Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Original exclusive site content
-Regular Updates (current average 16 new scenes every 7 days)
-High speed direct downloads
-2200 smokin hot european girls - Average age range: 18-30
-Over 8000 scenes spread over 40 exclusive sites mainly consisting solo, lez, anal and dp scenes
Behind the scenes available for some videos
-up to 1080p Full HD resolution video quality - Multiple video formats - PS3/XBOX 360/WDTV Live compatible - All scenes are DRM Free
-Scenes available to be viewed in browser with flash streaming - Multiple quality options to best suit your internet connection
-Picture sets for every scene
-Websites are very easy to navigate
Cons:
Girls are all eastern european and at least 75% or more speak very little english beyond generic lines like "oh baby" and "fuck me"
-|| What Plan To Get ||-
2-3 sessions or more per week porn users that are always looking for new releases, I recommend going for a 1 year subscription for $119.40 which works out to $9.95 a month.
If your only an occasional porn user (1-2 sessions a week) to get most out of 21sextury for your money I recommend going for a 1-3 month subscription.
-|| Conclusion ||-
If your a regular porn user like me and enjoys HD downloads of scenes containing solo, lez, anal and dp with smokin hot young girls then 21sextury is great value for money and highly recommend it above all other xxx sites.
No other website I know of can keep providing every week new exclusive full HD anal and dp scenes featuring some of the hottest porn girls in the industry today - for this reason I award 21sextury with a full 100 of 100 rating!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great, huge selection of top class Busty models, including famous models like Zuzana D, Carol,Lucy, and introducing great new models all the time every month.
-Highest quality top resolution full size pictures, easy downloadable in one file, amazing high resolutiion and definition videos.
-Very friendly user interface and site design make it a pleasure to navigate.
-Direct full support and short responce times to your feedback and requests.
Cons:
None
Bottom Line:
If you love Busty women, you'll find ABSOLUTELY everything in DDF Busty, all your favorite models and more in great sets and videos of the best quality, in a friendly and cozy to use site.I definitely recommend it to all Busty models fans.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
ALS has been setting the bar high for years.
-all models are shaved and otherwise natural
-over 500,000 pics in zips
-resolution 2000x3000
-overall amount of content is overwhelming
-lost count of videos, but I'd guess over 3000
-most videos in 1080P
-mostly solo and g/g
-subjects also include b/g, peeing, dildos, speculums, fisting, anal insertions, anal fisting and lots of outdoors and BTS
-newly redesigned and searchable website with tags (90% of peeing content was tagged correctly, I looked at everything on their site and tagged the remaining 10%. You are welcome.)
-one, sometimes two updates daily
They are remastering lots of their older stuff. How cool is it to see those favorite pics of yours from years ago in more detail than ever before? This is one of the coolest things going on at ALS right now. I give them so much credit for staying true to their roots, and for putting in the real effort and investment that it takes to do this.
Cons:
I honestly can't come up with any cons here.
Some past reviews have mentioned their introduction of b/g content as a con, while other have considered it a plus. I'm pretty neutral on it personally. To those who feel that ALS is straying from their roots with b/g content, I will say that is not true. ALS has done b/g content in their early days too, including one video with Mia that I'm thinking of, it was just rare back then.
The merger with Met Art was totally a good thing, all concerns regarding that have not played out, and they have kept everything that made them unique and great while totally modernizing their site.
You may notice some of the oldest archived sets appear thinned out. This is not new, they were thinned out on their old site too, actually those old archived sets were just samples of what was once available on CDGirlsOnline.com. As part of their renovation with Met Art, ALS had actually brought more pics back online than they had before.
Bottom Line:
ALS - All Ladies Shaved. I obviously love this site, because I have given it my top score. If you look at all of the sites that I have scored close to 100%, they all have one thing in common - they are large, high quality networks that are run like the best of the small operations. This could not be more true of ALS - they go to every length possible to please their customers. Usually, the "Bottom Line" is the section where I go into objective detail about a site. With ALS, I will ask you to forgive me for being a bit subjective, because I would rather tell you the story of my own personal experience. ALS is a site that dates back to 1996, just about my earliest days ever seeing online porn. I didn't find them in the 1990's though, they first came to my attention in the early 2000's. I remember that ALS's pics were the first that I ever saw in 1200x800 resolution back around 2003, and I knew they had just raised the bar on everyone else. Those 1200x800 ALS pics still look amazing today. Back in those early days, I got what ALS pics I could from TGP's and the like because I was not in a position to get a full membership. Over the years, I lost many files, first due to an ill conceived idea to delete my collection, and later to a hard drive crash, but ALS's pics were among the ones that I remembered the most.
So I finally joined ALS a few months ago, hoping to rebuild my old collection and check out all of their new stuff too. I was impressed with the amount of content on ALS's site. They are one of those sites that you really can just get lost in, due to the overwhelming amount of pics and videos. ALS has a very distinctive style. It goes much beyond just having all of their models shaved. They love to do shoots at the beach and by the pool on bright, sunny days. Their models are young and slender with natural breasts and few if any tattoos. They always look like they're having a lot of fun too, and you can see lots of behind the scenes videos where the models are just having a good time with each other and with the staff. At the same time, with all of this lighthearted fun going on, ALS can really push the boundaries. ALS is the only site I can think of where the models seem to be having such a fun time while doing things as extreme as fisting, using speculums, and putting clamps (the ALS "dreamcatcher") on their pussies. Of course, there is lots of peeing too. So, there I was, downloading all of this great stuff from ALS, when I realized that something was missing.
I had some pics from the earliest days of ALS that I just couldn't find anymore. Actually, as I would later learn, the pics that I couldn't find were shot and watermarked by ALS, but they were never on alsscan.com or alsangels.com. They were only released on CD by CDGirlsOnline.com, a site that is long gone. CDGirlsOnlines.com was a site that sold CD's of pics via mail with exclusive ALS pics that couldn't be found on their websites. I was let down, thinking that I might miss out ALS's original, earliest work.
So, I contacted support, and they were incredibly helpful! Support passed my email along to several other employees, each of who were remarkably helpful, until it ended up with ALS's content manager. We compared notes about ALS's pics from it's earliest days, and we looked over the really old stuff that I had in my collection. Almost all of the stuff that couldn't be found anymore was from CDGirlsOnline.com. Despite the fact that they had closed CDGirlsOnline.com years ago, he went the extra mile to help me out. So far, he has found thousands of rare, old pics from CDGirlsOnline.com. The ones that he has found so far were released only for a limited time as bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes on the ALS sites and then removed. Out of incredible generosity, he has made these classic ALS pics from CDGirlsOnline.com available to me. Some people feel inclined to guard and keep secret the rare things that they come across. I would rather as many of you as possible enjoy ALS's pics, so that is why I am sharing this information with you, with ALS's permission. These old pics - bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes - are available to you as well, if you sign up as a member and ask politely. ALS has made no announcement that they will be remastering these pics, posting them on their sites, or making them available indefinitely, but they are available right now by special request. They are not up to current ALS quality standards, they range from 400x600 to 1200x800 in resolution, but they are the sharpest 400x600 pics I have ever seen. It's also really cool to have ALS pics with watermarks dating back to 1996, even if the resolution is low by today's standards. What's more, ALS tells me that they still have everything that they ever shot, some in RAW files, and the earliest content on analog color film, all saved in a storage locker somewhere. Isn't that the stuff of legends?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Absolutly the most fresh, flawless women you'll find on the net doing super hot things with wild toys!! Excellent quality, hi-res photographs and hi-def videos updated daily! Videos no longer rotate off the site. LOTS of high quality content.
