Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (371)  

Feedback:   All (2921)  |   Reviews (175)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (2710)

Other:   Replies Received (1300)  |   Trust Ratings (68)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 2954 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
Reply of jook's Reply

I just read on another forum comments made by the owner of the site and in case anyone had a doubt that the caning is real than I can confirm that it is because he said that a performers who agree to it will show marks of it on their body. It's not my cup of tea but it's still basically what the stuff Kink was shooting a little less than a decade ago so nothing new. They shoot out of NY so I don't hold a lot of hope that they can survive long term. Flying a California based performer to NY can't be cheap and this kind of porn must also be a little more expensive to shoot because you have to pay the performers more money.

09-27-14  05:46pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I didn't even consider that when I posted my comment but I guess it does fall under feedback. Mind you I'm also not sure if I'm talking to a webmaster or a support person.

09-27-14  05:37pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only feedback I have given is when one of them comments on a review of their site.

09-27-14  10:39am

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I don't know about the rest of you but these days almost every site offers some kind of discount. The only thing that differentiates one from the next is the level of the discount.

09-25-14  03:50pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

graymane has already said what I was thinking.

09-24-14  03:13pm

Reply
56
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Let me first say thanks for the review. I'm glad you found a site that you enjoy. This is the kind of site that could get a high score from multiple people and it would still get a low score from me because I simply can't enjoy their brand of porn. Here is a partial list of why it would get a low score.

1-There are way too many visible pain marks on the body of the women for me to overlook them or get sexually stimulated.

2-The main character always wears a mask and I can't tell you how much that that annoys me.

3-Too much of their porn is circus acts that I thought was on the way out. I guess there must still be a market for someone to attempt bringing it back.

4-Too much of the porn is designed to demean the women and by default it makes it impossible for me to believe that they enjoy what's being done to them.

This site reminds me of the misogynistic stuff Facial Abuse is known for but here it's may alienate many performer who might otherwise have worked for them thinking it's like Kink. It's not by a long shot.


09-21-14  06:22pm

Reply
57
Visit Club Savanna Samson

Club Savanna Samson
(0)
Reply of starduster's Reply

Don't mention it. I also would want to get as much of Savanna's stuff as I could. After all Savanna was a really hot looking women who did some amazing movies.

09-21-14  01:11pm

Comment
58
Visit Sex Fight Divas

Sex Fight Divas
(0)

To be avoided.

This site and any associated with them should be avoided because even if they only charged you a dollar to join. That would still be one dollar too many. The content looks old and grainy. I'm sure anyone reading this can find something better to do with their 20$ and if they don't then I'm confident a PU member will gladly steer them in the right direction.

09-21-14  05:21am

Replies (0)
Reply
59
Visit Prostitute Movies

Prostitute Movies
(0)
Reply of Herman's Review

I am glad that you enjoyed it but the TBP review makes it clear that this is not a very good site. In fact it's borderline awful and it is a complete sham. You can believe that these are real prostitutes having sex with their customers but 2257 regulations means that you cannot release a video if you do not have the proper identification of each performers in those videos. The nature of prostitution is such that real names are usually to be avoided for fear of legal and marital repercussions.

09-21-14  05:13am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It must sometime improve it but my theory as to why that is has little to do with the performer having new breasts as much as her attitude toward herself.

An older woman looking at her sagging breasts who gets a lift and implants may have cause to get them but a teenager or young woman doing the same thing has none. Other than she is unhappy with herself and thinks that altering her appearance will cure what ails her. It usually doesn't because that was not the problem.


09-21-14  05:05am

Reply
61
Visit Club Savanna Samson

Club Savanna Samson
(0)
Reply of starduster's Reply

Did you look at Videobox? You will need to purchase the extra Vivid channel but I think they have the bulk of Savanna's movies and you only need to spend a little extra above the standard VB rate to get access to those movies. It will still cost you less than 20$.

The only negative is that you aren't likely to get a lot of pics.


09-21-14  04:53am

Reply
62
Visit Club Savanna Samson

Club Savanna Samson
(0)
Reply of starduster's Comment

Khan has already told you they no longer do business with them so that means you should avoid the site. Savanna was a Vivid contract star so I suspect that any site like Videobox will have the bulk of her movies.

09-20-14  10:01am

Reply
63
Visit RRR Entertainment

RRR Entertainment
(0)
Reply of Murr's Comment

I would recommend you contact the CC Processor which appears to be Segpay and explain was is happening. Hopefully they can refund your money and you can spend it on a decent site.

