| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Once again as a fan of fetish (latex) I must say that larger cup sizes are better. There is nothing worse than a model with very small breasts wearing latex as it just doesn't look tight like a second skin. Ideally a model should be at least a C cup (B verging on C would also be acceptable). If there is one thing that I don't like it's small breasts, as it can make a model look very young and in some circumstance almost like a boy.
|
06-05-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Most certainly a case of fantasy fulfilment.
I think that for the most part people subscribe to sites because of the fantasy element.
I could also have gone with other - given the fact that at least for younger guys watching porn has become a rite of passage into adulthood and for me at first it probably was too. Of course now it's all about the fantasy element, and maybe because I'm a perv anyway.
|
05-30-12 12:22pm
|
Reply
3
|
Young Legal Porn
(7)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Very good review.
The layout and format results in a review that gives great amounts of detail with regards to things such as download speeds, something which some people (including myself) often don't include (and probably should).
You point out bugs and give detail as to each one and what it means in terms of the overall effect on the site experience.
Plenty of solid evidence to back up the score you've given. We need more users like you on this site providing quality reviews.
Bravo, good sir!
|
05-30-12 12:17pm
|
Comment
4
|
Little Niki
(0)
|
|
05-30-12 09:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Although I voted over-eating, I don't have any real experience of this, but it relates to me in that I used to be incredibly lazy, rarely taking exercise - that is a hard thing to break as my mind still wants to just sit around and do nothing.
Of course I'm still pretty lazy but in a different way, I take a lot more exercise now, and feel far better for it, but given the chance I'd gladly stay in bed most of the day.
|
05-20-12 05:11pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Voted depends, but by that it means what type of work I'd be doing. In an ideal world, one that means lots of latex, but that ain't ever gonna happen.
|
05-20-12 05:06pm
|
Reply
7
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(1)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
I've actually found that most Latex/Fetish sites are actually quite competitively priced and often you don't pay much more than you would for a standard porn site.
I think that part of the reason for the high prices at Latex Lair are due in part to the fact that Bianca is one of the most well known fetish models. Whilst it's a very good site and the production values are fantastic, I think that paying nearly $40 as an initial price is a bit steep, but I can understand as to why they would put it so high.
As I've said in the review, there are often periods where membership prices are reduced and that it's far better value for money when you join during these periods.
I will admit that it can be rather hard to be subjective when you really enjoy a site or really like a model but of course sometimes it's by not being subjective that we learn the most about a site.
|
05-20-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've got 4 installed;
Chrome (which is the one I use the most)
Firefox (handy for things that Chrome can't handle - which is very rare)
Internet Explorer (back-up for both Chrome and Firefox)
Opera (back-up for the back-up)
|
05-20-12 08:54am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have done a couple of times, I've even emailed the model of a certain site to let her know my views of her recent sets after I was ignored by the webmaster. Said model got a bit upset at me saying that as a member I didn't appreciate a couple of her recent sets and thought that they were somewhat poor. That leaves me wondering if there is any point in sending it to either the models or the webmasters as more often than not they ignore what I have to say.
|
05-20-12 08:41am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My enjoyment of pissing depends upon the circumstances. My exposure to pissing in porn has mostly come from The Rubber Clinic & Video Eva - both sites courtesy of RE Productions.
I only find that pissing appeals to me when it is combined with latex/rubber with normal pissing leaving me feel indifferent.
|
05-20-12 08:37am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Strong maybe from me, of course it depends on the girl. If she did H/C at the time, I'd request that she move to only softcore or get me in the adult entertainment industry with her so that I'm the only one doing the dirty deed with her.
|
05-20-12 08:18am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
As a man who likes latex, I enjoy it most when they start fully dressed and removed as little of the latex as possible,
|
05-20-12 08:16am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What captures my attention most of the time is what the model is wearing, as I'm always looking for more good quality Latex content
|
05-20-12 07:31am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Media Player Classic Home Cinema with the combined community codec pack. I originally used VLC but after having trouble watch some non-porn content I switched to MPC-HC never looked back since.
|
05-20-12 07:30am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Got my trusty laptop, couple years old now but still going strong.
|
05-20-12 07:08am
|
Reply
16
|
Latex Heaven
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I think that the owners understand the latex fetish to an extent, but not to the extent that someone who was serious about latex and latex fetishism. However they haven't really thought some of the decisions through carefully enough and that has resulted in a lack of creativity which is killing the site.
