Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company The SCORE Group
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Score Videos

1. Score Videos (1)

roseman (253) 01-16-07  06:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Large variety of babes
- Access to tones of content
- Good price
Cons: - Downloading was slow sometimes.
Bottom Line: A good choice at a good price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit XL Girls

2. XL Girls (0)

roseman (253) 06-07-07  04:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great monthly sub price (only 15 USD) & awesome FREE 7 days trial.
- Tones of content to download.
- Photosets available for download in ZIP format.
- Videos can be downloaded in parts (clips) or as full movies.
- Website design is very nice and navigation is easy.
- Frequent updates.
- Exclusive content.
- Downloading was pretty fast for me.
- Bonus content and customers support section.
Cons: - Some photos quality is average.
- Videos quality could be even better.
- No magazine archieves.
- Some content looks old.
Bottom Line: XL Girls is one of the best adult sites if you are looking for such content.
When you sign up and log in to members area you will find out that tones of content are available for download and surely will like it ;)
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format (sizes 800x600 or 1600x1200) and videos in .wmv or .mpeg
making downloading very easy and simple.
Website design is very cool and navigation is quite easy making member's life easier. You can search by models name or by category making your day better ;-)
From the other hand there are a few things that need improvement, thing that I am sure that it will be taken care of in the near future by sites owners. For example, there are no magazines archieves, which would be definitely good, at my opinion.
I surely recommend this one for lovers of big boobs, it's a great choice especially while monthly sub price is so low.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score Videos

3. Score Videos (1)

Marianna (Disabled) 06-10-07  05:21am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: * large collection
* multiple video formats
* daily updates
* navigation is easy
* nice browse features
* good price
* no drm videos protection
* exclusive content
* bonus feeds
* good customers support
Cons: * no photos only vidcaps
* downloading could be faster
* site design needs improvement
* many videos quality is about average
* no bonus websites access
Bottom Line: scorevideos is a site that must not be missed by big tits fans.
members can download tones of content without drm protection plus bonus feeds will keep them happy!
sites navigation is very easy but still design needs some improvement. downloading speed could be faster but daily updates and good price will make u forget it.
u can download videos as full length or as vid caps but there are no photos but only vid caps :/
i think that it would be good if members could have access to all of their sites with only one pass.
overall site is very good and u should try it!!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 50Plus MILFs

4. 50Plus MILFs (1)

messmer (137) 07-06-10  11:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p

Excellent streaming at 720p.

Downloads were generally quick for me.

Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.

Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.

Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line: I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Leg Sex

5. Leg Sex (0)

malikstarks (8) 02-19-08  10:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site.
Cons: - No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content.
Bottom Line: Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.

Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.

I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone).
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score HD

6. Score HD (1)

pat362 (367) 11-10-12  11:09am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have a loyalty program where you get access to one extra site each month that you remain a member.
+They truly have a wide variety of different body type models.
+A huge collection of older women models.
+Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV and basic resolution is 640x360.
+They also offer videos in the 1280x720 resolution.
+You can download all the photosets of each video in a single zip file and resolution is 1280x720.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with 6 new videos per week.
Cons: -There's a preview video that automatically starts each time you go to that videos download section.
-There are no tags on the videos so you actually have to search through each one to find what you are looking for.
-Many of the models may not be what you are into.
-They offer two extra sites with your membership but these aren't necessarily all that good.
**-It's possible to see what each model has on the other Score sites but since this is the only site where you can download all the content then that's not necessarily a good thing.
Bottom Line: **I got badly burned when I joined 40something because they implemented their policy of only allowing downloads of only their most recent updates after TBP had done their review so I was pleasantly surpried when I saw that this site offers almost every video I wanted from that site and a lot more. It's not perfect by far but you at least don't have any surpsise when you join this Score site.

