Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Jeffrey99 (27)  

Feedback:   All (96)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (66)

Other:   Replies Received (64)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 96 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Kaya Luv

Kaya Luv
(0)
Reply of joexdoe's Review

Would have to agree, not really a good review. How do you figure it goes to criminal activity, if it can't be proven? As said above, whats wrong with working with children from a sick hospital? How's that a con?

To be your review comes off sounding more like a guy pissed off that she wouldn't date you, then a honest review of a site.


03-19-09  07:10am

Review
52
Visit Nicole Graves

Nicole Graves
(0)

73.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Nicole is hot.
+Nice mixture in the scenes (solo, b/g, and a few g/g)
+Included in the Twistys bonus sites.
Cons: -Hasn't been updated with new NG stuff since June of 08. All the new updates are rehashed stuff from when she was NaughyCoco.
-Photos and videos could be better. All the photos are 768x1024.
-New videos decent quality (640x480 @ 1627kbps) The older Coco stuff is pretty bad @ 320x240 and from 700-900 kbps range, it seems to always be different.
Bottom Line: NicoleGraves.com seems to be one of the many sites that I've been a member of recently that has fallen off the face of the earth.

Ealier reviews comment on her interactivity with fans, however I can't comment on that. As there seems to be none anymore. I've even tried to email her a few times, with no success.

The photos and videos are decent quality but nothing that will strain your PC to run. In todays day and age of 3000 or 4000px images, NG's 768x1024 seems a bit behind the times. The only advantage to that is that all the images, even the older Naughty Coco ones, come in at the size.

The videos are on the low end of what I'd expect for a site in 2009, the newer stuff being 640x480/1627kbps. The older(or recently updated) Naughty Coco stuff is 320x240 and between 700-900kbps.

It is one of the bonus sites included in Twisty's so I'd recommend you sign up through Twistys as it'll save you $5.

The store, which on her page says it offers signed dvd's/photos/posters doesn't work. When you go there it's completely empty.

Overall I think I just seemed to miss what appears to have been a great website. Since the site is included with Twistys, I can't really knock it too bad. As your not paying $20 for just this one site. However coming from a fan of Nicole, if your only interested in this site and haven't been a member before, then I think it'd be worth it for a month. However if you've been a member of NG.com before, then I really don't think it's worth the money. I'd have no problem paying the $20 for this site alone, if it ever gets back to what it seemed to be in early to mid 2008.

03-18-09  09:06am

Replies (0)
Reply
53
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of slutty's Review

I've been a member of Twistys off and on, a month here and there over the past couple years. And I gave Twistys about 8 more points then you, I think you have some valid points in your review.

I'll agree with you on the bonus sites. I forgot what they are called but the ones with the exact same content as Twistys main page, really need to just be taken down. I don't really understand Twistys Hard, as it's also updated on the main page. So not really sure why it needs to be in two sections. As for the bonus site, NicoleGraves.com (the main reason why I keep joining Twistys), that sites pretty much dead since nothing new has been updated June 13th of 08. All the recent updates have been rehashed stuff from when she went by Naughty Coco.

The one huge bright side for Twistys though is the Member Forum and Shap. As he's on there all the time answering people's questions and interacting with the members. To be honest, that probably keeps me coming back more then the content.

Overall I think your review could use a bit more detail: photo sizes, video sizes, number of updates each week/day. Overall a decent review.


03-18-09  08:45am

Review
54
Visit Craving Carmen

Craving Carmen
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Carmen is very hot
+Images are decent quality (792x1200)
+Super HD videos are decent quality (1280x720 @5000 kbps)
Cons: -So called regular HD videos are fine if there isn't a "Super HD" option available. For some reason if there's both a Super HD and HD option, the HD version is 16x9 that's been zoomed out and made 4:3. So even on a widescreen monitor it's only 4:3 with huge black bars at top and bottom. Why they done that, I have no freaking clue.
-Site is pretty much dead. Pictures haven't been updated in over a year (March 5th 08) and the videos haven't been updated in 6 months (10-22-08). The only thing updated in 09 has been webcam archive.
-Expects you to pay another $18 to get two seperate video zip sets. Not sure if that's for both or only one. I have no interest in that BS.
Bottom Line: CravingCarmen is another site that could be soo much better then what it is but the people behind it appear to be more interested in just raking in money then actually putting out a quality side.

The site appears to have turned into nothing more then a ad for SpunkyCams.com. A webcam site that charges you anywhere from $3-12. For how long or for what, I have no clue. I'm not into webcams. Quality is always horrible.

