I've never been excited or turned on by "erotic literature". Anais Nin (sp?) is a dead bore, example, and I'm lampooning:
"He took his bristling rod in hand and slipped it into my dripping velvet chamber, and with his other hand he clasped my creamy swollen breast and pulled its distended teat until I felt it would tear from my flesh..."
Literotica is full of stories that make Anais Nin sound exciting.
The most erotic literature I know of is Keats's early poetry, particularly Endymion, some Faulkner, James Joyce, Henry James, Balzac. The erotic tension between the main characters in Kate Chopin's The Awakening is very hot.
I know, lk2fireone, I was grinding my own particular axe at your expense (pun intended).
Believe me, I understand having to budget one's self for this kind of entertainment.
This is a BIG issue for me, and I think I might start a thread in our forum about it: the concept of value in light of the Internet, and how ideas of value have changed dramatically in the last few decades.
Sorry, mate! You're right, and I was just being an (_!_)
The idea that 30 dollars is considered "expensive" for a month's access to a HUGE amount of adult entertainment - that would have cost you thousands and thousands of dollars a relatively short time ago (say twenty years - if they even had content this good then, which they obviously didn't) - is proof to me of just how jaded people are becoming, and how upside down the concept of value has become in these modern times.
Another example is, and this is just one - Amazon Kindle. I can download enough classic literature to last me a hundred lifetimes for FREE. Or, if I want tables of contents and other nifty things, I can pony up a dollar, or two dollars, for the complete works of Thomas Hardy, Charles Dickens, Aquinas, Chaucer, Shakespeare, etc. BUT - if I want to download a modern-day piece of literary ephemera - any one of a thousand crime novels, romance novels, fantasy/sci-fi novels, self-help books, etc, I will pay at least ten to fifteen dollars. The worst part is, the more useless the book, the more expensive it is - say for instance some university-educated simpleton's book-length navel-gazing excreta about the poetry of Derek Walcott (one of the greatest living English-language poets) sells on Amazon for upwards of two hundred dollars - if you want the "prestigious" cheaply-printed hard or soft cover - while the actual poetry of Derek Walcott sells for the price of your average crappy dimestore-quality "best-seller".
Not to single you out, like2fireone, but 30 dollars for ANY high quality content of this nature is highway robbery, and it's YOU robbing THEM, not the other way 'round.
How sad! Don't you think that your interaction with the models would be increased by being allowed to hear the sounds they make? Another question - what possible benefit is there to having a music track on a video intended for sexual titillation? Can a music track actually improve the erotic response a person has to seeing beautiful women cavort about? If so, how exactly? I'd really like to know.
Every man knows how AMAZING it is to do that. And every man knows how **even more** amazing it is when an adult female is watching. Every man, when he's doing that, believes that he's the only entity in the known universe that can do it. He's proud of it, and believes he actually invented it. Every man likes for the woman to go along with this delusion and believe exactly that, at least while he's doing it.
When it's over, there's plenty of time for him to feel silly and rather embarrassed. But DURING it! - See second paragraph, rinse, repeat.
mbaya: When you say "miss tease", I don't quite understand, since what you seem to be saying is that the site is *too* long on the tease factor and too little on what you call the 'interesting action'. Was there a typo? Most likely I just didn't get what you were saying.
Yes, I certainly agree that the gyno aspect of the site is overdone, BUT - their mission statement plainly tells the prospective customer what to expect, so, it is what it is. I'm not disputing you, or trying to argue for the sake of argument (I HATE that!), just basically agreeing and reiterating things (because I like to type!).
Unfortunately, my review left a few things out, and these are big things, so I need to add:
- The male presence is virtually non-existent on this site, and even when so much as a male hand will be in the video, the customer is warned beforehand (pun intended). I think this is a cardinal virtue, and should be applauded, and copied on other sites of this nature. Since this site isn't about sex between men and women, but about the adulation and worship (literally) of the beauty and - what used to be - the mystery, of adult females, the customer is NOT interested in seeing or hearing another male. The people behind this site understand this and the total absence of the male voice and male presence is intentional and adhered to religiously.
- The absence of silly music, which I mentioned, is of UTMOST value and importance on a site of this nature. We have FIVE senses, and we can interact with the models here via TWO of those five: seeing and hearing. We can't touch, taste, or smell them (but in time we'll be able to do something like that in a "virtual" sense). Hence the utter silliness of sites that put a music track to their videos, which effectively reduces our real contact with the models by blotting out the sounds generated by the model: her footsteps, the rustle of her clothing, her breath, her utterances, and whatever other blesséd noises that come from her body. I refuse to pay even a cent for a site that offers video content of models posing and stripping if there is a music track. It almost destroys the experience for me. Music is an art. Worshipping a woman in the privacy of my cave is not an art, and I don't want art while I'm worshipping a woman.
