Porn Access (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
advertise:
-1,535 Porn Sites Available
-15,668 Porn Movies
-5,351,505 GB of Content
-4,901 Hours of Porn
-35+ Niches
-some vids (small percentage) are nice and clean: nice lighting, nice setting, good focus, good colors.
-simple system to cancel subscription on the internet.
-easy log on. Useful to get onto site, useful if disconnected from site.
-occasionally a very low membership fee is offered. I got a 30-day full membership for $5
-huge amount of vids (a lot with low quality)
-no DRM
-no download limits |
| Cons: |
-navigation is extremely poor.
-to search for specific models is terrible.
-to search for specific videos is terrible.
-video clips are duplicated at many different sites. This makes navigation more difficult and
confusing, because the video clips are named by numbers, not by a simple descriptive name. So you
have to remember which clips you have already looked at if you don't want to keep checking some of the same vid clips over and over again.
-many of the sites are tiny, just a handful or more of videos, with poor-quality vid-caps to show what the video is. They should combine many of the sites to make a much smaller number of sites, to make it easier to find what there is, and delete the hundreds of duplicate clips.
-update schedule: no idea. The videos are not dated as to when they were posted.
-no simple listing of video title (just a number)
-no simple listing of what models are in the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cons (continued):
-the screen shots are really poor quality, and small, so it's hard to see clearly what the video
they represent is supposed to be like.
-some links are misdirected. Instead of taking you to the clip that is described, it takes you to a different clip.
-lack of different formats. All the vid clips I've seen are in WMV format.
-poor quality of many vids. Vids are unattractive because models are not good-looking, lack of plot, poor lighting, poor soundtrack, etc.
-large size of videos: the higher quality videos can be 433 MB or more for a 29 minute clip. The
quality of the video is not that good, I don't understand why the size is so large.
-for many videos, if you want to download or watch the video, you can get an error message:
"SORRY, the video you requested is temporarily unavailable."
-there is no sense in having a lot of sites with 4-5 videos that are the same videos that are at other sites in your network, except for the false sense that your network has much more content than it really does. It just makes it harder to look thru all the junk on your network trying to find any good videos that you might like.
Bottom Line:
-I've said many times that I'm more into photos than vids. There are many reasons for that, the
primary reasons being it's easier to find good/interesting/erotic photos than videos, because of time needed to examine the photo versus the video, download the item, photos are easier and faster to make (therefore easier to make well), etc.
Trying to look thru the junk at pornacess takes a lot more patience than I have. I think this site is not worth even a reduced membership fee of $10-$15/month. I would rather hunt thru free sites, which are easier to look thru, and which have videos that are smaller in file size, that have at least a few videos that I might really enjoy or find interesting.
-This is not a photo site. The only photos are screen shots to illustrate the vids, and the screen shots are small, poor quality pix.
-most of the vids I saw are poor quality: models not attractive, lousy lighting, lousy sound track, fake moans and groans, little to no plot,
-The people who award the razzies for poor acting in a motion picture should watch some of these
porno clips. They would get a new appreciation for what terrible acting really is.
I am giving this site a score of 70. It is not a scam, there is a huge amount of vid clips here,
most of poor quality, but there have to be sites/networks (videobox or videosz) out there with easier navigation, better quality clips. Even if those sites charge more, the extra money would be worth it to most PU members. Few PU members would have the patience to search thru the junk here to find the worthwhile clips.
There is a huge amount of the network I did not examine, because I did not have the time or
patience or interest. I've been a member for 3 weeks, but to see all this site has to offer would take many months. I've got better things to do. |
Reply To Review |
