Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (42)  

Feedback:   All (1465)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (95)  |   Replies (1346)

Other:   Replies Received (662)  |   Trust Ratings (55)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 1468 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Copy that.

01-04-15  10:27pm

Reply
27
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of benmar51's Reply

Unlike others, Brazzers seems to be straight shooters. Another site I joined offered a good price that was "lifetime" and required that I pay a monthly (low) rate to stay with the site.

Then, a year or two later they decided to split the site into two sites and "allowed" me to stay with just one of the two sites under the deal. Then, later, they split again and again offered the deal only with one of the three sites.

My experience with Brazzers (and with MetArt) are the exact opposite. Both are open and honest with their customers which, as demonstrated by the continued success of both sites, is sincerely appreciated.


01-04-15  11:00am

Reply
28
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(4)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I'm a 10 year continuous member from way back with the one update per day, through an update every 4+ hours to the 5 at a time daily updates.

I'm OK with the ratio of crapola to good stuff because there have been a few crappy updates with some really good stuff hidden away in them. For example a few weeks ago there was a really crummy video that had a pre-enhancement Venus Knight video where she "outnastied" her nastiest later stuff.

I just wish they would improve their accuracy in model identification, but that's a subject for another comment.


12-30-14  11:53am

Reply
29
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of EverNight's Review

Good review because it says what I also think. I dropped Brazzers after a long spell and joined Bang Bros, primarily because BZ has far too many babes with breasts distorted by lousy silicone "enhancements."

12-30-14  11:41am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Totally agree with Jay. Artsy fartsy camerawork and unnecessarily dark venues really piss me off when I want to check out the babe's basic assets.

Of the choices listed, I picked shower scenes just because they are seldom very erotic but it was a close call. Just show me PTA* in quality lighting and I'm a happy camper.

*PTA=pussy, tits & ass.


12-26-14  04:49pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I usually regret having too many subscribed sites because there's so many babes, so little time. Sure wish I had this problem with real life babes! ;->

12-24-14  10:57pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

And what about Saturnalia? Seems like a gang bang under the mistletoe would be a very appropriate way for pagans to celebrate the Winter Solstice.

12-21-14  05:12pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I'm OK with it but I don't understand why Hannukah isn't represented.

What I find really offensive are scenes when nuns are doing it with priests.


12-21-14  09:41am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm

Comment
35
Visit Club Sweethearts

Club Sweethearts
(0)

It's About Time

I'm happy to see that reason prevailed with the management of this website by creating a much better site name that won't attract the authorities.

As I said in another post, I was unwilling to have a porn site that calls itself Club Seventeen on my computer in any form. While it's very unlikely that my computer would ever be taken from me and searched by the authorities, can you imagine how hard it would be to convince them that Club seventeen does not contain child pornography. Child porn includes any person younger than 18 years who appears nude and/or in sexual situations.

Cloning the Club Seventeen site into a more generic name like Club Sweetheart was the right thing to do.

12-15-14  05:37pm

Replies (2)
Reply
36
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(1)
Reply of clubseventeen's Reply

Will clubsweethearts.com be listed on the PU/TBP site?

12-13-14  01:05pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

"Other"

My word would be FRAUDULENT


12-12-14  10:42am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

if a site looks good on the PU page and if the price is right, I always go to the TBP page to see details such as company sites, networked sites, update rate, DRM, negative comments, etc. It's just one click and TBP has a lot of good addl information.

12-06-14  12:11pm

Comment
39
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(4)

Video Box Will Drop WMV Format In 2015

This notice is appearing on the VideoBox site:

"A message from VideoBox: As part of an overall systems and server improvement, we will be retiring our old web site (known as "VB2") in early 2015. At that time we will also stop offering the WMV file format for downloads. The exact cutoff date is not yet known, but we expect it will be on or before February 1, 2015. For more information, please click here." http://www.videobox.com/wmv-removal

12-05-14  03:40pm

Replies (2)
Reply
40
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(3)
Reply of ievi's Review

I agree that the site has some great, probably exclusive, content. The one beef I have is with the less than easy to use navigation system which really makes finding what I want unnecessarily complicated.

12-02-14  11:28pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

I check PU first just because it's quick and I like seeing what's new. Next is one of my favourite porn sites.

I wait on checking my email because once I start, I'm usually tied up for the rest of the day.


12-02-14  12:15pm

Reply
42
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(4)
Reply of Kavalier2's Review

While I agree with the comment about older content, I'm quite happy that content continues to be available. The alternative is to take those scenes down making them unavailable.

11-28-14  10:20pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Firefox & IE

11-28-14  10:07pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm OK with them if not overdone.

If the site is clear, honest and uses no tricks about upsells, I actually like them. What I really don't like is what Naughty America is (was?) doing where they hid the fact that you were buying an upsell rather than just clicking on a content offering. You discover you bought an upgrade only after you see an unexpected charge on your credit card. I canceled immediately and refuse to sign up again.

Scoreland, on the other hand, has a lot of upsell opportunities but they make it very clear you are buying an upsell before you commit. That's fine.


11-27-14  01:07pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of LPee23's Reply

Ditto what LPee23 said.

11-24-14  02:26pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

The problem with a poll like this is that many sites are currently being gobbled up by large companies and will continue to operate as if they are separate companies.

I expect 66% will still be there, but probably only 25% of the current companies will still be inbusiness with the rest being bought out or closing up operations.


11-21-14  07:33pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not a chance. For the same reason I won't carry any porn on a thumb drive.

11-11-14  11:14pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.

Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.

I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).


10-31-14  05:22pm

Reply
49
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
(7)
Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

OK. So I thought I'd check out Babes.com and I read both the TBP review and Toad's review. That's when I discovered that the company owned Brazzers, Reality Kings and Twistys.

I dropped Twistys after 5 continuous years when their site turned south earlier this year. I also have been a Brazzers member off and on, and in one memorable lapse in judgment, I joined the Reality Kings site.

Brazzers could easily promote itself as the king of lousy silicone jobs and RK as the roach motel of porn (remember the old roach motel ad..."You can check in but you cannot check out.")

Toad's observations about their billing and business practices tell me that this company is one I can definitely live without, especially with all the other sites with outstanding customer service and with terrific content. (DDF, VideoBox, Perfect Gonzo and ALS Scans come immediately to mind as superior in both service and content.)


10-30-14  10:39am

Reply
50
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

When I upgraded from monthly to annual a few years ago, the monthly still had 2 weeks or so to go. They immediately changed me to annual and prorated my partial month to the annual rate.

I was pleasantly surprised.


10-28-14  07:52pm


Shown : 26-50 of 1468 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.1 seconds.