Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Rocketpay. However never got an acknowledgement email.
-Excellent PU discount
-Many ads for other score sites, but no popup sand not in your face and annoying.
-Did not encounter any broken links or slow downloads
-Updates are at least one new video and photo set per day
-Huge site. 969 models, 4200 videos and 5980 photo sets.
-Well done effective search engine using 69 different tags.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
Cons:
-Some videos are dull interviews. In nearly every one of these videos they say they are sex addicts. I find that hard to believe. A few could be, but I doubt that all are.
-Some videos are set in a foreign travel spot. Not hot as basic posing similar to glamour photo sets.
-Fairly standard glamour style sex.
-Site layout is not too bad, but it could be better. Can move forward or back at most two pages at a time.
-Some models are a bit too BBW for my taste, too many tattoos, and some are silicone enhanced and not natural. In spite of this, there is so much of everything on this site that you can ignore these models and still find a lot to like.
Bottom Line:
Scoreland has been around on the net for decades. They were a magazine for years before that. I am not sure when they opened this site, but the oldest videos and photos are from the late 1990s. The site says it is now their 25th anniversary of being in business. Their specialty is having a treasure trove of large breasted women. Within this particular specialty, Score is an iconic web site. It seems incredible to me that the site has had so few reviews in recent years.
Many of these women are of large overall body size, BBW. Many are not as they are normally proportioned women who have huge breasts. Most of them are all natural, but a much smaller number are silicone enhanced. The models are a mix of known porn stars and some that are not. Not all models do sex, as some are nude only. There is a nice mix of Americans as well as Europeans, Japanese and even models from Latin America. The mix of ages and ethnicities is excellent. For example there are 56 HD Asian videos, 63 of Latinas, and 102 Black women, not all of whom are Americans.
Overall there are 4200 videos of which 3300 are HD. For a site that has been around as long as this has, this is quite good. The HD videos are currently 1280x720, 3900kbps. There is better HD at 1920x1080 and also 4K to be had on other sites, so the site is behind the times on the latest and best quality. On the other hand, they play very nicely on my computer monitor. Maybe on a bigger screen you might have a complaint.
The latest photo sets are 2000x3000, also not the greatest. The photos are not what you get on sites that specializes in them, such as Metart. Mostly the latest photo sets are the same as the videos of the same name, but are not screenshots. Scoreland needs to up their game, but what they do they do well.
The videos come in a few types. XXX is sex videos. This is by far the biggest video category. The sex here is fairly glamorous in style. There is little anal. The sex is not forceful or even very hard. Given all this, the scenes still work well.
The models are mostly quite beautiful, as well as having huge breasts. Many were photo models taking the next step. Most speak in sexy way before and during the videos. There is a large number of videos with jacking, which I have seen described on other sites as JOE, jerk off encouragement. The videos start slowly with tease and buildup. Not blabby, the beginning is stripping and/or verbal sexy talk. The models at least go through the motions, which is better than the usual gonzo that has no buildup at all. This adds a touch of fantasy.
With a focus on breasts, the camerawork adds a nice touch. There is a lot of whole body usage, breast play, fondling, as well as breast sex in most videos. I prefer extreme sites, but I found that here they know how to create sexy, hot videos out of fairly standard sex. It helps a lot when you start with models that really catch your eye. I could see this being a site for couples.
The solo videos are mostly masturbation, but some are sexy stripping. Some are hot, but not all. The girl girl videos are not all lesbian scenes. I found these somewhat dull and uninspired. Some other videos that I did not care for were the ones set in somewhat of a travel location, such as the Caribbean or some city. These remind me too much of photo set glamour photography.
There are also some videos of the models being interviewed. Mostly these were dull, the same as they are on so many other sites. I found it very hard to believe that every model is a confirmed sex addict. This sounds far too scripted.
For me, this is a site that I was very glad that I joined. In spite of it not being a fetish or otherwise extreme site, I truly enjoyed this. It is so big that I could see it taking more than a month for anyone to get their fill.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great monthly sub price (only 15 USD) & awesome FREE 7 days trial.
- Tones of content to download.
- Photosets available for download in ZIP format.
- Videos can be downloaded in parts (clips) or as full movies.
- Website design is very nice and navigation is easy.
- Frequent updates.
- Exclusive content.
- Downloading was pretty fast for me.
- Bonus content and customers support section.
Cons:
- Some photos quality is average.
- Videos quality could be even better.
- No magazine archieves.
- Some content looks old.
Bottom Line:
XL Girls is one of the best adult sites if you are looking for such content.