They've chosen to rely on pretty much a single designer and one with a rather limited selection of products, rather than looking around to find a variety of different outfits from a variety of different suppliers/designers.
When it comes to latex fetishism one of the first things people think of is of a catsuit. Whilst I appreciate that people want to showcase that there is a fashion side to latex, to focus completely on that to the detriment of more traditional fetish style outfits.
I have yet to see any negative or constructive feedback on any of the site's social networking pages, I don't know whether this is as a result of admins removing negative comments from the page or simply because no one has spoken up yet.
|
05-19-12 05:13pm
|
Reply
17
|
Latex Heaven
(1)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
This site has no affiliation with either the old Latexotica or the new Latexotica. I don't know what the plan was, but I feel that this was an attempt to produce a spiritual successor to Latexotica (of course we now have a true successor with the re-opening later this year).
I personally never got the feeling that it was mass produced nor that it was generic. In fact I feel that it was as far flung from being mass-produced and generic as you can possibly get.
Latexotica was probably the first genuine multi-model latex site and after it's second revamp (the first being the change of name from Amateurlatex to Latexotica) it carved out a very specific niche, non-nude latex photography with a more adult edge, something which Latex Heaven has tried and - in my opinion - failed to do.
Latex Heaven feels far more mass produced than Latexotica ever was.
|
05-19-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm quite open when it comes to this sort of thing and although I identify as straight, I have been curious as to what it would be like to be with another guy and as for what makes a guy sexy, I couldn't honestly say as I haven't ever actively sought a relationship of that kind with another man, yet.
|
05-18-12 08:00pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I would say it's getting better. Decent camera equipment is becoming cheaper and cheaper and video editing software can come cheap and some are fairly easy to use too, as a result standards of production increase.
|
05-18-12 07:56pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I have found that it varies, you get some who chose an alternate name, some who use a variation on their name, some who use their name as is and then there are those who have names asigned to them.
A good example that I can think of was Latexotica, as it had a mixture of all 4. There were girls who had names chosen for them but the majority either used their real first name or a variation of it.
|
05-18-12 07:53pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Porn will always be stigmatised, I'm 20 and within my generation, porn is seen by most guys as a rite of passage, and that viewing it is perfectly healthy and normal.
With my Parent's generation it's a pretty different story. Both my parents know I look at porn, they accept that and don't really bother me over it, sadly my mother (as much as I love her) has a pre-conceived notion that any woman doing porn must be on drugs or at least attempting to fund a drug habit and that 'normal' people don't do things like oral/anal etc.
So in short, yes whilst there are right wing conservatives and people who have pre-conceived notions, porn will be stigmatised. 10 or 15 years from now, people will be a lot more open when it comes to talking about sex and other important things like that.
|
05-18-12 07:47pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If the girl is in Latex then it's most certainly a start. I tend more to go for solo than lez, as for some bizarre reason some studios seem to think that if a girls tongue touches another then it must be lesbian kissing and therefore it is lesbian porn. If the girls are actually going at it then I'll consider watching it, but I mostly go for solo.
|
05-18-12 07:39pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ads should not be in a members area unless it's a small banner promoting another related site and it's out of the way.
|
05-18-12 07:31pm
|
Review
24
|
Latex Heaven
(1)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large selection of models
- Site is simple and easy to navigate
- Photos appear to be well shot
- Photos come in 3 different sizes - described as Small (800px), Medium (1024px) and Large (2000px)
- One update every 3 days (2 updates per week)
- Members get half price on joining the sister site which deals with videos (Latex Heaven Video) |
| Cons: |
- Some models look like they aren't all that into latex.