I'm curious to know what you found appealing in this site because I didn't see anything myself. I'm guessing you joined prior to TBP's review but you should have taken a look at rabbit's because he gave them an even worse score last year.


09-19-14  06:24pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I got one when I was 18 and I don't necessarily regret it but not having it would not be a issue.

The moral of the story for me is don't get one because it's not going to add anything to your life
and I could have spent that 72$ on something more interesting


09-17-14  05:55pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I could have picked the option all of the above if there had been one but in truth it is impossible for a model to no longer be fresh or too popular. us but anyone stumbling on her for the first time would probably be as thrilled as us when we first saw her.

There are plenty of active performers who I used to love watching but don't anymore because I own so many of their scenes that I don't really care to add more. I still keep track of their stuff in the hope that she will offer something worthwhile but most rarely do.


09-13-14  11:54am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Rarely these days but there are so few new sites to join that I mostly join established ones. That's not to say that I'm not partially disappointed in their content but that's another subject.

09-09-14  05:30pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

The face is always the first thing I look at and than it's the body.

09-07-14  09:10am

Reply
68
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The bigger they are. The more important it is for them to have a search option but it has to be a well functioning one. I'd rather there not be one than one that gives out the wrong info

09-05-14  05:55pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I used to say that I don't mind it but these days I prefer to see a condom because otherwise I know that one of the scenes I'm enjoying involved the transmission of an STI. In fact probably many of the scenes I watch have that same problem.

09-03-14  06:09pm

Reply
70
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Reply

I can't be certain but my guess is that they still list it because it is still active and they offer a significant discount to TBP/PU members so although you did not like the site. Someone else might be satisfied with content that is 3 years and older. Especially if they aren't too picky about screen resolution which appear to be only 640x480 for the videos.

I highly recommend you take a look at many other sites listed on TBP/PU and you will notice that quite a few of them haven't updated in many years. Just look at my back and forth with the webmaster for busty buffy and you will see that their sites have old content and aren't updating anymore.

I joined the Claudia Marie site because of the TBP discount and do you know what my 10$ got me. Videos that can only be downloaded in 428x240. You can stream them in HD but I don't join a pay site that allows downloads to stream in HD but download in crappy resolution.


09-02-14  06:34pm

Reply
71
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Comment

I'm sorry you got fooled and maybe there should be more warnings but I think you are partially to blame here. I think you did what most of us have done at least once in our life and went with your heart rather than your brain. You clearly noticed that the TBP review was three years old which should have been your first clue that something might be wrong but your second clue and in my opinion the more obvious one is that the site facts have not been updated in 2 years which means that the review is for all intense and purposes null and void as the site could be completely different. The third clue and you can be forgiven for not looking at it is that if you look at The bottom of the TBP page for this site. You will notice that Rabbit did a review this year and the site got a 58%. I rarely look at other review sites but this is a case where I would only because I prefer to have the most up to date info.

09-02-14  06:01pm

Reply
72
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
Reply of pornpundit's Comment

The reason marcus gave seems logical but is it possible that they changed their name because they were having a harder time recruiting women to appear on their FA site because of their bad reputation with talent? Maybe they think that they can fool new girls in appearing on their new site since they won't equate the old FA with the new FF.

I would rather they went out of business but that's just me.


09-01-14  04:58pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The thing that most people don't realise is that there isn't anything quite like online porn. Where else can you get hundreds of hours of content for less than 30$? Most mainstream sites require a lot more money to get a lot less content and often most mainstream sites don't allow download unless you buy the individual movie/show and that gets expensive real fast.

09-01-14  09:34am

Comment
74
Visit Porn Megaload

Porn Megaload
(1)

Goodbye ScoreHD

I discovered this week that Score has converted their popular site Score HD into the new site porn megaload and basically changed the content on score video to only large breasted women.

The cost for the new site is 50$. That's a pretty expensive increase when you consider that the other one was only 20$

08-30-14  09:09am

Replies (1)
Reply
75
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Technically I own three since I have a PS3. One is set up on my 55" TV where I watch most of my movies (that's non-porn movies) and the other two are on my 46" TV. I can't be sure if dvd's look better when played on a BluRay but they sound a lot better and that adds a lot to the viewing experience.

I now own a decent quantity of BluRay movies as the price is now about the same as most dvd.


08-30-14  07:01am


Shown : 51-75 of 2954 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.6 seconds.