When you sign up and log in to members area you will find out that tones of content are available for download and surely will like it ;)
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format (sizes 800x600 or 1600x1200) and videos in .wmv or .mpeg
making downloading very easy and simple.
Website design is very cool and navigation is quite easy making member's life easier. You can search by models name or by category making your day better ;-)
From the other hand there are a few things that need improvement, thing that I am sure that it will be taken care of in the near future by sites owners. For example, there are no magazines archieves, which would be definitely good, at my opinion.
I surely recommend this one for lovers of big boobs, it's a great choice especially while monthly sub price is so low.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Deep sleeper site that comes from the Score Group.
Their speciality is pictures in a magazine-style layout.
Videos are not as common, but newer ones are 4K.
Pictures are downloadable. Most have a 3000x2000 download resolution.
Models range from amateur to pro-amateur.
Almost 5,000 models
Cons:
Bonus sites are not even worth looking at. All three sites included as bonus sites stopped updating in 2014 or earlier and the three combined do not offer large collections.
Videos could stand more production and direction. The videos seem more like a bonus to the photo sets.
Picture sets outnumber videos 4 to 1.
Bottom Line:
As a breast-aficionado, the Score Group, has been a longtime destination for my porn money to go to. Naughty Mag does not follow the Score Group’s love of only large-breasted models. I am sure the models being amateur to pro-amateur plays a part in the decision not to focus just on large breasts, but I didn’t even notice. Naughty Mag is the perfect name for this site. Every memory you have of opening a porn magazine as a teenager will flood back into your mind when you look at all these sexy models. Most if not all breasts are all-natural, but some are very small up to medium-large.
The site includes 3 bonus sites. Those are Bored At Home, Porn Loser and Naughty Tugs. They should not even mention these as bonus sites. Two have not been updated in over a decade. The collections are not very large and these scenes and photo s would be just as well-served as Naughty Mag releases. The other issue is with the amount of videos and if the videos are even worth downloading. I will say yes, but the videos are not the focus and should be viewed that way. Any other expectations will bring a letdown.
You should join it with the knowledge and understanding of you’re here for the pictures. The pictures are not only high quality, but feature some of the best lighting you will find in porn pictures. The models, while mostly amateur, are excellent at posing and the photographer gets the best angles. I would even suggest the pictures on Naughty Mag are close to the same league as the Met-Art sites.
There is hardcore content and that may surprise some. The site is promoted more as softcore, and it is, but there’s some hardcore and it at least confirms the videos go beyond posing or teasing. Even so, you’re still better off looking at the pictures.
For me,the make or break point for this site, s centered around your attraction to the models. I find their models to be the prettiest collection of amateur models, and that greatly benefits the site. If anyone knows of a prettier collection of amateur models, I would like to know what site so I can join it. There may be some nostalgic bias based on me loving old pin-up and “girly magazines” but I am sure no one would be disappointed with this content as long as they understand the difference between quantity of photos to videos.
It is one of my favorite sites and is the only amateur site (not on a network) that I join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.
Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p
Excellent streaming at 720p.
Downloads were generally quick for me.
Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons:
Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.
Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.
Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.
Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.
Still a relatively small site with 49 models.
Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.
Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line:
I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.
The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.
I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
* large collection
* multiple video formats
* daily updates
* navigation is easy
* nice browse features
* good price
* no drm videos protection
* exclusive content
* bonus feeds
* good customers support
Cons:
* no photos only vidcaps
* downloading could be faster
* site design needs improvement
* many videos quality is about average
* no bonus websites access
Bottom Line:
scorevideos is a site that must not be missed by big tits fans.
members can download tones of content without drm protection plus bonus feeds will keep them happy!
sites navigation is very easy but still design needs some improvement. downloading speed could be faster but daily updates and good price will make u forget it.
u can download videos as full length or as vid caps but there are no photos but only vid caps :/
i think that it would be good if members could have access to all of their sites with only one pass.
overall site is very good and u should try it!!
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
A lot of sites dedicated to gilf seem to hire whoever wants to work for them. That's not a bad thing, actually it's good to know that there's place for everybody. But that means also that a lot of hardcore sites dedicated to gilfs (Mature.nl, Lusty grandmas, Aged love, Grand mams) often are not exactly the best place to find super hot mature women.
On the other hand 60 plus milfs has the best looking models of this age in the industry. Cara Reid, Katia, Seka Black, Rita Daniels, Chery Leigh, Georgette Parks, Julia Butt, Gina Milano, Cammille Austin, Lady Sextasy, Leah L'amour and many others make this site hands down the best choice if one is into sexy older ladies.
A lot of great scenes (the ones with young men are without a doubt my favorites, check out the ones with Ivan, or those with Matt Sloan, Archie Stone, John Long or James), the interviews are fun, and the fact that they do anal scenes is really appreciated.
