Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network (6)

Active
99
BubbaGump (18) 01-11-13  01:14pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Best erotic photography I have come across so far. Clearly professional-level photography. Perfect lighting. Non-forumlatic and dynamic poses.

-- Classy and conservative style erotica. No extreme stuff, bizarre angles, or depictions of rough sex/choking the models etc.

-- Layout and menus are up their with the best.

-- Photo galleries are put together niceley. No repetitve content in each gallery.

-- Plenty of HD content for those into videos.
Cons: -- I really struggle to find negatives beyond the nit-picking variety. I guess the only thing I could offer in terms of tangibles is the price. Obviously, the premium price for the network is higher than others.
Bottom Line: My score is somewhat biased as I am a photography buff and my review is based on what the site means to me. buff so I appreciate the professional work at this site. There is a tremndous amount of high-quality photo content at this site. The galleries are well laid out and the models are all beautiful.

The details in the high-resolution photos are quite stunning. In many cases, you can count peach fuzz hairs.

Clearly, this is not the typical site that offers a large amount of photos where the majority of them are simply repetitions of the same pose as the model stands in front of a muslin and the camera and lighting is set on rapid fire.

Most every gallery I have browsed so far demonstrates impecible lighting and technical expertise. The artists clearly put a lot of thought into the work. There is photoshopping evident, but it is not overdone to the point that the colors are over-saturated and the images look unreal or the models plastic. IMO,
DDF is one of those sites that qualifies as art as well as it does porn.

The models themselves range from petite to busty, depending on what site you view. I have only browsed a few videos. However, the presentations should appeal to most of those itnerested in videos. There are quite a few HD selections to choose from.

The models appear quite engaged most of the time and do not look like they are just standing around bored while scratching their butt.

The site does demand a premium price. But considering the amount of content and the number of sites offered in the network, I find it palitable. For me, it is worth the admission price.

If you are a photography fan, I would not hesitate to reccomend it. It is a must see. If you are into videos, you will likely find the content appealing as well. But for me, the site shines in the photo department.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

pat362 (367) I respect your score and the reason why you gave it. I guess this is your first time but you if you do comeback then you may not find that your score remains the same. DDF used to be one of the best networks but that was many years ago. These days they are but a mere shadow of their old self. I don't think they still do that but it was common for them to use the content from one site to update another site. They were subtle about it. They would remove older content and then after a little while it would appear on another site.

They don't update as often as they used to and that has also been for quite some time. They also started using leased material which was a new thing for them. Greta if you are unaware of that material but not so much when you already have it. I think that it's is an amazing network for a first timer but a past member might not think so. I know I don't and I'm a past member.

I think your review could definetely use a lot more data in the pro section.

01-11-13  06:43pm

Reply To Message

2

BubbaGump (18) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

Well, I base my reviews on impressions. All I have to go by when forming the impressions is past experiences with other sites. Comparatively, it is the best site I have personally come across. I am not a real high powered user so my experiences are limited. I really find it to be as good as my score indicates. That doesn't mean it really is a 99 in an objective sense. That is just how I rate it. Others will see it different perhaps. Someone might not like the content or the camerawork isn't their style etc. but it is the closest to a perfect site as I have come across so far. My views may change if I come across something else in the future and I have a new baseline to judge things. As it exists now, though, this site is at the top of my current baseline. I honestly haven't seen anything better yet.
01-11-13  08:46pm

Reply To Message

3

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #2 - BubbaGump :

Let me first say that I hope you don't think that I want to pick a fight with you. I enjoy your reviews. I just tend to target anyone who gives a near perfect score but doesn't put a lot of info in the review.

I respect the reasons you gave for your score but I just find that giving a site a near perfect score without corroborating facts makes the review less relevant than it probably deserves. Some people will look at your review and see an extremely high score but then read very little information to justify that score. You are honest about being biased and that is a credit to you but someone reading your review may decide that the score is too high for what was written and pass on what might have been a really good site. I know that I am always leery of any review with a high score and no infoto go along with the score. We all have some sites that we think are as perfect as they can be and we gladly give them a high score. I just try to add as much information as possible to justify that score and maybe help bring traffic to that site.

01-12-13  08:06am

Reply To Message

4

BubbaGump (18) REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :

Hi. I understand what you mean. I don't take it as trying to pick a fight. I just provide points I think the average person would be interested in. I could add more comments but it would just be for the sake of adding more comments. I don't think it would be of much use to anyone. Really, what my review is saying is that, in my humble opinion, for those interested in photography and professional-grade production, this is about as good as you will come across in terms of quality of content, etc...

The full HD videos also are as good as I have ever seen in terms of the eye-popping quality. I really haven't seen clearer and more detailed videos from an online service--whether it is netflex or bangbros. To me, the detail and professional quality of the material is outstanding.

The user interface is as good as others. very simple and easy to use. DL speeds are very high. I never had issues with timing out or locking up. Now, whether or not people enjoy the actual content is entirely subjective. Everyone has their own interests and tastes in erotic content.

I really am not thinking about drawing attention to the site or trying to sway opinion by scoring it a 99. The thought never crossed my mind. I am just calling it like I see it personally. To me, it is a near perfect site. Others may see it entirely differently, as some other review scores testify.

01-12-13  08:42am

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (367) REPLY TO #4 - BubbaGump :

I think you should have info on the overall quality of the pics and videos. ie: resolution, bit rate and what not. Your review is the most recent one so any info you give is going to be more relevant than anything else.
01-12-13  09:05am

Reply To Message

6

BubbaGump (18) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

The most recent images are roughly 2000 x 1328. The most recent full HD vids are in the 2gig range for MPEG format. Not sure about bit rate. Don't know enough about videos to supply this. I can say, however, the videos are fluid and not choppy when viewed in the browser. Again, I am not much into videos. But even these are higher in quality than I have seen elsewhere. They just have a pop on the screen I have not seen from other videos. It is eye-popping.

But again, for me, it's all about the detail and quality. Regardless of what the specs are, I would rather see a high-quality image at 800x600 than a large 4000x2000 image that is sub-par and poorly taken ,with bad llighting. That is what I value the most.

01-12-13  09:17am

Reply To Message

7

luv lickn clit (19) REPLY TO #6 - BubbaGump :

Hi Bubba, good review. I would expect that Denys would have high photographic standards for his network, as he was a first rate photog for the big UK porn magazines back in the day when we got most of our porn from mags. But I don't consider 2000 pixel to be high end--are you sure you got that right? If you're counting hairs its probably more. Met-Art is publishing some photo sets with 39 megapixel images--thats 5400 by 7200 pixels, and over 500 megs per photo set. Its kinda overkill, but it does allow you to crop the photo (say for example to get a good pussy close-up), and still get a good image if you want.
01-12-13  07:11pm

Reply To Message

8

tangub (151) I enjoyed reading your take on this network. As a recent first time subscriber to this site and a photo fan myself I can't really disagree with anything you wrote, the quality of the photography is some of the best I've seen. My only minor issues with the site were billing related.
01-13-13  09:47am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.