Cons:
The only con is they don't off a deal with their sister site ALSANGELS.com, they should offer a package deal where the cost is somehow greatly reduced if you subscribe to both sites...so good I want more!!
Bottom Line:
Bottom line is you won't find women THIS hot doing the things that they do on ALSCAN anywhere else!! The price is VERY affordable for what you get...I've been a member off and on since 1996 and am A VERY SATISFIED CUSTOMER INDEED!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Beautiful women in glamorous and tasteful clothing in almost every scene. Production values and HD content are excellent. You won't find women wearing athletic tube socks and worn and frayed Daisy Dukes (severely cut off jeans for those not familiar with that term) and the men are tastefullly dressed as well. Far and above the class of most of the other "plot oriented" studios. All the women are European or east European but all are beautiful. Definitely a positive feature in my book.
Cons:
My only cons are personal preferences of mine. I know that there is a wide range of porn viewers who will disagree with my tastes in porn so I believe individuals should judge the productions on their own.
Bottom Line:
This is a great site with outstanding production values combined with beautiful women and handsome stars. This is an excellent website for couples, women, and those of us who like "plot oriented" films and vignettes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Archive has 715 videos, huge for a specialty site
-Part of six site network
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Active forum
-Updates once a week
-Nice variety of ages and ethnicities
-No download limits
Cons:
-Sometimes their accents can be difficult to understand
Bottom Line:
If you are like me, you may feel that too much of porn has become stale and just formulaic. The lack of creativity and sometimes poor execution of good ideas is a major turn off. I think the time for a porn revolution is overdue.
There is an increase in the numbers of women watching and enjoying porn. This huge virtually untapped market should break the mindset of porn producers. We here on Pornusers have two very active women reviewers and I know of several other women who are just as interested in porn as are us over the hill old guys.
The second review I wrote here on Pornusers was on this site in August of 2008, Pure CFNM. That stands for clothed female naked male. In September of 2015 I started a thread about sites within this niche. The last entry was four years later in 2019. https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4340
What I find of interest in this niche is how very nonstandard and mold breaking it can be. I find this appealing and there are many other men that love this. Many gay men love this, too. But who really loves this? WOMEN.
In most standard porn the male is empowered and the females have a submissive role as a pleasure provider. Female attractiveness is depicted from the male point of view. This not true in CFNM and this contrast is huge.
In CFNM content, men are seen as the sex object and the women are empowered. The men on this site are ordinary in looks and speak very little. The women here make the man cum for their own gratification. They enjoy the man’s sexuality and his orgasm is what they desire to witness as well as cause.
I have found that while men enjoy sex, women enjoy being seen as sexy. Women love to think they make men crazy with desire for them.
The scenes are all fantasies that both men and women can find hot. The story lines are simple but surreal. Many of those scenes are ones where the typical male and female roles are reversed. The men are not like the usual porn studs. They look like someone you might know, or meet and I mean not meet in a biker bar.
The women dress nicely, sometimes beautifully and appear feminine in nice everyday clothes. This is not like gonzo porn in stripper outfts, fishnet stockings or latex or some other ideas that porn producers have felt we should like, but don’t.
Imagine a teacher being sexually dominated by a group of four female students. Imagine a scene where a man is reported to HR for sexual harassment and the tables are turned where he gets a blow job there as “punishment”. Four female policewomen “attack” a prisoner. I would love to be a sex object! Harass me, please!
There are only a few CFNM sites, but this one is the oldest, biggest and still the best. With more than 715 videos, no other even can come close.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-PU discounted price of $19.99. This site is worth at least double that, considering the quantity and quality.
-First class customer service.
-Very complete tour of the site. You know exactly what you will get.
-Huge quantity of material gong back to 1998. You cannot download everything you might like in one 30 day subscription.
-Daily updates of about four to six photosets.
-Stunningly beautiful models. Hardly a disappointing one on the entire site. I did not see a single tattoo.
-Outstanding specs. Hi res photos recently come in at 5616x3744, videos at 1920x1080.
Cons:
-Mostly Eastern European models, which results in close to zero ethnic variety.
-Mostly teens to twenties models and most are extremely thin. In some cases their rib cages and pelvic bones are quite visible. Despite their beautiful faces, many are not sexy.
-Little variety of body shapes.
-Too much emphasis on the art aspects of the female body. If I wanted art I would take a class or perhaps glance through Vogue. I like more explicit.
-Most sets seem to have no natural progression, such as stripping. The sets often have the model clothed in the last few photos. You could randomly mix up the order of the photos and they would be just as logical.
Bottom Line:
It has been more than three years since I last joined Metart. In spite of some flaws, it is a great site for many objective reasons. The low price, as well as the quality of the content and the models makes this a site that should be ranked at the top of the nude photos category. Lk2fireone’s review says a lot that I totally agree with and he describes it very well.
I want to describe the subjective experience of being on the site. The layout and navigation are both logical and easy to use. The search engine is great. It is inviting, warm and friendly and it practically begs for you to get into checking out the content.I am referring to the old format here, as they just launched a Beta. I did not use it much yet, so I can't say much about it.
Once you are inside the site it is a lot like being in the jungle hunting for the good stuff which is camouflaged. I am not so much into art as I am into more explicit photos. There are some here, but it is hard to find them due to so much art. What you mostly see are side shots, legs crossed, jumping, use of props etc. Sometimes the photos are black and white, sometimes sepia, some with a soft focus, some with a low depth of field, where one part is in focus where other parts are not. Some sets are shot in the dark without much light. This is soft core, but that term does not tell all. I can find soft core erotic, but don’t find art erotic. Some sets have no explicit shots, most have only a few. The videos mostly do not tease as they have the model moving too fast. I would prefer a scene to linger as appropriate. Finding what I like is tedious as there is just so much to see. When you finish checking out a photoset and want to move on, you can look for more of the same model and many have multiple photosets, more of the same photographer, especially if you like his style of photography and model presentation, more sets with the same tags, or the one updated before or after-you can see a thumbnail of the model.
