Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (373)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (331)

Other:   Replies Received (155)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 378 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Sexy Pattycake

Sexy Pattycake

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-10-12  04:12am  (Update History)
Reason: Comprehensive rewrite as am a current member
Pros: - Good balance of photos and videos, all of which is downloadable
- Patty is a very pretty, young-looking blonde non-nude tease
- Gets very close to nude while leaving something to the imagination
- Website takes full advantage of her eternal youthful looks
- Features forum and blog, both of which are active
Cons: - Website seems stuck in the 90s in many respects
- Most videos are short and poor quality
- Photo galleries are tiny, normally with only 30-40 pictures
- Slow update schedule compared even to other sole tease sites
- Some content is 'limited time' so won't appear in archive
- Best content is saved for overly expensive downloadable ZIPs
Bottom Line: I must admit I have a soft-spot for Patty, but this a hugely disappointing website offering content that might have been acceptable 10 years ago, but is definitely a long way behind what I'd expect in 2012, even bearing in mind this is a solo website.

Membership costs $29 via CCBill. Do not get fooled by the offer of discounts for long-term members - you save only $2 for every six months you remain a member (maximum two discounts).

Frankly, the content and number of updates don't warrant a six-month membership, and if you do want to remain a member for several months, then you can save $22 by buying their 90-day membership.

Their preview area is probably a fairly accurate representation of their member's site. Once inside, you have options at the top for a blog, bio, photos, videos, webcam and forum.

The bio has full stats for Patty (height, weight, vital stats), favourite films etc, plus a short introduction. The blog is a relatively new addition to the site and is updated occasionally with thoughts from Patty and a few candid pictures.

There are around 200 galleries, but not a single gallery I viewed had over 50 photos. The photos themselves are only 1024px on their longest side, which is pretty low-fi nowadays, even on my little monitor. I can't think of any other website that consistently offers such low-res photos in such small galleries. The photo content is good, but you feel like you're only getting half of the story as there are so few photos.

Navigation-wise, galleries are arranged onto 13 pages with a thumbnail gallery of photos. You can save all pictures, but there are no downloadable ZIPs.

Content-wise Patty is a great tease. She must be in her late 20s now, but hasn't aged at all. Most galleries have her removing her underwear, there are handbras, implied nudity and often slips here-and-there. Sometimes she'll have a dildo or something, but from what I've seen there's no insertion.

They definitely take advantage of her youthful looks. Lots of candy colours, Patty wearing bunny ears, posing in front of cuddly toys, lots of Hello Kitty backgrounds etc.

Video-wise, there are around 250 videos, which - at best - are only OK quality-wise. The very best quality is 768px wide which, again, is very low quality for 2012. Most videos (and I mean around 200 of the 250 available) are 352px which, for videos released in 2010, is very bad (and I don't have particularly demanding standards, either).

Most of the videos are her stripping on a bed, playing in the shower or doing a strip tease to teeny bop music. She's pretty good, and there are nip slips scattered throughout the latter videos, but the quality is poor to the point there's little-or-no pay-off in that respect.

Most of the scenes are split into two-or-three parts. With other updates in between, along with a pretty pedestrian update schedule, it's likely to be several months until you manage to download the whole scene.

The videos are arrange chronologically, with a thumbnail preview and an option to stream a few of the newer ones. Only one format is downloadable (MP4 for newer videos, MPG for the majority), no indication of file size (although most are 50-200mb) or running time (most are 5min long), and no description other than the video title.

There is a section for webcams, which is an archive of screenshots from her webcams. Most of the webcams seem to just be the same as her videos or galleries, but there are hundreds and hundreds of small (600px wide), blury screenshots. No videos and no clue as to where her webcams are available or when the next show is.

The forum is active, and Patty clearly has passionate fans. No input from what I can see from Patty herself though, and although there's a 'Patty Tweets' thing on the membership homepage, I'm not sure if she's on Twitter or not as there's no link to it, so I think it's just a kinda member's only news feed. No sign of interaction here, either.

Unfortunately, the best content is saved for ZIPs which have to be bought on top of membership. There are discounts for members, but at $35, it's still hugely expensive and 'In Training', though hot, was hardly on another level to what's available on her site. Another cynical aspect by her webmasters is splitting member's videos into 3 parts, so with updates in between, you have to remain a member for months to get a whole scene.

To summarise, Patty is wonderful, but her website is hugely disappointing, particularly compared to other solo tease websites. A lot of the content is pretty samey, the update schedule of one update a week maximum is pretty disappointing, as is most of the content.

680x354 videos, 1024x680 pictures and 30 pictures per gallery might have been OK ten years ago, but definitely aren't in 2012.

Patty's site is a jack of all trades, master of none. The video content, pictures and interaction from Patty are all below average. Patty is great, but her website has hardly moved with the times.

