This is another site on my list. Was hoping it would be networked with some of there other sites, but looks like they have built up a lot of sets now.
My question is on full access. If I understood the comment I saw on OnlyAll sites, the rotate sets or give you only a few sets, and then you have to pay for more.
Do we get all the content from launch of the site? Not many sites do this, though since this is a special niche site, I can see them maybe pulling material or limiting. Not that I agree with it and generally stay away from such policies.
Thanks for any help.
For a while they had an offer of $9.99/month. But that apparently expired.
I was just a member, and they sent me an email inviting me back, at a special price of $24.99/month, which is their regular price.
PU offers a discounted price of $14.95/month (recurring).
(Automated programs sometimes don't make a lot of sense. It's nice that they have a automated program offering a special price to former members. But when the special price turns out to be the same as the regular price, you sometimes wonder if anyone is asleep at the wheel driving your machine.)
Unrelated topic:
Why do they have a captcha when you want to check the balance on your gift card?
You have to enter the number of the gift card.
Then you have to enter the captcha.
Who the heck is going to use this service to steal something, or play games, or whatever. Why add a captcha, when some of them are so fricking hard to read, you have to enter the captcha several times before you guess it correctly.
If I were God, I'd design to world to suit me better. First, I would assign 100 of the most beautiful girls to satisfy my wants. Then I would increase my wants to satisfy those lovely girls.
I haven't delved in to see if the Holly Randall site that is now part of Met Art Network includes Forever Vamp (the name Forever Vamp without the former content apparently stayed with Brand Danger) and whatever other sites her site had split into under the Brand Danger ownership, but this site is now part of Met Art Network - and can be added to one's Met Art membership at $10/month, as can ALS Scan, SexArt, Viv Thomas, Michael Ninn's site, Rylsky Art, and 4 other sites.
Quite the network our friends at Met Art have put together - congrats on helping to maintain the diversity of internet erotica!
I joined here on a whim, due to the very good TBP price. It's nothing revolutionary, but it's a solid site with lots of content - my review to follow. But for such a big, high-profile site, the members area is a little disappointing. Page loads are slow and there are frequent errors when loading pages (sometimes have to load 2-3 times to get a page to work).
As noted in a recent review, the advanced search - which is essential for a site of this size - is AWOL, so just paging through the models is the best way to browse. And although you can add photographers as favourites, there doesn't seem to be a way to click through and see all their material.
Granted it's a bit churlish to complain for the price! But a site like this should be more on top of this stuff...
TBP shows the site was just launched this month.
Yet the monthly price is $29.99/month, recurring.
That price seems extremely high for a new site, that almost certainly has far less content than the other sister sites in the network.
However, as TBP points out, if you have a membership in one of the Metart network sites, you can get a membership to any of the other network sites for $10/month, recurring.
If you are interested in this site and have subscribed to EvilAngel, DevilsFilm or such in past, check your junk mail. There's a very nice 9,95$ (regional pricing warning!) probably awaiting.
Too bad I have too many sites at the moment that I'm subscribed to.
I got my hopes up when my eyes lit on all the "strip" tags underneath the scenes, contained in this site, until I realized that every site I have ever belonged to is a strip site by their standards if it means that a model takes only a couple of items of clothing off.
"Strip," to me, means more than taking off a bikini top and bottom, or a bra and panties. Another site that can't quite deliver to my taste. This is just a personal observation, since they call themselves a glamour site and not one that majors in full strips.
This site is currently not accepting new members - presumably in preparation for the switch to being managed by Met Art? I'm hoping that's soon - I'm quite a fan and as I am a long-term member at TLE, I can join any other network site for $10 :)
Interestingly, Holly's other sites, like Holly Core and Forever Vamp are still taking members - there is some overlap in the material here with her main site so I wonder what is/isn't happening with these?
Just saw this one today. All the DDF sites are having a 2 day full access trial for free (yes, you still need the credit card info to sign up). Gotta like the price for a network like this.
"The cost of membership is reasonable. It's $30 for the first month but then it recurs at just $20 a month." It's the other way around: $20 for the first month and 30 subsequently.
In the members area Playboy Plus has separated the Playboy Girls galleries for an additional charge. If you un check the box and click on the link to get more information they automatically charge your credit card an additional 49.95 on top of your paid monthly subscription. You get no confirmation page or option to decline this fee. A day later you'll get an email stating they charged your card.
Sorry, TBP, I could not subscribe to this site through you no matter how many times I tried (see comment below) so I purchased a subscription through Epoch directly.
First impression: 12888 videos with ho-hum contents. Only the later videos are true HD while many are 640x480p. I wanted to subscribe to a Japanese site because people are always raving about the "weirdness" of some JAV porn and I was dying to find out how weird it gets. :-)
Well, if you are looking for different, don't bother. It is basic porn, mostly masturbation or oral, wearing Japanese faces.
