Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Karup\'s Older Women

Karup's Older Women (0)

Active
80
messmer (137) 01-20-11  01:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-28-11  11:08am  (Update History)
Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.
Pros: A huge archive of mature, attractive models.

Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.

Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.
Cons: Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.

The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.

However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.

Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.

Too many enhanced breasts.

Cons continued below:
Bottom Line: The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.


Bottom Line:

A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.

Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.

I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.

Edited Jan. 28, 2011

I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.

Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) A very fair assessment.

I am with you on the 'enhanced' breasts issue.
Quite often they appear to be best viewed clothed, which to be fair I suppose they would be 'designed' to look good that way.
On a few occasions there I have been mightily impressed with the clothed shots, only to be a little taken aback when they are revealed :00

Another thing that used to be an issue for me there was the preponderance of the shaved look. :0/

I agree with your score though.
A good solid MILF photo site really, just with a little too much 'enhancement.'

Cap'n. :0)

01-20-11  01:50pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Thanks, Cap'n. This "enhanced" business has already ruined two of the "appealing lingerie" videos and picture sets that I had downloaded. I deleted them the moment I got to the denouement! :-(
01-20-11  01:55pm

Reply To Message

3

WeeWillyWinky (88) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Some of us quirky fellows actually like the ho-hum, practical underwear!
01-20-11  06:09pm

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - WeeWillyWinky :

LOL. I know, www. That's why I was so tactful and didn't take anything away from the score!
01-20-11  06:15pm

Reply To Message

5

otoh (54) Sounds like you found it much the same as I did! Perhaps something for everyone, but spread a little thinly. As you said, not much in the way of (nice) lingerie there, you know where I'll send you for that ;)

If you need a little inspiration, I found fun videos from the following models with good personalities: Darcy Tyler, Helena Handbasket, Holly West, Robbye Honeck, Kimberly, Liz, Megan

Of course, YMMV :)

01-20-11  10:07pm

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - otoh :

Hey, otoh, I actually like the site and am not disappointed one bit for having subscribed for a month. I have found quite a few videos and picture sets already that appeal to me, even though it took some searching, so I'm a happy camper. My beef expressed above was that anything that contained a pair of panties, no matter how utilitarian, was put under "lingerie." To me lingerie and underwear are different categories. One means perfume, bedrooms, romance and seduction, the other means being comfortable at work. :-) But that's me!

And yes, I am definitely keeping your other site in mind. I just took another tour of it last night and certainly like the models. I am just a bit confused about the free pictures because not a single one shows lingerie even though the photographer professes to be a lingerie fetishist and this makes me wonder about the general content. I know some is nude, and that's okay, as long as the majority of the shoots are done in "lingerie"! Well, we'll see.

PS. Thanks for the names!

01-21-11  11:43am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.