Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (371)  

Feedback:   All (2957)  |   Reviews (175)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2746)

Other:   Replies Received (1315)  |   Trust Ratings (67)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 2746 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I say 10% will still be active and by that I mean actually still updating.

11-20-14  05:53pm

N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I'm at 2 TB but I could easily be at a lot more. I currently only have a 2 TB external drive so I have from time to time to delete some files to make room for others. Not that it's a huge issue as I find that some files is stuff that I more or less cared for at some point but don't remotely care for now.

11-16-14  09:42am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I can't remember the last time I searched or cared about solo girl stuff. I need at least two players to be happy.

11-14-14  05:50pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't actually own one but I still wouldn't keep any if I did anymore than I keep porn on my tablet.

I refuse to watch porn on anything smaller than a 22" computer screen.

11-10-14  01:41pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I was going to pick other but changed my vote for like it because I do like some massage porn but it must be an integral part of a scene where there is more than just massaging.

11-06-14  06:38pm

N/A Reply of host2626's Reply

About the only exception to this rule is the site "the classic porn" but since they mostly offer porn that is at least a decade old and older than it's really not the same thing. The only complain someone could have about their content is that the video and sound quality leaves a lot to be desired but I don't care. especially when I have found so many amazing movies from my younger days.

11-05-14  06:06pm

N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

All the time. Thank God I have it because I would stop watching porn right now if I had to watch the bulk of what gets made these days.

11-04-14  03:19pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind cross-sells per say. I'm an old hand at them so checked on un-checked isn't an issue for me but I prefer that they be un-checked simply for other people who aren't and would get stuck with a site they didn't want and a cost they really didn't need.

11-02-14  10:51am

N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I don't think we can add cunnilingus to the list because it is now something so rare in porn that some people have probably never seen it performed on screen if they only watch b/g porn. About the only place I see it these days is in lesbian porn. In fact I would say that the only place where you are sure to see cunnilingus and kissing is in g/g porn.

10-31-14  06:45pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I picked other because it depends on the scene in question more than anything else. Since co much of todays porn is gonzo in nature than I often skip the extended 15 minute BJ because I honestly don't understand the need for it when the guy is already hard as a rock prior to the girl touching him. I will of course always skip the facial as I dislike that.

P.S: I will only add that I know what graymane meant with his question but in no way do I think that I'm watching love making when I look at porn. I don't even see that when the two people are actually married or dating each other. The very nature of porn pretty much precludes the inclusion of love making.

10-31-14  03:04pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I do look at their profile but not to see their average score but more to see their other reviews. A reviewer can have a low average score because he has joined awful sites that deserved the low scores.

10-29-14  06:19pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I think any and all scene should begin with the performers wearing clothes.

10-27-14  05:15pm

N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

No. I still like the exact same thing I did when I first started to watch porn. The only thing that is different is that I spend more time looking for stuff because there is more to look at.

10-26-14  08:58am

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

I agree that a girl walking around is softcore. Especially if she is walking while wearing clothes but I daresay your average softcore porn guy will not be satfied with just that. Anymore than your hardcore guy would be satisfied if you couldn't actually see any of the action because of camere angles and what not.

I like progression in my porn so of course I want some softcore stuff that becomes midcore and than ends in hardcore.

10-25-14  01:42pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I often wish that some mostly hardcore performers would do softer content if only because hardcore porn tends to make sure that beautiful women look as cheap as possible.

10-23-14  06:31pm

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

You'll have to direct me to those scenes or movies because it's been my experience that most porn shot in the last decade or longer is either hardcore or softcore and neither format is ever present in the others scene/movie. I guess you can argue that a girl walking in a bathing suit outside is softcore but is it really when that same girl is about to be sucking some dudes dick in the following 5-10 minutes?

Of course the very nature of softcore porn precludes the possibility of their being anything remotely close to hardcore cin it.

10-23-14  06:28pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I have probably about a dozen or so because these are the ones I keep track of or I have membership to.

10-21-14  05:58pm

N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

All of the above. In fact any kind of slapping in a porn scene is likely to annoy me if not disgust me

10-19-14  08:38am

N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll


10-17-14  02:50pm

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

No but a specific scene may have been the catalyst that made me decide to join earlier than what I had planned.

10-15-14  05:57pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Thank God it doesn't happen very often because the scene is ruined when it does.

10-13-14  09:22am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think starting a new one may be more interesting because it would allow everyone to start fresh and more importantly won't require people to read back multiple pages to see where the thread was going.

Mind you the forum is almost a non-entity these days. There are so few people posting stuff that it's coming to the point where it won't be worth it to bother looking at it. I'm just as guilty as everybody else because I rarely bother writing stuff.

10-11-14  10:59am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Although I agree with Drooler that it would be okay if he had something worthwhile to say but they never do and that is why I really dislike it.

10-07-14  03:14pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It is very important for me because I find that all videos are improved by the addition of multiples camera angles. By default that means that a video that has only one or few angles is likely to be a bit of a disappointment to me. That's not always the case but you need someone with a lot of talent behind the camera to make sure the scene is good.

10-05-14  09:34am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Yes but wouldn't those women be more inclined to get the real thing as opposed to using a hand or a toy?

10-04-14  09:22am

Shown : 26-50 of 2746 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.31 seconds.