- There is nothing but complete respect for the dignity of these models as individuals, as human beings. Yes, they are being objectified here, but they are being well-paid, and these girls know the deal. The site should be applauded and copied by other sites in that they DO NOT refer to women as sluts, bitches, whores, or any of those dehumanizing terms, and the site does not belittle the models or speak of them as anything other than the equals of the men behind the cameras and the consumers. There is a strong sense that these models are well paid, respected, and above all, SAFE, while they do their work for ITC.
- If I think of something I left out, I'll return.
Yes that's the dimensions of their large sized pics. I must be old, but this size is ridiculously huge enough for me. I can count the hair follicles on any square millimeter of a model's lovely bits. What else do I need?
Holy crap, Monahan, I only just noticed this in my swamped email account. In case you never opted for a sub here, it's a great site! The vids are great. Some of them are too talky for me, but there are also plenty where the model is not talking. No silly music tracks! Lots of wonderful boobies!
Wonderful review, graymane! I agree with you about the attractiveness of these three young beauties. Legs! Legs up to their earlobes!
The non-nude approach is MORE stimulating than nude for me. Once you've seen The Prize in all its glory, it gets a bit old seeing it pulled and yanked and twisted and gaping every which way. I much prefer the subtle, barely concealed suggestion of The Prize, the bittersweet agony of the known unknown.
Great review. The models are drop-dead gorgeous and the preview pics alone make me feel like I just got an injection of testosterone.
Great review! Hey, you fellow panty lovers, things are looking up for us! A few articles I read recently claim that full-cut, vintage style undies are making a big comeback. The evil thong has had its day and perhaps the time will come when we will see it breathe its last!
Also, a lot of the major undy companies are using short videos to advertise their products. Google "knicker-picker" to see what I mean. Also, check youtube. Many companies have their own channels there with lots of vids uploaded.
Viva la Panties! When the Singularity comes and I am transfered to hard-drive, I will live forever in virtual panty heaven!
**Khan and mods, I hope this doesn't violate the no-sharing free porn rule, since it's not porn and I have not given any links?
If I have broken the rule, I am sorry and will resist such behavior in the future.
Mez, I think full-backed nylon panties are considered granny panties! Those are my favorite too.
By and large I like to see women in the things they wear under their clothes which are not supposed to be seen. That's the thing for me. That's why bra and panties are way more of a turn on than a bikini, even though the same amount of skin is on display.
Take a beautiful woman and put her in a micro-bikini from Wicked Weasel and it's hot, for sure; but put the same woman in a skimpy camisette or bra and a regular pair of Hanes panties and I'm toast.
otoh, well-met fellow, hail! If you like sheer panties, then you are absolutely gonna love VF Academy! I cannot urge you strongly enough. If you like full-cut, full-size sheer (and I do mean, SHEER) panties, there is probably no other site on the net better than this one.
I have zero affiliations with this site, and I am only a fan, not a salesman.
You gotta go for it. Just bear in mind, there is a lot of content, but it's not a mega-motherlode of content like at some sites. I'm gonna give you the exact numbers right here:
Image sets: 94
Total images: 11,625
And remember, these are all zipped sets of big pictures, and the Hi-def vids average at nearly a half a gig each.
And don't forget, you get access to the other sites too. I haven't even scratched the surface of Pantyhosed4U yet! Of course I go about my enjoyment of this content slowly, relishing it like a fine wine.
I thought it could be fun if done well. I joined this site because I am a big fan of the hand-job/CFNM niche. Unfortunately what I've seen so far is very disappointing. First, given six or seven minutes of a real, non-faked hand-job, the switch to the faked stuff is obvious because of terrible editing and terrible acting. It is not convincing at all, although if the participants tried a wee bit harder it could be a "blast".
Better to look for guys like Peter North who can do it for real (well, within reason!). There must be other males out there who could compete. ??
A lot of guys are into this. There are a lot of photoshopped pics of women squatting over stadiums and walking through cities, etc.
I don't have that fetish but I can understand it a little. I do like the idea of a strong, dominant woman in complete control, and I love the view from below of a beautiful woman towering over me. Methinks it might be some residue from infancy lurking in the psyche: The mama figure looming over the crib? That tied in with authority, appeasement, satisfaction, and obvious sexual attributes.
Where the fuck do they find these beefed up thugs? How the fuck can a man with an endowment like that brutalize a woman in such a way? These thugs are like animals. Is this the only way these poor girls can make a living? Fuck these gorillas and their sickening, psychotic energy. Disgusting.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.