Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (40)  

Feedback:   All (1358)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (89)  |   Replies (1246)

Other:   Replies Received (625)  |   Trust Ratings (56)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 1361 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - 5 FULL videos per day
- Superb search engine
- Price is best of any video site
- Offers DVD quality at a $5 per mo. premium
- Permits selective downloads via 30 second segments that can be automatically connected.
- Has a member review section for each video and for each scene
- The vast majority of the scenes have a cast list that is interactive so a member can generate a list of all offerings with a particular porn star.
Cons: - No pics at all
- With over 800 vids per year and the limitations on acquiring licences, a few of the vids are rather poor
- Occasional mis-identification of the talent
Bottom Line: This site exceeds all possible comparisons to other sites and is a bargain. The occasional obscure wierd vids (midgets, hirsute Japanese, trannie) pop up once in a while but so what? The member review section is new and the members haven't figured out what a "review" is because most postings are more like a chat room than an evaluative discussion of the scene or the video.

Great site, great deal. Go for it!

Follow-Up:
Bumped the rating up by 2. See my separate updating comments.

01-17-07  06:00pm

Replies (0)
Rating
2
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

96.0
No Review.
10-02-07  07:29pm

Rating
3
Visit Babelicious

Babelicious
(0)

94.0
No Review.
09-19-07  07:28am

Review
4
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge number of top quality photos and decent number of video clips.
- Great search engine that finds just about anything of interest - by name, body part, hair color, etc.
- Daily updates with 4 photo sets and 1 clip
- All recent videos are top quality
- Decent level of exclusive content but a lot of non-exclusive stuff as well
- TBP price ($19.95) is excellent compared to similar sites
- Zip photo downloads
- Has a rating system that is reasonably consistent with my tastes
Cons: - Some older video clips are of lousy quality
- Video content is lighter than similar sites
- Older videos are in parts, requiring multiple downloads
- Many videos are X movie scenes and are not easily identified as such. Quality is a sometimes thing.
Bottom Line: I'm more interested in video than in photos and this site is quite good in providing top notch quality in its daily updates. Many of the models are apparently exclusive to Twistys.

Bottom line, this site is definitely worth the investment for one month. I am a 10 month member at $99.00 and am quite satisfied with it.

01-25-07  04:08pm

Replies (3)
Review
5
Visit Busty Adventures

Busty Adventures
(0)

93.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Great video quality in recent additions. (Bang Bros. affiliation)
- All natural models.
- Excellent camerawork and lighting
- Good assortment and getting bigger (one new video per week)
- Each video has 60 minutes of content, 40 or more minutes nude/hardcore.
Cons: - Same 3-part sequence for each model. No variety. Scene 1- Pickup; Scene 2 - Solo; Scene 3 Hardcore (or just BJ in a few cases). Hardcore always vaginal, sometimes anal as well.
- Same stud does them all. He's good (lets the babe show all her stuff) but no variety
Bottom Line: If you love gorgeous women with large, natural breasts captured on video by a great tit loving cameraman, you'll love this series. You'll recognize several of the models who are quite popular in porn such as Jane Darling, Anastasia Christ, Sandra DeMarco, Tiffany Rousso and others.

Partner sites vary in quality but provide a good value add. Best one is Big Ass Adventures.

Heed the TBP warning. The "trial" membership gives you only the first of 3 scenes, which seldom has much nudity and no hardcore. The site has 1 minute (FREE!) trailers for each model that are far better than what you'll get with a trial membership.

Best move is to sign up for a full month and give it a full shot. You won't regret it if you're a bit tit fan.

(I was a member for 3 months then cancelled a few weeks ago just because I'd pretty much seen all the content and downloaded (NO DRM!) the ones I wanted to keep. I plan to rejoin in about a month or so after several new models have been added.)

01-19-07  02:45pm

Replies (1)
Rating
6
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)

92.0
No Review.
10-02-07  07:44pm

Review
7
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - A group of 9 sites, 8 active (see below) and one inactive with quality ranging from superb to adequate.
- Outstanding babes with soft core more dominant than hardcore.
- Reliable. No site downs in over 1 year as a member and only a few broken links.
- Responsive customer service (for minor issues)
- Most photos (all posted in last few years) are in zip downloads.
- Exclusive content (as far as I can tell)
- Easy navigation.
- Babelicious has some good features - see sparate review
Cons: - Older content lower resolution; some without zip.
- Ambiguous model names. Same babe in Sexy Babes has a different name in Eurobabez, for example. Others are fictitious names for known pornstars.
- Inactive users forum that is not monitored by webmaster. (But see Babelicious, below).
- UserID and Passwords required for each site; no unified log on.
Bottom Line: Sexy Babes TV is the "parent" site with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Eurobabez, also with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Dreambabes with 5 photosets per week and no video, and BabesUK with 1 photo set per week.

