They have 5,190 videos, these range from studio, homemade, closeup, fantasy and adventure.
These videos -- especially the newer ones -- are more explicit than other sites like the one and I see that as a plus.
Excellent use of artistic representations, the rooms are mostly bare, the light isn't blaring bright and it creates a distant, lonely feeling for the solo model.
They average 10-12 updates per month and as far as I can tell these are all amateurs.
Expresses the beauty of the female orgasm without requiring a perfect or fit body with models of all different shapes and sizes.
Billed through a biller I was not familiar with, GM Bill, but it was easy to use and easy to cancel.
Cons:
The navigation is difficult. They have 12 videos per page, 433 pages.
It is not all solo, they have in the 700 range of girl/girl and boy/girl scenes. That's a tough con to use against them, but the site is I Feel Myself.
Bottom Line:
This site should be joined for more than 1 month. I find the explicit, solo masturbation scenes to be my favorite. There's excellent camerawork that includes perfect sound. You see the women's faces as the orgasm, you hear their moans, you can see some of their orgasms causing contractions.
There's a high amount of voyeuristic quality to the scenes. You get the feeling of the fly on the wall.
I listed the non-solo scenes as a con, but only by definition of the site's name. Some of those scenes are very good. Of all the sites I have joined (not that many), this one has to be in the top 3 for eroticism.
You will find yourself not paying as much attention to how the model looks, or what her body shape and size is, instead, paying attention to her bodily movements, spasms, moans and how her hand carelessly reaches up to squeeze her nipple harder than she probably meant to.
I have told in previous reviews I am not a lesbian. I am not even bi-curious. I am drawn to this content for the natural sexual expression, it could be a man or woman and it would work either way.
The site itself doesn't have a lot to talk about. Over 5,000 videos, there's no model list, the navigation is close to archaic, but they do have ways for you to find the different content. If you find a model you like you can click her name and it will show you if they have other scenes of her. They have the scenes broken into categories including one called "friends" that focus on the scenes with girl/girl content and boy/girl content.
The site doesn't look like it is have been updated in layout style or programming in 20 years, but everything works well.
If I find anything truly disappointing with it it is the multi-month or long-term membership options. They offer a 3 month plan for $70. I am on my 6th week and probably would have been better off joining it for 3 months, but $70 just seems like a steep price to pay upfront.
I also wonder if they have considered making a boy/girl site in similar style. I usually prefer high production qualities. These scenes are probably the most basic I've seen and it works for them.
I'm going to go a little off-track by saying as much as I like the desolate, lonely room, I would like to see more open scenes, maybe outdoors or in a different room, position -- like on the couch or in the bathtub.
The video quality does vary. They have HD videos going back to 2009. I haven't seen any picture sets.
A lot of the older scenes are less explicit, but overall, this site has impressed me in nearly every way. I'll come back to it eventually. The content is worth the price. I would recommend it to men and women alike. This just doesn't feel like a porn site. It feels like genuine, human sexual expression and that's something you just don't see a lot of. Very highly recommended.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Choice of join options $14.95 full access or $9.95 streaming per month. Multi-month and annual memberships are also good value.
Payment options include Paypal with Epoch.
A membership at Wet And Puffy includes access to The Puffy Network.
Exclusive Content. Wet And Puffy updates once a week with a new scene and accompanying photo set, the network as a whole gives you around 15 new updates per month.
Photo sets available as high quality or low quality with a zip download for each.
Videos with 6 download options ranging from 320p to 4K and 4 streaming options from 320p to 1080p.
No problems using my download manager, (I use an old version of Firefox with DTA)
Unique file names with name of model and set name.
Cons:
I could not find a way to view the HQ photos within the site, clicking on a thumbnail opens the photo to the size of your browser with no way to expand it that I could see so the only way to view the HQ pictures is to download the zip.
Lack of variety in shoot location, I don't recall seeing a single outdoor shoot.
Many models only have 1 update.
Content can become a bit repetitive after a while.
The site lacks an advance search tool.
