Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (387)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (345)

Other:   Replies Received (159)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 392 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Sexy Pattycake

Sexy Pattycake
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-10-12  04:12am  (Update History)
Reason: Comprehensive rewrite as am a current member
Pros: - Good balance of photos and videos, all of which is downloadable
- Patty is a very pretty, young-looking blonde non-nude tease
- Gets very close to nude while leaving something to the imagination
- Website takes full advantage of her eternal youthful looks
- Features forum and blog, both of which are active
Cons: - Website seems stuck in the 90s in many respects
- Most videos are short and poor quality
- Photo galleries are tiny, normally with only 30-40 pictures
- Slow update schedule compared even to other sole tease sites
- Some content is 'limited time' so won't appear in archive
- Best content is saved for overly expensive downloadable ZIPs
Bottom Line: I must admit I have a soft-spot for Patty, but this a hugely disappointing website offering content that might have been acceptable 10 years ago, but is definitely a long way behind what I'd expect in 2012, even bearing in mind this is a solo website.

Membership costs $29 via CCBill. Do not get fooled by the offer of discounts for long-term members - you save only $2 for every six months you remain a member (maximum two discounts).

Frankly, the content and number of updates don't warrant a six-month membership, and if you do want to remain a member for several months, then you can save $22 by buying their 90-day membership.

Their preview area is probably a fairly accurate representation of their member's site. Once inside, you have options at the top for a blog, bio, photos, videos, webcam and forum.

The bio has full stats for Patty (height, weight, vital stats), favourite films etc, plus a short introduction. The blog is a relatively new addition to the site and is updated occasionally with thoughts from Patty and a few candid pictures.

There are around 200 galleries, but not a single gallery I viewed had over 50 photos. The photos themselves are only 1024px on their longest side, which is pretty low-fi nowadays, even on my little monitor. I can't think of any other website that consistently offers such low-res photos in such small galleries. The photo content is good, but you feel like you're only getting half of the story as there are so few photos.

Navigation-wise, galleries are arranged onto 13 pages with a thumbnail gallery of photos. You can save all pictures, but there are no downloadable ZIPs.

Content-wise Patty is a great tease. She must be in her late 20s now, but hasn't aged at all. Most galleries have her removing her underwear, there are handbras, implied nudity and often slips here-and-there. Sometimes she'll have a dildo or something, but from what I've seen there's no insertion.

They definitely take advantage of her youthful looks. Lots of candy colours, Patty wearing bunny ears, posing in front of cuddly toys, lots of Hello Kitty backgrounds etc.

Video-wise, there are around 250 videos, which - at best - are only OK quality-wise. The very best quality is 768px wide which, again, is very low quality for 2012. Most videos (and I mean around 200 of the 250 available) are 352px which, for videos released in 2010, is very bad (and I don't have particularly demanding standards, either).

Most of the videos are her stripping on a bed, playing in the shower or doing a strip tease to teeny bop music. She's pretty good, and there are nip slips scattered throughout the latter videos, but the quality is poor to the point there's little-or-no pay-off in that respect.

Most of the scenes are split into two-or-three parts. With other updates in between, along with a pretty pedestrian update schedule, it's likely to be several months until you manage to download the whole scene.

The videos are arrange chronologically, with a thumbnail preview and an option to stream a few of the newer ones. Only one format is downloadable (MP4 for newer videos, MPG for the majority), no indication of file size (although most are 50-200mb) or running time (most are 5min long), and no description other than the video title.

There is a section for webcams, which is an archive of screenshots from her webcams. Most of the webcams seem to just be the same as her videos or galleries, but there are hundreds and hundreds of small (600px wide), blury screenshots. No videos and no clue as to where her webcams are available or when the next show is.

The forum is active, and Patty clearly has passionate fans. No input from what I can see from Patty herself though, and although there's a 'Patty Tweets' thing on the membership homepage, I'm not sure if she's on Twitter or not as there's no link to it, so I think it's just a kinda member's only news feed. No sign of interaction here, either.

Unfortunately, the best content is saved for ZIPs which have to be bought on top of membership. There are discounts for members, but at $35, it's still hugely expensive and 'In Training', though hot, was hardly on another level to what's available on her site. Another cynical aspect by her webmasters is splitting member's videos into 3 parts, so with updates in between, you have to remain a member for months to get a whole scene.

To summarise, Patty is wonderful, but her website is hugely disappointing, particularly compared to other solo tease websites. A lot of the content is pretty samey, the update schedule of one update a week maximum is pretty disappointing, as is most of the content.

680x354 videos, 1024x680 pictures and 30 pictures per gallery might have been OK ten years ago, but definitely aren't in 2012.

Patty's site is a jack of all trades, master of none. The video content, pictures and interaction from Patty are all below average. Patty is great, but her website has hardly moved with the times.

