Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Jeffrey99 (29)  

Feedback:   All (98)  |   Reviews (18)  |   Comments (14)  |   Replies (66)

Other:   Replies Received (65)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 98 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, I have a PS3. However I"m one that has no interest in the whole digital only format. Maybe it's because I have horribly slow internet, so actually downloading a HD movie will take me days. Not to mention all the DRM that is included with purchased movies from places. I have no interest in watching a HD movie on a 19" computer screen when I have a PS3 and a 51" HD TV in the next room over.

However I will admit that due to financial reasons I haven't rented Blu Ray in a while. As of right now I can't see it worth the price increase over a place like RedBox where you can get a regular DVD for $1 a night.

03-20-10  11:04pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

About the most editing I've ever done is joining files together.

I just don't care enough to take the time to edit what parts out of the video that I don't like. Instead what I normally do is fast forward to the part(s) I want.

I've done editing before of video I've captured form TV or 360, so I've got experience doing it. Just feel it's too much of a hassle and time consuming without some nice ($$) software. Using the software I've used, the new video never looks as good as the original.

02-22-10  04:12pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I'm cool with 2-3 mins as long as it's a streamable preview. Due to my POS ISP, I have no interest in downloading a trailer. Takes long enough to download the full movies as is.

10-23-09  07:20pm

N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I wish I could even sniff 500. LOL I live in a small town with crappy DSL. So, I'm really happy if I'm running in the 120 range bur normally it's between 80-100.

08-22-09  06:36am

N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

It was a tough one between video and picture quality but in the end I went with Picture quality. It seems if sites have great HD qualty vieos, the photos suffer and if they have great qualty photos then the videos suffer. Seems to be hard to find one that has both.

05-28-09  02:10pm

N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I think I've joined maybe two sites that were not based in the US and with the conversion rate made it $40+.

At this point and time, $30 is the max I'll spend per month and even then it must be a great reviewed site. As typically I stick to the $15-$25 price range.

05-18-09  07:07am

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

What few sites I've found like that has some of the worst quality I've seen in a while. I'm too much of a high quality fan to even waste my time on streaming video with a quality that looks like it's from the 90's.

03-27-09  04:08am

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I guess my question is, would it have been considered porn before the interent? And I think most people would say yes.

In uptight America, I would still consider it porn but it's about as soft as you can go. Other countries where nudity is more acceptable, then I don't think it would be.

01-08-09  07:29am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most of the time, within a week. Unless it's a site that I really dislike or that doesn't update anymore, then I cancel pretty much days, if not hours within singing up.

01-04-09  08:49am

N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

My first is price. Second would be if they use Epoch. The rest don't really bother me, as there are ways around DRM and/or streaming only video.

01-02-09  06:25am

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

No. Mainly for two reasons. My dsl isn't the fastest out there and it really isn't a realistic option for me to stream hi quality/HD videos.

Most videos I download, I like to skip around or fastly skim through it.

The only way I'd realistically think about doing it, was if it was only $10 or less per month. AS there are always ways around streaming only videos. It's just normally more of a pain in the ass then needed.

12-23-08  08:03am

N/A Reply of sitsat's Poll

My number one has to be dumbass guys talking in the background. I don't mind it too much on some sites like FTV where most of the talking is more of a interview kinda thing. But I hate the cameraman telling the girls exactly what to do.

My 2nd would have to be the camera snapping away. Mainly just because it normally follows a 3,2,1 or the guy telling the model how to pose.

12-16-08  01:01pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a newb here but is there anyway to tell what a person gave you a positive or negative review for? For example if I post 2-3 reviews in a couple days time, can I tell which of those reviews got me positivea and which of those reviews got me negative?

11-07-08  03:12am

N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Have to agree the system sucks.

I voted for Barr. We really need a 3rd party. It's completely stupid to only have 2 choices.

11-04-08  04:58am

Visit 21Sextury.com


List of sites you get?

So am I just completely blind and missing something, or is there a listing of what sites you get 1st month, 2nd month, etc? I've looked all over the site and in the faq's and can't seem to find anything. So was wondering if it's there.


01-27-11  06:13pm

Replies (3)
Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
Reply of somedays's Comment

Damn that sucks. Guess nows a good time to sign back up to get all of her content.

11-05-08  12:28pm

Visit All Teen Rev Pass

All Teen Rev Pass
Reply of OneMan's Comment

They also instantly cancel your access to the sites when you cancel. So even though you paid for 30 days, if you cancel 10 days into your month, you lose access instantly. So I agree with OneMan, I'd highly recommend stay away from. They are a disgrace of a company. And on top of it all, the website they list for "Customer Service" responses doesn't exist.

11-04-09  06:32am

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
Reply of turboshaft's Comment

"It involves the model deep throating the cock, and then when the guy is about to shoot his load, he rams his cock down her throat thereby directly depositing his entire load into her stomach."

That quote right there is enough to make me never visit either ALS site again. While I'm not against hardcore per se, the whole ramming or slamming just isn't for me.

03-21-10  06:36am

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
Reply of mr smut's Reply

You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.

