Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (42)  

Feedback:   All (1417)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (93)  |   Replies (1300)

Other:   Replies Received (646)  |   Trust Ratings (56)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 1420 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
(7)
Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

OK. So I thought I'd check out Babes.com and I read both the TBP review and Toad's review. That's when I discovered that the company owned Brazzers, Reality Kings and Twistys.

I dropped Twistys after 5 continuous years when their site turned south earlier this year. I also have been a Brazzers member off and on, and in one memorable lapse in judgment, I joined the Reality Kings site.

Brazzers could easily promote itself as the king of lousy silicone jobs and RK as the roach motel of porn (remember the old roach motel ad..."You can check in but you cannot check out.")

Toad's observations about their billing and business practices tell me that this company is one I can definitely live without, especially with all the other sites with outstanding customer service and with terrific content. (DDF, VideoBox, Perfect Gonzo and ALS Scans come immediately to mind as superior in both service and content.)


10-30-14  10:39am

Reply
2
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

When I upgraded from monthly to annual a few years ago, the monthly still had 2 weeks or so to go. They immediately changed me to annual and prorated my partial month to the annual rate.

I was pleasantly surprised.


10-28-14  07:52pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Fully dressed in heels always the expectations high for me.

10-27-14  10:24am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

My interest fluctuates and the current state of the art adds so much to my interests. The current superb HD offerings, the proliferation of incredibly sexy new talent and the maturation of the production values over the last few years has made it tough to keep up so I try to keep to the really good stuff.

I could easily imagine if i had 24 hours each day to devote to my Porn hobby, it still wouldn't be enough.


10-25-14  01:48pm

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

That's what I thought the question referred to. I have quite a lot in my PU Favorites list.

I also have a few (perhaps 5 or 6) free sites that I guess I should blow off. Don't look at them very often.


10-21-14  03:42pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Misogyny of any kind is inappropriate in porn.

Question. Does anyone think dick slapping is sexy? Does anyone think the babe enjoys it?


10-19-14  08:45am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Absolutely. Especially on single person sites, like Victoria Pink or Hitomi. BUT only after checking PU/TBP and also the preview site.

10-16-14  02:47pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

To me the sounds add to the scene so when I hear "fuck me hard" in a female voice while the babe is getting plugged with her mouth closed destroys the scene completely.

10-13-14  10:36am

Reply
9
Visit Aussie Ass

Aussie Ass
(1)
Reply of jook's Review

Nicely written review! I really like your narrative style.

I spent just a few minutes checking out the site and see what you mean. The teaser video is into female degradation and will make misogynous guys, but few others, happy.

A shame, because Aussie babes are super hot and less reserved on average than their American counterparts.


10-12-14  09:19am

Reply
10
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(6)
Reply of tikkit's Reply

I rejoined for one month using a special deal. They modified the cross promotion formats so they aren't "quite" as likely to be accidentally activated.

However I agree that NA now qualifies to be banned from pU/TBP because of their lousy and deceptive business practices.

The Bang Bros scam is just a tad different because their game is played via a promotional email and not on the site itself. It's lousy, but if you sign up for the site and don't respond to their emails, you're safe...at least for now.


10-11-14  07:59pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Adds nothing at all. Worse, it kills the fantasy that both (all) participants are truly into the sex.

10-07-14  02:54pm

Review
12
Visit Bikini Pleasure

Bikini Pleasure
(1)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.

The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.

The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).

There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.

The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).

Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples
Cons: Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.

Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.

The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.

I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material.
Bottom Line: The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.

Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.

In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.

The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.

In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.

The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.

I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.

My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.

Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.

Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.

One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up.

10-06-14  03:13pm

Replies (0)
Reply
13
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Agree generally with Drooler.

I watch porn to check out the babe and her gorgeous body parts. Give me variety with great angles and mixes of closeups and full body shots. Yes I love the gynecology shots, especially when bodily fluids are being secreted, boob massage, nipple pulling, etc., but lately the vids are focused on the guys butt, schlong and "dangleberries" when the babe's fabulous boobs are out of the camera's range.