Then there is Babelicious with 5 photosets and 2 videos per week, and a great design and a very active users forum. (See separate reviews.)

Bringing up the rear are Babes on Film that has 1 clip from a porn vid posted each week, Cummin' At Ya! with 1 BJ video per week, BikiniBabe.TV with 1 photoset of babes in bikinis that never come off, and finally RoyalBoobs.com, an inactive site with about 10 big tit video clips.

Last note - Babelicious is the newest site of the bunch and has several characteristics that are similar to Twistys, but with Hi Def video clips now available on Babelicious, they win. (See the separate reviews for Babelicious for more details.)

While the main sites are very similar, the hottest babes (IMO) show up on SexyBabes.tv, Eurobabez.com and Babelicious.com that really make the membership price for sexybabes.com worth the money.

The site(s) are LOADED with a ton of content

09-18-07  06:35pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: OLD Review (1/17/07)Pros:

- 5 FULL videos per day
- Good search engine
- Price is best of any video site
- Offers DVD quality at a $5 per mo. premium
- Permits selective downloads via 30 second segments that can be automatically connected.
- Has a member review section for each video and for each scene
- The vast majority of the scenes have a cast list that is interactive so a member can generate a list of all offerings with a particular porn star.

UPDATE (4/2/09) Pros:

All "pro" comments still apply.
-Excellent blog was added with substantial involvement of the site's management that really adds a lot to the members' enjoyment of the site.
-Anime has been added.
Cons: OLD Review (1/17/07) Cons:

- No pics at all
- With over 800 vids per year and the limitations on acquiring licenses, a few of the vids are rather poor.
- Occasional mis-identification of the talent

UPDATE (4/2/09) Cons:

- No "real" HD (but some high bit-rate stuff obviates the absence of HD)
- Added two major sources (Evil Angel and Vivid) accessible only at substantial additional cost.
- Comments have deteriorated into wise guy comments about the screencaps so they are of little real value.
- Significant deterioration in the accuracy of the model identification which creates a serious problem using the search engine.
- More "Bargain Bin" compilation videos that contain scenes that have already been posted earlier on the site.
Bottom Line: OLD Review (1/17/07) Bottom Line:

This site exceeds all possible comparisons to other sites and is a bargain. The occasional obscure weird vids (midgets, hirsute Japanese, trannie) pop up once in a while but so what? The member review section is new and the members haven't figured out what a "review" is because most postings are more like a chat room than an evaluative discussion of the scene or the video.

Great site, great deal. Go for it!

UPDATE (4/2/09) Bottom Line:

The site continues to have the largest number of videos of any site (over 6,000 at this writing) and add 5 per day which is 1,865 new videos per year.

That may be a contributing factor to the deterioration in model identification. The sloppiness in model identification has really made the site a lot less desirable for me because I see the searchability of a site to be very important.

The introduction of Vivid and Evil Angel productions were added with a lot of fanfare but they hit a serious sour note with many when they belatedly added the rather high supplemental charge to access the videos from these studios.

As mentioned in the "Pro" section, the blog is an excellent interactive forum. Management of the site gets into a lot of substantial discussion with the members which is very good.

I reduced my original score from 97 to 90 for two major reasons.

- The significant increase in the sloppiness in model identification is a major annoyance that hurts the site's value.
- The lack of thought given to the roll-out of the two premium studios. (Had they announced the move along with the cost associated at the outset, the reception would have been a lot better.) In my opinion, the roll-out also took their attention away from their number one mission, and that is their primary offerings.

Once again, photo enthusiasts need not apply. There are none.