*I'm pretty choosy about what I download and I still managed to find some amazing videos that were well worth the membership. The only warning I might give someone is that you should definetely check out all the models prior to joining because they do have a wide variety of models. You have some cute teens all the way to women in their late 40's and probably a couple in their 50's. There is also an abundance of BBW so if this is your thing than you'll have plenty to be happy about. On the downside. If you prefer women under the age of 30 and who are more on the slim side then this may not be your site of choice. Also anyone looking for more softcore or midcore stuff may want to steer clear as there is very little to be found here.

**The site could really use the addition of tags on their videos. It took me a long time to find what I wanted to download because I had to search through each model's video page. A nice search by keyword would really be appreciated by most members.

**It would also be really great if they offered the 50plus and 60plus content. As it is. You can see which models go on to shoot for those sites but yoiu have to join those sites knowing that only a tiny percentage of their content will be downloadable.

**They also don't necessarily add all of the content from their listed sites so while you do get a large amount. You don't get it all so it's very important to check this site's content before joining or you could be in for a surprise.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Christy Marks

7. Christy Marks (1)

roseman (253) 12-21-08  02:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good monthly subscription price.
- Hardcore content.
- HD videos quality.
- ZIP download option for photosets.
- No DRM videos protection.
- No download limit.
- Great photosets quality.
- Cool website design.
- Multiple download options for videos.
- Navigation is very easy.
- Bonus content.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Creative scenes photosets / scenes scenario.
- Regular updates.
- Exclusive content.
Cons: - Needs growth.
- More hardcore content needed.
- No bonus sites access.
- No trial option offered.
Bottom Line: ChristyMarks.com is a great solo model adult website with interesting content and great quality.
Site's collection is not huge at the moment but I am sure that you will love every Christy's photoset and video offered.
Members can download photosets in ZIP format making it simple and easy. Quality is very good. Videos are offered in multiple download formats and of course HD wmv format is offered (1280 x 720) so ScoreGroup's work is surely professional. Quality is very good in here as well.
Website's design is very good and you will not have a problem with navigation. There is no DRM videos protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
Content is exclusive and site updates 2-3 times per week. Monthly subscription price is good but there is no trial option offered.
Members gain access to few more videos but there is no bonus sites access which would be cool, at my opinion.
There are a few hardcore scenes offered but more are surely needed.
In conclusion, I really enjoyed this one and it's a must for boob lovers.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score HD

8. Score HD (1)

messmer (137) 10-23-09  09:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Approximately 800 videos in HD (1280x720), bitrate varies but all are of satisfactory quality.

+ Various tastes are catered to through 8 sites that offer everything from teens to MILFs to plumpers to breast lovers to foot fetishists.

+Zipped Photo sets (large at 1280x720, small at 640x360)

+Almost daily update of one to two videos.

+2 additional sites, one containing non-HD material (Scorevideos) that is pretty good if you don't use full screen (640x480, 640x360 wmv), while the other site caters to owners of hand held devices (Score2Go).
Cons: - All pictures are screen captures. Quality isn't bad but I would rather see a set of a given model in a different setting.

- All models of the various sites and their videos are found in the data base at "Home." I find this a plus but why advertise 8 additional sites if it is really one site with 8 niches.

-No streaming except for previews.

-Search is somewhat limited, offering only "body type," "model name," and "Color Of Hair."
Bottom Line: I like this site very much, it gives me hundreds of good quality videos to choose from. Despite the fact that it is "Score" I do have a choice of models that range from tiny to pleasingly plump and that goes for breast size as well.

The material itself is a welcome mixture of softcore and medium hardcore, in other words nothing extreme or degrading. All clips have at least a little bit of a build-up leading to the action. Just like with Naughty America it isn't much of a story and very much cliche (repair man, rent collector, delivery boy etc.) but better than the hard core without any story found on so many video sites.

I am not reluctant in the slightest to recommend this site.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Mag

9. Naughty Mag (0)

WeeWillyWinky (88) 04-07-08  11:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons: - Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line: Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.

While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.

The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.

I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.

It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

10. 18 Eighteen (0)

WeeWillyWinky (88) 09-23-07  09:08pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
Cons: - Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
Bottom Line: I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.

Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.

There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.

Elvis and me, we'd be mates.

A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.

