Soft Content Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 3 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Mature Erotic (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content. |
| Cons: |
Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie! |
| Bottom Line: |
Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Digital Desire (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
05-13-12 01:14pm (Update History)
Reason: had a chance to download site.
|
| Pros: |
HD 720 videos ( average 5-10 minutes in length )
Zipped Photos ( 100 average per set )
Great Search Engine
Nice pretty look to site.
Amazing women most are stunning,
Unique Content ! |
| Cons: |
Site says Not Download manager friendly,
Getting to download to many steps.
Navigation is oldschool hard to use.
Inconsistent file format.
No bonus sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Over View:
I have not done a review in over 4 years on this site, since then some things are better like 720p HD in many of the videos. However the formats are varied and some scenes are MP4 some WMV some DVX, flv etc. But most have cells phone formats. So thats good an bad
I was happy with the amazing women that continue to bless this site. The site has migrated to better quality of shots. The pics are amazing and great quality. But again the sizes vary making inconsistent downloads in video and pics alike!
Good:
The site remains a quality site in that they stage and film very well and the concentration seems to be on this. I signed up with an 18.00 discount price, normally is 29.95 . lots of pornstars and scenes appear unique to this site. I loved the new talent that is only seen here first.
Bad :
Why if they do not allow download manager do they make it so hard to download a file. To many steps for this. Should be easier since they limit the use of other software. Navigation is ok at best and remains a sore spot if you are looking for something use the search, problem is if you have no idea what to look for it will not be fun just to try and surf the site. Many videos are absent quicktime support anymore.
Toads Take :
I joined because of the discount I got, I would not have otherwise done so. The site has not changed to much in 4 years, It was a pain to use back then and is now. However all that said the women and scenes are stunning and there is a good amount of content at a guess 500 plus videos and more sets of photos the site makes it hared to figure out how many they have, which ads to the pain in using it.
But I digress, the women are amazing and nice rocking hard bodies along with natural and implants alike. The age is from about 18- 35 from what I could tell. They use good backgrounds and the only complaint is the music sometime goes on and on way into the masturbation scenes very distracting but seems to be more the exception.
I would say join for the porn and women, but be Leary about the access an be prepared to spend time clicking and clicking and clicking to download.
They do need to get their formats in order and have the same formats for every videos. Nothing like clicking on a video and it was not Mac compatible glad I do not have a Mac as some would not show without proper codecs.
CT
( update 5/13 2012)
After addressing my own concerns with this site I changed 80 to a 78 to fit in the average site areas.
After downloading the entire site at a huge time consumption.
Comparing the entire site :
More then not I found models with no videos, and many old poor \quality videos maybe a 1/3 of the collection old and grainy. No attempt seems to be made to improve anything older however the site does not claim any kind of quality standards. Most photo sets were from good to outstanding.
I have to say there has to be a better way to download.
1. pick a model
2. pick the scene
3. Click the icon
4. save the file.
If the site was faster this would not be as much and issue and the limits set for downloader make users stuck to their pc's. I realize they are trying to save bandwidth, and the site is not all that fast to begin with. I like that the site has original content and smokin hot models. But the site experience was barely ok. If it was not for the photo's being very good I would have rated it lower. I tend to see this site as more a photo site then video. I do have to say the lack of consistency makes video downloading like buying a grab bag and hoping it turns out well. Some Icons for videos were duplicated by some script error as much as 30+ times. And names were often not what the video says. I hate to be so critical but as I said previously I had a much better experience with this site years ago. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
|
3. Girls Out West (2)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.
Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.
More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.
Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.
Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.
You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