04-02-09  06:00pm

Replies (4)
Review
9
Visit Girls Love Toys

Girls Love Toys
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Superior video quality, very sharp
-Excellent, and large, inventory of models, genres
-Some anal and DP masturbation
-Sure to satisfy those who like solo masturbation by uniformly gorgeous ladies.
-Top notch production values - good lighting & editing
-TBP has a special deal $9.95 per month. Major discount
-No DRM!
Cons: -Site has zip down loads for photos (excellent quality) but you must be a subscriber for at least 30 days to have access to the Zip feature. My scure dropped from 93 to 89 because of that.
-Single focus is as advertised, so there is not much variety in the situations and themes.
-Navigation is a bit clumsy but not awful.
-Some content is not exclusive.
-Small but permanent watermark appears in lower right of all videos.
Bottom Line: If your preferences include masturbation in its various forms, from finger play to dildo and veggie insertions, this site is definitely for you. If you are into solo strip tease, this site is also recommended. Crisp, clear camerawork and great camera angles throughout. The Best Porn has an incredible special price right now ($9.95 vs. reg price of $24.95) and the TBP team posted positive reviews. The price and the reviews caused me to sign up just to check it out. I'm happy I did, and I may stick around for another month or two if only to be able to use the deferred zip feature.

07-13-07  01:25pm

Replies (3)
Rating
10
Visit Nude Fight Club

Nude Fight Club
(1)

88.0
No Review.
03-18-11  09:57pm

Review
11
Visit X Movies

X Movies
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent video quality with options
- Easy and well thought out navigation
- TBP discounted price makes this a good value
- Assortment is fresh and varied
- Avoids extreme genres such as dark bondage, "classics" (i.e., very old material)
Cons: - Only full scenes can be downloaded
- Must use iafd.com to determine who appears in a scene. Cast list is provided only for the entire video, not for each scene.
- Rating system is non-functioning
- Advertises that all videos can be downloaded and retained but several videos are streaming only.
Bottom Line: A very good site for the video fan because of the consistent high quality of the material, the very large volume of videos and the wide variety of talent. However, compared to VideoBox with 5 updates per day at a lower price, I found this site a tad bit wanting with just one new (high quality) addition per day. VB, on the other hand, will throw in crappy and/or poorly ripped videos once or twice a day. Thus I maintain a membership on both sites but give the rating nod to VB because of its sheer daily volume.

Follow-Up:
I've found that VideoBox has many (most?) of the content offered by X Movies, sometimes much earlier than it's available on X Movies. So membership in both sites is redundant and can be a waste of money. Also, unlike VideoBox where all of their videos can be downloaded, some of X Movies' content is streaming only.

02-22-07  05:58pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Ox Pass

Ox Pass
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 15 sites as of this writing; 10 active and 5 "archival".
- 2 sites updated each weekday, no Sat or Sun updates
- Very easy going, frat party style to most of the videos
- While POV is excessive, a lot of the angles and details are outstanding
- Enjoyable concepts and fantasy stuff
- Lots and lots of gorgeous babes plus 3 ugly ones
- Models usually are into the fun which adds to their sex appeal
Cons: - Videos are far too long. Way too much garbage is left in for reasons known only to the producers.
- The later updates are very high quality but some of the older stuff is hard to watch. It's a shame because the babes are gorgeous in many of the old ones.
- Ancillary features not well maintained. One example is that a Jane Darling video is listed on one site as #6 in the top rated list, but the link has been broken since I signed up
Bottom Line: The site accesses for $23.95 per month which, considering the volume of material, isn't too bad a price.

The navigation is OK once you get used to it but at first it's difficult to figure out how to access all scenes involving a specific girl.

The BangBus series has some stuff that I don't find enjoyable. I'm sure degradation schtick appeals to some, like waving $100 for a bus side blow job or kicking a chick out with her face covered with goo in a homeless area as the Bus takes off and the guys giggling about that "stupid broad." (Given hat the girls all must sign a legal release this nonsense is all part of the act/fantasy, but it's still unnecessary.

After 1-1/2 months of membership, I'm still discovering new stuff and features, so I suggest you ration your time when surfing Oc Pass (also known as Bang Bros Network). There's an incredibly large quantity of stuff to check out.

08-24-07  07:42pm

Replies (2)
Review
13
Visit Whale Tail 'N

Whale Tail 'N
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: A huge amount of content - old and new - video and photo. (They claim to have over 1 million photos)

20+ daily updates, mostly video but several photo

Good video D/L options (iPod, wmv and Xvid (AVI) with some MOV and MPEG's). Vids are all full length scenes.

A huge model listing that is accurate and linked accurately (that's becoming rare).

It's genre is Whale Tail (the rear view of a babe wearing thong panties under low rise jeans or slacks) and there is a good selection of whale tail scenes in that specialty area.

