Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (420)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (378)

Other:   Replies Received (160)  |   Trust Ratings (22)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 425 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Sexy Pattycake

Sexy Pattycake

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-10-12  04:12am  (Update History)
Reason: Comprehensive rewrite as am a current member
Pros: - Good balance of photos and videos, all of which is downloadable
- Patty is a very pretty, young-looking blonde non-nude tease
- Gets very close to nude while leaving something to the imagination
- Website takes full advantage of her eternal youthful looks
- Features forum and blog, both of which are active
Cons: - Website seems stuck in the 90s in many respects
- Most videos are short and poor quality
- Photo galleries are tiny, normally with only 30-40 pictures
- Slow update schedule compared even to other sole tease sites
- Some content is 'limited time' so won't appear in archive
- Best content is saved for overly expensive downloadable ZIPs
Bottom Line: I must admit I have a soft-spot for Patty, but this a hugely disappointing website offering content that might have been acceptable 10 years ago, but is definitely a long way behind what I'd expect in 2012, even bearing in mind this is a solo website.

Membership costs $29 via CCBill. Do not get fooled by the offer of discounts for long-term members - you save only $2 for every six months you remain a member (maximum two discounts).

Frankly, the content and number of updates don't warrant a six-month membership, and if you do want to remain a member for several months, then you can save $22 by buying their 90-day membership.

Their preview area is probably a fairly accurate representation of their member's site. Once inside, you have options at the top for a blog, bio, photos, videos, webcam and forum.

The bio has full stats for Patty (height, weight, vital stats), favourite films etc, plus a short introduction. The blog is a relatively new addition to the site and is updated occasionally with thoughts from Patty and a few candid pictures.

There are around 200 galleries, but not a single gallery I viewed had over 50 photos. The photos themselves are only 1024px on their longest side, which is pretty low-fi nowadays, even on my little monitor. I can't think of any other website that consistently offers such low-res photos in such small galleries. The photo content is good, but you feel like you're only getting half of the story as there are so few photos.

Navigation-wise, galleries are arranged onto 13 pages with a thumbnail gallery of photos. You can save all pictures, but there are no downloadable ZIPs.

Content-wise Patty is a great tease. She must be in her late 20s now, but hasn't aged at all. Most galleries have her removing her underwear, there are handbras, implied nudity and often slips here-and-there. Sometimes she'll have a dildo or something, but from what I've seen there's no insertion.

They definitely take advantage of her youthful looks. Lots of candy colours, Patty wearing bunny ears, posing in front of cuddly toys, lots of Hello Kitty backgrounds etc.

Video-wise, there are around 250 videos, which - at best - are only OK quality-wise. The very best quality is 768px wide which, again, is very low quality for 2012. Most videos (and I mean around 200 of the 250 available) are 352px which, for videos released in 2010, is very bad (and I don't have particularly demanding standards, either).

Most of the videos are her stripping on a bed, playing in the shower or doing a strip tease to teeny bop music. She's pretty good, and there are nip slips scattered throughout the latter videos, but the quality is poor to the point there's little-or-no pay-off in that respect.

Most of the scenes are split into two-or-three parts. With other updates in between, along with a pretty pedestrian update schedule, it's likely to be several months until you manage to download the whole scene.

The videos are arrange chronologically, with a thumbnail preview and an option to stream a few of the newer ones. Only one format is downloadable (MP4 for newer videos, MPG for the majority), no indication of file size (although most are 50-200mb) or running time (most are 5min long), and no description other than the video title.

There is a section for webcams, which is an archive of screenshots from her webcams. Most of the webcams seem to just be the same as her videos or galleries, but there are hundreds and hundreds of small (600px wide), blury screenshots. No videos and no clue as to where her webcams are available or when the next show is.

The forum is active, and Patty clearly has passionate fans. No input from what I can see from Patty herself though, and although there's a 'Patty Tweets' thing on the membership homepage, I'm not sure if she's on Twitter or not as there's no link to it, so I think it's just a kinda member's only news feed. No sign of interaction here, either.

Unfortunately, the best content is saved for ZIPs which have to be bought on top of membership. There are discounts for members, but at $35, it's still hugely expensive and 'In Training', though hot, was hardly on another level to what's available on her site. Another cynical aspect by her webmasters is splitting member's videos into 3 parts, so with updates in between, you have to remain a member for months to get a whole scene.

To summarise, Patty is wonderful, but her website is hugely disappointing, particularly compared to other solo tease websites. A lot of the content is pretty samey, the update schedule of one update a week maximum is pretty disappointing, as is most of the content.

680x354 videos, 1024x680 pictures and 30 pictures per gallery might have been OK ten years ago, but definitely aren't in 2012.