- No download options for sets
- No videos available, available on a separate sister site (Latex Heaven Video)
- Lack of variety in outfits shown.
- No model biographies |
| Bottom Line: |
OK, So I've been a member of this site several times for a total of about 8 months now and when I first joined it (after closure of old Latexotica) I was excited at the opening of a site with apparently similar ethos.
The site continues to stick to those ethos however the site is starting to become a bit tired for a couple of reasons.
Over the last few months a sizeable percentage of sets made available were of one particular model who goes by the name Natalia K.
Whilst Natalia is decent enough model, at times it felt like she was the only model working for the site.
Second is the outfits, whilst all the outfits are very nice, for the most part they all come from the same designer and a lot of the outfits they have are identical in design but differently coloured.
It would appear that there is little originality left when it comes to investment in new outfits, choosing not to take a risk on new kinds of outfits.
With regards to outfits, for the most part it's a top, pair of hotpants and a pair of stockings, sometimes with a pair of capri pants and the odd dress making an appearance.
I am also sometimes a bit baffled by the choice of models, Latex looks best on a girl with curves. There are several models on the site who have virtually no curves, with parts of outfits hanging loose and most certainly not giving a second skin effect.
The site does a few good things though, it offers high resolution images, has 2 updates per week and isn't overly expensive
It's also pretty easy to navigate, featuring a model page (so that one may view all of a certain girls sets) as well as the normal update page. The standard update pages feature 6 updates per page and a bit at the bottom where you can go to the previous/next page.
I originally intended to give this site an 80, but after careful consideration I have instead awarded it a 70.
I am a fan of this site, but if I'm honest, I would only recommend this site to someone who liked latex along with a number of other things.
I would not recommend this site to someone who has a serious latex fetish, as this site does not cater to those who are serious about latex. |
|
05-18-12 06:16pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
25
|
Saffron Taylor
(1)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
HD Videos in a variety of settings.
Good resolution images, crisp with no blurring, good lighting, looks professionally shot
Variety of latex outfits worn, in different colours
Site is not too difficult to navigate, when you click on a set/vide part you are directed to a page dedicated to that set/video where it is possible to download each individual part and read a small description about each set/video |
| Cons: |
All updates are segmented and are often released over the course of several months.
Model is often static or moves very little for extended periods in the videos.
Videos feature no sound, just a music track over the top (so we don't hear the creaking of the latex)
Videos are downloaded in zip files, leading to slight compression within the video
Each video part is barely longer than 5 minutes
Not a very big site in terms of updates compared to some others that have been around similar lengths of time |
| Bottom Line: |
Ok then so here is the bottom line
All updates are segmented, both videos and sets, split into 3 parts. Completion of a set or video series can sometimes take a couple of months.
The videos promise a lot but I feel that they fail to deliver as the model does not move very much within the videos, with several minutes often being spent looking at the model from several different angles with nothing really happening.
The videos also do not feature sound from the shoot itself instead a music track is played on top.
People joining this site and hoping for nudity are going to be disappointed, as the model only exposes her breasts.
At some angles and in certain lighting conditions the models face can look angular and a bit plastic.
The pictures are decent sized and are well shot but show limited creativity, featuring standard modelling poses and a variety of simple (although sometimes colourful) latex outfits.
Saffron Taylor has a large collection of latex outfits, however she does not mix and match different items to create new outfits.
I've given this site a 78 as I feel that at first glance as a non-member the site looks as if it could be a very good site.
As a member though, it's a bit different, as mentioned earlier videos have only a music track, and sometimes feature little movement from the model. The videos are the main draw for the site with sets being a lesser draw.
Suggestions:
Avoid spreading updates over the course of a couple months.
No music in videos, use sound from shoot instead, also in videos get more movement from the model instead of having her stand still sometimes and move the camera around.
Start mixing and matching on outfits, be a bit more creative. |
|
05-18-12 06:45am
Replies (0)
|