Tags are comments that subscribers add to the sets. You may see for example, “killer body” or “pretty face“. Obviously these are a matter of opinion. Some tags are not so easy to use though. If you use “unshaven“, you get sets with full bush or even as little as barely a landing strip. You never know what may turn up in the search. The same is true for “open labia” . There is a large gray area here. In some sets you cannot even see the labia, but the tag is still there.
I find that about an hour of downloading is about all that I can reasonably do. This requires a lot of patience and attention to detail. The temptation to go all over the place following the searches can be a bit overwhelming. Should I check out more of the same model or should I switch to searching for open labia?
I cannot leave without mentioning the customer service. I accidentally signed up twice using two different billing processors. Each came with a prechecked cross sell for another site and I did not catch that. The member name and password were randomly generated and I did not know which went with each subscription. It was a complete mess so I contacted customer service. Despite that fact that it was a Sunday, everything was corrected in about five minutes. No hassles, no runaround that I should contact the processors. My highest compliments to their staff!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line:
As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.
Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.
Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.
The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.
Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.
One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.
Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.
Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.
I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.
I am giving the site a score of 99.
How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?
That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.
2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.
Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.
For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the best softcore photo site on the internet.
-Over 3,000 models. Many of the models are lovely to stunningly beautiful.
-A wide range of professional photographers contribute to this site.
-A huge backlog of photo sets. Site started in 1998, as MostEroticTeens.com (hence the name change to Met-Art.com).
-The site updates daily with 4 to 6 photo sets + videos per day. So not only a huge backlog of content, but a truly generous update rate as well. Most updates are photo sets.
-You get a small bio sheet on the models, that includes their age when shot, body measurements, and a brief note on what they like. Not much a bio sheet, but it makes the girls more real.
-No DRM. You download a photo set, it's yours to keep.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 5.5 or 5.6 MB/sec, which is extremely fast for me.
-Fast response from technical support. You get an an email within a few hours that shows a human actually read your problem email and is helping.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Site is basically easy to use. However, because of the huge number of models and photo sets, it can take months to search through the site to find everything you will like.
-There is an index of the models, with a large thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like.
-There is also an index of the contributing photographers. With the photo sets from each photographer.
-So you can search by the name of the model, or by the name of the photographer.
-You can comment on each photo set (or photographer). And there is an active community that discusses their likes and dislikes of the photo sets. Most comments are positive, but negative comments are allowed. And the contributing photographer sometimes responds.
-No download limits.
-CCBill is the billing agent-one of the best credit card processing agents on the Net.
-Allows the use of download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager.
-The photosets are offered in three sizes for download and viewing.
Bottom Line:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The photosets have separate zip files for low definition, medium definition, and high definition.
CONS
-The cons are basically minor. This is the best softcore erotic site on the Internet.
-Not strictly a con, but the site is softcore erotic. No hardcore porn. If you want hardcore, look elsewhere.
-The videos are boring. They have tried in recent years to make the videos more erotic. These are videos of attractive models that are naked, but the videos are disappointing, and mainly a waste of time and effort.
-Because of the huge amount of the photo sets, and the 3,000 plus number of models that are mainly attractive to stunningly lovely, it's a natural human reaction to become slightly bored with the site. Back in the day when Playboy and Penthouse were in their glory days, you only got those magazines once a month, so the impact of each issue was more potent. Because Met-Art has thousands of photo sets and thousands of lovely models, instead of appreciating how wonderful the
site is, you start to feel bored by the loveliness and attractiveness of the models and photo sets. That is human psychology. You want what you don't have, but once you get it, the value of what you have diminishes.
-Some people object that the photos don't meet the professional standards that they are seeking. Again, that is human nature. There will always be people who object or complain about any beautiful model or photo or object. The site features attractive to stunningly beautiful models that are photographed by professional photographers.
Obviously, not every photo set is a masterpiece, but you get access to a boatload of softcore photos of lovely women.
-Most models are 18 to early 20s. White, slender to medium build. You don't get a lot of variety in the models as far as age or race or build.
BOTTOM LINE:
MetArt is best site for softcore erotic photography on the Internet.
Based on a variety of factors:
1. Huge number of attractive models (over 3,000 models).
2. Huge number of photo sets (around 15,000 sets, which will take you many months to look through.
3. Over 1,000 videos, which you can use to put yourself to sleep through boredom. Maybe a few videos are truly erotic, but the erotic videos are few and far between).
4. Hundreds of contributing photographers. So you get access to a range of styles. But the overall approach is softcore erotic.
5. Site is easy to use. Can search by name of model, name of photographer, or by other attributes: hair color, age of model, eye color, ethnicity, etc.
6. A low price (with PU discount). $20/month, or $100/year.
There are other sites that are similar, that offer high grade photography and lovely models: MPL Studios and Femjoy are 2 of the closest competitors. But even though they are both Mega-sites (huge content of photo sets and large number of lovely models), Met-Art is the biggest site as far as number of photo sets and number of models.
I enjoy the photo sets at Met-Art and MPL Studios more than the photo sets at Femjoy. The Met-Art and MPL Studios photos seem fresher, the models look more attractive, than the models at Femjoy. Many of the Met-Art and MPL Studios models also
appear at Femjoy, but I normally prefer the Met-Art and MPL studios sets over the Femjoy sets.
Other people can and do appreciate the Femjoy style over the Met-Art style, and have stated so. So it's a matter of personal preference.
This is my third review of Met-Art. I gave it a score of 97 in my first review (which was also my first review for PU), a 99 in my second review (because the number of models and photo sets just keep increasing).
In this review I am giving Met-Art a score of 99.
I know many members feel that a score of 99 for any site is wrong. They believe that any site can be improved, and that a score of 99 ignores whatever faults a site may have.
But I believe that Met-Art is the best softcore site on the Internet. And that because of many
factors that I listed, it does deserve a score of 99. In spite of the boring videos.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- gorgeous European girls
- good locations
- lots of content
- many sites included
- many updates
Cons:
- need to stay longer to access more sites
Bottom Line:
It is an exceptionally good network, with gorgeous European girls, good locations, lots of content, and almost all actions I can think of (excluding BDSM and extremes like pissing).
Network allows access to several sites instantly, and more sites after the first month. Amount of content is huge, network has thousands of models and scenes. If counting updates not for one single site, but on the whole network, it will be several updates per day.
Girls are mostly from Europe, and I like it. Almost all girls are "pro" type, from 8 to 10. Locations are very good (but I'd like more outdoor stuff). Most of the girls look eager to have sex. Network provides sites with a very wide range of actions, from lesbian to anal and occasional "ass to mouth" and "ass to other girl mouth".
Video quality is great, recent videos are 1920x1080 (and look very good too). I have never seen any DRM.
Download speeds are very good for me, I have never seen any download limits.
If I could join only one site in my lifetime, I'd choose 21sextury.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Fights a close battle with Twistys as my top site for quality, quantity and value.
- Descending price per month going from $20, $15 to staying at $10 from there out.
- The numbers are staggering, 2,216 models, near 10,000 scenes and the majority are exclusive.