This is made worse by the abundance of those over-sized hiuge wands that might delight the ladies but manage at the same time to hide what you want to see.
Another purely PERSONAL observation (and disappointment:) far too few really mature women in the lot! I looked under mature and MILF and most wouldn't be much past their early thirties.
The final puzzler: When looking at my personal settings I find that I have a "standard HD account" with the possibility to upgrade! I didn't dare hit that button but am wondering what I would be upgrading to if I did. Maybe all that "weird" stuff I couldn't find? There is no mention anywhere, when first subscribing that there are any standard and higher grade plans.
If you like Japanese girls (and I do), it's not too bad a site, but it is leaving me disappointed because of the sameness of much of the material. A younger person might enjoy it but, trouble is, I've seen it all.
Signed up here the other day and so far loving the high quality photography and the collection of first time never seen before models which features a good percentage of exotic beauties from Asian and Latin countries.
The video collection is rather limited though, only 13 total on the site and only 1 video update in the last year. Also there are no downloads available for the videos and even though the highest quality streaming states 720p it doesn't really look hd.
Hopefully I'll get back with a full review in the next week or so.
This network has lately become the main source of DRM free scenes of Lucy in solo and also hardcore action. In addition to already having one of the best fetish sites around (HouseOfTaboo) this makes the network one of the best at the moment in my opinion. While Rubber Passion keeps fooling around with fair use prevention systems, I'll vote with my money here instead.
I mainly joined this site thanks to the discount price. Just thought I would throw that in as a reason for other webmasters to take the discount route.
I'm still a little iffy on the whole heartcore genre, but I do like the content better here than on the other heartcore sites. I have a few of the same complaints I had with Sex Art, I don't understand why solo sets are included, unless this model is extremely good at masturbation, dirty talk and has a lot of charisma. Eve Angel didn't do the talk at all, but she set a standard very few solo models reach, thanks to her ability to communicate with body movements and eye contact with the camera. The other is more minor complaint and it is the girl/girl content. I don't understand why one of these heartcore sites haven't tried 100% boy/girl. Maybe one has and I haven't found it yet?
Either way, for me, I liked it much better than Sex Art. Will review it over the next week or two once I've had a chance to see it all.
I signed up for this site (taking care to avoid the heavily biased regional pricing) and overall it's good - I'll review it shortly. However, I just found one odd thing that bothered me.
Watching the videos of Jodi Taylor, she has a prominent birthmark on her thigh, and another smaller one above her pussy. They are part of who she is and do not at all detract from how pretty she is - I'd actually say it enhances it, as not trying to cover them shows a little more personality. But they are both notably absent in the corresponding photo sets - which is kind of jarring, especially as the pictures do not otherwise seem heavily photoshopped.
I'd understand if perhaps she asked for them to be removed, but I'm guessing she's not self-conscious about them otherwise she wouldn't be doing porn in the first place! This is wholly unnecessary and I hope it is not an emerging pattern.
I'm not hugely into the schoolgirl niche, although St Mackenzies is vaguely on my list, both because most of the models are very obviously more than schoolgirl age and I'm a fan of the photographer - of Breath Takers and Girlfolio.
However, I do like a girl in uniform or workwear - especially a dominant one (in the milder sense) - so the teachers and matrons here should make it worth watching, hopefully there will be some more material soon!
This site gives the impression that it is updating daily but in reality all they are doing each day is taking a set from the bottom of the updates page (October 2010) and placing it back at the top with the current day's date. Hopefully I'll find time for a full review next week.
Joint this site. When opening HP for members you are informed to download 1 pic set per hour. This hint is on top of EVERY side.
Good photo contend, less videos.
When exceeding the "1 set/h" strange broken downloads occur.
In practice there is a download limit, cause it protects you from downloading in this annoying way.
have quitted the site after finding this out.
Easier to build a collection of playmates through newsgroup.
Even though many of the photos of playmates are available at this site, it's easier to build a collection of playmates through a newsgroup than it is through Playboy PLus.
The collection will also be more complete through a newsgroup.
The problem with a newsgroup is that you have to learn to use a newsreader, and pay for the newsgroup access, and a few other methods you will have to learn.
But for fans of past playmates, a newsgroup offers more complete files (in photos, not in videos), and an easier method of collecting and sorting your photos.
It's been many years since I belonged to a newsgroup, but Playboy Plus made me realize that poor site structure (and other problems with the site) makes newsgroup access a worthwhile alternative for collecting Playboy material.
But there is a lot to learn about how to use a newsgroup effectively.
Sweet Nature Nudes is up for Hot Review at TBP - and it looks great, though I prefer indoor shoots.
And then I take a look at the top site of the company: David Nudes. The content of that site is also and primarily outdoor shoots, so???
I'm looking at the previews to these two sites (wowgirls.com and 18onlygirls.com) and the images and videos are almost exactly the same, but they do not appear to be part of a network. Anyone have any info about that?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