I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.

The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Bootylicious Mag

11. Bootylicious Mag (0)

malikstarks (8) 02-10-08  11:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great video quality, vids can be downloaded in full scenes or clips.
- Solid amount of Content, some 80 plus vids and hundreds of picture galleries.
- 100% Exclusive content
- Nice variation of solo and hardcore scenes with some anal mixed in.
- Very good pic quality, sets of about 60 pics each, zip files can be downloaded in 800X1600 and 1600X1200 sizes.
- Frequent updates.
- Easy browsing options which have improved since I first joined.
Cons: - Focus on ass alone is a bit obsessive
- The price, at 29.99, is a bit steep for a site offering no network access. There is at least one way around it however, I joined Legsex at 29.99 and got this site included for 16.99 a month (of course I know not everyone will be interested in Legsex).
- Although there are plenty of pics, it could offer more for a magazine affiliated site.
- Noticed a few dead link picture galleries, these were rare however.
- Plenty here, but still needs growth
Bottom Line: Overall this site is strong on the fundamentals of pic/vid quality and options. I've been a member of this site for a while now simply due to the fact that for this particular niche there really isn't any better out there. The price is quite high considering there is no network access here; so if you only OCCASIONALLY like to see ebony and Latino gals I would probably suggest other sites like the Bangbros Ballhoneys, or RoundandBrown from Reality Kings. However, the afformentioned sites really have nothing on Bootylicios Mag in terms of both quality, and even potential(as it's still a fairly new site); so if REALLY you need your fill of these ladies, this is the place.

That said, my only real gripe is that the obsessive focus on ass alone may limit the site somewhat. It's quite normal to see whole photo sets without even one full frontal shot of the girl photographed. The videos also follow a similar track, which can make them a bit one dimensional as well. Obviously the name of the site IS "Bootyliciousmag", but for those wanting to see ALL these gals have to offer this could be a turnoff.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Scoreland

12. Scoreland (0)

EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  08:09am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I was a member of this site for 6-8 months - the key is here is their loyalty program. I got in at a promotional pricing of $14.95 or $19.95 (not sure) - each month I would get access to 1 more site. You can't choose just any site - they give you 5 or 6 choices each month - the site you really, really want may not be on that list until the following month.

ScoreLand is a huge site. It's a large part of the Score Group's archive of content - which like Big Top Cinema or Pussyman, vivid, etc - shot and filmed a lot, a lot of content. The focus here is on large-bust models. You have video content in all their subdivisions like Naughty Newbies, Voluptuous (large women), etc. You can spend days on end here and not get through all the content.

Videos easily number into the hundreds - perhaps 300+ at 100megs all in all. Photoshoots are extensive as well - I don't remember particularly easy downloads for any of it. Not sure about zip files for images.
Cons: Layout, organization is poor. Downloads can be slow and are not easy to do en-masse. You have to work a bit to get the content down.
Bottom Line: Go for the loyalty program.
Go because there are a few models that you love and want to see their work here.
You can look up most content on Scoreland by model (or go to google and play around with xx model and scoreland.com in the search) - you can see most of the specific content before signing up.

Scoreland is unique in that this is THEIR content from 2-3 decades of filming and work. It doesn't get better if you like big bust.

Want higher quality - Go to danni.com (HOTBOX) or Suze.net (Suze Randall). Danni has the big bust queens as well.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score Videos

13. Score Videos (1)

Docloveless (1) 10-24-07  12:16pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -original content
-lots of content
-different niches
-good video quality
-updated often
-great models
-no download restrictions
Cons: -models pictures a bit small when searching content
-needs more amateurs
Bottom Line: Very nice site,worth the money,good content,many models,easy to navigate. enjoy!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score HD

14. Score HD (1)

shooter (11) 02-19-12  11:33am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large collection of exclusive videos to stream and download.

Updated a few times a week.

Good quality vids and pic.
Cons: Plain site and average navigation layout.

Updates are constant but not set on any particular schedule.