- Videos range from 640x480 to 1920x1080, going to try and list in reply.
- Photos are zipped and stayed at 1280 high end up until the last year, then the 4300 high end photo zips option showed up on the exclusive sites.
- I would go as far as saying there are at least 10 sites in this network that would be worth joining just for that one site for the $20 price. The value is very high.
- I have found the navigation to be very good for a network of this size.
- Ability to "stay" a member after membership runs out so you can check out all the new updates.
- Quite a few niches covered even with the split of the extreme sites to their own network.
- Can't say much more than it's the best of its kind.
Cons:
- Well there isn't much outside of the few technical glitches I had mentioned in the previous comment.
- Nitpicking, as another member here pointed out, the file names. I don't run into this problem most of the time since I rename the scenes to whatever the title of the set is, but that's going to be the 1 point I take off since I could download more if not for having to rename the files! Little bit of joking there since I'm already crossing bandwith limits.
Maybe it's a change in the porn world, but there was a time that I joined some of these sites for $30 each or $45 for two. Those listed above aren't the only exclusive sites either. Those are just the ones that I personally would have joined at least once or have joined as one site.
The updates for the network average around 6 per day. That's around 200 updates a month. We can do the math, stay for 3 months, 600 updates, 3 month price $45 total, with the majority of those updates being exclusive. That's serious value. The navigation added points to the score just because I've never been on a network that had accurate search by model results. This one does.
For someone new to their sites, I suggest a couple of new external hard drives. As example, say you just discovered Sophie Moone, she has 449 scenes on here. Sandy has 356. Eve Angel has 125. Cindy Hope around 100. These numbers are combined with the other 2,000+ models. Even Regina Ice, who I think is a very underrated model, she has 24. You could spend probably 4-5 months here downloading and still be discovering new models.
A few things to add here. To show the amount of new models, they have 697 new models listed in the last year. It's like they've got a model factory and just keep churning out new favorites to combine with the older favorites.
I know 99 is a high score, but I could break this down in cost per exclusive scene, amount of models and make a case for it that way. That wouldn't even include the fact that the new videos are 1920x1080 and new pictures are 4300 long end. It wouldn't include the near perfect navigation once you get used to it. In terms of price + quality + quantity = value, they are as near to perfect as I've found. The amount of updates keeps you busy too. If there is any problem with the site it is just that. It's overwhelming. Just when I find a model that I want to download all of the content by her, I discover another one and this creates a problem of being overwhelmed.
I joked in the comment about hitting my monthly bandwith limit with my internet provider and that is probably the best compliment I can pay a site. I especially want to add to be sure to check out Lez Cuties and Anal Teen Angels, lots of new, young models on those sites that I was not familiar with. If I were to break these sites down, I could realistically see rating at least those 12 I listed above from 82-92 each, getting them all for the price they offer makes it the best value in porn to me.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Best erotic photography I have come across so far. Clearly professional-level photography. Perfect lighting. Non-forumlatic and dynamic poses.
-- Classy and conservative style erotica. No extreme stuff, bizarre angles, or depictions of rough sex/choking the models etc.
-- Layout and menus are up their with the best.
-- Photo galleries are put together niceley. No repetitve content in each gallery.
-- Plenty of HD content for those into videos.
Cons:
-- I really struggle to find negatives beyond the nit-picking variety. I guess the only thing I could offer in terms of tangibles is the price. Obviously, the premium price for the network is higher than others.
Bottom Line:
My score is somewhat biased as I am a photography buff and my review is based on what the site means to me. buff so I appreciate the professional work at this site. There is a tremndous amount of high-quality photo content at this site. The galleries are well laid out and the models are all beautiful.
The details in the high-resolution photos are quite stunning. In many cases, you can count peach fuzz hairs.
Clearly, this is not the typical site that offers a large amount of photos where the majority of them are simply repetitions of the same pose as the model stands in front of a muslin and the camera and lighting is set on rapid fire.
Most every gallery I have browsed so far demonstrates impecible lighting and technical expertise. The artists clearly put a lot of thought into the work. There is photoshopping evident, but it is not overdone to the point that the colors are over-saturated and the images look unreal or the models plastic. IMO,
DDF is one of those sites that qualifies as art as well as it does porn.
The models themselves range from petite to busty, depending on what site you view. I have only browsed a few videos. However, the presentations should appeal to most of those itnerested in videos. There are quite a few HD selections to choose from.
The models appear quite engaged most of the time and do not look like they are just standing around bored while scratching their butt.
The site does demand a premium price. But considering the amount of content and the number of sites offered in the network, I find it palitable. For me, it is worth the admission price.
If you are a photography fan, I would not hesitate to reccomend it. It is a must see. If you are into videos, you will likely find the content appealing as well. But for me, the site shines in the photo department.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the very best all-around network on the internet.
- Comes with 13 sites, and those 13 sites include at least 8 sites that at one time were successful standalone sites. Eight of the sites are still updating and 5 are fairly listed as "Archive" sites.
- The navigation in its newest iteration blows other networks away. Will further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 70% of my max.
- Averages a new update per day across the network.
- The amount of content across the network is reaching hard to believe levels.
- Ready for this one? Over 2,500 models. And some have over 100 scenes.
- DDF, the producer Denys DeFrancesco, helped create "Leg sex" and is one of the most copied producers and photographers in internet porn history.
- The network itself covers nearly every genre. It's the closest I've seen to complete.
- House of Taboo is maybe the best mainstream accessible kink/BDSM site on the internet and it's included.
Cons:
- Two checked cross-sales sit directly over, "Yes, I am 18".
- Being used to American porn can cause a slight problem here since most of the models don't speak English. The good side to that is the men aren't talking at all in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
There really isn't much at all to complain about here. I've evaluated my last 10 years of porn sites and can say this one easily is in my top 3. I like several of the American networks but DDF has consistently been working on their navigation and for me they've hit a good spot with it. Navigation on a site this large is very important.
I'm going to get the numbers out of the way since they're distracting.
- 2543 models
- 15,161 scenes, each scene comes with a video and zipped photos.
That's a lot of porn. I always thought DDF's biggest strength could also be seen as their biggest weakness. They have variance in their network sites. When you look at most networks the sites really aren't that different, they change a setting, add a few twists to the storyline and call it a different site. The DDF network isn't like that. You have sites that still focus on solo girls, posing, teasing, masturbating. Then they have a couple of lesbian sites. Throw in a couple of hardcore sites. And a kink/BDSM site.
I think for DDF's experience to be understood, one has to consider how successful these sites were as standalone sites. I know at one time, on PU's parent site TBP, three of the sites included here were in the top 10 of overall review scores. I can tell you I paid $29.95 for One By Day, for Hot Legs and Feet and for Euro Girls on Girls. I don't remember what the standalone price was for Eve Angel Official but I paid whatever it was.
