Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Glamour The category portal for a specific niche.

Glamour Models Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. MPL Studios (2) 93.0
2. Wow Girls (3) 87.3
3. DDF Network (4) 83.8
4. X-Art (3) 83.7
5. Watch 4 Beauty (2) 81.8
6. The Life Erotic (2) 81.6
7. Twistys (4) 81.5
8. Babes Network.com (5) 76.0
9. New Sensations Network (2) 76.0

Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Babes Network.com (5) 76.0
2. DDF Network (4) 83.8
3. Twistys (4) 81.5
4. Wow Girls (3) 87.3
5. X-Art (3) 83.7
6. MPL Studios (2) 93.0
7. Watch 4 Beauty (2) 81.8
8. The Life Erotic (2) 81.6
9. New Sensations Network (2) 76.0
10. Eternal Desire (1) 91.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit The Life Erotic

1. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
80
skippy (50) 07-02-15  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good navigation
Cons: Very "artsy" site.
Very little eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
Bottom Line: Stats (Deduced):
About 1500 photo sets
About 500 videos
About 320 models
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc.

This site is, to a large extent, sort of an evolution of the "girl in the woods" theme with the idea that you are observing a model in a more natural environment instead of a studio environment. Often the idea is that the model doesn't really know you are there or doesn't pay much attention to you, the viewer. About 50% of the sets are solo girl in a straight modeling scenario. Many of these sets are of very, very attractive girls that are just standing or in other conservative poses. Another 40% are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And the remaining 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Earlier sets are better, but the quality of those sets is not as good. Oh, most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.

The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.

The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. When you get to the landing page, you don't see a single girl on the site you are paying for. instead you get a full page of images from the two live-cam sites that seem to be taking over the Met-Art network. You have to scroll down to see the contents of the site you already paid for. The webmasters are apparently experimenting with where best to put these live-cam ads as they can be found in different places on the various Met-Art sites. This is the most intrusive placement, right at the top of the main page and present on every page on the site. Stop it! Really. Just stop.

Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.

And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. You can tell if you are familiar with other Met-Art sets that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art. For example, there is an outdoor set of Lorena, beautiful Met-Art regular, where she is entirely covered in red mud in every single image. Really? Has to be a B-roll.

Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better.

Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites like Met-Art itself or Errotica Archives. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.

I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standards.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Watch 4 Beauty

2. Watch 4 Beauty (2)

Pay
Newbie
90*
drbart (3) 06-19-15  10:06am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some extremely beautiful models (eg: Sapphira), Hi Def images, great photography, locations (lots of outdoor shoots).
Also currently joined via Epoch which is easy to cancel and manage membership.
This is mostly solo nude modeling but they do spice it up with some wild ideas (peeing, toys etc.) so its not like met art where the sets get repetitive. The videos are very nice quality plus they are not superlong ones that are mostly filler. Not short either but not so long that most of what you download is filler.
Their forums are managed well and you will get responses on requests or comments.
Cons: Updates about every other day which would be ok but they dont seem to have too many models. Most are very good looking but not a lot of variety.
limited video download size and formats.
Bottom Line: For nude modeling site still one of the best. All you have to do is compare Sapphiras images here with hers on playboy (or for that matter on met art)and there is no comparison.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit X-Art

3. X-Art (3)

Pay
Newbie
85*
Artie Fufkin (0) 05-24-15  01:03pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -absolutely beautiful natural girls who appear to be enthusiastic and well looked after
-well presented site with multiple streaming/download options
-good value for money compared to some others
-high quality shoots, excellent production values
-good mix of established and unknown girls
-Angelica's "Goodnight Kiss" is almost worth the subscription alone!
Cons: -very little variation in themes/scenes/styles/locations. if you're looking for anything other than two people having tasteful sex in a white room with white sheets then maybe try elsewhere
-website could be improved with a better tags and filters system
-sister site colette.com is now being heavily promoted and standards on x-art seem to have gone down slightly since its launch
-it's definitely more "x" than "art" these days, I'd like to see a little more artistic license being used
Bottom Line: If you are looking for high quality content with stunning, natural girls then I would recommend this all day long.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Bollywood Nudes

1. Bollywood Nudes (0)

Pay
mbaya (358) 06-28-15  10:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)

Total waste of money

The site has only a small handful of low quality, short videos. I downloaded everything in five to ten minutes. I contacted CCBill for a refund and they refused. I wrote to the webmaster and they never answered. Not at all recommended. The bonus sites were low quality scenes from DVD's. Many, maybe mostly broken links that took multiple tries to download. Nothing I downloaded was worth keeping. The 70 that it got from Duke is way too high.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fedorov HD

2. Fedorov HD (0)

Pay
lk2fireone (196) 06-27-15  05:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

fedorovhd recycling older material?

I'm not a member of fedorovhd, but the photo set dated 2015-06-26, model Julia, titled "Orchid", with 139 images, appears to be the same set that was posted on 2010-02-26. That 2010 set model was Julia, also titled "Orchid", also with 139 images. Both sets have the same cover.

The 2010-02-26 set is no longer listed at fedorovhd as a separate set.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wow Girls

3. Wow Girls (3)

Pay
uchuuji (0) 06-04-15  11:09am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

WowGirls & WoW Porn

When you sign up for WowPorn do you also have access to WowGirls or do you need to sign up separately to gain access?

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Photography (30)
2. Amateur (18)
3. Softcore (0)

View All : Niches


Glamour @ TBP
1. DDF Network 94.0
2. Twistys 90.0
3. Penthouse 89.5
4. Only Silk And... 88.5
5. Art-Lingerie 88.5
6. Babes Network... 88.0
7. Playboy Plus 87.0
8. Tease-X 83.5
9. Spinchix 83.5
10. Daring Sex 83.0
11. VIP Area 83.0
12. Mac and Bumbl... 81.5
13. Garry's Girls 80.0
14. Glamour Bikin... 78.0
15. Model Muscles 77.5

View All : Glamour Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.33 seconds.