Cons:
The recent lack of very young guys in recent times is my biggest complain. I've always thought that their main potential was in scenes where it's possible to see a hot woman like Rita Daniels fucking with a real nineteen or twenty year old guy like Archie or Ivan. Lately they're hiring often men in their thirties or even older, which is a big disappointment.
Also the bad camera work is frankly always been quite bad: no camera movement, lack of good angles (faces are the most erotic thing, and they seems to try to avoid the face of the male performer constantly, and sometimes even of the woman), too much close ups.
And the lenght of 20, 25 minutes for scene is just too short. I don't have anything against a good instroduction with teasing and dialogues, but with scenes that short this means lack of positions or positions seen for just few seconds and with very few angles. I think that scenes of 35-45 minutes could be much better.
Bottom Line:
As said,if you're into hardcore sites with good looking sixty-something ladies this is the best one. And they do anal!
Sadly the full potential of the site is partially ruined by the fact that the scenes with young guys especially recently are very few, and the bad camera work and the fact that the scenes are too short are things to consider.
But in this particular niche this is the site I always eagerly look for the new updates.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Longtime favorite site of gorgeous amateurs
One of the best sites for use of make-up and glamour
Videos and pictures can be downloaded with no limits
There are hardcore scenes, but their solo scenes are my favorite
Huge site that has been around since 1998
Tagging system is very good and one of the best uses of tags I have seen
Cons:
Not enough variety in the hardcore videos
Being a nearly 30 year old site also comes with downfalls
Bottom Line:
18 Eighteen has been around longer than I have been buying porn. I do believe there are downsides to a site being around that long. The site’s producers have to be near or reaching contentment with how much they show in the scenes or even in how deep the scenes go. The majority of scenes on this site are going to give you the basic thrill nearly all porn offers.
One place I see the positive of the duration of this site is in the use of make-up. Glamour with amateur is not common in porn, but 18 Eighteen does it and does it better than anyone. My concern about becoming content is easiest seen in the hardcore scenes. You really do feel like they are painting by numbers in the newer hardcore scenes. It is to the point, you could probably direct the scene yourself.
But, I much prefer the solo scenes and it is where 18 Eighteen stands above the crowd. The models are gorgeous, nearly all, even with the nearly 30 years of existence, this site is somewhat selective with the models that make their way onto the site. Having over 800 models is a big number, but when you consider they have been in business for 27 years, it’s really not that big of a number. You will see some model variation too. There are models from most ethnic backgrounds and the search engine makes it easier to find those.
One of the strongest parts of the site is how easy and effortless it is to use. The tags are accurate and easy to find. It is one of the few big sites that feels like you can see everything on the site in a month. It does help too, if you are not into the hardcore.
The video downloads include the usual HD options and the newer scenes have 4K. As someone who likes 4K, I can say, some of the solo 4K scenes are worth downloading in 4K. I would not download any of the 4K hardcore scenes. It is one of those sites that someone like me wonders if it would just be better off to stick with just solo scenes.
The pictures are excellent and only strengthen the solo scenes. I cannot say I have ever liked any hardcore pictures from any site. Solo picture sets give the viewer more of a slo-motion or step by step view of the video. You can see the parts the video may zoom by and miss.
The other downfall of a site being around 27 years is the scenes may end up having a similar feel to all of them and you will run into that on this site. I am sure it is just because the same producers or directors are producing and directing the scenes, but it makes the content become more love or hate. Luckily for me, I love the solo scenes and am happy to see more solo scenes shot in the same ways. If you are a fan of models that look in the teens group and like solo videos, this could easily become your favorite site. If you are only interested in hardcore scenes, maybe it is still worth a join. Since hardcore is not my favorite genre of porn, maybe I am not the best judge of it?
I do feel confident the majority of porn fans would at least enjoy this site. The models alone are enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good monthly subscription price.
- Hardcore content.
- HD videos quality.
- ZIP download option for photosets.
- No DRM videos protection.
- No download limit.
- Great photosets quality.
- Cool website design.
- Multiple download options for videos.
- Navigation is very easy.
- Bonus content.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Creative scenes photosets / scenes scenario.
- Regular updates.
- Exclusive content.
Cons:
- Needs growth.
- More hardcore content needed.
- No bonus sites access.
- No trial option offered.
Bottom Line:
ChristyMarks.com is a great solo model adult website with interesting content and great quality.
Site's collection is not huge at the moment but I am sure that you will love every Christy's photoset and video offered.