No DRM or D/L limits

Huge Bonus Site options; some excellent and some lousy, but there are enough opportunities to keep you busy looking 24/7.
Cons: Biggest fault, IMO, is no zip for the photos. 1 million photos and no zip, you do the math. Worse, each photo needs the user to label. There's no unique numbering or lettering. (Remember the good old days back in 2000 and 2001?)

Photos are smallish.

Navigation is rather clumsy and not intuitive, but after a while it becomes much easier to use.

Mostly non-exclusive video, but some of the photos look like they are exclusive.

The mechanics of name searching is rather clumsy but once you figure out the shortcuts (use the "favorites" feature when you find a model you want to track) it's a bit easier.
Bottom Line: This site is a real sleeper but I recommend it to everyone. At $9.99 it's a Helluva great deal.

The TBP review claims they are not updating, but the site is slamming a lot of new content (20+ additions - video mostly) every day.

My score of 86 would improve to 90+ if a zip download feature was added to the photo sets. (Incidentally, my score is based on content and ease of use, not on the fantastic price.) The score would also improve with a search feature that made it easy to locate a specific model by name.

If you are into "whale tail," there's enough content to make you happy. But the site name is somewhat misleading because it's far, far more than just the whale tail genre.

Do not be turned off by the less than exciting appearance of its home page and its annoying characteristic of dimming down as it's loading a page. (I was and almost canceled without giving the site any chance to show me its stuff.) Give it time and once you get used to it, you'll find it acceptable. Not great, but not terrible either.

BOTTOM LINE - Go for it and drop $10 and check this site out. It's worth the effort to understand the design and, once you do, you'll be happy when you discover the treasure at the end of your quest.

07-03-08  11:47am

Replies (5)
Review
14
Visit Danni.com

Danni.com
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge inventory of exclusive content.
Emphasis on big breasts
Recent videos are usually well designed and good resolution
Cons: Photo quality and quantity could be better
Uses error filled DRM. DRM permits no access after cancelling membership.
Customer Service is virtually non-existent.
Frequent broken links and discontinued content remains in indexes
Bottom Line: Has its moments, but has deteriorated severely over the last 12 - 18 months. Unless the new owners (Danni Ashe is no longer in the game) step up to the plate and make some big changes, the site is no longer ready for prime-time.

Follow-Up:
Since I wrote the review, Danni.com removed the DRM (finally!) but all previously downloaded material can no longer be viewed. Connection problens are the worst in the biz, but the more recent material is excellent. I came back to give them another chance and increased my rating from 75 to 85. I get the sense that they are trying hard to recover the ground they lost over the years with DRM. The score will go up more when they let members log on more than 50% of the time...and access all content.

01-17-07  06:09pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Shay Laren

Shay Laren
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Superb quality photos and videos
Some videos at 1720
All relatively fresh content
Photos are all zipped
Photos appear to be actively updated (last update was today, 3/30/08)
Normal speed download of both photo sets and videos (broadband)
All content is Shay Laren, most solo with a few lesbo shoots/vids
Subscription includes 6 other sites (see "bottom line" for details)
90 photo sets in three categories: Candid (8 sets), Girl/Girl(11 sets) and Solo (71 sets).
Easy navigation (site is too small to be complex)
Cons: Light on content
No video updates since November, 2007 but new photos were added today (3/30/08)
UPDATE - 2 new videos added in early April, each about 11 minutes and each almost identical in content. Photos added on 4/5/08, none since.

Way overpriced as a standalone site, but partner sites make its price less terrible.
Personal blog has not been updated since last October.
The advertised Live Cam is non-existent.
Bottom Line: $29.95 subscription gives access to:
Glamour Models Gone Bad (huge content maintained daily)
Amateurs Gone Bad (huge content maintained daily)
Crissy Moran (static) (47 vids, lots of pix last u/d 2/08)
Natalia Cruze (static) (2 vids, lots of pix last u/d 4/07)
Lonnie Waters (static) (10 vids, lots of pix last u/d 1/08)
Jesse Capelli (static) (25 vids, lots of pix last u/d 11/07)

Each of the sites in this list offer the other four for 24.95. The Shay Laren site is not available on any of them. That means if you like Glamour Models Gone Bad but want access to the Shay Laren site, you should sign up on the Shay Laren site first. It's $5.00 more but the content offering is worth the $5.00 if you are a shay Laren fan.

