Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Softcore The category portal for a specific niche.

Soft Content Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Wet And Puffy (3) 89.3
2. The Life Erotic (2) 89.0
3. Bryci (2) 88.0
4. Digital Desire (2) 87.4
5. MC Nudes (2) 86.0
6. Goddess Nudes (2) 81.3

Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Wet And Puffy (3) 89.3
2. The Life Erotic (2) 89.0
3. Bryci (2) 88.0
4. Digital Desire (2) 87.4
5. MC Nudes (2) 86.0
6. Goddess Nudes (2) 81.3
7. Mr. Skin (1) 100.0
8. Eternal Desire (1) 91.0
9. XX Cel (1) 90.0
10. VIP Area (1) 90.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit VIP Area

1. VIP Area (1)

Pay
Active
90
wally (8) 10-11-14  11:50pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the best solo or lesbian erotica you can find anywhere. Quality of the photography is rarely equaled.

Models look stunningly beautiful

Current updates have many download options, including 1920x1080HD

Update frequency has been great for the past several months

Access to a sister site "ikissgirls.com" featuring lesbian erotica of similar quality
Cons: Streaming and downloads are slo-oh-oh-oh....

Sets may be exclusive to the net, but some may be available on DVD as part of Girlfriends Films Glamour Solo series (not much of a negative considering the series has won AVN awards three years running)

A nitpick: would love it if updates were more frequent.

An odd nitpick: is it possible to be too perfect?
Bottom Line: In the field of females-only erotica, Tammy Sands may be the best photographer working today. I was familiar with her work from Twistys, where her solo sets were always great, often my favorites. She's quoted as saying "I believe solo movies are the most intimate of any adult genre" and I think this belief in what she's doing is reflected in her work - these scenes are put together with loving care, with sumptuous settings and exquisite lighting. The women all look gorgeous - don't know if it's great lighting or tons of well disguised makeup, but I don't think any of the models have looked any better anywhere than they do on this site.

That said, understand that the style is very much in the glamor category, fully explicit but with a fairly soft sensibility - there's more of a focus on sensuality. For my taste they strike a nice balance - they're more explicit than the "no close-ups, please, let's not be vulgar" style of some of the out-and-out softcore sites, but something short of the gynecological "camera always two inches from her clit" approach of a site like In The Crack. A nice mix of full-body long shots and up-close-and-personal shots. Plus, the women all seem to be having a good time doing something pleasurable and natural - masturbation and cunnilingus have never seemed so healthy.

But this whole glamor approach relates to my odd negative about being "too perfect". The portrayal of sex here is so idealized that it can sometimes seem a bit remote - something reserved for these goddesses but not available to mere mortals like me. It can lack some of the charm of a good amateur scene with a cute but seemingly more attainable model (a la Abby Winters) - if you prefer the girl-next-door type of model you will likely be disappointed [and it almost goes without saying that if you like your sex scenes to be "hard" and "nasty" you should look elsewhere].

In earlier years the update frequency was not the best, with maybe one new scene a week and occasional gaps of two weeks, but for the past several months the frequency of updates has been great, with three and sometimes four a week. (Speculation: this may have to do with the fact that Tammy quit producing for Twistys in the wake of the Twistys Treat controversy - possibly scenes that used to go to Twistys are now going to this site).

So if you like seeing beautiful women pleasuring themselves and occasionally each other in beautiful surroundings then this site would be a great choice.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Eternal Desire

2. Eternal Desire (1)

Pay
Active
91
luv lickn clit (21) 10-07-14  08:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --models are gorgeous!

--photographic and video quality are excellent

--explicit but tasteful posing

--videos are far better than those at parent site Met-Art

--easy site navigation, signup and cancel through CC Bill

--3 sizes of zip files and multiple video resolution and format options

--comment section with participation from the photographer

--good site preview
Cons: the only real cons relate to the relatively small size of the site:

--only 114 models at this time

--updates with about one photoset or video a day (wish it were more)

--some photosets broken into 2 sets of about 60 photos each (applies mainly to older material)

--some sets shot using a lower megapixel camera (6 megapixel)

--the user tags search system doesn't have very much user participation, and as such, isn't very useful
Bottom Line: Eternal Desire is one of the newer sites in the Met-Art family, and consists exclusively of the work of "Arkisi", one of Met-Art's better and more prolific photographers. The site was launched in February 2013, and now features 114 different models.

The models are gorgeous European girls in the 18 to 25 year old age range. Only 8s, 9s, and 10s here, with most of them on the top end of the scale (or off the scale!).

The site consists primarily of photo sets, with a small amount of videos (there were 8 videos released in July, August, and September of this year).

The site looks and navigates very much like Met-Art, which is to be expected as it is one of their sites. I had no problems whatsoever navigating around the site, and my download speeds are always good. I don't know if download managers would work, as I don't use them.

The photographic quality is excellent--lighting, focus, etc are all top notch. One caveat to that is that some sets are shot as low as 6 megapixels. The sets are upscale (often with fine furniture and well appointed rooms), and the girls wear nice outfits and lingerie. The makeup is well done, and not overdone (IMHO). The posing is explicit, but not vulgar, and always seems to include a few good pussy close-ups. Occasionally there is too much fingering and finger spreading in the photos for my tastes, but there are very few sets that actually disappoint me.

