Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (42)  

Feedback:   All (1501)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (99)  |   Replies (1378)

Other:   Replies Received (677)  |   Trust Ratings (55)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 1504 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

As usual I agree with Pat. If a site is loaded with great content, too much good stuff to download in a month, and it has a great discount for multi-month memberships, I will sign up after the first month.

Quality matters most and volume is second.


08-30-15  05:10pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

As a religious person I totally agree with Jay G. The obvious truth that is visible in virtually every species of animal is the necessity for reproduction to maintain the species. That is accomplished by each of the two sexes having characteristics that attract mates. For Homo Sapiens the female attracts the male first through physical appearance.

Thus we girl watchers are just following the embedded characteristic that the Good Lord included when he created us.

The aspects of notional modesty and the use of clothing to cover the human form is a complex expansion of the attraction element that can get too deep for this forum.

Short form...girl watching is a natural and necessary part of being a male.


08-28-15  11:10pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Ditto. Sweet young things and experienced ladies with great bodies and attitudes. Love 'em all.

08-25-15  10:03am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Especially a British accent!

08-25-15  10:01am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends on the director and the videographer. Some rub flix are just awful where the interesting body parts are not even visible. Others are great where those body parts get a very clear workout. But even those can get boring because there really no opportunity for novel camera or body angles.

08-11-15  11:59am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

Ditto what Pyrenees said. All the listed characteristics in the poll are interest generators, but if she's just sitting in a chair and doing nothing, my interest is lost fter about 30 seconds.

08-01-15  11:41am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Ditto that. It's boring as hell watching fixed camera position cam shows.

07-30-15  11:00am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer restarting the old thread. That way the folks who posted to the old one and who stayed subscribed will be notified that the thread is back in business. That will, in turn, result in possible updates.

I see no benefit in intentionally starting a new thread when an old one is still there.


07-30-15  10:58am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

100% agree.

Not only the rental fees, but also having to schlepp to the video store twice, no opportunity to preview the material and relying on the box cover to be accurate, having to fast forward through crap to find the babe(s) that prompted the rental, etc.

And, holy shiite, Batman, the quality is so much better today than back in the day.

Today's web based access is far superior as is The Best Porn, which I call the Consumer Reports of porn. There was nothing similar bak in the day; just caveat emptor.


07-08-15  10:54am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a video guy but there are times where I want a photoset as well. But I'll be damned if I'm going to d/l photos one by one. Not a chance.

07-06-15  02:13pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Frankly whether the dude uses a condom or not doesn't concern me. I am interested in the babe's body parts and if she's getting drilled by a guy wearing a rubber, who really cares?

07-04-15  01:01am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have done 12 month memberships with Met Art and VideoBox because both have been reliably updating with predictable quality.

I dropped Met Art after 2 years, however because their site moved further away from good video stuff and more photos.

VideoBox does have a habit of posting marginal material, but with an average of 150 video updates averaging 4 scenes per video or 600 new scenes per month I have invariably found enough really good scenes to stick around.

I also had a 12 month with Twistys but dropped them like a rock when the site was sold and went to Hell in a handbasket.


07-02-15  06:09pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I am totally against any brutality in any form. Gagging is not erotic at all nor is stuff like pussy slapping and spanking.

While anal to oral is an option in this poll, so is obvious poor hygiene, but neither of these is nearly as bad as beating up women (whether play acting or for real).


06-29-15  10:38am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

A few tasteful tats (see, for example, Jana Jordan with a few small ones on her feet and Anastasia Christ with her one small butterfly above her fabulously gorgeous right breast) are OK.

But what annoys the bejeebers out of me are the babes that cover their whole arm or leg or neck with ink and destroy a gorgeous body.


06-26-15  10:29am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Almost never.

There are a precious few where the aftermarket installations are close to perfect but 99% of the boob jobs really screw up the natural perfection of the babe. (Jana Jordan (ala Jana Foxy) was a small A cup with an absolutely gorgeous body. When she added some man made goo she messed up that perfect body.)


06-24-15  10:47am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

My favorite Japanese model is HITOMI TANAKA with her innocent face and outrageously huge natural tits.

Most of the time the pixillation of the pussy is a distraction...but not from what I'm cumming for (I meant coming).


06-14-15  03:08pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

CCBill or Epoch. If a site uses any other biller, I'll usually pass. Too many bad experiences with others.

05-30-15  08:17pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I'm with messmer and with pat362.

05-08-15  01:47pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Bingo. Give me a nice, soft REAL original equipment B cup over an aftermarket D cup any day.

04-30-15  05:25pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

A pornstar's "shelf life" depends on a bunch of factors including her basic sexiness and smart personal management of her assignments. Nancy Suiter should have been around for a long time but lasted only a year or so. Nina Hartley, however, is still going strong 20 years after she started.

04-27-15  02:09pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

Laptop is not on the list so I chose Other.

03-31-15  07:11pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When I saw the very hot Nancy Suiter getting fisted in the original version of Taxi Girls on tghe big screen at Pussy Cat theatre back in the day, I went nuts. Then it came out in video with the fisting scene removed.

No idea why, but that kinda said it was now "forbidden fruit" which always makes an OK kinda thing special.

So when fisting scenes first started showing up on porn sites, I had to check them out. Now, not so much. They are now OK now and then but no longer are they something special.


03-27-15  09:48pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

When Danielle (FTV) was in her prime, she did FTV style midcore and was great. Now that she is doing ful bore hardcore she jsut isn't that appealing.

Another all midcore babe was Andie Valentino with a superb body and a labia that was beyond wonderful She did just one or two hardcore scenes; why? dunno, but before she hung it up she was back to just midcore stuff.


03-20-15  08:37pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It's fine with me. Loved a scene where a flute and a clarinet were used in a manner that was not really intended by the maker.

03-20-15  08:30pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

There are two sites where the webmaster's attitude caused me to cancel and to never sign up again. Short version; promises made on sign up were not kept and the webmasters in both cases essentially told me they had the right to change the rules.

03-08-15  11:06am


Shown : 1-25 of 1504 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.57 seconds.