I have a normal speed cable modem and was able to "drain" all of the site's videos in about 5 hours. There are a total of 90 photo sets as of 3/30/08, and it looks like they are adding new sets quite frequently. There are a few more Shay Laren downloads available on Glamour Models Gone Bad.

BOTTOM LINE: If you like Shay but are not interested in any of the partners, $29.95 is way, way too much to pay for the currently paltry Shay Laren offerings. However, if the other sites are good for you long term, sign up for Shay's site for a month, drain it, then cancel and sign up next month for one of the partners.

The score of 84 is based on the small quantity of Shay Laren only. Considering the entire package, including the partner sites, it's a 90

03-30-08  09:23am

Replies (3)
Review
16
Visit Sex Video Casting

Sex Video Casting
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Gets them young and fresh. This site is really an adjunct to the DDF Prod network and, IMO, is a place for them to share their "audition" shoots with their members. You can see some of their very popular babes looking quite young and, usually, without any "stage presence." As you might guess there normally is only one relatively brief shoot. Downloads are fast and reliable. The separate site has over 200 models, some with just photos, some with just videos and some with both.

Very easy navigation and a rudimentary search function where you can find babes by category: Solo, Hardcore, Blowjob, Big Tits and Legs.

In some cases there are some great shots and/or activity that one doesn't encounter in the professional DDF productions. Brief, but still quite good.

Updates posted 3 times a week.
Cons: Many (most?) of their stuff is in low definition (which, I suppose, is consistent with these being audition shoots.

Lots of interviews, which is also expected, with inane questions and monosyllabic answers. Many of the interviews are hard to understand because of very heavy accents of both the interviewer and the model. In some cases the interviews are in their native Eastern European language.

There are no direct links to the DDF Prod site's inventory and in a few cases the names on the SVC model list differ from the names in DDF Prod (and in a few rare cases, to the name mentioned by the model herself during the interview.

Not all the models on the DDF Prod sites are included in the Sex Video Casting site.

The SVC shoots are not included in the model directory on the main DDF Prod site. (Not a real problem. Just reporting the facts.) However the updates page on DDF Prod do include the Sex Video updates.
Bottom Line: I may be strange but I really like the audition videos. Yes they are plotless and all have essentially the same, "what is your name" start, with a model showing a variety of apprehensive attitudes. In a few cases (very few) the model has a persona of self confidence but most times they give the impression that they aren't sure they really want to be doing this.

The shoots range from short clips of the newbie just stripping down to nude to full, hot and heavy hardcore. That's one of the positives because one never knows what may be coming up. And being part of the "discovery phase" of a truly gorgeous babe's career is always fun.

Responses to direction (such as "take off your sweater," or "show me your pussy") are almost comically rapid; sort of like when a cop pulls you over and asks for your license.

Bottom line. I don't recommend joining this site individually because it will be disappointingly repetitive and the babes are not up to their full blown quality, both in appearance and in "stage presence." Also the quality in production values and in the actual video quality is not up to DDF standards. But I strongly recommend joining DDF Prod and later finding this site to enjoy the first shoots of your favorite babes.

I wish more network sites would do this.

My score of 83 is an amalgamation of subjective opinion (I really enjoy the raw footage aspects for some perverse reason) and objective evaluation (the content is not of the same caliber as the material on the rest of the DDF Prod sites by any means) with a 6 point enhancement solely because it is an integral part of the network and not trying to be a self sufficient site.

01-30-11  09:58am

Replies (3)
Review
17
Visit The Real Me

The Real Me
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great talent.

Great concept, dealing with the babes as REAL PEOPLE and not porn whores.

Attractive site and interfaces.

Interesting thematics.

$2.95 [b]trial[/b] price is a good deal
Cons: Very thin content.
Way overpriced for monthly membership (but great price for trial)
Slow, but not terribly so.
The interviews are fun, but most are done fully clothed from beginning to end. (Out of 43 total videos, 13 are interviews and 13 more are sloppily edited "behind the scenes," leaving a total of 17 videos that are full productions (but those 17 are very well done.)

One very cute babe, Franchezca Valentina, has no videos, just 118 photos. The other 13 have photo sets and at least 3 videos each.

Navigation is easy and well structured for a future fully populated site.
Bottom Line: I signed up after reading Drooler's Comment. There are now 14 babes in the stable - SHAY LAREN was added on July 1 with 117 photos and 3 videos, the first update since mid-March.