Members can download photosets in ZIP format making it simple and easy. Quality is very good. Videos are offered in multiple download formats and of course HD wmv format is offered (1280 x 720) so ScoreGroup's work is surely professional. Quality is very good in here as well.
Website's design is very good and you will not have a problem with navigation. There is no DRM videos protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
Content is exclusive and site updates 2-3 times per week. Monthly subscription price is good but there is no trial option offered.
Members gain access to few more videos but there is no bonus sites access which would be cool, at my opinion.
There are a few hardcore scenes offered but more are surely needed.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed this one and it's a must for boob lovers.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site.
Cons:
- No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content.
Bottom Line:
Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF ITS KIND:
Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.
I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone).
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Specific niche
- Outstanding preview
- No download limits that I encountered
- Photos and videos available in multiple resolutions
- User friendly site
Cons:
- Photos and videos in multiple resolutions, but it's not always clear what you're clicking on
- Silly write ups
- Personal opinion, but probably shouldn't be its own site.
Bottom Line:
Do you like large women? This is the site for you. If you're shopping for this niche you already know what to expect. BBW, where the girls are big and not always beautiful, but most are passable and a few are genuinely attractive in the zeftig sense. There's ample content (ha, get it?), videos and photos, and download options for most stuff, although the older material will be more limited, of course.
I appreciate sites that offer fairly substantial preview capabilities, and Score needs to be commended for this. You can click through and see the pages upon pages of material, and clicking on individual models will pull up that content and what to expect. Well done, Score. This is refreshing in this day of "main page, scroll down, click on anything and you go to the signup/purchase page" style of websites.
It's my understanding that there were download limits in the past, but I didn't encounter any, and my speeds were good. I had to log back in every day or two, but I appreciate the overall user-friendliness of the site. Similar to the popular approach to main-pages mentioned above, I've spent too much time on websites that log you out after an hour or two and make you go through captchas to get back in to the place that YOU didn't leave. Well done, Score. Make things better for your users and the users will be more likely to spend money on the other sites.
Which brings us to another point, and one that I am on the fence about. You can click on an actress' name and it will pull up her content. Scroll on down and you'll also see other content on other Score sites, and it always sort of irritated me that I'd need to join two or three other sites to get the Score content of one Score model. Pornmegaload is their big semi-network site and priced accordingly, and it sort of seems like the Score sites could all be part of that expensive network.
The write-ups for the scenes are often goofy "Dear Penthouse, you'll never believe..." types of things. Did you know that this model's favorite thing is ALSO getting tit-fucked?
The video quality of the newer clips is good, although the lighting and camera angles can be sub-par. I can never tell much of a difference between the 720 and 1080 clips, but I appreciate having options up to and including 4k. One thing I like a lot is that the video clips aren't outrageous in size. There are lots of sites that will have HD clips that are 3GB+, and this site (and I assume their others) seems to know how to keep them around 1-2GB. Again, well done, Score.
Some of the photo and video download links were unclear on what resolution you were downloading and you'd need to look at the browser info while you hovered over the link to see if it was a higher or lower resolution. No big deal overall, but something that I encountered that might trip some people up if they want the highest resolution available.
A few nitpicks here and there, but recommended overall if this is something that appeals to you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons:
- Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line:
Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.
While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.
The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.
I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.
It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nostalgia is my biggest reason for joining Scoreland
You really could just type the word “boobs” over and over and it would describe the site well
There is a combined 10,000 photo sets and videos you can download
A lot of the videos are now available in 4K downloads
Nearly 1,500 busty models
Promo prices are easy to find including on Porn Users
Cons:
The Score Group has over 60 sites and the majority of those are standalone sites that you must pay a separate membership for. They are in desperate need of a super network with all their sites included
Big boobs, as a boob-fan knows, often includes chubby and even BBW women.
Bottom Line:
As I near my 40s, I finally can say that boobs are no longer my top interest of the female anatomy. Go back 10 years ago and I almost always had a subscription to this site. Despite its age, it is over 25 years old, the navigation, the looks, the search tools, have all been updated to a more modern website. Boobs are greatly glorified and represented by the Score Group. Jiggling, bouncing, heaving, it’s all here and the women are often very pretty, too.
It is for lack of better word, a glamourous site, meaning: the women are usually a little over “made up”. Makeup is flowing by the gallon. The outfits are typically low-cut tops and tight tops. I really don’t agree with the style of dress. Women that are this endowed, do not need clothing to make them look busty. I am going to go even further by saying, I would be happier with this site if the women started out in more clothes.
It is interesting to notice the difference in number of photo sets and videos. There are right at twice as many photo sets and videos, and logic and common sense answers that: The older content was more picture focused due to the internet of that time period being dialup.
