Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Fame Girls

Fame Girls (0)

graymane (33) 06-14-11  10:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
This site consists of only three models: Ella (age 18) Sandra (19 and Virginia (age 18). All are hot as a pistol, and each set of pictures I see of these beauties leaves me salivating to see more.
This is a non-nude, renewable, and non-renewing pay website. But don’t let the “non-nude” throw you, because although the genitals are skillfully concealed, these girls are so appetizing and photographed in such erotic attire and poses that your imagination does all the rest for you.
Note: Each girl also works at SEV-archive.com, which are separate sites of their earlier work and giving you eye-popping views closer to the peak of their youth.
To really better appreciate and get the most out of Fame-girls, one might do himself justice by first perusing the archives.
The content is 100%exclusive, have Zip’s, offers easy navigation, touts premier Hi-Res images.
151+ Galleries (avg.126 pics each) €25.00/$31.76 per Mo.(recurs at €22.00 Euro/mo. Small water marks but non-obtrusive.
Cons: There are no videos.
Updates are trice weekly, but only features one of the three girls at a time, therefore you have to wait on your favorite model.
No visual break-down or presentation of regional prices. All monies are in Euro, and don’t be surprised if you’re surprised.

You won’t see pussies (at least not whole ones). Enough, though, to feed the imagination and certainly what you see is mouth-watering.
Display of tits are bolder, but minimal.
Too many outdoor shootings, as well as more waste on the gals cutting up and making cute facial expressions.
Volume of pics, although substantial, are less than one would expect. I went through almost all of them in two settings.
Pricey. A greedy bunch; but the girls (especially Ella) are so damned addictive that caution is thrown to the wind.
Bottom Line: I came upon this site soon after it opened, which got me swept up by it's three tender, young models. These sexy Russian gals have a fresh, natural beauty and innocence that ..well, rocks! -- Happily disturbing some of my dormant, virility hormones and getting them off their collective asses.
Hark! Let me repeat: although the models are photographed in provocative settings, and shot in ingeniously clever ways to trick the eye, those juicy, budding little hair-sprinkled mounds (nestled between the legs) unfortunately hide behind fabric -- but to keep us coming back, we’re thrown just enough eye candy to keep our appetites wetted.
Pictures portray the girls frolicking and involved in playful antics, others are mood embodying, and, of course, the good stuff -- high octane poses that test the testes.

Worth repeating, probably because of the overall volume, this site being reviewed seemingly picks up later in the girls careers. The archives of their earlier work is individually seperate and noted on this reviewing site’s tour -- Which, again, I suggest you examine before hurriedly launching into this one
These girls are a good example of less being better. By that I mean creative tease stepping front and center showcasing arousal at it’s finest. Contrarily, The repetitious, pussy-close-up-images continuely being churned out now by this business have become overkill. Can one imagine the sight of a pussy as being jaded?

In conclusion -- For those who might fancy a diversion by retreating to a milder-erotic, theater of porn -- then a ticket to this site could be rewarding. Of course, at the same time, a charge conceivably exceeding $30 is something to think about.
I’ll be going back to Fame-Girls, because I want to follow those young ladies’ growth in this business. Especially, when and if the time comes that the strategically located “fabric” is pulled aside, or comes off.
I recommend only that one who might be interested, to visit Fame-Girls, take the tour, and decide on those merits if it's worth the trip.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


WeeWillyWinky (88) Wonderful review, graymane! I agree with you about the attractiveness of these three young beauties. Legs! Legs up to their earlobes!

The non-nude approach is MORE stimulating than nude for me. Once you've seen The Prize in all its glory, it gets a bit old seeing it pulled and yanked and twisted and gaping every which way. I much prefer the subtle, barely concealed suggestion of The Prize, the bittersweet agony of the known unknown.

Great review. The models are drop-dead gorgeous and the preview pics alone make me feel like I just got an injection of testosterone.


09-25-11  04:59pm

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #1 - WeeWillyWinky :

Glad to see you were so impressed, WWW.
"the tour" alone of this site doesn't even scratch the surface. You must see these girls from an earlier time, and follow them to where they are now......all done in shoots sans the nudity but so erotically charged they'll bring you right up out of your chair.
For that, one should first go to the archives site.
Ella is my favorite, and to tell you the truth, I'm so damned obsessed with her images that I'll take whatever chances necessary to find and download her updates..... and I do.
I'm exactly like you about the spoils engendered when everything comes off.... the mystique is flushed down the john and one appetite for that subject is foregone and satiated.
These gals have found whatever magic is necessary to continue their sets "creatively covered" and still stoke the scrotum fires and assemble sperms on ready to bale out.

09-25-11  06:03pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) After reviewing the site, I have to say, based on your current poll question, Sandra is the hottest in my book. Shame she has no updates and has "retired", whatever that means.
01-17-13  01:18pm

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #3 - jberryl69 :

You gotta follow these gals from the site's inception. And you're right, Sandra is hot! She was much hotter at the beginning -- as her early pics will show; but something went on amongst the trio that seemingly divided their interest in some aspects of the series.
I think Sandra got married and/or ultimately become somewhat jaded.
Ella is the one that pretty-much consumes my attention. And following her sets from the early age she began doing this stuff, all I can say is she's done such a number on my porn habits, I've all but put everybody and everything else on the back-burner.
Her expressions and many of her poses are corny, but the damned girl has an uncanny way of growing on you. An' I ain't the only one. She's developed a global following thats more than done her country (Russia) proud.
All her picture sets are floating around all over .... but unfortunately I haven't been able to find her recent ones -- except through host and tube sights. If you come across something, please let me know.

01-17-13  05:50pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #4 - graymane :

I don't know Graymane - I probably won't go looking. I've subscribed to Met-Art's newsletter in the past just to take and edit some of the photos to go on labels of my DVDs. I've shown some of them in other posts but that's about my extent of my still photo interest.... oh, except some ripped photos from videos of throating to the balls of some models that I play with just cause I can.
01-17-13  08:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.