Videos are high quality but not neccessarily high-def.
Bottom Line: ScoreHd is a great site for checking out voluptious women in soft and hardcore scenes.
The site mainly vocuses on older plump women though there are some scenes with teens and slimmer models. There are a bunch of mini sites that are a part of ScoreHD like 40 something, Curvy girls, and Bootylicous big asses for example. Most scenes are boy girl and you get about three new ones a week. You also get around two solo scenes a week too. Most the action focuses around older big bressted women taking on a younger big cock guy. Most the action is standard though a lot of those women take it up the ass and the cumshots are mixed between tits, asses and facials.

The updates are regular though there is no set schedule on when they come out, they just pop up day to day. You might get a preview the day before of whats coming. The videos are able to be streamed or downloaded. The downloads are available in wmv format only and in small clips or the whole scene in a high and low resolution. The site says its high-def, and the videos are good quailty but don't appear to be true high-def based on todays definition. Each scene has a brief description, a trailer that pops right up, the videos, screencaps, a rating system, a selection for your favorites, and most have a comment section for you to remark on the scene.

You also get access to score videos and score2go. The first is just older vids from various score sites and the second is the same but lower resolution desigened for mobile devices.

Overall this is a good site to check out if you like to see more mature plumper women getting nailed by big cocks. Some of the scenes are scripted others are more gonzo style. All the scenes seem exclusive and most the models are amateur or exclusive to Score too.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Christy Marks

15. Christy Marks (1)

atrapat (112) 10-12-08  11:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Natural 36H model "SCORE Newcomer of the Year 2008" official site.
-Really good website design.
-TBP facts are right except for video maximum resolution.
-1280x720 wmv (2100 kbps), 854x480 wmv, 640x360 wmv / mp4. ipod, psp, windows mobile.
-All formats also available to download in 5-minute segments.
-Flash streaming: high bandwidth, low bandwidth and trailer.
-Scripts and scenarios are usually quite elaborate.
-There's music during videos but model can be heard when she moans or speaks.
-Zip files for small (800x600 H / 400x600 V) and large (1600x1200 H / 800x1200 V) pics.
-50-100 pictures per set.
-Scenes usually shot at a studio but good amount of outdoors.
-Current update rate: 1 new scene per week (video and photos).
-Most content is solo but they have been releasing more boy-girl and girl-girl recently.
-Solo videos usually focus on boob playing (jiggle, lick, squeeze, ...) with some masturbation.
-Model is very flexible which makes for many interesting positions.
Cons: -You enter CC details at their site and don't know what payment processor will charge you.
-I was billed by a processor I had never heard of.
-There is no link between photos and videos page from same set.
-Large portrait pictures are not 1200x1600 but 800x1200.
-Poor interaction: you only get a weekly blog entry with pictures.
-Must solve a CAPTCHA to login every time.
-Extras section is currently just two videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more.
-Long in-depth text interview without video: missed opportunity.
-Website sub-domain name changes periodically: hard to use download managers.
-She sports four weird belly-button piercings in her latest scenes.
Bottom Line: If you like the model's looks and her huge assets, you should not hesitate about joining (as long as you agree to give your CC details to a little known payment processor). For a solo model site, the update rate is more than OK. Video quality is great and they come up with interesting ideas to make the scenes different, even the solo ones.

The current lack of content (site was launched recently) and the little interaction with the model are what refrains me from rating the site higher. There are weekly blog entries with a few pictures but they are a bit of a letdown: the model seems to have an interesting personality but the most remarkable events during last month's entries were that she was sick for a couple weeks and that she played guitar hero and ate popcorn with some friends. I don't know why they didn't tape the long text interview they have posted.

I liked most of the scenes but keep in mind that there's usually a playful attitude that might not be every one's cup of tea. Specially in the solo videos: playing strip space invaders (banging the buttons with her boobs), squeezing lemons between the tits to make lemonade or a bra fitting session are some examples. Scenes always have some kind of script but it can feel somewhat cheesy at times. I'm not familiar with Score Group content but I believe these kind of things aren't that unusual with them.