Every video, not most or almost all, every single video is in at least HD download resolution. Nearly a third of the videos have the 4K download option.
On the negatives: Score has over 60 sites, but only a few of their sites come with multi-site access. You can tell the site is old with their section called “friends”. That was a popular feature around 20 years ago. I can say after being a member of at least 50 times,, the content feels less inspired than if you just discovered it. There could be and should be improvements that show the models evolving. Instead, you really could look at a video from 2003 and not be able to tell it’s 20 years older than the newest scenes. It's the style of dress. The “look” of the models, their makeup and their hairstyles.
The site does have a high appeal factor. These type of women are the women I grew up wanting to marry, even the BBW ones. If you like women that are chubby or BBW, you’ll find a lot to like on this site.
The navigation is excellent. The site has steadily improved and updated the user functions and features. Thee is a chance new members won’t even notice those changes, but I definitely see the changes. It is still a very good site and value, but for me, the site needs more variety.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
Cons:
- Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.
Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.
There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.
Elvis and me, we'd be mates.
A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.
I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.
Follow-Up:
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great video quality, vids can be downloaded in full scenes or clips.
- Solid amount of Content, some 80 plus vids and hundreds of picture galleries.
- 100% Exclusive content
- Nice variation of solo and hardcore scenes with some anal mixed in.
- Very good pic quality, sets of about 60 pics each, zip files can be downloaded in 800X1600 and 1600X1200 sizes.
- Frequent updates.
- Easy browsing options which have improved since I first joined.
Cons:
- Focus on ass alone is a bit obsessive
- The price, at 29.99, is a bit steep for a site offering no network access. There is at least one way around it however, I joined Legsex at 29.99 and got this site included for 16.99 a month (of course I know not everyone will be interested in Legsex).
- Although there are plenty of pics, it could offer more for a magazine affiliated site.
- Noticed a few dead link picture galleries, these were rare however.
- Plenty here, but still needs growth
Bottom Line:
Overall this site is strong on the fundamentals of pic/vid quality and options. I've been a member of this site for a while now simply due to the fact that for this particular niche there really isn't any better out there. The price is quite high considering there is no network access here; so if you only OCCASIONALLY like to see ebony and Latino gals I would probably suggest other sites like the Bangbros Ballhoneys, or RoundandBrown from Reality Kings. However, the afformentioned sites really have nothing on Bootylicios Mag in terms of both quality, and even potential(as it's still a fairly new site); so if REALLY you need your fill of these ladies, this is the place.
That said, my only real gripe is that the obsessive focus on ass alone may limit the site somewhat. It's quite normal to see whole photo sets without even one full frontal shot of the girl photographed. The videos also follow a similar track, which can make them a bit one dimensional as well. Obviously the name of the site IS "Bootyliciousmag", but for those wanting to see ALL these gals have to offer this could be a turnoff.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful teen models
- Mix of solo, lesbian and hardcore
- Great for both photo and video fans
- 452 videos
- 2356 photo sets
- Site updates regularly
- Supports download managers
- TBP Discount
Cons:
- Video resolutions and bitrates are lower than average
- Bonus sites aren't worth considering in your decision to join
- Photos are lower resolution than many comparable sites
Bottom Line:
I went into this membership with high hopes because the models look to be exactly what I like: young and petite. The site isn't perfect, but it has a narrow focus and it sure does that one thing well: youll see some of the freshest porn models here. What I think bugs me most about this site is that it is so good that if the few flaws fixed on a go-forward basis this would be one of the best teen-themed sites on the net.
I think the best thing this site has are the models. There is a mix of up-and-coming porn stars and girls who just dabbled a bit in porn once or twice. There is also a mix of American and Eastern European / Russian models, but the majority are American. The common theme in the models is that they are all petite, just over 18 and, in my opinion, exceptionally hot. I realize that this is entirely subjective, but these are the exact kind of models I prefer. If you share this interest then a membership here is definitely worth considering.
The site has been around since 2007 and has amassed 450+ videos and 2350+ photo sets. The site updates with two photo sets and one video being added per week. Occasionally there will be two videos per week. The videos are a mix of solo, girl/girl and hardcore. This is just a guess, but it seems that for the last few years at least the split is somewhere around 45% solo, 45% hardcore and 10% girl/girl.