I do think that separates it from the American networks. And if it's not known, you can actually still join the sites in DDF Network by themselves for a reduced price.
I can't say I've ever really liked Hands on Hardcore but that's mainly because at this point, I really don't like most hardcore.
The archive sites should be mentioned since these are most likely aimed at collectors. They include Cherry Jul, Sex Video Casting, Eve Angel Official, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter. Sandy's Fantasies for those who are curious is the lovely Zsanett Egerhazi aka Sandy from Club Sandy. This content of Sandy is from the earlier years of her career and features one of the most viewed Euro lesbian sets of all-time, it's Sandy vs Sophie Moone, two of the most popular Euro models of the Euro porn boom in the mid-2000s. They were also a part of the group that I once called, "The no take dick six". That name came from watching multiple interviews of Eve Angel, Sandy, Sophie, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone and Peaches. Their English or lack thereof led most to answer, "What's the most you'll do on video?" with, "No take dick, no, no."
While I'm having fun at their expense, they were the models who interested me the most. I couldn't understand how 6 European models who were from Hungary could have that much power over their scenes.
And if you like them, they have over 500 scenes just of those 6.
The big change that led the network to a 98 is the navigation. I don't think many people question the quality of content at DDF but the navigation has been really bad in the past. You could click something and end up on Google, bad redirect urls, dead links, it was terrible.
Now, as of 2/6/2018, you sign in to a hub. Across the top are the names of the still updating network sites. The hub itself shows all updates to the network. Say you want Hands on Hardcore. Click it and the hub reloads with only Hands on Hardcore content. Not good enough? Go directly to "sites" and pick your favorite, you now have a brand new search engine that will just search within that site's content. And you can just search through models and see all their content.
So, why the -2? I didn't put it in cons since it's a minor problem and not to make fun of DDF's tech group but every time they try to fix something, they break it! If you want to go to one of the archive sites you have to sign in one time. It doesn't move seamlessly to them like it does the active sites. That's pretty minor so I took 2 points off for those cross-sales and the biller is Vendo, who I haven't ever had a problem with but those cross-sales could easily be re-checked if trying to click the age consent.
Other negatives aren't worth taking points off like older content not being HD, that's accepted at this point and I'm afraid if we keep complaining about it they're going to start removing it.
Even with my high score, I don't join DDF Network more than twice a year. I mainly focus on the 1byDay, Hot Legs and Feet and House of Taboo content and have all the archived content already on a hard drive. I really think at least 4 of these sites deserve a standalone review but will probably limit it to 2-3 of them.
The active sites are: 1byDay, Euro Girl on Girl, House of Taboo, Hot Legs and Feet, DDF Busty, Only Blowjob, Hands on Hardcore and Euro Teen Erotica. There's still an emphasis on glam but it's why I just join twice a year. I still like glam to a point and they are shooting the best solo sets.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Massive site
- Stunning models
- Mostly exclusive scenes
- Class-leading production values
- Well organized layout
- Fast downloads
- Supports download managers
- TBP / PU discount
- Photos available (with zips too)
- Excellent quality photos
Cons:
- Nothing really. At three weeks into my membership I haven't found anything to complain about.
Bottom Line:
I’m probably the last PU member to take out a membership on this network. I finally took the plunge and joined the network and was immediately impressed by the quality here. I’ve said in the past, and I stand by it, a site has to do well in three areas to be a great site. First, the porn has to be good, second, the site has to be well organized, and third, it has to be easily accessible.
I should step aside for a moment and say that I’m writing this review as a first-time subscriber. I realize that some PU members have said that they don’t like some of the recent updates. I don’t see anything in the latest updates that would cause me to agree with that, but I’ll admit that I may be just overwhelmed as this is my first visit here.
Regarding my first criterion – good porn – I think this network is among the best I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been an active porn subscriber for many years. Subjectively it is incredible. If I were to allow more subjectivity in my scoring this network might just be 100. It’s that good. The network is so big that there are likely models to satisfy most interests, as long as you like specific types of women. (I’m not being sarcastic – BBW, hairy, etc are legitimate niches but you won’t find those represented here.) Many of the models are exactly what I look for: young and petite. Last year xexbot wrote that “The skankiest girl on their sites will still be ten times hotter than the best looking girls on other sites.” He’s right: there is really no clearer way to describe the models here. The sex too, is what I like. I don’t think the site is too heavily skewed to anal sex, but if you don’t like anal you might think that it is. There is definitely a lot of anal, even on the sites that aren’t anal-themed.
This criterion isn’t just subjective though. Even if I didn’t like the models I’d have to admit that the production values are top quality too. It is obvious that the directors and technical staff are highly skilled.
My second criterion (site organization) is also met, but it could be better. That’s the bad news. The good news is that they are working on that now. Just in the past few weeks they’ve made some improvements and it appears that they’ll soon have an extensive list of tags to help sort material. For now, each of the network’s sites is fairly unique so that alone is a good first cut at sorting things. Once in a site you have a large thumbnail for each scene on the page and rolling your mouse over it gives you key data like female models in it and the date it was uploaded. Depending on the site there could be one page or many. You can also search the network by model and doing so brings up all her scenes in the network. Some have said that the navigation is too simple. It is simple, but it does work. I have no complaints about it but I am looking forward to the massive number of filter tags coming soon.
As for the porn being accessible, the network scores high here too. You have the option of streaming or downloads with many download options available. Obviously the newer scenes have more options, with three different resolutions each of wmv and H.264. When available I took the medium range of H.264 and these are a great compromise between quality and file size. These came in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Those numbers don’t do the scenes justice though as they look better than higher resolution scenes at some other sites. Obviously the older material has fewer download options and in some cases limited options for file types.
I used a download manager with no issues. Download speeds were as good as I’d get anywhere else but the real advantage is that the links don’t seem to time out at all. If they do, the time-out duration is long. And given the amount of data I was downloading the first week or two of my membership I can guarantee you that there is no download limit.
The network is huge. There are 21 primary sites and 18 bonus sites. The network has almost 11,000 scenes spread over these sites. A vast majority of the material seems to be exclusive and the only non-exclusive stuff I was aware of was some older U.S. DVD stuff on some of the bonus sites.
For a (primarily) video site they definitely don’t scrimp on photos. I suspect a photo collector could join here too and be very happy. The photos offered are often both screencaps and photos and they’re available as singles or zips. Many sets come in two resolutions. The highest resolutions look great and come in at approximately 3000x4200. Older photos aren’t so high, of course.
So would I recommend joining? Yes, yes and yes. This is a huge network of top-quality porn with some incredible models that is available on a well-organized site that has fast downloads. And it offers an amazing price for PU members. This is definitely in the top three sites/networks I’ve ever joined and I highly recommend joining.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
* Access to 13 sites
* Excellent mix of glamour, fetish and hardcore erotica
* Super-hot European babes
* Huge quantity of videos and pictures with regular updates
* Superb video and picture quality - it doesn't get much better than this
* Exclusive content
* Download manager (IDM) worked flawlessly
* Excellent customer service - these guys really do care about their customers
Cons:
Ummm ... nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Bottom Line:
I really loved this site. Very rarely do you get a site with incredibly gorgeous women who put on such a great performance. I'm not a big fan of glamour sites but this was definitely different and the mix of hardcore and fetish sites made DDF Network very worthwhile.
