution as the online versions.
+Jules used to be able to get some of the top women in porn to do a lot more hardcore stuff than they had previoulsy done.
+All the scenes have multiple tags and it's possible to do a search by keyword. |
| Cons: |
-A percentage of the content is not exclusif.
-Jules decided to start another site sometime after this one so part of the content that should have come to this site is on the new one.
-They don't release all the scenes from a movie even though that movie is on the site.
-It's hard to tell whether the site will update using newer movies or if he's going to use older stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the best site for any fan of Jules Jordan movies or at least the younger version ofJules as a lot of the movies are a couple of years to many years old. Mind you that's actually a huge advantage since I find that his earlier stuff is far superor to what he tends to relesae these days. Hopefully he will keep adding new content from his older movies rather than the newer stuff or at least a mix of bothe.
*Now if you aren't familair with Jules then he's is on a very short list of directors able to get top stars to do some pretty hardcore stuff. He has always been known for gonzo porn and anal is common in his movies(at least the early ones). He cares that the women appearing in his movies look both beautiful and desirable. To that end. He'll usually make sure that they wear appropriate makeup and that their hair is well done. He will then spend a large amount of time shooting the girls from a wide variety of angles so that we get to enjoy her beauty. There is rarely any transition in his movies so girls are first oggeld and then they meet the guy or guys and the sex begins.
*If what I described above appeals to you then you have to join this site at least once. Of course if it doesn't then you should avoid it. Be advised that he's not into lesbian porn so anyone looking for this type of content from him should also avoid the site because it doesn't really exist. |
|
01-07-13 06:55pm
Replies (10)
|
Review
17
|
60 Plus MILFs
(1)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.
*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.
*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.
**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.** |
|
12-27-12 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
50Plus MILFs
(2)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway. |
|
12-27-12 08:14am
Replies (4)
|
Review
19
|
Jim Slip
(1)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content.
+All content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+They started to offer videos in a single file rather than in small clips in 2009. That's about 175 videos out of 469.
+The 185 newer videos are offered in at least 720x408 resolution and they also offer them in 1280x720.
+All the photosets since October 2009 are now offered with a resolution of 2000x1343.
+They hire a good selection of models from most European Countries.
+They now offer Lara latex site with your membership.
+The addition of Lara's site means that you get some lesbian content as well as b/g. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest problem with this site is that they have never considered remastering their older content to at least offer the videos in a single file format rather than in multiple clips.
-Although you now get Lara's site. She does not update very often and the total number of scenes is only 32.
-The performers are only Jim and Lara so you may get tired of seeing only them in the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they still put out decent suff and I keep hoping that they will remaster their older content. Until they do that then the site will always suffer a lower score than it could get if theyr tried to make some changes. The good news is that you now also get Lara's site included with your membership and that's not bad. Lara is Jim's wife and the person responsible for shooting his scenes in the same way that he's responsible for shooting her's. I wish she would update more often because she is a good performer and she does add some lesbian content which is always nice.
*The site hasn't done any changes since my last review (except adding Lara's site) so I can't really add more info than what's on my previous review. I will only say that Jim is geting older while the models he hires remain at about the same so you are getting an older man with young girls. I guess the same can be said for Lara except that she tends to go for older males and females over younger ones.
I've added a couple of points to my previous score because of the addition of Lara's site. |
|
12-23-12 05:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
20
|
Mom POV
(1)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many of their models are true unknowns not seen on any other sites.
+They have an excellent mix of models and
+They update with one new video per week.
+All videos can be downloaded in MP4 with a 720x480 resolution.
+Most of the scenes are suprisignly well shot and the sex is often quite good.
+The site is about 2 years old and already has 108 videos.
+A decent percentage of thse milfs do anal.
+You can stream videos in 518x288, 720x405 and 1024x576. |
| Cons: |
-The title of the site makes it clear that you are only going to get POV shots.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then selecting one of the model on that page.
-The content is dated but you have to use a very convoluted way to know the date.
-There is also a scene description but you again have to find that in a convoluted way.
-There are absolutely no pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm pretty sure the people who own and operate girlsdoporn are also responsible for this site. Everything from the site design to the interview to filming style is identical in every aspect except that the guy who shoots for this site seems to know a lot more on how to use a camera than the guy who shoots for girldoporn. Now it is possible that it's the same guy but he does a far superior here than on the other site.
*Here are the important things you need to ask yourself to see if this is the kind of site you would enjoy.
1-Do you like older women(they have some 30years old but most of the women are in their 40's, 50's and even in their 60's.
2-Is body art a problem. Not all the models have ink but a large enough group does that if you have to have all natural then you may want to avoid.
3-Is POV shot porn a negative then avoid since it's all POV. I actually didn't mind it too much and I known for not liking POV.
4-Do you have to have HD content. They don't and even if it's available then I suspect that they do like GDP and make it available only to members who stay with the site for multiple months.
You'll know if you will enjoy the site based on how you answered the above questions or at least on how flexible you are on some of them. I know that I enjoyed the site and have no problem recommending it but there's plenty of room for improvement.