12-12-08  06:57am

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Helps a charity (The only site I've ever known to do so)
+Great quality images(2592x3888 portrait/3888x2592 for landscape).
+Great quality videos. Had Divx (which my pc wouldn't play smoothly) and 720p MP4 videos.
+Most models are small chested and pretty skinny. Very seldom are any models C cup or bigger.
Cons: -Website must have been one of the first ever built and boy does it show. WAY past due for a upgrade.
-No easy navigation.
-Most vidoes are just behind the scenes of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line: As you can tell by the name of the site, every model is 100% shaved. At first it's pretty cool but then it starts to make every photo set and every model start to look the same. I love the fact that they have alot of smaller chested girls but after a while, they start to feel the same. Could really use some variation.

There are normally 100 or so photos per set. And the photos are great high quality images. The first 3/4 of the set is your normally glam style shoots but the last quarter can get pretty strange. From sticking normal every day items (food, end of a shovel, etc) in the pussy to pissing. Pissing seems to be a pretty big niche on the site, as it seems to happen alot.

The videos are great quality but most are behind the scens of the photo shoots. So you've always got the lovely cameraman talking through out the whole thing. When will these companies learn? Get rid of that shit.

Navigation for the site is complete crap.You've got either updates or all models. No way to search by cup size, hair color or even model name. To find certain model you have to go to the all models page and do a find within IE or Firefox.

For the price ($29.95 1st month/then $24.95) I think the site is past due for a upgrade. While the images are great quality, due to the navigation and the constant talking during videos, unless a your a image fan you'll probably be disappointed. If your a video fan like me, you'll quickly get sick of hearing the dumbass guys talking.

12-11-08  02:17pm

Replies (5)
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan

Breakdown of Content?

Was wondering if anyone could give me a break down of how much of each content there is on ALS Scan? I'm not really a fan of fisting, large toys, using everyday objects like hotdogs, bananas, etc, Speculum use, Pussy gapin. Is that most of the content on here?

Some reviews make it sound like that's all every set is, while others make it out more as it's a smaller sub category of stuff available. So just wondering which is it?

11-07-08  04:53am

Replies (4)
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
Reply of Jack P's Comment

I've always wondered, is it mainly just a BJ site or does he normally fuck every girl? Or does it just depend?

05-12-09  07:13am

Visit Babelicious

Reply of badandy400's Reply

Videos do work fine. And you can use download managers to download both the videos and the zips, it's just that you can't pause/resume or zips. So you'll have to download 3 zips at a time.

01-30-09  04:00pm

Visit Babelicious


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Newer videos are good quality. 08 & 09 videos are 3000 kbps (1280x720), 07 and before are 2000 kbps (640x480).
+Most images are in high resolutions and good quality. Sizes range from 1000px to 4000px.
+Great site layout and navigation.
+Easy search function. By model name, clothing, etc.
Cons: -Can only view one image at a time.
-Must download zips at once, no queing up in a download manager & no pausing/resuming.
-No option to default to bringing up all thumbnails at once, instead of default 20 per page.
-No consistency to images, a 06 set will be available in 4000px, while a 08 set will only be in 2000px.
-Only uses Epoch.
Bottom Line: Babelicious is in the same line as Twistys, a glamour style site featuring softcore & hardcore. I really liked the site navigation and the ability to search for clothing type or cup size. And both the images and videos are good quality, I had a few problems that I just couldn't get past.

First being that each image must be viewed 1 at a time. If you use Firefox, there's no way to right click and open in new tab for each image your interested in. When you do that it just brings up the full gallery again. So that means you either waste time going photo by photo, which is opened up in a new window, or you download the full zip and then sort through the ones you want. I've never been the kind to download the full zips, I prefer to just keep the images I like.

The problem with downloading the zips, is the fact that you can't que them up into a download manager. There is also no resuming of the zips. Videos seem to do fine queing up and downloading but for some reason you can't with the zips.

Each gallery comes up as default, 20 thumbs per page. You can change it to 50, 100 or all but there's no way to make all the default.

One other problem with images seems to be that there is no consistency. For example a 06 gallery may be available in 4000px, while a 08 gallery may only be available in 2000px. Or it may be 3500px or 2500px, there just seems to be no consistency to image size. It's all over the map.

They have a rating system I really like. You can rate the model, photosets & videosets. If you've been a member of a site like Twistys before, then you've seen most of the models. I guess that's one reason why it was just kinda blah to me. Different site and galleries but still most of the same models.

You do get access to bonus sites: BabesOnFilm.com, BikiniBabes.TV, BabesUK.com, CumminAtYa.com, RoyalBoobs.com, Sexy-Babes.TV, DreamBabes.com & EuroBabez.com. Some are still updated regulary, looks like mainly Sexby-Babes.tv, others look like they haven't been updated in awhile.

Overall for the TBP discount of $19.95, Babelicious is a good site. Unfortunately the quirks about downloading the photos and/or zips is enough to make me not stay a member. If your the type that downloads all zips and don't mind not being able to que them up, then I'm sure you'll love the site. Unfortunately, that's a huge turn off for me and I felt the site just wasn't worth the hassle required to download the images.

01-30-09  02:08pm

Replies (3)
Visit Bring Me Your Sister

Bring Me Your Sister
Reply of theswedish's Comment

Are you downloading or streaming? Sounds to me like your streaming the video. If your actually downloading, sounds like the video file is messed up. But either way, I don't see how download speed would affect the quality of the video.

02-25-10  06:51am

Shown : 1-25 of 98 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.1 seconds.