The quality of the videos was the best: 12,000Kbps MPEG at 1920x1080. There are only a handful of other sites that come anywhere near to these incredible specifications. Even the 1280x720 videos have a bitrate of 4,000Kbps which is excellent. The quality was crystal-clear and flawless. The download manager worked every time and with fast download speeds.
The video scenes are technically well-shot and there are enough themes to keep you always interested. In one week I counted about 21 updates, which is well above the average of other sites. Not all is hardcore: there are foot fetishes, blowjobs, and solo performances as well as bondage, Euro teen and the usual gonzo. There is a lot of anal, which I don't mind, and even anal creampies - and that's something you don't see too much on American/British sites. My only slight complaint is the sets: not enough variety and there are no outdoor scenes.
I can't say enough about the quality of their customer service. The best ever. After initially joining HansOnHardcore by mistake - I thought that this would get me access to the entire network - the webmaster got in touch with me and let me join DDF Network for the same price. Thanks so much.
I don't give such high scores because I'm very fussy and demanding. DDF Network: you rock!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No DRM
- Unlimited Downloads
- Excellent Customer Service
- Exclusive Content
- Good Value ( explain later on )
- Excellently shot and edited scenes
- No fakery of moans/groans etc. ( that drives me mad and spoils the whole scene unless volume turned down, particularly in U.S porn ) as they are all geniune-ish ( at least to my reckoning )
- Good general quality of video download
Cons:
- Quality of image on video can vary sometimes ( particularyl when displayed on a 42" screen ) like when a VHS has been converted to DVD and appears 'blocky' ( I'm no technical expert )
-Photos of video scenes can sometimes not give an accurate reflection of the scene ( I'm really nit-picking here )
-No HD video content, yet.
Bottom Line:
Although there may be some very minor flaws to this site it is worth every penny and let me explain why. If, like I have, you take out the 90-day non-recurring package that cost me Ł42 ( or $80 ) you can download the whole 1,150+ scenes to a hard-drive that is yours to keep forever. That's 3.6p per scene ( or just over 5c ) which I think by any stretch of the imagination is damned well cheap.
There are minor niggles with the general navigation of the site that are soon overcome after a few minutes and once overcome never really enter the mind again.
The customer service is excellent, there was a problem with one of the scenes I downloaded and once alerted to this problem it was corrected by the end of the day and a subsequent e-mail informing me it had been corrected sent to me, you can't say fairer than that can you.
I saw one reviewer had said they had blocked them because of a download manager,I have no idea what one of those is, but I recommend using the 'Firefox' internet browser as you can simply click on as many scenes you wish to download in one go and it does the job for you no problem whatsoever.
I have to admit that although the choice of download formats fits my own requirements, it would be nice to be able to download content in even higher specification, HD would be great for displaying on the TV, that is lacking somewhat, though I have no doubt it will appear in the fullness of time.
Overall a thoroughly fabulous site that is damned good value for money( if you aren't a mug and don't subscribe to the Ł20 ( $40 ) a month re-curring option ) with uber sexy girls that are sometimes not to be found anywhere else. The shooting of scenes is second to none and you get the sense that all the models are thoroughly enjoying themselves and not merely 'going through the motions' as is so prevelant in so many films.
I would have given it the full 100% except that there are improvements that could be made, but what more do you want in exchange for Ł42 and nearly 400 hours of film, jam on it?
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
CFNM stands for Clothed Female Nude Male.
Elements of femdom, but not too heavy of an influence.
Comes with multiple themed sites.
Unique genre that could appeal to all genders.
Everything is downloadable.
A rare genre that doesn’t tell you what’s going to happen in each scene.
Cons:
The genre does seem to be slipping in popularity.
Repetitive by nature.
While the sites sound very different they’re really not. CFNM Porn focuses on male masturbation. It appeals to straight and gay men as well as women. The interest for straight men is watching a guy, usually below average in size and looks, be groped, teased and masturbated (by women)
until he orgasms. That interest goes into most guys having fantasies about
women masturbating them or even watching them masturbate. The gay male audience likes this porn just to see a nude man touching himself and being punished by women. Women have maybe more reasons to like CFNM than any other gender group.
My screenname tells som
e of my biggest fetishes. I love “peeping” on people masturbating and even having sex. I also am straight, but when I watch porn – I usually prefer the women. Seeing a woman have sexual and emotional control over a man is a turn on.
The different sites represent a different theme for each site. Pure CFNM is the main site, but you receive Lady Voyeurs, which is women watching guys masturbate. Lady Voyeurs and Pure CFNM are the best two sites on this small network.
The femdom elements are interesting even if a little contrived. The bonus sites Hey Little Dick and Girls Abuse Guys are not much more domianant than their other sites. The names give you an idea that the abuse is mostly verbal and involves giggling and pointing. It’s not really femdom in the truest sense of the word. These men are well aware of what they’re going to be doing in the scenes they are in. I’m not for sure that femdom could ever be that believable.
On that note, I do believe the producers tend to forget it’s porn and it’s scripted. The scenes do a good enough job of making them believable, but that’s where the humiliation shows up. The humiliation does not look real to me, but it’s better than trying to wait on our kids to play a sport.
I enjoy this network despite its shortcomings. I am able to go right into a fantasy with these scenes and that’s very important to me when watching porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Huge amounts of full length HD Video for member download
+ Daily Updates 7 days a week
+ Highest photo and H.264 video quality on internet
+ Pictures available in 2 sizes all zip paks for download
+ Directors Blog for secrets about models with advance preview
+ Lots of behind the scene videos shows models true personality
+ Large monthly video and picture bonuses.
+ Lots of glamore pictures and lots of hardcore pictures
Cons:
- No boy-girl sex
- No Vagina hair at site. Sometimes model with vagina hair is nice.
- Old site design with frames
- Some models not updated for me enough
- Old Models before 2000 low quality and partial sets
- No open multisite discount
Bottom Line:
For me Alscans is best site on internet because I have been member of over 150 of sites.
Best balance of glamore and hardcore. No site have ever allow member to feel closer to model. They love work for Alsscan and must make them very happy to show best in pictures and video. Compare model shot by alsscan with other sites like Ron Harris, metart, ftv, or Suze Randal, and models always look very much better on alscan. Five years before I think site might not be so good with not enough video but now site is amazing. So much full length videos. More pictures and HD video than member can ever download. I wish for alsscan boy-girl then site is perfect 100.
