Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (367)  

Feedback:   All (2815)  |   Reviews (173)  |   Comments (32)  |   Replies (2610)

Other:   Replies Received (1257)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 2848 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

This is a tough one to answer because I've got many years of experience surfing for porn and maybe more knowledge than most surfers and therefore I may know that a site is being dishonest while another person wouldn't and would think the site is great.

Trust is, after all, a two way street. If you are lying to me and I don't know than I will trust you until I hear otherwise.


04-06-14  07:32am

Reply
77
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of kanaka's Review

This should be in the comments section and not a review since I don't think you can post a review if you haven't actually been inside the site.

04-05-14  05:34pm

Reply
78
N/A Reply of Woodruff's Poll

I haven't but I see no point in joining a site that has only BJ scenes of any performer. I enjoy a BJ like the next guy but I need a lot more than that in my porn for me to be happy with the scene.

04-02-14  05:48pm

Reply
79
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I took the question to mean in my private life as opposed to on the net so I consider myself to be very social. If the question was in regards to any kind of social media like Twitter, Facebook or any other than the answer is the complete opposite because I refuse to use these platforms. I'm a member of 3 forums and I am a pretty active member of two of these and a partial one on the other.

03-31-14  05:22pm

Reply
80
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I can't comment too much about the looks on the girls face because I simply haven't seen enough of any of their scenes to have a decent sample but these guys aren't trying to shoot porn where the girl is having a good time so it's probably next to impossible for the girls to fake it. I guess their formula works so why change it? I won't say anything else on their method of billing but their ticket based system is a guaranteed cash cow. I mean how can it be anything but that when a 30$ membership only gives you 35 tickets which will get you a maximum of 35 videos but only if you pick old content newly updated. I would say that 35 tickets gets you about 7 to maybe 9 scenes but that's it.

03-31-14  05:18pm

Reply
81
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

The main reasons why I wanted to join this site is because they hire all the really hot new Euro girls and they make them do some truly hardcore stuff. Their choice of models is amazing. Just look at Lucie Wilde: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/luciewilde.html
for a good example. You would think that good looking girl having hardcore sex would be a great recipe for success and I suppose to some people it is but I've come to the conclusion that the stuff LP does is so bad that they prove that it's possible to screw up a great recipe.

The reason I've come to the above conclusion is that whenever I watch a preview (obviously a full scene is impossible since I got shafted) of any of their scenes then there are recurring themes that ruin the scene. Here is the list in no articular order.

1-Hot girl is made to look as skanky as possible.

2-White sofa, white wall, bright lights make all the scenes look like they were meant for some kind of documentary rather than porn.

3-The sex is mostly all circus porn so you get weird positions, pile driving penetration of the girls orifices and a general disregard in regard to the model.

I'm kind of glad that I didn't actually get to download anything because I would have had to delete it all from my drives sooner or later.


03-30-14  09:40am

Reply
82
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I picked thrilled but this is often an after the fact comment since I rarely follow softcore models.
I keep track of new models so I'm usually aware of some of them prior to them making the jump to HC but it's not like I was following their softcore career and than saw that they were doing HC.

I suspect that most people who enjoy softcore feel a little(if not a lot) cheated when they see one of their favorite go to the dark side of the force.


03-29-14  09:40am

Reply
83
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've only had few exchanges with webmasters but a bad attitude guarantees that I will never rejoin a site that I might have if he hadn't been a dick.

03-27-14  05:40pm

Reply
84
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(7)
Reply of Abel Semen's Reply

I never said that people didn't like them but only that facials can't be considered glamorous. The act of ejaculating on a girls face is not one that I would call respectful and it's certainly not something you do to a person you adore. I equal facials with spitting in the face and no one likes to get spit in the face. I don't care what you have read or heard from porn performers in regards to cum shot to the face but none of them enjoy getting sperm all over their face and they certainly don't like it in their eyes. It's just that they know that a certain percentage of fans like yourself like them and they try to sell the fantasy. That's why glamour sites can't do facials because facials never equal glamorous no matter how good the camera operator is.

You'll have to give me the names of the movies where you saw post facial kissing between the man and the woman because I can't think of one where I have seen it. That's not to say they don't exist but strangely enough guys don't want to eat their own sperm.


03-25-14  06:36pm

Reply
85
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No and why would you?

03-25-14  06:19pm

Reply
86
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I picked that I'm smarter but a large part of that is because I'm older and have accumulated a lot more info than many other surfers.

03-23-14  07:42am

Reply
87
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of Schirm's Reply

The bulk of the content on VB and VideosZ is many years old and it's not getting any younger. The quality of the print the sites used was not necessarily the best and they never bothered to remaster them so the final product is often of passable video quality. Their problem is compounded by the fact that so many studios have died in the last 5 years that it's getting harder and harder for them to find new material to update on a daily basis. In fact the bulk of the new stuff is actually content taken from porn sites as opposed to actual porn studios. The rest is a mixture or older titles and content from the few remaining active studios but that last one now means that it's not exclusive to VB and/or VideosZ.

That doesn't mean that both sites aren't worth joining because they are if for no other reason than they have such a huge library of content that it's well worth a month long membership. Likely longer if you want o truly find everything that you want.