Bottom Line:
As a fan of solo content Wet And Puffy was the main site of interest for me within The Puffy Network which is made up of 5 sites, the others being Wet And Pissy, We Like To Suck, Simply Anal & Euro Babe Facials. Wet And Puffy is primarily a solo masturbation site which promotes itself as the only pussy classification website on the internet. They categorise their models by the three different pussy types which they describe as a Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry.
The site has been online since 2009 so has built up quite a large collection over the years, at the time of writing this review there are 654 models in 907 movies with matching photo sets. As you can tell from the ratio of models to movies most models only have one update with very few models having more than two. The network as a whole gives you access to 1757 scenes.
The members area itself is well laid out and uncluttered with just the one banner ad right at the bottom of the page. If you go to the models page the girls are displayed 20 per page across 33 pages with nice large thumbnail preview pictures of each one and tabs to change how they are displayed from most recent to most popular or by pussy type. You can also click on a letter of the alphabet displayed across the top to filter them alphabetically or there's a drop down menu from which you can simply select any model by name. On each model's page you will find some brief biographical details such as nationality, age, height, weight, breast size, etc. along with large preview thumbnails of her scenes. Hovering your mouse pointer over these will provide you with a brief preview of the action. Once you click through to a scene you will find a nice written description of the action and a list of clickable tags, all the download options listed with their file sizes along with the run time and release date. Scroll down a bit and you have all the photo thumbnails and zip download links on the same page. You'll also find a tab where you can find the videos broken up into 1 minute clips, not something you see so often these days. You can rate the scenes, add to favourites and leave comments.
The collection of models has little in the way of diversity, they are virtually all white, slim, European and in the 18 to mid 20s age range and include many well known names. One of my all time favourite models Lola (a.k.a. Dido) is the top ranked model on the site and one of the few models to have more than one or two scenes here. A couple of my other long time favourites Caprice and Monika Vesela also have a couple of scenes each.
The content itself is nearly all solo masturbation with just a handful of lesbian scenes thrown in. The girls usually start out wearing some clothing or lingerie before teasing and stripping and then getting to work on her pussy, usually some fingering and masturbation before the toys come out, not only dildos and vibrators but various other contraptions such as pumps, speculums, and spreaders. Scenes can often include some anal play and peeing. I kind of feel the same way about this site as I did about ALS Scan several years ago, I enjoy the scenes up to a point but when the girls start using the speculum or pump on their pussy it becomes less erotic for me and more gynaecological. These solo scenes usually run around 20 to 25 minutes long. The 1080p scenes I downloaded had an 8000k bitrate and looked excellent on my 24 inch monitor. Each video comes with a matching photo set, the most recent ones being sized at 2267 x 3400.
Overall a decent site if you enjoy this type of content, the only downside for me being the lack of diversity in the models and lack of variation in shoot locations made it all seem a bit repetitive and formulaic at times.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
• Huge collection of unscripted solo and lesbian videos and photosets
• Real amateur girls, with a wide range of looks and body types
• Lots of behind-the-scenes content: interviews, bios and profile pages for all of the girls
• Streaming and downloading is available in different resolutions (maximum is 1920x1080)
• The site is organised well – there’s a directory/list of the girls, separate pages for the masturbation and lesbian videos, separate pages for photos and videos, etc
• Yanks has some kind of partnership with ATK Exotics, ATK Hairy, Wet and Puffy, and Girls Out West. You don’t get full access to these sites, but you can view a lot of content from these sites directly on Yanks. A nice bonus to have.
• The site is available in a few different (European) languages
• There are updates every day (sometimes more than one), and a calendar that shows you what updates are coming
• Secure payment and membership (they use Epoch)
Cons:
• The site has a pretty dated look. It almost feels like you’re in the early 2000s compared to other, slicker porn sites. For example, one of the payment options is ‘snail mail’!