The videos deserve special mention and accolades. Any of you who have been a member at Met-Art know their videos are kinda lame. Not so at Eternal Desire. There are explicit lingering views of what you really want to see, and lately, quite of bit of fingering and even finger insertion (though not overdone). The girls interact with camera quite well and seductively. Instead of being a waste of time like many of the videos at Met-Art, these are videos that you actually want to see. The resolutions come in 720p and 1080p, plus a few smaller sizes as well. The HD vids are in MPEG4 format.

The only real cons for the site relate to its relatively small size. 114 models is still small compared to many, and 1 photoset or video day is a lot less than the mega-sites. Eventually I noticed enough of my favorite models there that I had to join. I've been there 2 months now, and I'm finding it difficult to leave (no doubt as soon as I do, several of my favorite girls will have sets published).

Like most of the Met-Art sites, there is a comment section, and Arkisi occasionally participates.

I wish all sites were this good!

The site preview is excellent, so if you are a fan of erotic photography featuring totally gorgeous women, you should definitely check it out! I got the PU discount price by navigating there through their review page.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Bikini Pleasure

3. Bikini Pleasure (1)

Pay
Active
84
Monahan (42) 10-06-14  03:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.

The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.

The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).

There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.

The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).

Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples
Cons: Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.

Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.

The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.

I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material.
Bottom Line: The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.

Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.

In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.

The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.

In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.

The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.

I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.

My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.

Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.

Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.

One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Simon Scans

1. Simon Scans (0)

Pay
yote78 (5) 10-08-14  06:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)

No more videos?

I hadn't browsed on this site in a while and I was very surprised to find that it seems they've taken down all the video content from the site in the past month or so (Sept/Oct '14). I'd always thought of this site as much more of a photography site anyway, but did they really do away with ALL their video content?

Although the site didn't have a lot of videos, at least compared with most other sites, virtually all of the videos were wickedly hot. Wildly uninhibited performances by well-known stars like Eufrat and Carmen Gemini as well as girl-next-door types, all of whom looked like they truly enjoyed showing themselves at their nastiest for the camera. Too bad that now seems to all be gone. I never got around to actually joining but now I know I definitely won't. Most of the appeal for me went away when they took down the videos.

Actually, reading some of the other comments esp. regarding all the potential malware associated with this site, I'm glad I didn't.

Maybe if they bring back the videos AND do something about the malware problems, I would finally get around to joining.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Erotic Beauty

2. Erotic Beauty (1)

Pay
skippy (42) 09-23-14  06:39pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

It's all B roll!

I rejoined EB as part of a special with Watch4Beauty. The EB site has had a slight freshening, but I'm not terribly impressed with the most recent content. First, it is all "B" roll! It seems as though these are sets of slightly less attractive models or, if mainstream models, slightly lesser quality sets. So they may not have been good enough for the main site, Met Art, when they were taken. Second, it is an odd collection of old and new sets. I recognize several models that retired back around 2008 or earlier and here they are in "new releases" this month with different names and the exact same look. A few models have sets from 2007 and new sets in 2014 and they look exactly the same...because they are old sets just being released now. (To their credit, EB lists the age of the model when the sets were taken, but I don't think those ages are accurate.) That usually only happens because the set was not rated very highly back when the model was popular but now, what the heck, who cares, release it! Fourth, some sets of once popular models might be a bit off because when these sets were taken, these models were very near retirement. There are a few sets where I looked at the model, recognized her and although she was still very attractive, she was several years older than she was at her peak. My typical male reaction was "Wow, what happened? She used to be really hot!" There is nothing that reminds you that YOU are getting old more than images of a favorite model showing that SHE is getting old. Depressing. There are also a few sets from the time before a popular model perfected her look. A lot of eastern European girls took a little time to perfect their looks and some of these sets are the "before" pictures. And lastly, releasing a set in 3 parts is positively annoying. There is no reason for this other than to string us along and get more money. Many Met Art sets have 120-160 images in them. These EB sets usually have 40-60 images spread over 2-3 or more pages of 20 images a page. They either do that to minimize load on their servers, or to make it look like there are more images. Either way, its a really cheap trick!

This site is still better than a lot of others out there, but it is really unfortunate when a good site goes mediocre.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babe Fox

3. Babe Fox (0)

Pay
Denner (233) 09-07-14  04:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)

Warning

Most here probably know the deal:
You just signed up/payed and look forward to login on a new site - and then nada.
This site looks just fine in the previews - som quite unfamiliar and great looking models....
But...I keep getting: Login og password invalid. By, George..I know how to write those two ....but still - and then: Wait 15 minuttes and try again. And the same over and over again...
No answer so far from neither Babefox or CCBill......grrrrr!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Solo Models (64)
2. Photography (42)
3. Glamour (22)
4. Public Nudity (2)
5. General (0)

View All : Niches


Softcore @ TBP
1. Only All Site... 93.0
2. Danni.com 86.5
3. Babespotting.... 83.5
4. Bikini Dare 83.0
5. Pretty 4ever 81.0
6. A Measure of ... 75.0

View All : Softcore Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.72 seconds.