I signed up today at 1:00pm. I completed a 100% drain of all content by 7:15pm, even with a lot of interruptions. I'm guessing that, with a normal broadbnand connection and no distractions, one could drain all of the content in two to three hour's time, tops.

The site has a lot of potential and really should have been loaded with a lot more content before going live, but for us Porn Users, it's a great deal at $2.95.

I'm hoping the webmaster works on building the site with much more content because I'll be back when it's ready for prime time.

(The 80 score is a direct result of the paucity of content. With 140 babes instead of 14, and if they are all of the same top drawer caliber, this site would warrant a mid 90's score.)

07-02-08  07:37pm

Replies (2)
Review
18
Visit Young Busty

Young Busty
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-07-10  03:25pm  (Update History)
Reason: I updated the score from 78 to 79 to reflect a score more consistent with my standard. I also cleaned up some typos and grammatical issues.
Pros: Absolutely all natural babes with great natural titties with most in excellent resolution.

The videography is excellent for mammary lovers like me. Concentration is on boobs in virtually all aspects whether soft core, midcore or hardcore

Appears to be all exclusive content with several top models inn the mix

Simple navigation

Frequent updates, no DRM.

A wide variety of situations and a very large number of models. I saw no evidence of any aftermarket enhancements.

Best part is that I saw no "BBW's" (they are all in great physical shape) or MILF's (they are, indeed, Young Busty models).

A TIT LOVER'S DREAM
Cons: Lousy naming for models. Several well known ladies are in their portfolio but with totally different names. I never understand why they do that.

Very (extremely) slow downloading. Considering that many of the videos exceed 500Mb in size, the d/l speed of a max of 90Kbs is totally unsatisfactory and cost the site 7 points in my rating.

The site logs the user off automatically if there is no activity in 15 to 20 minutes. That mean that, unless you are browsing other content whilst downloading, you can expect to being required to log on after each download. Worse, if you start the download and leave your computer inactive the logoff cancels the download.This cost the site another 6 points.

Unlike other sites this site prevents you from downloading more than two videos at a time.

No zip files for photos. Excellent quality but very slow process to download.
Bottom Line: I've remained a member for 6 months because I wanted to download the good stuff but could not invest the time to do more than 2 d/l's per session.

The frustration is that this could be a terrific site with a high score by making the downloading process more user friendly and extending the logon time. I wrote tech support about this problem and got a brief response that the server they use here in the US is slow (no kidding!) but no promise of any correction at all.

The site is among the best big tit sites for content, quality, variety and quantity. Worth a score of 92 before the deducts mentioned above.

If you are interested in the site, you should sign up for the 3 day trial and see if you are good with the download process. If you can deal with the slow speed and logoff issues, you should be a very happy member.

11-07-10  02:07pm

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit Christy Marks

Christy Marks
(1)

76.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons: No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads

* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line: The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.

The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.

Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.

I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.

Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.

Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.

I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.

I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.

07-03-14  07:55pm

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit Nicole Peters

Nicole Peters
(1)

69.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.

Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.

The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.

That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons: Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.

No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.

Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.

It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line: This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.

If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.

The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.

The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.

The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.

05-05-13  10:17am

Replies (4)
Review
21
Visit Busty College Coeds

Busty College Coeds
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month.
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.
Galleries are Zip downloadable
No DRM
Several "Non-Exclusive" sites, whatever that means, with just streaming vids only - no downloads from the non-exclusive sites, no pix.
Cons: Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined.
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months.
Videos not top quality, slow loading
Photos are quite small
Content not dated.
Bottom Line: The site is probably wrapping up its existence. Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download manager, you could drain all the content on the three sites in a month. But there are enough much better sites that skipping this one is no big lost opportunity.

03-26-08  07:14pm

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Victoria Pink

Victoria Pink
(0)

64.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM
Cons: - Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes.
Bottom Line: Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content.

05-08-07  11:13pm

Replies (0)
Review
23
Visit Busty College Coeds

Busty College Coeds
(0)

56.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: From my previous review [current review is in brackets]:

Pros: Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models. [Nothing at all added since the first review.]

Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
[Now part of the New Sensations network, so the entire NS network is now available for $15, a great price.]

Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month. [See above.]

Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.[Ditto.]

Galleries are Zip downloadable [Ditto]
No DRM [Ditto]
Cons: Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined. [Now part of New Sensations. No longer a "con" because of that.]