• A lot of the updates are just interviews with the girls. These can be nice, but there is a LOT of this ‘bonus’ kind of content
• Because the girls are really amateurs and not pro ‘performers’, the scenes can sometimes be so realistic that they’re boring
• Not much variety in the scenes. Most of the time you see the girl lying on her back masturbating until she cums, then enjoying the afterglow.
• The videos have a low-budget feel a lot of the time. The lighting can be basic, locations and furniture are often boring or ugly
• Short videos (usually 5-15 minutes)
Bottom Line:
Yanks specialises in videos and photosets with amateur girls, mostly in masturbation scenes but also with many lesbian scenes. I’m a big fan of amateur videos, and Yanks girls seem to be ‘extra’ amateur. I love that Yanks gets girls who look like they wouldn’t usually do porn. They’re often in regular/everyday clothing, many of the girls seem charmingly awkward in front of the camera, and ‘performances’ are really authentic. The girls have a range of body types, but usually they are slim, with natural breasts and pubic hair – natural looks are the most common. There are interviews with the girls before (sometimes after) the action, plus they all have bios that give an impression of their personalities.
Most of the ‘action’ videos have a short introduction, then the girls get naked and masturbate with their fingers, or a dildo or vibrator. It’s not very ‘artistic’ but the camerawork is good: you get lots of pussy close-ups, orgasmic faces, and full-body shots. Except for some unscripted conversation with the girl filming, all you will hear is the breathing, moaning, etc from the girls. There’s no music, no story, no transition shots, just relaxed intimacy and basic recording of the action.
It’s similar with the lesbian videos, the atmosphere is very amateur and authentic. You can look forward to seeing girls fingering and licking each other to orgasm, and in one video there’s even some EXTREMELY hot pussy-slapping. Because of the chemistry between the girls, it never gets theatrical or over-the-top. Still, the orgasms are real and hot, and there is often squirting – fantastic!
Something unique is that Yanks uploads the application questionnaires that the girls complete, so you can read their private thoughts on sex, masturbation and their bodies. This seems pretty legit to me, and I’ve never seen it on a porn site before. Yanks is obviously very serious about keeping things amateur and ‘real’, and I appreciate this a lot.
I have a few criticisms, of course. I personally like the ultra-amateur/unpolished look of most of the girls, but this will for sure be an issue for a lot of people. There’s no glamour to be found, in the girls or the locations or even the filming style. This is part of the Yanks charm, but it would be nice if they could avoid the ‘cheap hotel’ feeling of some of the locations. The videos are all pretty similar, too, which is weird considering how many there are! It’s not hard to get a bit bored with seeing the same positions and ‘techniques’ in so many videos… The photosets also have a particular style. The girls look great, but the pictures can have a rushed or cheap look. It’s almost as if I was taking the pictures, not a professional photographer. Some will love this, some will not. It’s a question of taste, but I think it’s worth mentioning.
Everything on the website works quite well, but I have to mention the dated look. It’s not a dealbreaker, but there’s something weirdly old school about the layout and visual design of the site. Photosets can be very irritating to view. When you click on an image preview, the expanded image is barely bigger than the thumbnail. You then need to click a ‘zoom’ button if you want to see any of the detail. Luckily you can download the photosets to get around this problem.