During the last couple months, they have been releasing a BG or hardcore GG scene every other week with solo scenes in between. Her hardcore performances aren't bad at all and there's always lots of tit fucking, handjobs and positions that showcase her boobs. There's a BBG scene coming next week and there was a BGG tit fucking scene recently where Janet Jade stole the show: what a RACK!, give that girl a site of her own.

Technically, the site is quite spectacular. The plethora of available resolutions is a real treat. Site design is really good and you are even offered two views while browsing the updates list: large thumbnails with scene description or smaller thumbnails with less info but more updates per page. I didn't pay much attention to photos but they seem to be good enough. It was a bit annoying to always get the smaller 800x600 galleries by default.

Needs growth and a bit more of interaction but I feel it's already a very good site.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Karina Hart

16. Karina Hart (0)

kman1982 (13) 11-29-08  08:35am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Excellent Site design, easy to navigate and to find whatever you want quickly and easily

+ A Huge varity of video options, streaming, HD and even ipod and psp video downloads for each video

+ High quality photo galleries and complete sets are available to download in zip format

+ Regular Updates, a new video of Karina is added weekly along with a photo gallery supporting the scene

+ High quality High definition video downloads showing Karina in every detail

+ Absolutely no download restrictions, videos and photos are yours to keep forever (if you wish)
Cons: - Limited content available but growing in size constantly. Currently around 30 full scenes at the current time of this review

- So far Karina has only done solo scenes, there are no hardcore or lesbian scenes, whether this will be something she will add to the site later i'm not sure but it might put some people off the site or limit the time they spend with site.

- HD Content could be better quality. The hd videos are 2100kbps quality which is pretty good but not the best quality i've come across. I think they have done this to reduce the file size of the videos. Also there are no 1080p videos, if you want the highest quality videos.

- Photo's could be higher in resolution
Bottom Line: If you like young busty girls then you should surely fall in love with Karina Hart, she is a gorgeous busty model with natural HH cup tits, a great rear end and a very pretty face, if you've never heard of her then check her out. She is contracted by the Score Group and has done various photo shoots for the Score and Score Voluptuous magazines along with other busty favourites such as Chloe Vevrier, Merilyn Sakova and Christy Marks, all of which have their own dedicated sites respectively.

Overall I enjoyed the site, I like how the site is presented, very clear and easy to navigate, each category is easy to get to and is listed at the top of each page. Theres an interview with Karina and more information about her as well as some bonus videos from certain sister sites such as christymarks.com. I enjoyed the video content, Karina is always looking smoking hot and wears a variety of different outfits and themes such as a maid, lingerie, tight clothing, bikinis, wet clothes, anything that flaunts her huge boobs really! All scenes are based around her playing with herself with various vibrators and dildos etc, getting wet and playing with cream and other food. As i've said before there are no hardcore or lesbian scenes so if you want some of this then you're out of luck, for now anyway.

There are a miriad of different video options avaiable, hd scenes are 720p 2100kpbs in the highest quality but they are also available in medium quality. If you don't want hd or you have limited hard drive space there are other options which include 640x360 and 320x240 resolutions in wmv or mp4 for quicktime or even streaming the video directly from the site in low or high bandwidth options. You can also download each scene in segmented parts, if you just want to see a certain piece of the scene. If you want to take Karina's videos with you there's also the option to download and transfer each video directly to your mobile device, which include; iphone, ipod touch, ipod classic, ipod nano, Sony PSP and Windows mobile device.

Photos are available in several options, medium (600x400) and large (1200x800). These can be downloaded individually or as complete sets in zip archive format. An online slideshow of each picture set is also available.