The photos and the so called Super HD videos are good quality as mentioned in the Pros. As mentioned earlier, if there is both a Super HD and a HD option, the HD option is 16x9 zoomed out to 4:3. So even on a 16:9 screen, it'll actually be 4:3 with the black bars on top, bottom and sides. If there is no Super HD option, then the HD videos are actually widescreen, 1280x720 @ 5000kbps.

Her earlier sets are non-nude. She has roughly 76 movies on her site and 36 are non-nude. So just under half. Her older videos are available in mpg format. Unfortunately right clicking and properties doesn't show me any info on what quality it is, however it looks comparable to VHS tapes.

She also has archived webcam shows, which is the only thing that's been updated in 09. Those are available in 320x240 @ 447kbps. So not any quality worth keeping.

The site also try's to sell you other zipset galleries, one is a webcam video with her and Ashley and the other is a HD video of her, for $18. Not sure if that's for both or only for one but trying to charge me additional for extra content for a site that's non-updating doesn't settle well with me.

The site could easily be summed up just by looking at her journal, which hasn't been updated since 2007. This site is evidently of no priority to Carmen or Spunky Productions. The fact that they still charge $24 is ridiculous.

Carmen is hot but her site is a sure fire miss. It's nothing more then a one month hit and run at best. And that's as long as you go into it knowing that you are pretty much spending $24 for what could be a months worth of update content for other sites.

03-13-09  08:40pm

Replies (1)
Reply
55
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of hogosos's Reply

That's cool and all, unless you don't want your reviews taken seriously? If you do, then you need alot more detail. As for Bam it's in your face, that all has to do with what your desktop resolution is at. If it's at 640x480, then yeah anything image will be life size. If it's like most of us here and alot bigger, say 1440x900, then a 640x480 image is nothing more then a thumbnail.

Your review has no facts, it's nothing more then opinion.


03-12-09  05:02pm

Reply
56
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of hogosos's Review

Could use alot more detail in your review. Example, what's the image resolution? How about the video resolution? How often is the site updated? As of know your review is more of a ad, then a review. You make your review sound fake.

03-12-09  09:53am

Review
57
Visit LV Panty

LV Panty
(0)

73.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Nice Quality Photos (1152x1728)
+A decent panty site.
+Some pretty good looking models
Cons: -Doesn't look like the site is updated anymore. No dates on the updates to know how old they are. But I haven't seen anything new in the month I've been there.
-Horrible quality vidoes (720x480 765kbs)
-Only 46 videos.
-All the photos look pretty much the same.
-No members link on the main page
Bottom Line: LV Panties is a decent site, that is if you are a panties fan. However it no longer appears to be updated anymore. There are no dates by the updates to know just when it quit but in the month I was a member I haven't seen anything new. From the layout and quality of the vids, I'd be guessing it's been 3-4 years since anything was updated. But again, I'm not positive on that and there's no way to know.

The photos are pretty much the only good thing about LVPanties, as they only have 46 vids at a crappy 720x480 @765kbs, so the only bright spot are the photos. Resolution wise, the photos are to the low end of todays standards at 1152x1728. They have what they call closeup gallerys, the photos are all in landscape, however they are 1152x768 size. So they are pretty much useless compared to the regular galleries. The photos are not available in a zip and there are normally 50-60 images per gallery.

The biggest problem I had with the photos is the fact that it was always shot in a bedroom or a bathroom. And it was always the same bedroom or bathroom, so it made the photos all blend together. 90% of the photos are shot in front of plain jane bare white walls. Makes for a very uneventful photo.

They do not have a member link on the main page. I had to search back through my history to find the link. Thankfully I hadn't cleared it out in a while. So unless you bookmark the members page, good luck finding it again.

In Closing, LVPanties is a decent site for a one month stay. There's really no point for anything else.

03-10-09  12:09pm

Replies (0)
Reply
58
Visit Real Teen Latinas

Real Teen Latinas
(0)
Reply of robert80's Review

Could really use some more technical info. For example photo size? Video size? Just saying high quality for pictures doesn't really cut it. As what's high quality to you, may not be high quality to most people.

03-10-09  10:45am

Reply
59
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Review

My problem isn't with the fact that he gave the site a 100, if you think it's that good so be it, however you went into no techincal detail on anything. For example, what size are those so called "Hi Res Photos"? What size are the videos? How often is it updated? What makes this site any different from the million other sites out there? You mentioned none of that in the review. Hell, even your cons are useless.