That's why I like what Score does (tit-centric all the way) with occasional and very brief shots of male body parts. Other sites with great camera work are DDF and ALS (all varieties). Naughty America and Evil Angel not so much.


10-06-14  02:27pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not only is it degrading, to me it's feeding those guys who innately have a hatred of women and see the humiliation effort as a sort of "payback" for how women have treated the guy his whole life.

Other stuff that turns me cold are:
gagging
slapping
choking
physical abuse of any kind
laughing at and belittling the babe after a fuck scene

I would like to see some retorts by the babe like:
pencil dick
30 second wonder
tiny dick
next time I want a real man
a physical fight back


10-02-14  10:11am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

WAY way too much. And I can only think the ladies who take it up the poop chute do so because they get paid for it. I really can't believe they enjoy the sensation any more than I enjoy the proctologist doing a prostate check.

09-29-14  08:03pm

Comment
16
Visit Zishy

Zishy
(0)

Zishy.com - a non=nude site?

Looks like a "non-nude" site (no PTA - Pussy Tits, Ass)

Their site says, "Zishy noun \'zi-shē\ : photos that leave something to the imagination."

Can anyone comment?

09-28-14  11:31am

Replies (2)
Reply
17
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Ditto.

The only exception is when I have a problem of some kind and contact the support function. Don't know whether the response comes from the webmaster or a support person...if there is a response.


09-27-14  11:07am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

Agree. I would guess that about 50% of the "special discounts" offered by email or that I find when checking out a site outside the TBP link are the same as, or not as good as, the TBP discount.

09-25-14  09:49am

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Seeing some guy yanking his shank doesn't really do much for me. After all I can see that in my mirror.

I'm OK with casual content that has a babe massaging a guy's junk. However, not if it's the major aspect of a video.


09-23-14  10:34am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Ditto. The only aftermarket installation I have ever found appealing were with Memphis Monroe's. They were done by someone who understood the appeal of nat mams.

An old controversy was whether Carmella Bing's mams were all natural but since she has decided to add a lot of weight (I gotta believe she's way over 200 lbs) it no longer matters.


09-21-14  10:40am

Reply
21
Visit Bikini Pleasure

Bikini Pleasure
(1)
Reply of RLane's Comment

I would say the ratio is about 60% bared boobs and 50% bared pussy. The bikinis usually come off altogether.

There's self touching but no insertions or hard core.


09-20-14  04:59pm

Reply
22
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(1)
Reply of Pedrote's Comment

Yes, I get tons of spam which had to come from some (or all) of the sites I've joined.

However I've never had my credit card info compromised over many years of joining on line sites.

Two techniques I use;

1. I have a separate Hotmail account that I use just for porn and nothing else. That means I can stop all porn spam simply by closing that email account.

2. I use a single credit card account exclusively for porn sites and nothing else. I asked the issuer to set an $80.00 credit limit on that account which will have the benefit of not having any bogus big charges go through. So far I have had no attempts by unauthorized parties trying to process a charge.


09-20-14  10:09am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Don't like 'em. Never did, never will.

09-17-14  01:31pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Two examples of "dramatic chqnges" that demonstrate that a babe has "turned the corner."

Carmella Bing whose current photos suggest that she's well over 200 pounds of gross fat. Link to:The "new" Carmella Bing

Jana Jordan/Foxy whose body was perfect with small, but perfect, tits. Then she got a boob job. Awful.

I would have said "doing anal" if I could pick two choices. I know anal is popular but, to me, doing anal is a sign a babe has starting her desperation tailspin. (I can't believe any woman could possibly enjoy getting porked up her poop chute.)


09-13-14  06:30pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

In my opinion, the only sites that don't need a search function are those with so little content that the site can be drained in just a few days.

The counter is a site where the search function is inaccurate (VideoBox, for example) and thus makes it nearly impossible to find your favorite model.


09-05-14  11:12am


Shown : 1-25 of 1420 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.99 seconds.