They have top photographers with largest picture details and alsscans only special toys and fisting. Large mix of European girls and American girls and I think 50/50 of each. Lots of model talking during video sex scenes that I like. I hate when photographer talks but that is old videos. No photographer talks in videos for last 2-3 years. I got 1 year memberships to both alscan and alsangels for $220,00 USD but I do not think they want people to now about discount. Maybe just ask.
A Blog has great stories and pictures about shoots and models. Alscans models use lots of body oils and looks so sexy with shiny skin and smoth wet vagina.
Site design is old with frames but member surfing works and is easy. My emails to site get answered. Nice Anna emails back. Sometimes photographers emails me back to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent quality in videos and photos
- HD Available (up to 1920x1080) for many videos and all newer videos
- Multiple download options
- HD Streaming available
- Over 1000 videos available (varying lengths)
- Photos available (most high resolution – some at 2592x3888)
- Photos zipped or singles
- Great mix of North American and European models
- Models are very beautiful
- Some great on-location shoots
- Not ‘cookie-cutter’ porn
- iPhone / mobile device users have separate area so no need to sort
- Still updating regularly
- Discount to ALS Angels with site membership ($9.95) (this is NOT a pre-checked cross-sell)
Cons:
- Limited search function
Bottom Line:
The last time I joined ALS Scan I joined specifically for the public nudity scenes. I did that because I really had no interest in anything else they had to offer. I did download some stuff other than the public nudity and when I finally got around to watching it I was amazed at how stunning the models were, how hot the scenes were, and how the site seemed to go out of its way to offer industry-leading resolutions on both video and pictures.
Objectively, the site is as good as it gets. It’s near perfect. It’s obvious that the site owner wants to deliver an excellent product to his customers.
The site offers both video and pictures, and unlike many other sites one doesn’t take a back seat to the other. Both are very well done. The site currently has over 1000 videos on the site, with more being added. One point about the updates is that they are new, as in recently shot, and they are old, in that the site offers older, re-mastered material.
The videos are all available in multiple formats. The formats and sizes vary depending on when the video was shot and uploaded, but it’s fair to say that if you’re downloading a video from 2007 it would have exceeded the specs of almost anything available elsewhere. For the past year or so all videos have been available in true HD. They’re available in DivX and mp4 format (1280x720) and in WMV9 at 1920x1080 (at 8000kbps). I only downloaded the WMV files, and they are amazingly crisp. This is some of the best video I’ve ever seen. HD streaming is also available. HD became pretty common in mid-2007 though not universal until later.
The videos come in several categories: solo photo shoot, solo masturbation and girl/girl. There are several public nudity shoots, but they haven’t added to these in a couple of years. Each year for the past several the crew has taken models to an on-location shoot in the Caribbean. The locations and the models combine with the technical expertise of the crew to create some fun, hot videos. There are also casting shoots in Budapest and the Czech Republic. These aren’t necessarily ‘hot’ but they are a lot of fun to watch. Mixed in to some of the scenes are some fisting (girl-on-girl and solo) and some peeing (but no golden showers).
I’m not a picture guy, but I’ll make an exception for this site. The pics are available as SD or HD and as singles or zipped. The HD size is large (I saw some at 2592x3888) and subjectively they are incredible! Zooming in causes no pixilation at all.
I used Free Download Manager and it worked perfectly. Download speeds were 1850+/- but that may be where my settings are since I don’t know how to change them. File sizes can be huge, so people with download caps need to be wary.
One thing I thought was a nice touch was that they created a separate portal for people who download to mobile devices. That makes finding the material easy.
Subjectively, this site is second to none. The models are stunning. There is a good mix of North American and European models. A-list porn stars are here too. The scenes all look incredible. The lighting, camera work, sound and editing are all near-perfect.
This isn’t cookie-cutter porn – although there are a few broad categories of scenes, the director and models do an excellent job of making each scene feel fresh. It looks like they’re having fun on the site. My guess is that they are.
Is there anything wrong with the site? Not really, but it could benefit from a search function. There is nothing now, and arguably that’s okay since the shoots can be sorted by model. By they should consider adding a search function for things like fisting, peeing and lesbian. But don’t get me wrong – the addition of a search function would only be like an extra layer of icing on a delicious cake. (And since they design and sell their own bikinis, maybe a search by style would be great too.)
Some caveats for anyone thinking of joining – these aren’t negatives, just things you need to be aware of: 1) there are no b/g scenes, 2) 99% of the models are petite, Caucasian and young.
To add more icing to the cake, when you join this site you can get a $9.95 subscription to ALS Angels. It’s a very similar site and I’m not really sure of the difference but it is a nice addition. If I find major differences I’ll post a comment or review if warranted.
The bottom line is that if you like this kind of material and these types of models, you likely won’t find a better site on the ‘net. Be prepared to spend some time here.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU/TBP discount, often memberships can be had for under $10 with holiday deals.
The ultimate site for fans of softcore photo erotica with a massive collection dating back 20 years.
Photos come in 3 sizes small, medium and large with a zip download for each.
Video download options from 270p up to 4k, stream options from 270p to 1080p.
4 new updates per day 7 days a week apart from the 1st of the month when you get 6.
No problems using my download manager. (Firefox DTA)
A multitude of user tools to set up your browsing options, search and sort the content as well as an advanced model search and user generated tags.
Billing by ECHST.net (Rocketgate), never had any problem with them and easy cancellation.
Cons:
It's difficult to find any faults with the actual site or content itself. My only real gripe and I get this every time I join any site in the Met Art Network is the misleading pricing how they display the join price in USD and then charge me the same figure in GBP, that's why I'll only ever join any of their sites on holiday deals and stay for 1 month only.
If you prefer videos it's probably not the site for you. I don't care about videos so not really a con for me personally.
Earliest content on the site lower resolution which is to be expected.
This is my first time back to MetArt since I last reviewed it back in February 2012 thanks to the early May $10 holiday deal from PU/TBP and it's clear the site continues to go from strength to strength with the number of photo galleries having almost doubled in the last 8 years. There seems to be no let-up in the production line of hot young women coming out of Russia, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries willing to take their clothes off for our enjoyment and even during the current world pandemic they continue to provide 4 new updates every day. In the last 7 days there were 26 new photo sets and 2 new videos and this is typical of most weeks so still very much a photo orientated site.
Back in 2012 my favourite models here were all the well known Eastern Euro models from the 2000s such as Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat but these days I much prefer the newer generation of models and favourites include Milena D (70 galleries, 6 videos) Mila Azul (42 galleries, 3 videos) and Emily Bloom (53 galleries, 6 videos). Mia Sollis, a cute freckled redhead who caught my eye as a relative newcomer with 6 or 7 galleries back in 2012 has taken over the crown of my favourite redhead from Faye Reagan and now has 67 galleries and 6 videos. Not forgetting my passion for exotic women there's the beautiful Asian goddess Li Moon with 51 galleries and 1 video and the dark, dusky Spanish senorita Apolonia with 18 galleries and 3 videos.