Maybe your a spammer, I don't know. But if you really wanna post reviews your have to get more in depth then that. That looks more like a forum post selling a site, then a review.


03-10-09  10:38am

Reply
60
Visit LV Panty

LV Panty
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

I know this is late but just wanted to let you know I signed up about a month ago (posting a review soon) and no they still don't have zip downloads. I also think they quit updating the site, as I don't see any dates for updates and didn't notice any while I was there.

03-09-09  12:31pm

Reply
61
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of mbaya's Review

While I don't agree with all you said in your review and actually rated it 11 points higher, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I don't agree with your video quality remarks, as I think the 07 videos are good quality for their time.

However I will agree 100% on a few ponts: The lack of any search function at all is flat out ridiculous for a site in 2009. Especially compared to some sites who let you search everything from boob size, clothing or labia size.

The one other thing that bugs me about the site, is the fact that Rob (the guy doing the shooting and behind it) seems to always think he's ideas are the only ones that matter. For example I brought up the image resolution thing to him and he pretty much told me I was dumb and 90% of subscribers think the images are already too big. And that sites doing them that big are just gimmicky.

Overall good thought out review.


03-09-09  12:27pm

Reply
62
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of TrashMan's Review

Just wanted to comment on a few things:

I've been a member for about 2 months now. I never have had to login twice to access any content. Could that be something on your end? You could get on the forum, which is hidden on the voting page, and ask Rob about it. Seems strange.

I'm guessing it's just with Euro but US customers have a option for $99 for 150 days. Which comes out to $20 a month. Or US customers sometimes get a $20 a month deal when they go to cancel.

I believe the color bars are suppose to associate with hot the content is. But who decides that I don't know. Not sure if it's based off member reviews, Robs opinion or number of downloads.

But I do agree some things needs changed. Like a option to download a full movie, rather then 7-9 3-5min clips. This is the DSL age, no reason to not have a option like that.

And I also agree that in todays economical age, $30 for only one site is a bit overboard.


02-04-09  05:40am

Reply
63
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

Videos do work fine. And you can use download managers to download both the videos and the zips, it's just that you can't pause/resume or zips. So you'll have to download 3 zips at a time.

01-30-09  04:00pm

Review
64
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Newer videos are good quality. 08 & 09 videos are 3000 kbps (1280x720), 07 and before are 2000 kbps (640x480).
+Most images are in high resolutions and good quality. Sizes range from 1000px to 4000px.
+Great site layout and navigation.
+Easy search function. By model name, clothing, etc.
Cons: -Can only view one image at a time.
-Must download zips at once, no queing up in a download manager & no pausing/resuming.
-No option to default to bringing up all thumbnails at once, instead of default 20 per page.
-No consistency to images, a 06 set will be available in 4000px, while a 08 set will only be in 2000px.
-Only uses Epoch.
Bottom Line: Babelicious is in the same line as Twistys, a glamour style site featuring softcore & hardcore. I really liked the site navigation and the ability to search for clothing type or cup size. And both the images and videos are good quality, I had a few problems that I just couldn't get past.

First being that each image must be viewed 1 at a time. If you use Firefox, there's no way to right click and open in new tab for each image your interested in. When you do that it just brings up the full gallery again. So that means you either waste time going photo by photo, which is opened up in a new window, or you download the full zip and then sort through the ones you want. I've never been the kind to download the full zips, I prefer to just keep the images I like.

The problem with downloading the zips, is the fact that you can't que them up into a download manager. There is also no resuming of the zips. Videos seem to do fine queing up and downloading but for some reason you can't with the zips.

Each gallery comes up as default, 20 thumbs per page. You can change it to 50, 100 or all but there's no way to make all the default.

One other problem with images seems to be that there is no consistency. For example a 06 gallery may be available in 4000px, while a 08 gallery may only be available in 2000px. Or it may be 3500px or 2500px, there just seems to be no consistency to image size. It's all over the map.

They have a rating system I really like. You can rate the model, photosets & videosets. If you've been a member of a site like Twistys before, then you've seen most of the models. I guess that's one reason why it was just kinda blah to me. Different site and galleries but still most of the same models.

You do get access to bonus sites: BabesOnFilm.com, BikiniBabes.TV, BabesUK.com, CumminAtYa.com, RoyalBoobs.com, Sexy-Babes.TV, DreamBabes.com & EuroBabez.com. Some are still updated regulary, looks like mainly Sexby-Babes.tv, others look like they haven't been updated in awhile.