Yanks has been releasing amateur masturbation and lesbian videos and pictures for a long time now (since 2004 or so). By my count, there are 2286 videos – even if you don’t count the interviews and behind-the-scenes content, this is huge. It can be a bit same-y, but the size of the collection makes Yanks pretty good value. If you have a thing for super amateur solo and lesbian porn, this is a really solid site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The videos as the photos are of excellent technical quality (4k available)
Various actions: ass and pussy worship, dildo, closeups, anal, gyneco, lesbians, pissing
The girls are generally beautiful
There is a lot of content
The update is daily
Alternation of close-ups and wider shots
The design is nice and navigation in the site is easy
The videos and photos are taken in beautiful places
There are many nationalities of models
Content is totally exclusive
The scenes are described in detail
New membership options offer cheap formulas for low-demand customers
Upcoming updates are listed on the homepage
You can watch the pics in a lightbox and scroll them manually
There is a list of favorite models that can be classified according to different criteria
Cons:
Older content is not in high definition
You can not preview videos
The subscription is expensive for full HD and 4k and there is never a discount
Download is limited except for the ultimate formula which is very expensive (there is a download report)
The search function offer only the category option
The photos do not quite match the videos, which can be misleading
You can not automatically scroll photos in a slideshow
You can not create a personal favorites list
4k videos are not yet in H.265 format and are therefore big
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite sites even if I do not like anal, gyneco and the few pissing scenes. The action is well staged and well filmed. The girls of in the crack are less wild than those of FTV Girls but they are naughty just as much. In The Crack is a high quality site offering HD footage of their beautiful porn stars, American and European babes, and sexy amateurs posing nude, showing off their bodies, spread pussies, and gaped buttholes in extreme closeups while masturbating and teasing. The content quality has been fantastic for more than a decade and their 1080p and now 4k videos still look better than most. With an update everyday and over 1300+ original episodes online, In The Crack is a great pick for fans of insertions and closeups. It's a shame that price is so high, but In The Crack does not skimp on quality and quantity. The only big thing that is needed is a search engine with more features.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price
-The video and photo archives number 792 scenes
-The best video quality is 4K
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. At least 100 photos per set.
-Top notch 20 something, thin Euro porn stars
-Part of five site network that has 1476 scenes in total
-The videos are exclusive.
-All scenes are well done and look professional
-No download limits.
-Easy to follow, logical site layout
-Links to discounts to other sites
-Bill through Epoch or CCBill
Cons:
-Updates are too few with 10 updates per month. The network has about three updates a week.
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. You get something like an alphabet soup of upper and lower case letters and some numbers.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that specializes in female masturbation scenes. Mostly they use dildos, but in some scenes they use metallic spreaders. I would have liked to have seen more scenes using a speculum, but there was only one. Mostly the action was enjoyable and the models seem to be having a bit of fun as well.
One thing unique, I think, about this site is a description of the type of vulvas (pussy) the models have. There are Big Taco, Puffy Peach, and Juicy Cherry. Now that they went that far, I would have preferred if they had focused on visuals of the types, but instead they opted to focus on the action. Even the photos are action oriented, not visually pussy oriented.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but a few are from Western Europe or the US. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely well known professionals and not amateurs. The models are nearly all very thin and white, but there are two black models, one from Brazil and one from the US. I would have liked a bit more variety, but this is par for the course for a European website. Further, as such you get little to no talking in any language.
The videos are available in quality as high as 4K. My choice for downloads were the ones that are 1920x1080 and 8,000 kbps. This is as good as it gets on any site without getting into 4K, which has much bigger files and may not play on your monitor. It doesn’t play on mine.
The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links. The site is uncluttered, but there is a link to discounts from other sites. Every time you login there is a popup pushing a membership to VIPissy, which is not part of the network, but has the same ownership.
The site has plenty of videos with an archive of 792 videos and picture sets at the moment, but is growing with updates twice a week, 10 per month.
There is a photoset of very high quality screenshots for each video. The network that this is a part of has five sites and 1318 movies, so you get quite a bit with your membership. The other sites may or may not be to your taste, as I did not care for all of them either. There is Wet and Pissy, We Like to Suck, Eurobabe Facials, and Simply Anal, which has a lot more than anal scenes. There is a PU discounted price as well, so you get both quantity and quality at a very reasonable price.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Fills a niche
- HD content is available in the more recent updates (720 or 1080 IIRC)
- Exclusive material
- Early stuff has decent energy.
- Um... Was easy to join and cancel?
- Let's see... Still updating every so often?
Cons:
- A listed download limit of 50GB/day, but it can and will apparently be lowered if you do unknown things that aren't mentioned in the terms. Good luck!
- Download managers aren't allowed.
- Not many updates
- It appears to have become a (lucrative, and good for her) job, and that has taken some of the energy and excitement away. It's not too hard for the different scenes to become similar, repetitious, and boring
- The same scene will be separated in order to pretend the single video is multiple updates because it was cut in half (or thirds).
