Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Christy Marks

Christy Marks (1)

atrapat (112) 10-12-08  11:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Natural 36H model "SCORE Newcomer of the Year 2008" official site.
-Really good website design.
-TBP facts are right except for video maximum resolution.
-1280x720 wmv (2100 kbps), 854x480 wmv, 640x360 wmv / mp4. ipod, psp, windows mobile.
-All formats also available to download in 5-minute segments.
-Flash streaming: high bandwidth, low bandwidth and trailer.
-Scripts and scenarios are usually quite elaborate.
-There's music during videos but model can be heard when she moans or speaks.
-Zip files for small (800x600 H / 400x600 V) and large (1600x1200 H / 800x1200 V) pics.
-50-100 pictures per set.
-Scenes usually shot at a studio but good amount of outdoors.
-Current update rate: 1 new scene per week (video and photos).
-Most content is solo but they have been releasing more boy-girl and girl-girl recently.
-Solo videos usually focus on boob playing (jiggle, lick, squeeze, ...) with some masturbation.
-Model is very flexible which makes for many interesting positions.
Cons: -You enter CC details at their site and don't know what payment processor will charge you.
-I was billed by a processor I had never heard of.
-There is no link between photos and videos page from same set.
-Large portrait pictures are not 1200x1600 but 800x1200.
-Poor interaction: you only get a weekly blog entry with pictures.
-Must solve a CAPTCHA to login every time.
-Extras section is currently just two videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more.
-Long in-depth text interview without video: missed opportunity.
-Website sub-domain name changes periodically: hard to use download managers.
-She sports four weird belly-button piercings in her latest scenes.
Bottom Line: If you like the model's looks and her huge assets, you should not hesitate about joining (as long as you agree to give your CC details to a little known payment processor). For a solo model site, the update rate is more than OK. Video quality is great and they come up with interesting ideas to make the scenes different, even the solo ones.

The current lack of content (site was launched recently) and the little interaction with the model are what refrains me from rating the site higher. There are weekly blog entries with a few pictures but they are a bit of a letdown: the model seems to have an interesting personality but the most remarkable events during last month's entries were that she was sick for a couple weeks and that she played guitar hero and ate popcorn with some friends. I don't know why they didn't tape the long text interview they have posted.

I liked most of the scenes but keep in mind that there's usually a playful attitude that might not be every one's cup of tea. Specially in the solo videos: playing strip space invaders (banging the buttons with her boobs), squeezing lemons between the tits to make lemonade or a bra fitting session are some examples. Scenes always have some kind of script but it can feel somewhat cheesy at times. I'm not familiar with Score Group content but I believe these kind of things aren't that unusual with them.

During the last couple months, they have been releasing a BG or hardcore GG scene every other week with solo scenes in between. Her hardcore performances aren't bad at all and there's always lots of tit fucking, handjobs and positions that showcase her boobs. There's a BBG scene coming next week and there was a BGG tit fucking scene recently where Janet Jade stole the show: what a RACK!, give that girl a site of her own.

Technically, the site is quite spectacular. The plethora of available resolutions is a real treat. Site design is really good and you are even offered two views while browsing the updates list: large thumbnails with scene description or smaller thumbnails with less info but more updates per page. I didn't pay much attention to photos but they seem to be good enough. It was a bit annoying to always get the smaller 800x600 galleries by default.

Needs growth and a bit more of interaction but I feel it's already a very good site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (12)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cybertoad (Disabled) Awsome review, id give you a plus rating if I could. I wont join the site I wasnt impressed by the previews or model. But the quality looks awsome. The review was detailed helpful, I am sure if other like this model they would join looks good just not my thing. ( I like more firmness to the mams lol)and not huge. But thats just me great review and look like site too.
10-12-08  03:15pm

Reply To Message


roseman (253) Great review, thanks dude.
10-13-08  02:00am

Reply To Message


roseman (253) Just joined and so far I am impressed.
10-13-08  07:40am

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) As with CT, I like a bit of firmness too but well developed floppers are still a turn on for me. This babe's mam's are spectacular anyway and she knows how to play with them and other body parts to great effect. The public site's video samplers made little Willy excited until he became big Dick.

I've learned my lesson on single model sites, but at $30 for three months, and with the fact that the site seems very actively updating, I may just toss a few bucks in the bucket and go for it.

Questions for atrapat. You said, "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova." Does that mean her site is a bonus site or just that there are a few videos in Christy's site? Also are there any bonus sites or other "girlfriends" material in this site?

10-13-08  08:17am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Question: In the past I had problems with the huge Watermarks (Logos) on most of the Score sites. I just checked the preview videos where they are still not translucent but not too hard to take because they are fairly small and on the bottom right. How are the pictures when it comes to watermarks? Are they (the logos) big, small, intrusive, discrete, solid or translucent? Thanks, it's a really big factor for me.
10-13-08  08:27am

Reply To Message


atrapat (112) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

> "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova."

I should have said "just TWO videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more" : no bonus acess to other sites or other girlfriends sets. I've edited the review to remove any confusion.

Glad that you found my review interesting too.

10-13-08  11:15am

Reply To Message


atrapat (112) REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

Watermarks on the pictures I've checked are always on the top right corner. It's the same one they have on the videos. On large pics, the CHRISTY part is about 170x70px and it's an almost solid block because of the typeface; there's a 40px-high part below with "Marks.com" which has a much lighter typeface.

I usually don't mind watermarks but these might be somewhat obtrusive, specially on the portrait pictures : they have a long axis of only 1200px which I hadn't realised when I wrote my review.

As I said, I feel pictures are quite good. They are not taken while filming the video: model is always looking and striking poses at the photo camera.

10-13-08  12:00pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - atrapat :

Thanks for taking the trouble to reply, atrapat. Your additional information is very helpful!
10-13-08  12:08pm

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) REPLY TO #6 - atrapat :

Ditto what messmer said. Thanks.
10-13-08  12:18pm

Reply To Message


atrapat (112) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Glad you liked the review. To each his own, though. Funny thing is I'm not a big fan of extremely huge boobs either and the usual body type of SCORE models has never done it for me but there was something with Christy Marks that prompted me to join and no complaints. The BGG scene with "major boobage" Janet Jade alone was well worth the price of admission.
10-13-08  03:11pm

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) Quite an excellent review. Very informative. I have joined Score sites in the past and found them dull, but you did a really good job here.
10-16-08  03:52am

Reply To Message


atrapat (112) REPLY TO #11 - mbaya :

Thanks. I guess I already said it in my review but this is the first Score site I've ever joined but I've added Scoreland to my list of sites to join in the future: it has a nice TBP discount and I believe it's the one with the most content.
10-17-08  09:11am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.