The videos dont follow any specific theme except the setup is intended to showcase the age and freshness of the models. The newer videos are offered with some choice: 1280x720, 640x360, 854x480 in MP4 and 640x360 in WMV. Bitrates are crucial to a video looking good but there isn't any consistency here. Even on the highest resolutions the bitrates can vary quite a bit. I have some scenes with bitrates as low as 1500kb/s. It does appear that the site is now fairly consistent in having bitrates around 3500kb/s. Older videos are WMV only and come in 640x480. Anything older than early 2011 and you will have to be satisfied with lower resolutions and bitrates. It is even later before 1280x720 is offered consistently.
The video quality is obviously the sites biggest flaw. While 720p videos are my choice as a balance between size and look I realize that others want the highest resolution possible. Maybe 4K wont happen, but it seems odd in 2015 to not offer 1280p. An immediate improvement could be made by using better bitrates. All isn't lost though, as the newer videos are encoded in a way to take full advantage of their less-than-stellar specs.
Another odd choice that seems to harken back to a decade ago is that the scenes are offered as five-minute clips. Some readers may disagree, but in my opinion the video offerings are outdated. Having 1280x720 as the top download is below what most people expect these days. Offering five-minute clips seems like its from a different internet era. Are there people buying porn memberships that still download this way?
Photos are a key part of the site too. This is one of the rare sites where photo collectors and video collectors could both feel the site offers good value. The photos do suffer from the same drawbacks as the videos in that they arent very high resolution. The newest photos come in 400x600, 800x1200 and 2000x3000. Older photos are available in a maximum of 768x1200.
The videos are offered in streaming too, and there is an in-browser photo slideshow available.
There are a few minor concerns. The biggest of these is that the search function really doesnt work well. I did a search for anal scenes and got some scenes that had no anal. To make matters worse, I couldnt sort those results to get only videos.
Some minor positives are that the site offers a TBP discount and allows download managers. The TBP page says that managers aren't supported but I had no problem using IDM to queue-up scenes. It may be that multiple simultaneous downloads are blocked. I didnt run into any download limits.
The site offers two bonus sites (Picking Up Pussy and T&A Tryouts) but both of these sites are small and offer what look to be old scenes with new release dates added. You may like the bonus sites, but I wouldnt use factor them in on a decision to join the main site.
I would definitely recommend this site to anyone looking for videos and/or photos of some of the freshest porn models on the net. With the TBP discount this site offers a great value. The older material is definitely not up to par by 2015/2016 standards, but thats to be expected. Some minor improvements to the current videos and photos would take this site over the top. Ill be adding this to my list of sites to join regularly.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I was a member of this site for 6-8 months - the key is here is their loyalty program. I got in at a promotional pricing of $14.95 or $19.95 (not sure) - each month I would get access to 1 more site. You can't choose just any site - they give you 5 or 6 choices each month - the site you really, really want may not be on that list until the following month.
ScoreLand is a huge site. It's a large part of the Score Group's archive of content - which like Big Top Cinema or Pussyman, vivid, etc - shot and filmed a lot, a lot of content. The focus here is on large-bust models. You have video content in all their subdivisions like Naughty Newbies, Voluptuous (large women), etc. You can spend days on end here and not get through all the content.
Videos easily number into the hundreds - perhaps 300+ at 100megs all in all. Photoshoots are extensive as well - I don't remember particularly easy downloads for any of it. Not sure about zip files for images.
Cons:
Layout, organization is poor. Downloads can be slow and are not easy to do en-masse. You have to work a bit to get the content down.
Bottom Line:
Go for the loyalty program.
Go because there are a few models that you love and want to see their work here.
You can look up most content on Scoreland by model (or go to google and play around with xx model and scoreland.com in the search) - you can see most of the specific content before signing up.
Scoreland is unique in that this is THEIR content from 2-3 decades of filming and work. It doesn't get better if you like big bust.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-07-1403:23pm (Update History) Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
Pros:
+There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either.
Cons:
-They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff.
Bottom Line:
*This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites
*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.
*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.
*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.
I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Excellent Site design, easy to navigate and to find whatever you want quickly and easily
+ A Huge varity of video options, streaming, HD and even ipod and psp video downloads for each video
+ High quality photo galleries and complete sets are available to download in zip format
+ Regular Updates, a new video of Karina is added weekly along with a photo gallery supporting the scene
+ High quality High definition video downloads showing Karina in every detail
+ Absolutely no download restrictions, videos and photos are yours to keep forever (if you wish)
Cons:
- Limited content available but growing in size constantly. Currently around 30 full scenes at the current time of this review
- So far Karina has only done solo scenes, there are no hardcore or lesbian scenes, whether this will be something she will add to the site later i'm not sure but it might put some people off the site or limit the time they spend with site.
- HD Content could be better quality. The hd videos are 2100kbps quality which is pretty good but not the best quality i've come across. I think they have done this to reduce the file size of the videos. Also there are no 1080p videos, if you want the highest quality videos.