It's interesting looking back at my 2012 review and almost as if the guys at MetArt read it and changed things at the site to suit my personal preferences. The biggest improvement in the galleries is that the vast majority of sets now start with the model clothed or wearing lingerie so a greater emphasis on the tease and a more seductive feeling with the anticipation and build up to seeing the girl naked. I was never a huge fan of the photo sets where the girl is completely naked from picture number one although they can sometimes be nice when photographed in stunning outdoors locations. I was also never a fan of those pseudo-lesbian shoots featuring two or more girls so pleased to see they don't seem to bother with those here anymore and that its basically all solo content these days. There has only been 2 two girl photo sets added in the last 2 years and the last two girl video was released in 2016.
I'm not really that much into the videos and stated back in 2012 that I find the MetArt videos boring so decided to download some of the more recent videos of some of my favourite models to see if they have improved. I think the videos have improved to a point for the same reason as the photo galleries for the simple reason that the models start out in more clothing or lingerie than they used to making them more seductive. Watching Li Moon teasing on a bed in a white lace basque in the film titled “Beautiful Handwriting” and watching Apolonia stripping out of a college girl uniform in the film titled “Homework” was simply mesmerizing. Once the girls become naked though this is the point for me where the videos revert back to boring because they don't really do anything remotely sexual and I find myself just skipping to the end. I guess they don't go as far as masturbation or insertions to keep the distinction between MetArt and their more explicit sites Sex Art and Metart X.
Apart from the introduction of the 4k videos the technical specs of the content has not really changed much since my last visit in 2012. I have no idea if my PC could play a 4k video so don't bother with those. On the videos page in the sort options you can select 4k but on doing this to see how many they have I only got 6 videos in the search result so I assume they can't be tagging their 4k videos correctly to show up in the search. The size of the highest resolution photos still vary greatly as noted in 2012 with recent updates ranging from 4300 up to 9000 px on the long side. Personally I don't see the point of 9000 px photos with a 24 inch monitor when the model's face won't even fit inside your screen. As an obsessive photo set collector who likes to keep every set the medium 2048px photos suit me still as the perfect compromise between quality and file size.
I'm raising my score from 92 in 2012 to 98 today as the improvements in the content make the site almost as damn near perfect as possible for a collector of solo photo erotica such as myself. If they got rid of the regional pricing forcing me to pay 30% more than an American all the time I might even consider giving them a 100.
Reasonable pricing, especially on a lifetime membership
Cons:
Older videos in SD, but that was state-of-the-art at the time they were created
There are plenty of studios where I have no interest at all, but on the plus side, you can hide some of them, or else make a list of your favorites and then only concentrate on those faves.
Pricing is in Euros, so you will have currency exchange considerations when signing up.
Bottom Line:
This is now my favorite large network site. Even after eliminating the stuff I am not interested in, there is still a huge portfolio of stuff that I am loving.
I know most reviewers praise Adult Time for its navigation, but for me, Adult Prime is much easier to get around. But maybe that’s just the way my mind works.
Current PU pricing is 19.99 Euros for 1 month, 69.99 Euros for 1 year, and 299 Euros for lifetime.
There are currently 149 “studios”, but not all of them are actually part of Adult Prime. Several are listed as “Bonus” or “VIP”. Bonus Sites give you a sample of the content from that bonus site. Usually it’s a video that you can stream, but not download. The VIP sites are really nothing more than a link to be able to sign up for that site.
My favorite studios include Club Sweethearts, Digital Desire, Perfect 18, and Lesbian Summer. I might do a separate review at some point of one or two of these studios.
Some of the studios are actually quite large on their own, and could easily be successful as a stand-alone site. Many others are small. Some are actively updating, most are not.
Here is the list of Actual Adult Prime Studios (99 by my count):
Note: Sites with *TBP after the name have a separate review on TheBestPorn
4K CFNM *TBP, Adult Prime Originals, Arousins *TBP, bAmateurs *TBP, BB Video *TBP, Beauty and the Senior, Bi Fuck *TBP, Bionixx, Bondagettes *TBP, Bound Men Wanked, Brasil Bimbos *TBP, Breed Bus *TBP, Club Bang Boys *TBP, Club Castings, Club Sweethearts *TBP, Cockin, Cuckoldest *TBP, Damn Tight, Daring Sex HD, Desi Bang , Digital Desire *TBP, Dirty Gunther, Dirty Hospital, Distorted, Elegant Raw *TBP, Evil Playgrounds, Family Screw *TBP, Fan Fuckers, Fetish Prime *TBP, Flxxxion, Fresh POV, Fucking Skinny, Gender Flux *TBP, Gonzo 2000, Good Morning Sex, Granddadz *TBP, Grandmams *TBP, GrandparentsX *TBP, Group Banged *TBP, Group Mams *TBP, Groupsex Games *TBP, Hardcore Holiday *TBP, Hollandisch Passie, Hot TS *TBP, Industry Invaders *TBP, Interraced, Jim Slip *TBP, Jims Classics, King BBC *TBP, Lady Lyne *TBP, Lara’s Playground *TBP, Lesbian Summer *TBP, Lets Go Bi *TBP, Mams Casting, Man Up Films *TBP, Manalized *TBP, Manko 88 *TBP, Massage Sins, Mature Van, Mucha Sexo *TBP, My Milfz *TBP, My Sexy Kittens, Nice and Slutty, Nylon Flix, Old Hans, Oldie X, Original JAV, Pawg Queen *TBP, Peep Leak, Peg Him, Perfect 18, Plumperd *TBP, Pornstar Classics *TBP, Pornstars Live, Prime 3DX *TBP, Prime Lesbian, Raw Euro *TBP, Redlight Sex Trips, Salsa XXX, Sensual Heat, Shadow Slaves *TBP, Sinful Raw *TBP, Sinful Soft, Sinful XXX *TBP, Southern Sins *TBP, Submissed, Summer Sinners *TBP, Sweet Femdom *TBP, Sweethearts Classics *TBP, SWhores, Teen RS, The Pain Files *TBP, Tranny Bizarre, Trans Happy *TBP, UK Flashers *TBP, Vlaamische Passie, VR Teensrs, Wankrs, Young Busty
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great as always blowjob photo sets and videos
-High def videos are fantastic quality
-Great European models
-interesting assortment of models,clothes and settings
-categorized by 1 on 1, pov, orgy, casting, 2 to 1, etc
-very fast downloads in wmv,avi,qt,mpg formats as well as flash 8 stream
-fantastic customer support as explained below
Cons:
-hard to think of any!
-in my original review, I commented (in this cons section) on how they had removed material posted prior to Feb. of 2008
-when I emailed their support team, I received a response almost immediately, fully explaining the website changes and showing me how I could still access the older material
Bottom Line:
The quality is still top notch, and you would be hard pressed to find a better site if blowjobs are what you want.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