01-01-12  09:12am

Replies (2)
Visit Bryci


Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Bryci is incredible hot with a great body
- Lots of content, good balance of pics and vids
- Good value with lots of other girls too
Cons: Awful webmaster. I had problems with my ADSL and my IP number was blocked. No problem I thought, and emailed the webmaster. He basically called me a liar and a thief and wouldn't humour me at all. I understand the need to protect content, but the way it was dealt with was totally over the top. I explained what happened, even listed the 10-or-so videos I had downloaded to prove only I had been a member but he wouldn't even listen. A huge shame as it's a great site
Bottom Line: An incredible website but let down by an incredibly arrogant webmaster. It was a huge shame because it was definitely the kind of website I could see myself joining and rejoining constantly.

12-31-11  07:10am

Replies (4)
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Anna is incredibly hot with a fantastic body
- Large archive of content and videos
Cons: - Unable to save pictures as they're sliced up into mosaics - essentially you cannot save ANY pictures or ANY videos
- No 'new' content being added
- Anna has gone to ground - no updates or interaction from her now
Bottom Line: This website has had a high fall from grace. It was once one of the best at looking after members, constantly updating - it was a masterclass in amateur websites.

Sadly you are no longer able to save ANY content (not even photos) and Anna and the webmaster no longer seem to care about their members. A real shame.

12-31-11  07:32am

Replies (3)
Visit Throated

Reply of lexis250's Reply

This was nearly a year ago, so all has been fixed. Thanks though.

04-14-14  12:48pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

By model first, then a combination of by niche and by date after that.

04-12-14  02:54pm

Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I agree - I'm never going to join Bangbrothers because of their shady practices, and I don't see why tricking those who do is a good business plan because they're hardly encouraging loyalty.

04-01-14  11:34pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

None of the options were really applicable for me, but I feel generally happy, although slightly nervous, when my favourites go hardcore. Normally it works out fine, but sometimes it kinda turns out to be the beginning of the end.

03-30-14  12:33pm

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of trash999's Comment

They're definitely fraudsters in my opinion, only need to look at the comments here on PU. Thanks for adding to the warnings, though, hopefully it saves other people joining the site and falling into the same trap as you. I know I will never join as a result.

03-25-14  02:58pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope, never even crossed my mind I have to say! I've nearly been late leaving for work, though, but only by about 5 minutes, and I had a good run in so wasn't even late arriving.

03-25-14  02:26pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Other, as I'm not even sure what the question is - smarter/pickier/more lenient in what respect?

03-23-14  06:38am

Visit Twistys

Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

Just reading that article and now they're not allowing people to cancel online?! Just wow. That's pretty dodgy.

03-22-14  09:38am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I use the in-built Chrome one which seems to catch most other than a few Live Jasmin pop-ups which I normally close before the window has even loaded.

03-18-14  01:23am

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of Divinx's Reply

Fortunately PU seem to think it's unacceptable too and are no longer associating themselves with the site. It says something when even despite PU being pretty quiet nowadays, there's over a page of comments from people who have been ripped off.

03-12-14  01:54pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No applicable option for me - I think they're OK. Have to be careful, though.

03-10-14  12:24pm

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of Sumom Ltd's Reply

Why do so many people have problems unsubscribing from your site? Seems not a week goes by without some PU member having problems. With respect, are you trying to scam people?

03-06-14  02:27pm

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I said other. It's mixed. Sometimes it's good, in fact, normally technical support is pretty good to be fair, but sometimes it's bad.

03-04-14  11:22am

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of tinus1965's Comment

That definitely seems to be the experience of lots of people here. Will be interesting to read the webmaster's excuse as this seems to have been ongoing for months. I'm only sorry that you didn't read PU before joining as plenty of people seem to have been ripped off by GGG.

02-23-14  09:49am

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of Sumom Ltd's Reply

And today yet another PU member has a problem:

02-23-14  09:48am

Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Apologies if it wasn't clear, I've updated my review now.

Thanks for the reply, though, and I'm glad at least someone read my review.

02-03-14  12:24pm

Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Thanks. No, it's 50 tokens for a flash, not $50. 50 tokens is about $5 (or less, depending on how many tokens you buy), and with other people tipping etc, you shouldn't need to tip too often.

02-03-14  11:06am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I went for 'don't care' - I don't like them, honestly, but I wouldn't say I hate them.

01-20-14  02:25pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I guess face. I mean, I like boobs big or small, legs long or short, but most of all I want the model to be pretty. It's at least what probably gets my attention first anyway.

01-13-14  11:46am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends on the definition of closed down. If you mean 'stopped updating' then yes, several times, if you mean the website is literally taken off line, then no, I don't think so. Most sites generally seem to still allow members to join even if they're rotating content or not even updating at all.

01-04-14  12:03am

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of gak68's Comment

How dodgy - can you take it up with your bank and get the money back that way? In the meantime, I'll make sure I don't join sites that use CentroBill.

01-01-14  10:34am

Visit Brazzers

Reply of Lester1's Comment

Thanks for the warning. I was actually thinking about joining this site, but on the basis of your account will add it to my blacklist.

01-01-14  10:30am

Shown : 26-50 of 378 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.03 seconds.