- Photo's could be higher in resolution
Bottom Line:
If you like young busty girls then you should surely fall in love with Karina Hart, she is a gorgeous busty model with natural HH cup tits, a great rear end and a very pretty face, if you've never heard of her then check her out. She is contracted by the Score Group and has done various photo shoots for the Score and Score Voluptuous magazines along with other busty favourites such as Chloe Vevrier, Merilyn Sakova and Christy Marks, all of which have their own dedicated sites respectively.
Overall I enjoyed the site, I like how the site is presented, very clear and easy to navigate, each category is easy to get to and is listed at the top of each page. Theres an interview with Karina and more information about her as well as some bonus videos from certain sister sites such as christymarks.com. I enjoyed the video content, Karina is always looking smoking hot and wears a variety of different outfits and themes such as a maid, lingerie, tight clothing, bikinis, wet clothes, anything that flaunts her huge boobs really! All scenes are based around her playing with herself with various vibrators and dildos etc, getting wet and playing with cream and other food. As i've said before there are no hardcore or lesbian scenes so if you want some of this then you're out of luck, for now anyway.
There are a miriad of different video options avaiable, hd scenes are 720p 2100kpbs in the highest quality but they are also available in medium quality. If you don't want hd or you have limited hard drive space there are other options which include 640x360 and 320x240 resolutions in wmv or mp4 for quicktime or even streaming the video directly from the site in low or high bandwidth options. You can also download each scene in segmented parts, if you just want to see a certain piece of the scene. If you want to take Karina's videos with you there's also the option to download and transfer each video directly to your mobile device, which include; iphone, ipod touch, ipod classic, ipod nano, Sony PSP and Windows mobile device.
Photos are available in several options, medium (600x400) and large (1200x800). These can be downloaded individually or as complete sets in zip archive format. An online slideshow of each picture set is also available.
Overall I would personally recommend this site to anyone who likes busty girls, however I realise that this is a single model site so you would really have to like Karina Hart to make you join as there are no other models or sister sites included in the membership. I think that this is one of those typical sites where I will be a member for several months and then move on, the content that is currently available is excellent but unfortunately there's not a great deal of it, once you have downloaded what you want I doubt it will be worth the $19.95 per month asking price for the 4 video and photo updates each month but if you think she is hot (like I do) then why not give the site a go.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Natural 36H model "SCORE Newcomer of the Year 2008" official site.
-Really good website design.
-TBP facts are right except for video maximum resolution.
-1280x720 wmv (2100 kbps), 854x480 wmv, 640x360 wmv / mp4. ipod, psp, windows mobile.
-All formats also available to download in 5-minute segments.
-Flash streaming: high bandwidth, low bandwidth and trailer.
-Scripts and scenarios are usually quite elaborate.
-There's music during videos but model can be heard when she moans or speaks.
-Zip files for small (800x600 H / 400x600 V) and large (1600x1200 H / 800x1200 V) pics.
-50-100 pictures per set.
-Scenes usually shot at a studio but good amount of outdoors.
-Current update rate: 1 new scene per week (video and photos).
-Most content is solo but they have been releasing more boy-girl and girl-girl recently.
-Solo videos usually focus on boob playing (jiggle, lick, squeeze, ...) with some masturbation.
-Model is very flexible which makes for many interesting positions.
Cons:
-You enter CC details at their site and don't know what payment processor will charge you.
-I was billed by a processor I had never heard of.
-There is no link between photos and videos page from same set.
-Large portrait pictures are not 1200x1600 but 800x1200.
-Poor interaction: you only get a weekly blog entry with pictures.
-Must solve a CAPTCHA to login every time.
-Extras section is currently just two videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more.
-Long in-depth text interview without video: missed opportunity.
-Website sub-domain name changes periodically: hard to use download managers.
-She sports four weird belly-button piercings in her latest scenes.
Bottom Line:
If you like the model's looks and her huge assets, you should not hesitate about joining (as long as you agree to give your CC details to a little known payment processor). For a solo model site, the update rate is more than OK. Video quality is great and they come up with interesting ideas to make the scenes different, even the solo ones.
The current lack of content (site was launched recently) and the little interaction with the model are what refrains me from rating the site higher. There are weekly blog entries with a few pictures but they are a bit of a letdown: the model seems to have an interesting personality but the most remarkable events during last month's entries were that she was sick for a couple weeks and that she played guitar hero and ate popcorn with some friends. I don't know why they didn't tape the long text interview they have posted.
