Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (2)

Active
99
lk2fireone (194) 02-14-13  07:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line: As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.

Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.

Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.

The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.

The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.

Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.

One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.

Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.

Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.

I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.

I am giving the site a score of 99.

How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?

That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.

2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.

Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.

For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (10)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

luv lickn clit (19) Great review lk2fireone! I really do wish they would completely rethink their approach to the videos. You are correct in saying that its a wasted opportunity. Maybe they could try to fill the slow sexy striptease niche--something that's almost entirely absent out there in porn land. I've been a satisfied $99 a year member for going on 3 years. At 8 bucks and change for a month it almost feels like stealing.
02-14-13  02:57pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - luv lickn clit :

I don't know a single PU member that has written they like the Metart videos. I guess it's a mental thing, but the videos at most softcore sites are really boring, no matter how attractive the models might be.
I've joined Metart a couple of times for the 1-year membership. But most of my memberships were for 1 month.

02-14-13  03:17pm

Reply To Message

3

Cybertoad (104)

Very nice reviews, I need to revisit this site.
The quality is amazing in most sets.

02-25-13  09:41pm

Reply To Message

4

Jackthecommon (2) Good review, I think this review is dead on with this site. Great website!!!
05-29-13  11:53pm

Reply To Message

5

Monahan (40) I stumbled into this review because I just read the comment posted by Parsnip about The Life Erotic and thought I'd browse the other sites operated by HLP.

Ditto all four previous replies. I was a $99 per year member for about three years but dropped out in 2011 because I've gravitated to video and found Twistys to suit my interests a lot more.

I'm into solo material of gorgeous ladies and the daily updates always seemed to have at least one, usually more, drop dead gorgeous babes. Unfortunately there were few videos and those they did make were, as previously noted, boring as Hell.

I'm reluctant but probably will sign up fot The Life Erotic because their preview site has a 2 minute video sampler that shows gorgeous babes like those on MetArt but they seem to be a lot better in the content (heavy petting, finger and object insertions, peeing, etc.) and, hopefully, some of the babes from MetArt have graduated to the erotic stuff.

One thing I really liked about this site's business practices is that, if you sign up for, say 1 month and decide to go for a full year, they will deduct the unused portion of the current month's fee from the annual price.

08-14-14  06:25pm

Reply To Message

6

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #5 - Monahan :

Have you signed up for the Metart newsletter?
It's free. A one-page email, usually showing some covers of photo sets or videos from the network.
The email sometimes has some nice discounts for different site memberships.

The best discount was for $1/month membership to Erotic Beauty, that would never be raised in price.
PU rules didn't allow the link to access that offer to be posted on PU.
I joined Erotic Beauty, and it's cost me $12 for the 12 months I've been a member.

But no other offers came close to that one.

But sometimes you do get a nice discount to one or more sites in the Metart network in the Metart newsletter.

08-14-14  08:49pm

Reply To Message

7

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #6 - lk2fireone :

OK, but I was already, in theory, subscribed...so I went to the Met Art site and tried to resubscribe.

I got this error message when I completed the template:

Your email is already on our list.

Your email address is already subscribed and confirmed to our mailing list. For further assistance, please email support at: support@met-art.com

-Met Staff


So I sent an email to the indicated address.

Here's the reply I just received:

Aug 15 05:57 PM

Hi there,

I apologize as we have already discontinued sending those type of mailer. If you are still interested in free photos, you can check out the daily photo archives of Metart, Domai's Beauty of the Day, and Goddess Nudes' Almost Daily Goddess here: {URLs of the sign up pages for those sites}.

Sofia Lola (MetArt Network)


Sounds like they aren't really sure what they are doing.

08-15-14  07:02pm

Reply To Message

8

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #7 - Monahan :

I agree that it sounds like some of them don't know what they are doing.

I just got a new email today (August 15) from Metart, offering me a discount to join VivThomas for $14.99, a 50% discount.

I can't post the link at PU, because that is against their rules.

And maybe you don't want to join VivThomas, anyway.

But send me an email through the PU internal email system, and I can show you a link to join The Life Erotic for $14.99/month, rebilling at $14.99/month.

I believe The Life Erotic Link discount is still good.

To use the PU internal email system, go to my PU user profile page, and click on the "email link" to send me a private email.

http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5722

08-15-14  08:11pm

Reply To Message

9

Monahan (40) REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone :

You've got mail ;->

I'm thinking that it's possible the emails are sent to those who subscribe to one or more HBP sites but not to us freeloaders.

I am definotely interested in VivThomas and The Life Erotic.\\

Thanks for your help.

Jack

08-15-14  09:47pm

Reply To Message

10

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #9 - Monahan :

I sent you an email.

Copy one link, and paste it into your browser address bar. That should bring up the offer.

Do the same for the other link (copy and paste).

Good luck.

08-15-14  10:25pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.