01-01-12  09:12am

Replies (2)
Review
27
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)

60.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Bryci is incredible hot with a great body
- Lots of content, good balance of pics and vids
- Good value with lots of other girls too
Cons: Awful webmaster. I had problems with my ADSL and my IP number was blocked. No problem I thought, and emailed the webmaster. He basically called me a liar and a thief and wouldn't humour me at all. I understand the need to protect content, but the way it was dealt with was totally over the top. I explained what happened, even listed the 10-or-so videos I had downloaded to prove only I had been a member but he wouldn't even listen. A huge shame as it's a great site
Bottom Line: An incredible website but let down by an incredibly arrogant webmaster. It was a huge shame because it was definitely the kind of website I could see myself joining and rejoining constantly.

12-31-11  07:10am

Replies (4)
Review
28
Visit Anna Angel

Anna Angel
(0)

55.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Anna is incredibly hot with a fantastic body
- Large archive of content and videos
Cons: - Unable to save pictures as they're sliced up into mosaics - essentially you cannot save ANY pictures or ANY videos
- No 'new' content being added
- Anna has gone to ground - no updates or interaction from her now
Bottom Line: This website has had a high fall from grace. It was once one of the best at looking after members, constantly updating - it was a masterclass in amateur websites.

Sadly you are no longer able to save ANY content (not even photos) and Anna and the webmaster no longer seem to care about their members. A real shame.

12-31-11  07:32am

Replies (3)
Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Some are, I guess. I like athletic figures (a lot of female sports stars/athletes for example) and fitness models like Zuzka. So long as they're still feminine, though.

07-10-14  03:01pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not really interested in its current form, but I wouldn't write it off completely, particularly if there's still an option for 2D. I voted for 'only slightly interested'

07-05-14  12:26am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

1, but it's dead, so strictly speaking it's a doorstop.

06-19-14  11:43pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Surprised there's no 'none' option, so I've voted 'other'

06-08-14  02:31pm

Reply
33
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(5)
Reply of ghosty's Comment

Good to know - regional pricing is pretty annoying, particularly with examples like this. Presumably you complained in response to their reply? If so, what was their response?

06-03-14  11:08pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I always try and organise as I download, but sometimes, where it isn't possible to right-click download to target, it will end up in my downloads folder, then I'll move into the appropriate place within a day-or-two.

06-01-14  12:33am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Depends on the type of site. Daily to several times a week for a network, while weekly (several times a month) I'd say is frequent for a solo/amateur site.

05-28-14  03:02pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

C for me, although B is a close second. Honestly, I'm not generally too fussy at all - shape is the most important aspect to me (more than size).

05-20-14  12:56pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Cropped thumbnails are pretty annoying as they're always indiscriminately cropped, often meaning you have to guess what's what's missing.

05-14-14  03:21pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of sonofzog's Reply

I'm with you. I've read and re-read and it makes no sense to me whatsoever.

05-12-14  11:12pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Same here, so long as they're obviously adverts they're absolutely fine. Anything that helps me discover new content I might otherwise have missed is a good thing in my opinion.

05-06-14  02:43pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't really notice the flaws, and when I do, I don't mind as it adds character.

04-30-14  10:54am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I voted no preference, but I guess ideally starting off with heels and ending up barefoot is the perfect scenario for me.

04-26-14  04:11am

Reply
42
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Thanks for such a great review, and for addressing the elephant in the room (ie, the upsells). Honestly, as amazing as the site is, and even bearing in mind your recommendations, it's still not worth the risk for me. All it would take for me to think again would be for a 'you will be billed extra for this - are you sure' popup to appear.

04-19-14  10:15am

Reply
43
Visit Throated

Throated
(1)
Reply of lexis250's Reply

This was nearly a year ago, so all has been fixed. Thanks though.

04-14-14  12:48pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

By model first, then a combination of by niche and by date after that.

04-12-14  02:54pm

Reply
45
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I agree - I'm never going to join Bangbrothers because of their shady practices, and I don't see why tricking those who do is a good business plan because they're hardly encouraging loyalty.

04-01-14  11:34pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

None of the options were really applicable for me, but I feel generally happy, although slightly nervous, when my favourites go hardcore. Normally it works out fine, but sometimes it kinda turns out to be the beginning of the end.

03-30-14  12:33pm

Reply
47
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of trash999's Comment

They're definitely fraudsters in my opinion, only need to look at the comments here on PU. Thanks for adding to the warnings, though, hopefully it saves other people joining the site and falling into the same trap as you. I know I will never join as a result.

03-25-14  02:58pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope, never even crossed my mind I have to say! I've nearly been late leaving for work, though, but only by about 5 minutes, and I had a good run in so wasn't even late arriving.

03-25-14  02:26pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Other, as I'm not even sure what the question is - smarter/pickier/more lenient in what respect?

03-23-14  06:38am

Reply
50
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

Just reading that article and now they're not allowing people to cancel online?! Just wow. That's pretty dodgy.

03-22-14  09:38am


Shown : 26-50 of 392 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.68 seconds.