Overall for the TBP discount of $19.95, Babelicious is a good site. Unfortunately the quirks about downloading the photos and/or zips is enough to make me not stay a member. If your the type that downloads all zips and don't mind not being able to que them up, then I'm sure you'll love the site. Unfortunately, that's a huge turn off for me and I felt the site just wasn't worth the hassle required to download the images.

01-30-09  02:08pm

Replies (3)
Reply
65
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I guess my question is, would it have been considered porn before the interent? And I think most people would say yes.

In uptight America, I would still consider it porn but it's about as soft as you can go. Other countries where nudity is more acceptable, then I don't think it would be.


01-08-09  07:29am

Reply
66
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)
Reply of Low End's Review

Could use alot more technical info. What is "Very High Definition"? Or pretty regular updates? Is that daily? Weekly? 3x a week? What resolution is that pics? Or what formats and resolution is the video?

If the sites not worth staying a member, how does it warrent a 99?


01-05-09  06:29pm

Review
67
Visit DOMAI

DOMAI
(1)

73.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Good price ($19.95 not rebilled or $14.95 rebilled)
+Good quality photos (1333x2000px)
+On average updated almost daily.
Cons: -No videos
-No search function
-Navigation is horrible (no models page) Everything is sorted by update. So while a model may have 6 different sets on there, there is no way to find out untill you get to that update.
-Evertyhing is sorted by year, then by update date.
Bottom Line: My main problem with Domai is the same problem I have with Femjoy, each model starts out nude. Or if she's not full nude, she will be within 5 images. Then you have 40 images that all start to look the same.

The navigation is horrible. You can't search for body type, hair color or even model name. Everything is listed first by year, since 2005, then by date that they were added. So if you find a model you like, there is no way to see her other sets or even to find out if she has other sets. Technically you can cheat and look at the web address to see what gallery you are in, then you'd know if they have any other sets
available. You can then change the gallery number to go to the other ones but frankly in 2009 you shouldn't have to do that to see the other sets. EAch model should have a main page.

Most of the models are pretty attractive and the photos are decent quality (1333x2000px) but there are no videos. No users forum. No bonus sites or anything. All you've got are 5 links on the side for update year.

Overall if you want nothing but full nude women, then you'd probably like Domai. But if you are the kind that likes the art of stripping, then I'd recommend you stay away.

01-05-09  02:58pm

Replies (2)
Reply
68
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most of the time, within a week. Unless it's a site that I really dislike or that doesn't update anymore, then I cancel pretty much days, if not hours within singing up.

01-04-09  08:49am

Reply
69
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

My first is price. Second would be if they use Epoch. The rest don't really bother me, as there are ways around DRM and/or streaming only video.

01-02-09  06:25am

Reply
70
Visit Playboy's CyberClub

Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Comment

Sorry I'm just now seeing this but if you are using Firefox you can use "Download Embedded" to download older streaming only videos. You can find it here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1993. When it brings up the page with the video streaming, there will be a little red arrow in the bottom right corner. If you click on that you can download the embedded video.

12-31-08  08:29am

Reply
71
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of TheRizzo's Reply

The problem is FTV doesn't update 6-7 times a week, it averages out to 1-2 a week max.

As to Monahan, I never have understood how FTV ranks their models. For example if you go to the recent updates page, you'll see member choice under Ileana, Franziska & Miyu. However I've never seen a page to rank or vote for the models. So not sure if it's just off of downloads or how they figure it.


12-30-08  08:05pm

Review
72
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

91.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update.
Cons: -Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click.
Bottom Line: FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.

Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.

Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate

Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.

The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.

The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.

Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.

In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.

If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.

In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot.

12-30-08  04:58pm

Replies (4)
Reply
73
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

No. Mainly for two reasons. My dsl isn't the fastest out there and it really isn't a realistic option for me to stream hi quality/HD videos.

Most videos I download, I like to skip around or fastly skim through it.

The only way I'd realistically think about doing it, was if it was only $10 or less per month. AS there are always ways around streaming only videos. It's just normally more of a pain in the ass then needed.


12-23-08  08:03am

Reply
74
N/A Reply of sitsat's Poll

My number one has to be dumbass guys talking in the background. I don't mind it too much on some sites like FTV where most of the talking is more of a interview kinda thing. But I hate the cameraman telling the girls exactly what to do.

My 2nd would have to be the camera snapping away. Mainly just because it normally follows a 3,2,1 or the guy telling the model how to pose.


12-16-08  01:01pm

Reply
75
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of mr smut's Reply

You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.

12-12-08  06:57am


Shown : 51-75 of 96 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.89 seconds.