They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months. [No updates since 7/26/2007]

Videos not top quality, slow loading [Ditto]

Photos are quite small [Ditto]

Content not dated. [Ditto]
Bottom Line: The site is probably wrapping up its existence. [Not true. It's dormant and hasn't changed, but it still tries to recruit new business.]

Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download mgr, it won't take more than a few hours to drain it dry. [Ditto.]

NEW: I'm back on the site because I signed up for New Sensations this morning and this site was a part of the network.

I reduced my score because the site is dormant and based on what is now available on other sites, this site is now a total pass.

It gets 6 points over minimum only because it has single scenes of Natasha Nice and Sara Stone, two of my favorite big titted babes and 3 or 4 other scenes that are worthy of download.

05-13-09  06:27pm

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Victoria Pink

Victoria Pink
(0)

51.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: My original review:

Pros: - Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM

Update: Some added "bonus content" since my last review.
Cons: My original review:

Cons: - Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content. Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes.
-No zip for photos

Update:

No new vids since last review, no changes in review.
Bottom Line: My original review:

Bottom Line: Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content.

Update:

Same except the current trial (go outside the TBP/PU link to VictoriaPink.com) is $1.00 for 7 days so if you have any interest in a nice looking babe with great natural tits and a nice meaty labia, skip the $1.00 burger tomorrow and spend it instead on this site...but be sure to cancel after signup so you can avoid a ridiculous $40.00 one month renewal.

51 score this time just because I love her tits and pussy.

09-30-09  11:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Jana Rocks

Jana Rocks
(0)

51.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Jana Jordan is the featured model, needless to say, and even when fully clothed she's still a "dy-no-mite" babe.

She is listed on the iadf.com data base as being 5'2" and 96 pounds, but she has the prettiest eyes and puffy nipples on top, a perfect pussy and an elegant pair of legs. And she loves to show off.

Jana, as far as I know, just does solo and lez stuff, but some of the lesbian material I've seen has been pretty nasty and never fails to transition Little Richard into Big Dick.

That's about it for the "pro's" ladies and gentlemen. The babe is the only thing going for this site. It sure ain't the content!

Worse, if you join this site to check out Jana's fine body parts, you'll be sorely disappointed. Go to one of the many "preview material" sites like freeones.com and you'll see a whole lot more of Jana than on this site.
Cons: The site has a total of 9 short videos (the same number as stated in the TBP "site facts" page for this site). There are 4 wmv's, 3 mov's 2 mpg's totaling about 25 minutes of Jana showing her car, magic tricks, bunnies and silly crap but no pussy, no boob.

There are 61 photo sets (nothing zipped, but in this case who cares) where TBP's "site facts says there were 55+).

All 9 movies and 61 photo sets showed Jana fully clothed, a few in semi sexy poses in bikini underwear. There are about 5 photos where she has wet toilet paper squares covering her nipples in a manner that suggests that hers are a bit on the puffy side (one of her main assets).

The TBP "site facts" was last updated on 12-24-05, which means the site has been dormant for three years.

There are 5 G-rated photo sets of her "friends" as well, that left limp Little Richard asking me why I bothered. I had no answer so I went back to my FTV Girls download to make the poor little guy turn back into Big Dick.
Bottom Line: This site is suitable for kids because there is no, I repeat, no material that isn't available on basic over the air broadcast TV. I wondered as I went through the material if it wasn't, in fact, created before Jana Jordan turned 18 because it wouldn't bother a censor or a lawyer in the strictest of situations.

This site got my cancellation about 1 hour and 45 minutes after enrolling because I had completed a review of all of its content in about an hour. That was, for me, the fastest time from sign up to cancellation ever. (My last record was with the Shay Laren site that has a whole Helluva lot better content. That one took me about two days to drain everything and be done with the site.)

The only reason I scored it a 51 is because, although they had the usual check box option to sign up for another of their sites, Lili Jensen.com, they had the decency to have left the box unchecked rather than the usual trick of pre-checking the box.

That should earn them 1 point over the minimum.

FINAL COMMENT: If you had any thoughts about signing up for JanaRocks.com, you should reconsider. Give your $15 to that guy standing at the bottom of the freeway off ramp with the cardboard sign. You'll at least feel like you accomplished something with your money.

(Boy, I need an attaboy for wasting my time and money. But it shows what torture I'll put myself through in my quest for the PU team! ;o))

11-18-08  06:02pm

Replies (14)

Shown : 1-25 of 1361 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.31 seconds.