Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Softcore The category portal for a specific niche.

Soft Content Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Eternal Desire (1) 91.0
2. VIP Area (1) 90.0
3. Showy Beauty (1) 89.0
4. Digital Desire (1) 88.0
5. MC Nudes (1) 84.0
6. Bikini Pleasure (1) 84.0
7. Happy Naked Teen Girls (1) 83.0
8. Goddess Nudes (1) 82.0
9. The Life Erotic (2) 81.6
10. Bopping Babes (1) 80.0

Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. The Life Erotic (2) 81.6
2. Eternal Desire (1) 91.0
3. VIP Area (1) 90.0
4. Showy Beauty (1) 89.0
5. Digital Desire (1) 88.0
6. MC Nudes (1) 84.0
7. Bikini Pleasure (1) 84.0
8. Happy Naked Teen Girls (1) 83.0
9. Goddess Nudes (1) 82.0
10. Bopping Babes (1) 80.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit The Life Erotic

1. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
80
skippy (52) 07-02-15  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good navigation
Cons: Very "artsy" site.
Very little eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
Bottom Line: Stats (Deduced):
About 1500 photo sets
About 500 videos
About 320 models
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc.

This site is, to a large extent, sort of an evolution of the "girl in the woods" theme with the idea that you are observing a model in a more natural environment instead of a studio environment. Often the idea is that the model doesn't really know you are there or doesn't pay much attention to you, the viewer. About 50% of the sets are solo girl in a straight modeling scenario. Many of these sets are of very, very attractive girls that are just standing or in other conservative poses. Another 40% are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And the remaining 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Earlier sets are better, but the quality of those sets is not as good. Oh, most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.

The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.

The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. When you get to the landing page, you don't see a single girl on the site you are paying for. instead you get a full page of images from the two live-cam sites that seem to be taking over the Met-Art network. You have to scroll down to see the contents of the site you already paid for. The webmasters are apparently experimenting with where best to put these live-cam ads as they can be found in different places on the various Met-Art sites. This is the most intrusive placement, right at the top of the main page and present on every page on the site. Stop it! Really. Just stop.

Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.

And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. You can tell if you are familiar with other Met-Art sets that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art. For example, there is an outdoor set of Lorena, beautiful Met-Art regular, where she is entirely covered in red mud in every single image. Really? Has to be a B-roll.

Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better.

Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites like Met-Art itself or Errotica Archives. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.

I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standards.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Bopping Babes

2. Bopping Babes (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (364) 06-28-15  10:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered “Bopping” means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There aren’t any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply don’t find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Web Young

3. Web Young (0)

Pay
Newbie
76*
drbart (3) 06-20-15  02:05pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Hi Quality videos with very good cinematography. "Tasteful" girl girl sex scenes (in other words not the makeup smeared screaming freaky sex you see on julesjordan or evil angel) . Lots of the top talent here. Website is very polished though navigation could be better. Joined here for 9.95 as a fathers day special price which was not bad at all.
Cons: The usual upsell. Fameassist is the one that did the billing and not as good to manage as with ccbill or epoch. Videos here are polished but also a bit overdone with schmaltzy music, soft focus scenes much like penthouse from the 80s90s. One of the keys to erotica videos is letting the talent be the star. Just get out of their way and let us watch. No need for the overdone schmaltz. (though still better than sites with blurry scenes etc) . content is low here which is strange as I thought webyoung was site I joined back around 201 or so. Maybe its different or maybe cleared out the old stuff. In any case not alot here. I ran out of favs to download after a day. There were about 4 sites in my memberships but still not a lot. They should hook up with more sites.
Bottom Line: Nice for the niche market of girl girl sex scenes (clearly a need and demand for that!) . But the music and lighting got a little too sappy for me. Olus content is low so this would best work with network of sites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Teen Dreams

1. Teen Dreams (0)

Pay
Vito (0) 08-12-15  02:26pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

content

Don't bother with this site. Most, if not all, recent contents are from amkingdom, twistys, teenmegaworld, etc etc.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ron Harris

2. Ron Harris (0)

Pay
tangub (155) 08-07-15  09:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

TBP/PU discount price?

I was wondering if the discounted price displayed on PU is still working or is it one of those offers only available to US subscribers? I was checking out the site with a view to joining but the price I get offered from the UK is £23.31 (GBP) which is equal to about $36 (USD) at todays exchange rate, obviously nowhere near the $19.97 price being currently advertised on PU.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zemani

3. Zemani (0)

Pay
nutcrackr (10) 08-04-15  03:26pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)

Site back up and functioning?

This site appears to be back online running as usual. I was a member when it went inactive for five months back in 2013. I never got an extension on my yearly membership or any discount on a future memberships. They never bothered to even inform users about why it was not updating or when it might be coming back online. Nor did they close sign ups. Does anybody know why it was inactive for 5 months and then just sprung back to life? Now it appears to be running fairly regularly for the past 18 months.

I must say the content in the site was fairly good, but having half my membership wasted due to inactivity leaves a bad taste, especially when they made zero effort to inform people.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Photography (26)
2. Glamour (16)
3. Solo Models (16)
4. Public Nudity (2)
5. General (0)

View All : Niches


Softcore @ TBP
1. Only All Site... 93.0
2. Bikini Dare 83.0
3. Pretty 4ever 81.0

View All : Softcore Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.