The bulk of the content on both sites is best appreciated if the video resolution is 640x480. I wish I could say the newer stuff can be downloaded and viewed in 720p or 1080p but stated above that both sites still update with older content so no way of telling you which new movie is actually recent and which one isn't without seeing their library.


03-23-14  07:41am

Reply
88
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of Schirm's Reply

You have to help me understand how you scored the network because I'm more confused now than I was. Unless I'm missing something than you enjoyed the bulk of content the two hardcore DDF sites have to offer.
That would be Hands on Hardcore and House of Taboo. The only other site to offer midcore to hardcore stuff is Euro Teen Erotica but that is mostly all leased stuff so not really exclusive to DDF.

Am I wrong when I say that you didn't enjoy only Blowjob because you couldn`t find the complete scene and not because of the actual content?

You find their platform and search option to be outdated. You have to give me the site you used for reference because I find that DDF has one of the best search engine around. They tag their scenes with so many keywords that you can search something as simple as the models name all the way to whether there were any G-strings in the scene. You can even search by year of release.

I'm willing to give you that the softcore and solo stuff outnumbers the hardcore stuff but these guys still update with at least one new hardcore scene each day. I'm a member of a couple of sites that only update once a week.

I think you have some valid points on a couple of their sites and if you had only reviewed these as opposed to the network than that would be fine but you gave the entire network a bad score.

I don't think we will agree on this but that's all right because we don't have to. I look forward to reading some of your other reviews.


03-22-14  06:25pm

Reply
89
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of Schirm's Review

I read your review and I honestly don't see where you put any info to justify giving the site a score of 60. In fact I'd say that what you wrote points to a much higher score. It's clear that you are pissed at something but since you mention something about cancelling than I'm not sure what the problem.

I was a member last month and it's not my first time and I have never had one problem with joining or cancelling and although their total output of new scenes is less than it was a few years ago. They are part of a small group of European sites still putting out scenes on a regular basis and I'd add that they have amazing streaming and download options.

You are entitled to your review and your score but I'm afraid that I can't refer to it if I want a proper assessment of this network.


03-22-14  09:52am

Reply
90
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I don't care one way or the other and seeing as most of the porn made these days doesn't include any dialogue than who could even tell. I only care that if there is some dialogue than that it be in one of the two languages I understand.

03-21-14  03:04pm

Reply
91
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I picked yes, maybe but I can't actually remember what it might be. One thing is for sure and it's that it must have been a long time ago.

03-19-14  05:51pm

Reply
92
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I only use the one that comes wit IE and Firefox.

03-17-14  11:06am

Reply
93
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have no problem saying that this guy or that guy is good looking but I have no desire to sexually interact with anyone that has a penis and I do not want to see any men interact sexually with each other. I wouldn't even want to d a threesome if the other person was a guy but then again I have no desire to do a threesome if the other person is a girl but I could be persuaded to try the later. For those reason I would say that I am as straight as they come.

03-15-14  07:53am

Reply
94
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(7)
Reply of sonofzog's Reply

The two reasons why I think cum shots came to be was because old time directors needed to prove that the guy had an orgasm and since men can't really fake it then showing a cum shot was the only way. The other reason is a little weird but it would appear that it's not that unusual for female porn performers to be less than wise when it comes to birth control so an internal cum shot is a little dangerous for these women.

I'd be just as happy if the guys wore a condom and made an internal cum shot or if they just faked it. After all we don't pretend to have an orgasm and then take out our dicks to shoot cum near the vagina or ass of our significant other so why does porn have to do that?


03-14-14  09:57am

Reply
95
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of cjd2004's Comment

Here are two pieces of information to explain what's likely to happen to most Manwin properties in the months to come.

http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/manwin-m...am-in-montreal-9324/

http://www.mikesouth.com/manwin/twistys-...-complete-scam-9311/


03-14-14  08:21am

Reply
96
Visit Kscans

Kscans
(0)
Reply of littlejoe's Reply

I get the feeling that you really want to join this site so simply go ahead. The worse that will happen is that you wasted 30$.

03-13-14  09:18am

Reply
97
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Here is a little bit of news about ATK that may explain some of your complaints.

http://www.mikesouth.com/reader-mail/thi...ng-ugly-at-atk-9313/


03-13-14  09:14am

Reply
98
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

I picked on ass or back but I was looking for other because the only thing that is important to me is that the cum shot be near where the guy's penis is at the moment of ejaculation so if the performers are in missionary then the cum shot should be near the vagina or the stomach.

All of the other choices are fine except for the face because I really dislike facials.


03-13-14  09:10am

Reply
99
Visit Seymore Butts

Seymore Butts
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Thanks for the info but I wasn't planning on joining this site only because if I were to join an SB site then I'd only do so if it had all of his movies. I don't know if he owns this one but it's quite possible that he doesn't own all of his movies anymore. He may have sold the rights in the past so no one will be able to release them all.

03-11-14  06:00pm

Reply
100
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only trials I join are those that offer full access so by default there is no censoring of their content. I have joined some limiting trials but that was years ago when I first started surfing the net. They all sucked and I don't think that as changed.

03-11-14  09:08am


Shown : 76-100 of 2848 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.92 seconds.