Nicole Graves (0)
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
||+Nicole is hot.
+Nice mixture in the scenes (solo, b/g, and a few g/g)
+Included in the Twistys bonus sites.
||-Hasn't been updated with new NG stuff since June of 08. All the new updates are rehashed stuff from when she was NaughyCoco.
-Photos and videos could be better. All the photos are 768x1024.
-New videos decent quality (640x480 @ 1627kbps) The older Coco stuff is pretty bad @ 320x240 and from 700-900 kbps range, it seems to always be different.
||NicoleGraves.com seems to be one of the many sites that I've been a member of recently that has fallen off the face of the earth.
Ealier reviews comment on her interactivity with fans, however I can't comment on that. As there seems to be none anymore. I've even tried to email her a few times, with no success.
The photos and videos are decent quality but nothing that will strain your PC to run. In todays day and age of 3000 or 4000px images, NG's 768x1024 seems a bit behind the times. The only advantage to that is that all the images, even the older Naughty Coco ones, come in at the size.
The videos are on the low end of what I'd expect for a site in 2009, the newer stuff being 640x480/1627kbps. The older(or recently updated) Naughty Coco stuff is 320x240 and between 700-900kbps.
It is one of the bonus sites included in Twisty's so I'd recommend you sign up through Twistys as it'll save you $5.
The store, which on her page says it offers signed dvd's/photos/posters doesn't work. When you go there it's completely empty.
Overall I think I just seemed to miss what appears to have been a great website. Since the site is included with Twistys, I can't really knock it too bad. As your not paying $20 for just this one site. However coming from a fan of Nicole, if your only interested in this site and haven't been a member before, then I think it'd be worth it for a month. However if you've been a member of NG.com before, then I really don't think it's worth the money. I'd have no problem paying the $20 for this site alone, if it ever gets back to what it seemed to be in early to mid 2008.
Reply To Review