*The first thing would be the addition of an actual camera guy to get different shots but I guess that will never happen since it would make the sites name redundant. They should make the features on the preview section available to the paying members. It would save people like me from opening two seperate pages so that you know what the action in the video will be.
**I did recognize a couple of models from this site on some of Scores sites so they are not all unknowns. |
|
12-09-12 04:58pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
21
|
VideosZ
(5)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 12000 dvd's to choose from.
+They update with 35 new releases each week.
+All content is dated.
+You can view a percentage of their upcoming releases and the dates when they will be uploaded.
+They offer some studios not found on Videobox and they also have more movies from some studios available on Videobox.
-They have started to offer some dvd's in HD. |
| Cons: |
-A huge percentage of their library is also available on Videobox.
-Videosz may have more releases from one studio but in return VB will have more from another one.
-Download speeds are often quite slow which is deadly for a site with such a huge library.
-The same scene can be on more than one dvd since there are many third party studios.
-A large amount of the content is at least 5 years old and a lot is much older.
-For some strange reason they list some studios but don't actually carry any of their movies.
-They have the bulk of some studios content but they also only have a tiny portion of many other studios.
-A large percentage of their releases are not new movies but often older content.
-Video reolution is not the greatest. There are plenty of videos that are 480x360. Not bad on a competer monitor but watching this on a bigger screen is likely to be noty very fun. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site is more or less identical to VB except that VB seems to be concentrating on releasing more recent movies while VidesZ is trying to bring bask ones. It does have it's share of more recent movies but I'd say that this is by far the smaller percentage than older titles. Now for some that is a bad thing but for others it's a great thing because some of the movies being offered byt VideosZ were all big hits at one time but have since stopped being produced for dvd so this is a great place to still get access to them. Even if the titles are still available on dvd then this is still a significantly cheaper place to get them than actually buying tons of dvd's.
*It would be nice to see better download options and also higher resolution on their videos.
*Their Paradise Films & Evil Playgrounds studios are great for people interested in Eastern European porn and who haven't yet joined a site like Teen Mega World because these studios get their content from the same source. Of course if you have joined that studios and similar ones than you may want to skip by the content from those studios because you probably already have it on one of your drives.
*The bottom line is that if you are looking to get access to certain studios that VB doesn't carry then you are obligated to join this site. I mean it's less than 20$ with the TBP/PU discount so it's a bargain that anyone should take. Just be aware that if you have to have HD content then this may no be the place to come because they only have about 650 titles that are HD. |
|
12-02-12 05:21am
Replies (7)
|
Review
22
|
Score Videos
(1)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.
*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.
*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.
**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?** |
|
11-18-12 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
23
|
Score HD
(3)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have a loyalty program where you get access to one extra site each month that you remain a member.
+They truly have a wide variety of different body type models.
+A huge collection of older women models.
+Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV and basic resolution is 640x360.
+They also offer videos in the 1280x720 resolution.
+You can download all the photosets of each video in a single zip file and resolution is 1280x720.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with 6 new videos per week. |
| Cons: |
-There's a preview video that automatically starts each time you go to that videos download section.
-There are no tags on the videos so you actually have to search through each one to find what you are looking for.
-Many of the models may not be what you are into.
-They offer two extra sites with your membership but these aren't necessarily all that good.
**-It's possible to see what each model has on the other Score sites but since this is the only site where you can download all the content then that's not necessarily a good thing. |
| Bottom Line: |
**I got badly burned when I joined 40something because they implemented their policy of only allowing downloads of only their most recent updates after TBP had done their review so I was pleasantly surpried when I saw that this site offers almost every video I wanted from that site and a lot more. It's not perfect by far but you at least don't have any surpsise when you join this Score site.
*I'm pretty choosy about what I download and I still managed to find some amazing videos that were well worth the membership. The only warning I might give someone is that you should definetely check out all the models prior to joining because they do have a wide variety of models. You have some cute teens all the way to women in their late 40's and probably a couple in their 50's. There is also an abundance of BBW so if this is your thing than you'll have plenty to be happy about. On the downside. If you prefer women under the age of 30 and who are more on the slim side then this may not be your site of choice. Also anyone looking for more softcore or midcore stuff may want to steer clear as there is very little to be found here.
**The site could really use the addition of tags on their videos. It took me a long time to find what I wanted to download because I had to search through each model's video page. A nice search by keyword would really be appreciated by most members.
**It would also be really great if they offered the 50plus and 60plus content. As it is. You can see which models go on to shoot for those sites but yoiu have to join those sites knowing that only a tiny percentage of their content will be downloadable.
**They also don't necessarily add all of the content from their listed sites so while you do get a large amount. You don't get it all so it's very important to check this site's content before joining or you could be in for a surprise. |
|
11-10-12 11:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
24
|
Reality Kings
(10)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising. |
| Cons: |
-The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site. |
| Bottom Line: |
**This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.
*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.
*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.
*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.
**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth. |
|
10-25-12 06:29pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
25
|
Whipped Ass
(1)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites. |
| Cons: |
-I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006 |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.
*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.
*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.
**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm. |
|
10-20-12 06:37pm
Replies (0)
|
