Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (369)  

Feedback:   All (2899)  |   Reviews (174)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2689)

Other:   Replies Received (1294)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 2689 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I often wish that some mostly hardcore performers would do softer content if only because hardcore porn tends to make sure that beautiful women look as cheap as possible.

10-23-14  06:31pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

You'll have to direct me to those scenes or movies because it's been my experience that most porn shot in the last decade or longer is either hardcore or softcore and neither format is ever present in the others scene/movie. I guess you can argue that a girl walking in a bathing suit outside is softcore but is it really when that same girl is about to be sucking some dudes dick in the following 5-10 minutes?

Of course the very nature of softcore porn precludes the possibility of their being anything remotely close to hardcore cin it.


10-23-14  06:28pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I have probably about a dozen or so because these are the ones I keep track of or I have membership to.

10-21-14  05:58pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

All of the above. In fact any kind of slapping in a porn scene is likely to annoy me if not disgust me

10-19-14  08:38am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

80.6

10-17-14  02:50pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

No but a specific scene may have been the catalyst that made me decide to join earlier than what I had planned.

10-15-14  05:57pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Thank God it doesn't happen very often because the scene is ruined when it does.

10-13-14  09:22am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think starting a new one may be more interesting because it would allow everyone to start fresh and more importantly won't require people to read back multiple pages to see where the thread was going.

Mind you the forum is almost a non-entity these days. There are so few people posting stuff that it's coming to the point where it won't be worth it to bother looking at it. I'm just as guilty as everybody else because I rarely bother writing stuff.


10-11-14  10:59am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Although I agree with Drooler that it would be okay if he had something worthwhile to say but they never do and that is why I really dislike it.

10-07-14  03:14pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It is very important for me because I find that all videos are improved by the addition of multiples camera angles. By default that means that a video that has only one or few angles is likely to be a bit of a disappointment to me. That's not always the case but you need someone with a lot of talent behind the camera to make sure the scene is good.

10-05-14  09:34am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Yes but wouldn't those women be more inclined to get the real thing as opposed to using a hand or a toy?

10-04-14  09:22am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Younger women may do it as much as men but I suspect that older ones do not as much as their male counterpart.

10-03-14  02:44pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I would rather no one does it because I finds it offensive and strangely those terms are often only on the preview section and not really inside the site.

10-01-14  02:41pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I had to pick other because there wasn't an actual choice for what I wanted to say. Although I agree that anal is now so common that it may even surpass that of vaginal porn but I think the number is on the decline. I like anal porn or should I say I enjoy good anal porn. There is very little of the good kind when compared to the crappy one so I keep track of anal in all it's form and that's why I say that the number is on the decline. I don't think it has anything to do with peoples desire for anal as much as studios just don't want to pay the extra amount knowing that they won't make enough profit to warrant paying more money.

09-29-14  04:14pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I didn't even consider that when I posted my comment but I guess it does fall under feedback. Mind you I'm also not sure if I'm talking to a webmaster or a support person.

09-27-14  05:37pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only feedback I have given is when one of them comments on a review of their site.

09-27-14  10:39am

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I don't know about the rest of you but these days almost every site offers some kind of discount. The only thing that differentiates one from the next is the level of the discount.

09-25-14  03:50pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

graymane has already said what I was thinking.

09-24-14  03:13pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It must sometime improve it but my theory as to why that is has little to do with the performer having new breasts as much as her attitude toward herself.

An older woman looking at her sagging breasts who gets a lift and implants may have cause to get them but a teenager or young woman doing the same thing has none. Other than she is unhappy with herself and thinks that altering her appearance will cure what ails her. It usually doesn't because that was not the problem.


09-21-14  05:05am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I got one when I was 18 and I don't necessarily regret it but not having it would not be a issue.

The moral of the story for me is don't get one because it's not going to add anything to your life
and I could have spent that 72$ on something more interesting


09-17-14  05:55pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I could have picked the option all of the above if there had been one but in truth it is impossible for a model to no longer be fresh or too popular. us but anyone stumbling on her for the first time would probably be as thrilled as us when we first saw her.

There are plenty of active performers who I used to love watching but don't anymore because I own so many of their scenes that I don't really care to add more. I still keep track of their stuff in the hope that she will offer something worthwhile but most rarely do.


09-13-14  11:54am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Rarely these days but there are so few new sites to join that I mostly join established ones. That's not to say that I'm not partially disappointed in their content but that's another subject.

09-09-14  05:30pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

The face is always the first thing I look at and than it's the body.

09-07-14  09:10am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The bigger they are. The more important it is for them to have a search option but it has to be a well functioning one. I'd rather there not be one than one that gives out the wrong info

09-05-14  05:55pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I used to say that I don't mind it but these days I prefer to see a condom because otherwise I know that one of the scenes I'm enjoying involved the transmission of an STI. In fact probably many of the scenes I watch have that same problem.

09-03-14  06:09pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2689 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.83 seconds.