| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Real Peachez
(2)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I didn't try the trial unfortunately - I'm always a bit cynical towards them so rarely do.
Video quality was not bad. The aspect ratios on a lot of the videos were mucked up and I had to either/both resize manually and set VLC to crop the outside black bars. It's hard to tell sometimes what their actual size is, but they all look fine full screen.
Her blowjobs are excellent they really are. There's about 15 BJ videos on the site, but she's done a lot more that unfortunately aren't on there at the moment :(
|
05-25-13 01:51pm
|
Reply
2
|
Real Peachez
(2)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You could do a lot worse than joining her site, for sure, but don't expect much more than photos and movies, and bear in mind there's a lot of missing stuff from her back-catalogue. If you want more details on something in particular, let me know.
|
05-25-13 08:22am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I really like them and vote about 90% of the time, and comment about 60% of the time.
|
05-23-13 10:35am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm really not fussy at all. I love models like Peachez (AA), Katie Banks (G, I think) and anyone in between, but I definitely err towards a more natural size or smaller.
My favourite size is probably around C. For me, models like Nicky Cassidy have perfectly-sized boobs.
|
05-21-13 12:12am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Odd poll in that there seem to be several options missing - no "love it" option for those who love both Euro/US and Japanese, no option for me where I quite like bukkake but don't love it, and no option for "other"
So I think it's a bit unfair as obviously people like me can't vote, those who have no preference over where it's from can't vote, so the result is overwhelmingly biased towards those who don't like it.
(sorry to moan)
|
05-17-13 12:10pm
|
Reply
6
|
Sexy Pattycake
(2)
|
Reply of
tboy's Reply
It's strange because I think she's great - she's been doing strip tease ever since I've been into porn and it doesn't get boring, but I always join her site every 6-or-so months and every time it just leaves me feeling unfulfilled - it's a shame.
|
05-15-13 02:32pm
|
Reply
7
|
Ann Angel XXX
(2)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Thanks for the updated review. This was a massively disappointing site for me. Anna's great but the content is pretty poor, and I think there has only been about one hardcore update since I left over a month ago.
|
05-11-13 10:43am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind a few, so long as they're obviously ads and not trying to trick you into thinking it's additional membership content. If an ad means I discover another porn site, then IMHO that's a good thing.
|
05-11-13 01:02am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I don't mind glasses on girls, but in porn it's pretty clichéd to be honest and doesn't really add anything.
|
05-07-13 11:13pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do if there are no current reviews, the current review(s) are vague, or if the score on the current review seems disproportionately low/high.
|
05-05-13 12:19am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
High heels for me. I don't really have a foot fetish, but if the heels come off after all the clothes then that's also absolutely fine :)
|
04-29-13 11:19am
|
Reply
12
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Such a great, in-depth review - good job!
|
04-27-13 09:28am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Voted 'Other' as it varies far too much. Sometimes it's excellent, sometimes it's terrible. Fortunately I don't need to deal with Tech Support too much normally.
|
04-27-13 04:04am
|
Reply
14
|
Indian Love Goddess
(0)
|
Reply of
bbiillyy's Comment
Hope you have time to review it as from a non-member's point of view there doesn't seem to be any arguments as to why it's so disappointing.
|
04-24-13 11:01am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but probably wouldn't rejoin.
|
04-19-13 08:22am
|
Reply
16
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for this, and I do agree.
I'm not a fan of regional pricing, and although I respect Capn for his passionate stance on the matter, I think 15 points is far too many to consider docking a website for regional pricing.
Like you noticed, I've updated the review, reduced the score by 3, but I'll let PU members draw their own conclusions. The score is illustrative of my thoughts on the site. I've gone into detail in the pros/cons, so if a particular issue (eg, regional pricing) grinds somebody's axe, then they have every right not to join the site - I'm only sorry I missed this in the first review, but like I say, quality of content is more important to me than regional pricing which is why it slipped the net.
I don't know the whole story about regional pricing - for example, I don't know if webmasters have to shoulder extra costs from international members, so it's not really for me to by judge, jury and executioner.
|
04-17-13 12:09am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really notice any flaws vs standard definition. Regardless, though, I think 'flaws' add character. Always mystifies me when a website goes through the effort to photoshop out moles etc, but then leave them in the video.
|
04-15-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
18
|
Ann Angel XXX
(2)
|
Reply of
dgerity's Review
Interesting, and if true, not particularly surprising. Her website did seem to have a lot of recycled content, and you've just reminded me of another con which is that their preview section implies (well, basically says...) Anna is NOW LIVE when she actually isn't.
With regards to 10 year-old content, yeah, I think a lot of the content is basically recycled from her old site, and it seems her webcams aren't even live which is unacceptable really.
The H/C content? Pretty sure that is new because her figure is different. She took a year-or-so off (at least) while she had a baby, and her boobs are definitely not as pert as they were.
|
04-14-13 04:47am
|
Reply
19
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I think regional pricing is bit of a cheek, but I don't feel as strongly as you - 15 seems a lot to reduce the score by! I have put it into the cons, and will let people draw their own conclusions in this respect.
|
04-11-13 11:09pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I voted how hot the model(s) are. However good quality the content is, if I don't like the model(s), I'm not going to join.
Quality of content (both preview and member side) are definitely a factor, while frequency of update is more likely to influence my decision to rejoin as opposed to join for the first time.
|
04-11-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
21
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
My personal POV is that videos are more important to me, too, but that doesn't mean I don't care about videos. Frankly I'm not a photo collector per-se, but so far I've not actually downloaded many photos just because it's quite hard to know where to start!
Like I say in the review, I'm quite choosy about photos I save, and I think if zips aren't a consideration, then it would be better IMHO to be able to right-click thumbnails and save the JPG which would effectively halve the amount of clicking. Not sure if the full-size JPGs are on individual pages to thwart pirates, though.
|
04-11-13 01:32pm
|
Reply
22
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Oh god, wow, yes - good point! Will update the cons to this effect. Thank you sir.
|
04-11-13 01:27pm
|
Reply
23
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Well, consider this me dropping you a message! She went hardcore in March.
Six hardcore video updates so far, four of which show everything, the other two being artistically shot.
|
04-10-13 12:17pm
|
Reply
24
|
Bryci
(2)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
Thank you for the reply. I ran out of characters to explain about why WMV files are no longer available, but I certainly didn't mark the site down for that.
I understand why from a webmaster's POV you don't offer ZIP files, but it does make it hard for members. I think I would find it easier if you could right-click thumbnails and save the link. I thought it was really important to communicate this to readers.
Chica's Place is a great website, so I'm really happy that your aspirations hardcore-wise are similar. Actually laughed that some people are disappointed because it rules them out of the picture - they sound like Beliebers who begrudged Selena Gomez for dating Justin Beiber (and no, I'm most certainly not a Beiber fan!)
|
04-09-13 10:39pm
|
Reply
25
|
Helix Studios.net
(1)
|
Reply of
mikala's Review
Sorry, but need far more information from your review to justify a perfect score, particularly reading other reviews from the site below yours which seen far more objective.
|
04-04-13 04:06pm
|