I liked most of the scenes but keep in mind that there's usually a playful attitude that might not be every one's cup of tea. Specially in the solo videos: playing strip space invaders (banging the buttons with her boobs), squeezing lemons between the tits to make lemonade or a bra fitting session are some examples. Scenes always have some kind of script but it can feel somewhat cheesy at times. I'm not familiar with Score Group content but I believe these kind of things aren't that unusual with them.
During the last couple months, they have been releasing a BG or hardcore GG scene every other week with solo scenes in between. Her hardcore performances aren't bad at all and there's always lots of tit fucking, handjobs and positions that showcase her boobs. There's a BBG scene coming next week and there was a BGG tit fucking scene recently where Janet Jade stole the show: what a RACK!, give that girl a site of her own.
Technically, the site is quite spectacular. The plethora of available resolutions is a real treat. Site design is really good and you are even offered two views while browsing the updates list: large thumbnails with scene description or smaller thumbnails with less info but more updates per page. I didn't pay much attention to photos but they seem to be good enough. It was a bit annoying to always get the smaller 800x600 galleries by default.
Needs growth and a bit more of interaction but I feel it's already a very good site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Lots of real amateur action
+ Over 500000 amateur pictures
+ Hi-Res pics
+ Well-designed site
+ Exclusive content
+ Frequent updates (near daily)
+ Live video feeds
+ MPEG, WMV, MOV video formats
+ ZIP file is provided
+ No DRM protection
+ No download limit
+ Easy to navigate
Cons:
- A little bit pricey maybe
- Not many videos in comparison with amount of pics
Bottom Line:
Naughty Mag is a online magazine featuring amateur content from several sources. This site offers an amazing collection of amateur pics and videos. Everything, beginning from masturbation and ending with hardcore where inexperienced sluts are practicing cock-sucking and try their first anal. This content is always amateur but there are a lot of different categories to surf. The navigation is simple enough for a kid but in the race for quality, there is no finish line. It could be improved. The pictures are pretty big and clear. I was really pleased with the quality. They come in two screen sizes, 800x600 and 1600x1200. Each set is thumbnailed and can be downloaded in a convenient zip file. Videos are available for download in short clips. It is very nice for downloading, but not so convenient for viewing. Nevertheless, vids in MPEG (1500Kbps, 640x480) look fantastic, even at fullscreen. In addition to all this, I've also got access to live video feeds covering everything from hardcore to solo girls. All the video feeds are available 24/7. If you are an admirer of amateurs, like me, Naughty Mag is a must see.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Big, often beautiful women
- Lots of focus on big breasts
- Large site
- Videos and photos available
- Download managers work
Cons:
- Sometimes more big than beautiful
- Lots of fake tits
- Downloads fail just before finishing fairly often
- Flash/java heavy = often unresponsive site design
Bottom Line:
Scoreland is a site that offers a large amount of content containing mostly larger women. It’s not always larger women, though. Sometimes it’s average sized women with large breasts. To my eyes more often than not those women have huge fake tits, but occasionally some of those will even have natural breasts.
The good:
There are often only photos for the older material, which is fine considering how long Score has been in business. On the bottom of the website they note that they’ve been in business for 25 years, and I’d guess that there are still a lot of offerings on their website that span that length of time. And that’s a good thing.
The newer offerings are usually available in multiple formats and even five minute clips of those multiple formats, and I commend the website for taking this approach. 720p is the highest resolution available for download as of September 2018. They look fine, but topping out at 720 is noticeable in this modern day and age of ultra high definition and virtual reality offerings. There are none of the latter that I saw, by the way.
There are often photos and videos available for the newer shoots, but occasionally you’ll find only one or the other.
The not so good:
Download managers work, but it’s not unusual to try to download a video and see it fail right before it finishes and yield a “server error” message. And my “right before” I mean the last 10% of the download. I never could determine that it corresponded with a particular time of day or file size. Sometimes the file would finish and sometimes it wouldn’t. It’s irritating and could certainly influence one’s view of the site.
The site seems to be based heavily on java script. So much so that it won’t show you anything if you’re running a blocker. I also noticed sluggish responses and images that wouldn’t always load unless you scrolled the page down. That would somehow trigger the images that should’ve loaded when the page was initially visited. Not a huge deal but definitely another annoyance.
Bottom line:
A good site with a lot of attractive larger ladies. There are some minor irritations here and there, but I would join again.
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some.
Bottom Line:
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available
+ No DRM
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips
+ Updates 5 days a week
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP
Cons:
- Navigation is a pain but tolerable
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel
- Some advertising on site to buy their products
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download
Bottom Line:
18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.
Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.
All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.
The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.
You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.
Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.
I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked.
I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.
I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