The Naughty Alysha site is focused mostly on an attractive middle aged woman who enjoys large toys, fisting, anal, going to adult video stores to have sex with lots of men, etc. There are some gloryhole scenes as well as gangbangs, and there will often be footage of the semen-covered departure out into the parking lot.
There are some good scenes, but I found the early ones to be the best because it didn't seem to be approached as a job. 2010 and before, when her hair was shoulder length and occasionally curly, were the best clips for energy but, of course, the worse clips for quality and crisp resolution.
There aren't a lot of updates. Looking at the site, here are the most recent updates:
Added 07/03/2017 (toys)
Added 06/20/2017 (toys)
Added 06/05/2017 (toys)
Added 05/17/2017 (MF)
Added 05/05/2017 (toys?)
Added 04/25/2017 (MF, 2nd half?)
Added 04/06/2017 (MF, 1st half?)
Added 03/17/2017 (gangbang)
You get the idea. Two a month or so if you count the halves as separate.
The more recent clips are available in HD if you're interested in feeling out the download limits and potential 24 hour bans.
Alysha and Jenny Jizz are the most active sites on the affiliated network, and the two often team up in clips.
As is the case with all sites on the network, there is a 50GB or less download limit each day, and download managers aren't allowed.
The bad is covered in the overall network review. I gave a few points for exclusivity and the good older stuff even with all of the limitations and stagnant site, so that's where the 63 came from.
Speaking of the network...
Pornicate:
Pornicate as a network is, as I mentioned, seeming to only update Naughty Alysha and Jenny Jizz stuff recently. Jenny Jizz seems to be the most active, and Jenny does essentially all the same stuff that Alysha does. Roxy Raye and her butt-stuff is in the network, and there are some other minor players as well. The sites' content offerings are hit are miss. There may be some videos without photos, or there may be photos without videos, or there may just be a few photos for you to look at online and with no download options for anything. Worse, some of the choices would appear to just be poorly lit, posed, or captured shots that the photographer was going to delete before the webmaster or actress said, "Wait! Don't throw those in the trash! I can put them on my site!"
Some strange and surprising older clips/pics are used as filler for the network. A Nella photo set popped up (late '90s?). Another, and I don't remember who it was, I remember seeing was a photo set of a now well-known porn star when she was just starting out. Young, gorgeous, and with her natural breasts. There was no other content including her and it had nothing to do with anything else. It was just some old content that had been purchased and put on the site.
The elephant in the room? The download limit. In mid-2017 it's listed as 50GB/day.
The FCC classifies broadband internet access as 25Mbps. If you don't have that, your connection is the modern equivalent of dial-up back around the year 2000.
25Mbps can download 50GB of 1GB+ HD clips in four hours. So, if you have broadband access, you can potentially use the site for four hours each day. If you have 100Mbps service you can use the site for less than an hour.
I understand concerns about content theft --- and, if we're honest, trying to milk another month or two out of customers--- but making a site so inconvenient to use that legitimate, paying customers give up and will never consider returning may not be the best approach, either.
mbaya has a review on the Roxy Raye page if you care to read another opinion of the network.
Bottom line: 56 or so if I had a place to score it. Avoid.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long running site that offers good (mostly) amateur masturbation pictures and videos.
- Good TBP/PU discounted price, especially if you haven't been a member for awhile or even ever.
- Navigation is good, but can be a bit wonky at times, my main problem is the picture near the top of the main page, it scrolls when I try to scroll the website.
- Good technical quality, newer videos have 1080p option and photo sets are downloadable in zips, the XL photo sets are 3000 long end.
- Well above-average DL speeds, about 80-85% of my max download speed (on porn sites).
- Updates daily, most days have multiple updates.
- Maybe the strongest pro is the models, for the most part, seem to be real amateurs who bring themselves to orgasm.
- This could be a con for some, there's also some "bonus" content from ATK Exotics, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Hairy and Wet and Puffy.