Overall I would personally recommend this site to anyone who likes busty girls, however I realise that this is a single model site so you would really have to like Karina Hart to make you join as there are no other models or sister sites included in the membership. I think that this is one of those typical sites where I will be a member for several months and then move on, the content that is currently available is excellent but unfortunately there's not a great deal of it, once you have downloaded what you want I doubt it will be worth the $19.95 per month asking price for the 4 video and photo updates each month but if you think she is hot (like I do) then why not give the site a go.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Mag

17. Naughty Mag (0)

silver (41) 11-19-07  02:22am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Lots of real amateur action
+ Over 500000 amateur pictures
+ Hi-Res pics
+ Well-designed site
+ Exclusive content
+ Frequent updates (near daily)
+ Live video feeds
+ MPEG, WMV, MOV video formats
+ ZIP file is provided
+ No DRM protection
+ No download limit
+ Easy to navigate
Cons: - A little bit pricey maybe
- Not many videos in comparison with amount of pics
Bottom Line: Naughty Mag is a online magazine featuring amateur content from several sources. This site offers an amazing collection of amateur pics and videos. Everything, beginning from masturbation and ending with hardcore where inexperienced sluts are practicing cock-sucking and try their first anal. This content is always amateur but there are a lot of different categories to surf. The navigation is simple enough for a kid but in the race for quality, there is no finish line. It could be improved. The pictures are pretty big and clear. I was really pleased with the quality. They come in two screen sizes, 800x600 and 1600x1200. Each set is thumbnailed and can be downloaded in a convenient zip file. Videos are available for download in short clips. It is very nice for downloading, but not so convenient for viewing. Nevertheless, vids in MPEG (1500Kbps, 640x480) look fantastic, even at fullscreen. In addition to all this, I've also got access to live video feeds covering everything from hardcore to solo girls. All the video feeds are available 24/7. If you are an admirer of amateurs, like me, Naughty Mag is a must see.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score HD

18. Score HD (1)

james4096 (126) 07-26-09  09:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to score video archive & mobile site
- Video resolution is pretty good
- Zip photo downloads
- Pretty decent sized library
- Daily updates
- Great value at $19.95 sale price
- No DRM
Cons: - Flash ads on every page in the members area.
- Photos are screen caps only
- The trailers play automatically on the video pages(it gets annoying)
- Content is not totally exclusive
Bottom Line: If you're familiar with Score then you'll know what this site is about. If not then I'll tell you, Bit Tits. You'll find a lot of the popular big and massive tit models here. The quality and design is much better than what you might have seen on the old Score Video. Overall, I'd say this is a decent site. I wouldn't really call myself an big tit aficionado, but I'm always looking for new videos so I joined.

Here are the sites in the network:

XL Girls
Leg Sex
Naughty Neighbors

You also get Score Video which has lots of older video content and Score 2 Go, which is geared towards mobiles/portables. Each month you get a loyalty bonus which means access to a new site. These are actual sites that you would have to pay for, not just crap feeds, though they can be small.

I didn't notice a daily download limit, but I should mention you are allowed up to 6 video downloads at one time, but you can still browse while downloading.

There are currently 680 videos in Score HD, and that doesn't include the stuff from Score Video. The top quality full scene videos are wmv's at 1280x720 and 3600kpbs or better. These are actually HD videos and look pretty good. If you have an older computer or laptop you may want to stick to the medium quality 854x480(1600kbps). The videos are also offered split into parts if you prefer.

This site is not for picture lovers. The only have screen caps from the video scenes. Would it be that big of a deal to shoot some photos of the girl before the scene starts at least? They are available in zips though, but they are blurry.

As you can tell by the network list, this network has a good little variety of sites that should satisfy more than one taste. I should stress that this is mostly for big boob lovers. Sure the videos for Leg Sex are pretty good by leg enthusiast standards, but what Score does best is big tits. So, if you're into big big titties, then I recommend this site. If you like it, stick around for the loyalty bonus sites, normally you'd pay $20+ for those anyway.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Scoreland