Patty's site is a jack of all trades, master of none. The video content, pictures and interaction from Patty are all below average. Patty is great, but her website has hardly moved with the times.

01-01-12  09:12am

Replies (2)
Visit Bryci


Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Bryci is incredible hot with a great body
- Lots of content, good balance of pics and vids
- Good value with lots of other girls too
Cons: Awful webmaster. I had problems with my ADSL and my IP number was blocked. No problem I thought, and emailed the webmaster. He basically called me a liar and a thief and wouldn't humour me at all. I understand the need to protect content, but the way it was dealt with was totally over the top. I explained what happened, even listed the 10-or-so videos I had downloaded to prove only I had been a member but he wouldn't even listen. A huge shame as it's a great site
Bottom Line: An incredible website but let down by an incredibly arrogant webmaster. It was a huge shame because it was definitely the kind of website I could see myself joining and rejoining constantly.

12-31-11  07:10am

Replies (4)
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Anna is incredibly hot with a fantastic body
- Large archive of content and videos
Cons: - Unable to save pictures as they're sliced up into mosaics - essentially you cannot save ANY pictures or ANY videos
- No 'new' content being added
- Anna has gone to ground - no updates or interaction from her now
Bottom Line: This website has had a high fall from grace. It was once one of the best at looking after members, constantly updating - it was a masterclass in amateur websites.

Sadly you are no longer able to save ANY content (not even photos) and Anna and the webmaster no longer seem to care about their members. A real shame.

12-31-11  07:32am

Replies (3)
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

I voted 'yes', but I guess a more accurate response would be 'sometimes'. I've definitely had problems resolved by webmasters here, even if it is just through complaining publicly about their sites.

03-13-15  10:24am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not if it gets in the way of regular content/updates, but yes, sometimes I do. It's good to see a model's personality, and in my opinion a good sense of humour or intelligence can make a girl even sexier.

02-24-15  03:09pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Beautiful, yes.
A turn on, no.

02-19-15  11:45am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind advertising on sites, but click-throughs are too intrusive and interrupt browsing too much.

02-12-15  01:09pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I'm sure a handful are either lesbian or at least bi, but the majority aren't and it's just fulfilling fantasies or following a narrative (just like many aspects of porn)

02-10-15  03:16pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Yep, I would join, and it seems like the fairest and most unobtrusive way of protecting content that I have heard of.

02-01-15  02:26pm

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Probably if they died as it wouldn't feel right.

01-27-15  11:30am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most videos I download are well under 1gb - many are under 500mb, but a good proportion of them are between 500mb-1gb. I have downloaded several over a gig, but I'm very fussy when they're that big, and if I have better videos that are smaller in file size, I will probably delete it as diskspace is a precious commodity

01-21-15  11:17pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I said yes, but it's been a case that it stops updating rather than shutting down altogether.

01-09-15  09:11am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Normally yes, I normally prefer solo sites or smaller networks as I normally join for a particular model. I prefer the softer side of hardcore generally, although if I like the model I will make exceptions.

01-04-15  12:32am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

About the same. I do go out a lot during the Christmas season, but it also means I'm using up holiday and so while I might be out in the nights/afternoons whatever, I'll probably have the same amount of 'me time'

12-22-14  11:10am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Normally an hour or two a day, maybe an hour watching 'properly' and the other hour will be in bed as I'm going to sleep etc.

12-14-14  12:26am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Hate it, but each to their own I guess.

12-08-14  03:24pm

Visit VideoBox

Reply of Monahan's Comment

I think that's fair enough, particularly with formats like MP4 which seem to be universally compatible, video players like VLC that play anything etc. It's also good that they give advance warning to members.

12-07-14  09:18am

Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
Reply of Parsnip's Comment

That's a shame. I sometimes feel like the only person in the world who doesn't like anal, and it seems so hard to avoid nowadays.

12-01-14  03:42pm

Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
Reply of CaloNord's Comment

Good to know - thanks for the tip off.

11-30-14  06:10am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Chrome and Internet Explorer. I only use Chrome. I'm not actually a fan of any browser really, and all have their faults.

11-30-14  04:48am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Video. I enjoy photos, and I understand why many PU members prefer images, but for me video is a great way to see models in motion, enjoy their personality and marvel at their technique, something photos often can't convey.

11-30-14  02:02am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind it at all. Some of my favourite Tia Ling scenes were her massage scenes. It's not a particular niche I follow, though.

11-07-14  08:38am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No objections to this whatsoever.

11-02-14  01:44am

N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

77.7 - most sites I've joined have been very good, but a few have been pretty disappointing.

10-17-14  04:36pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends - I've seen good banter between models and cameramen before, sometimes it brings out the best in models. But often it's just annoying.

10-07-14  03:04pm

Shown : 26-50 of 425 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.56 seconds.