19. Scoreland (0)

xyzzy (11) 07-29-08  12:42pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well-established name in the industry. You know what content you're getting with this site!
- Large model archive, including both natural breasts and silicone-pumped monsters
- Updated nearly every day!
- Good selection of videos and photos, with different resolution offers
- Rewards loyalty; you receive extra sites added to your account the longer you stay, featuring more exclusive content. This is a great idea.
- photo and video clarity is good; even the gonzo-style shoots feel professional and well-shot
Cons: - Site can be a pain to navigate. Way too many options, menus, etc. Some links don't work or crash. Pages are not consistent; some photoshoots have a completely different layout to others.
- maximum of 6 downloads at once
- It's just what you'd expect from reading the magazine. All the photos have pretty much the same style, the language is the same..etc. A little bit of variety would help.
- Scoreland don't choose models for their beauty, but for their bustline. Some of them are just, well, ugly. Sorry girls.
- Varying content on each model. You may browse and find a model you like, only to discover she only has one bad photoset, from 1998.
- Download speed isn't great, for me in the UK. I have a 2Mb/s connection, but sometimes was barely getting 48kb/s, and never more than 500kb/s
- no complete archive of the Score magazines, which I would have liked to see.
Bottom Line: So, if you're a fan of big boobs, Scoreland is obviously the place to be. They've been going for decades now in print, producing the same kind of professional-quality boob pictorials ever since the beginning.

I'd say it's definitely worth giving the site a try. There's a large collection of models (albeit some have very little content), new updates every day or so, and loads of content. And the way that they give you an extra site every few weeks is awesome, it's a great incentive to stay.

The biggest problem with the site is that it just gets boring after a while. Everything looks the same; the models all use the same poses; the lighting doesn't vary much. Even the hardcore all seems vaguely similar. You find yourself watching the vids and thinking, "why didn't they just change the formula a bit?"

I ended up just going through the model list, picking the models I liked the look of, and downloading their content. I barely glanced at the homepage or updates, which is a bad sign.

Don't get me wrong, it's still a professional, entertaining site with great content and regular updates, and it's a must-subscribe if you're a breast fanatic, even if it's just for a month. But after a while, it all just looks the same.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

20. 18 Eighteen (0)

Wittyguy (95) 10-24-08  05:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available
+ No DRM
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips
+ Updates 5 days a week
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP
Cons: - Navigation is a pain but tolerable
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel
- Some advertising on site to buy their products
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download
Bottom Line: 18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.

Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.

All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.

The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.

You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.

Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.

I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked.

I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.

I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Score Videos

21. Score Videos (1)

pat362 (367) 11-18-12  07:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week.
Cons: -None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video.
Bottom Line: *I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.

*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.

*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.

**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

22. 18 Eighteen (0)

TheSquirrel (53) 02-01-11  10:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM/DL limits.
A variety of download options with good download speed.
Sites still updating.
Lack of irritating things Porn Users hate like pulling hair, spitting, slapping, insulting the models, mucking about on camera etc.
Good customer service, and no pre checked cross sells.
No regional discrimination.
$10 discount for 18 Eighteen through TBP/PU.
Easy sign in procedure.
Good quality video and zipped pics.
Mostly no contraceptives.
Models are young, attractive, have girl next door looks, and there are mercifully few fake breasts.
Cons: Navigation is difficult, not least because there are far too many links and adverts for trying to sell members material outside the membership.
Far too many tattoos and piercings.
To use a perfect Drooler phrase - "pussy fixated" sums up the photography and camerawork, which is a shame because they are professionally done, with both the videos and pics looking good. It's just there are far too many close up groin shots, and three quarter shots, especially in the videos, where you don't see the whole model.
Very little anal.
Suprisingly few videos compared to some sites, especially long serving ones. Less than half the material on 18 Eighteen is hardcore.
Bottom Line: TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy are included with membership. You get a 10 dollar discount through TPB/PU. I was more interested in TNA and PUP than 18 Eighteen as they specialise more in hardcore, but I joined through 18 because of the discount. Less than half of the 18 Eighteen material is hardcore.

Pics come in downloadable zips or you can watch them as slideshows. Videos can be streamed or downloaded. Specs are as follows-:

Pics 1600 high or 800 medium resolution. TNA only has around 16-30 in each set whereas PUP and 18 Eighteen have 50-80.

Full downloadable videos in HD wmv at 1280x720 and medium HD wmv at 854x480. Medium wmv at 640x360 and mp4 at 640x360. There are also 5 minute segments in wmv at 640x360 and 360x240, or mp4 at 640x360. Unfortunately 18 Eighteen does not have the high 1280x720 downloadable videos. They do have 720 HD streaming. Full videos or 5 minute clips are available for mobile devices.

The videos on TNA Tryouts take the form of a girl coming to the door and pretending to be a newcomer. She takes part in a short interview before doing a strip and having sex. On Picking Up Pussy the build up takes the form of a girl being picked up by a driver or on a street/in a park. On 18 Eighteen the sex starts a little quicker. You see the same girls on all three sites, so the build up is just a bit of acting to get the scene going. Camera work and pics are good quality, but once again there is far to too much groin/pussy oriented and three quarter close ups for my taste.

On TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy the videos and photo sets are dated, so although they are kept separate you can match up the pics to the video. On 18 Eighteen it's horrible. Very little is dated so in most cases you have to find either the photo set or video, then go to the model directory to match up the videos and pics. In fact there are so many bits and pieces, which are usually not great quality, that trying to find anything is very time consuming and annoying, because it's all mixed up with the upsells. Some of the material comes with the membership, some of it doesn't, and it's really tedious trying to sort out which is which. In the end I spent most of my time on the two bonus sites.

As on all sites, the older material is poorer quality. Given how long 18 Eighteen has been going I was surprised at how little high spec material was available. There was not a lot of hardcore avavailable on 18 Eighteen, but the other two sites are purely hardcore. Today I have counted 15 videos and photo sets on TNA, with 5 of them being 2011 updates. On PUP there are 30 videos and photo sets, with 5 being 2011 updates.

On cancellation there was an offer to remain for five pounds. If navigation was not so hard I'd have probably taken the offer.

However, I consider the money well spent, and good value. This is another site that I find to be almost old fashioned, and better for it, because of the lack of those annoying cons that we all hate.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Leg Sex

23. Leg Sex (0)

cucuta (6) 05-24-09  05:28pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons: - Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.

-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.

- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line: I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.

My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?

I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.

I think it is worth the discounted price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Scoreland

24. Scoreland (0)

BubbaGump (18) 01-15-12  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Huge amount of content.
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- A little pricey compared to competition.
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.


Pros and Cons:

-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site.

-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.

-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.



This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl.

Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to Score HD to download HD.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

Who won't like this site:

Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.


Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: C-
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B+
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: A
Quantity: A+
XXX Action: C


Suggestions for improvement:

Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply

Visit XL Girls

25. XL Girls (0)

jonesyboy (23) 01-14-07  06:36am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Tons of content
-Large, natural breasts? This is the place
-latest vids are solid quality
-Easy to navigate
-hardcore and softcore
-Updates regular and consistent
Cons: -Difficult to cancel (See bottom line)
-Annoying tendency to post updates already seen on Scoreland (some years old)
-Isses with replying to email questions\complaints
Bottom Line: If you love natural breasts (and unlike it's sister site Scoreland, this site is all natural), then you will be busy for a long, long time.

So overall I would recommend this site.

But the first two cons really hold the score down. It seems the only way to join is with Scoreland's provider and not through CCBill or the like. Which would be OK except they don't send a confirmation email when you join, which makes it much harder to cancel.

Also, the last time I was a member I didn't receive a cancel mail either, which forced me to contact them to verify.

The more conspiracy-minded among us might think they do this on purpose, but decide for yourself on that.

Also, the posting of sets that are already available elsewhere (on Scoreland) is not good. Many updates I've seen I recall seeing before (years ago sometimes).

But overall, there's no question this site is worth a membership (just make sure you catch the URL on the joinpage so you know where to go to cancel).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (11)
2. VideoBox (8)
3. X-Art (7)
4. Naughty America (7)
5. Babes Network.com (6)
6. DDF Network (6)
7. Wow Girls (5)
8. Reality Kings (5)
9. Bangbros Network (5)
10. Evil Angel (5)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.14 seconds.