- One of personal preference, most of the models dress in normal, everyday clothes to start the sets.
Cons:
- Watch me not win over any fans with this one. I really don't like ATK Hairy. I understand there are men and women who like seeing hairy women, but the underarm hair is just too much. One can look over at some of my old ATK reviews where I also complained about the Hairy content.
- Nitpicking here much like Raging Buddhist's recent comment, I don't like the interview videos. Seriously, why would I care what an adult model says about the adult video industry?
- One that all sites using amateur models runs into, a lot of the models are shy. That's a con for me, but could be a pro for others.
Bottom Line:
I last joined Yanks way back in 2011. I did enjoy the content back then, but I thought the site lacked a certain personality I like a site to have. I compared Yanks to I Feel Myself back then and still think they're similar. The "personality" I look for is the opposite of shy. The transition from dressed to fully nude is still lacking in the majority of the videos. Most I have watched start nude and end ... well, nude. That's just a personal preference and lets have some understanding here, I've reviewed and been a member of over 200 sites. At this point, there are just things that annoy me. I'll even explain the clothed to nude preference. It lets me see what the model would look like if I saw her in person at the store.
One place this site scores high with me is its picture sets. Which continues my clothed to nude preference. The vast majority of their photo sets do start clothed and end nude with flash/teasing in-between. I enjoy these photo sets as much as the videos.
I put a con on the Hairy sets. It looks like Yanks also has their own Hairy models. Believe it or not, burn me at the stake for it, but those turn my stomach. I've told it before, I shave my head, I hate most body hair and have been this way for most of my life. But, a little neatly trimmed bush is fine, see my all-time favorite model Eve Angel. We're not talking about bush though. We're talking hairier armpits than mine. And those models are right there in the updates with no way for me to remove them from my view.
Most of that complaining isn't that bad. I like Yanks and am glad I returned. They have a lot of models I really like. Was glad to see a little heavier model like Jennavive Marie. There's some older models too. And all in all, the masturbation and orgasms are about as real as you're going to see in internet porn.
Navigation is good. They even have the bonus content from the other sites in drop-down boxes so you can easily switch from Yanks content to whichever bonus site you like. There's another side too. Straight male masturbation site called Club Stroke. Which I think is an underused concept on porn sites these days. My wife likes porn too so she can check those out. I've always wondered why more sites don't try this gender mix format. Download speeds are very good across the sites.
There's a lot of content, by my count:
2,120 videos
1,353 photo sets
Those are just the Yanks only numbers and don't include the bonus content from the other sites.
Here's the problem and it's what Raging Buddhist commented on, those video numbers include interviews, playing around videos and what I would consider non-porn videos. Which is why the navigation is considered just good. There's no way to remove the videos you're not interested in. A quick fix? Put a masturbation tag on all of the masturbation videos and add a new option in the videos drop-down box that is just masturbation to filter those out or in, depending on your perspective.
Still, the content is good and the photo sets are very good. Sometimes photos can convey teasing better than video since it captures the model before she stops teasing.
The overall technical quality is very good for a site with this type of content. As far back as I've looked, 2011 or so, has at least a 720p option on the videos. And if I were to complain anymore it would just be to say they seem to be worried more about their overall video numbers than they need to be. This is a fairly underpopulated niche in 2017 porn world. No offense is meant to the models who tell their stories or talk about the politics of the porn industry, but to put it mildly, it's just not interesting. Some of the greatest solo girl websites have used interviews and behind the scenes with some effectiveness, the ALS sites come to mind and Twistys old content when Shap was still around. It's not a big negative to me. It's just once I get caught up on the content I've missed since 2011, it will probably be awhile before I come back. Though, I don't think I'll wait 6 years again.
I'm giving the site a boost from my 2011 score since this type of content isn't easy to come by. And I'll continue to stress how important the pictures are to my score. It's a very good site to me or at least to anyone like me who hasn't been here in awhile. There's even some girl-girl content in there too, but I've mostly burnt out on girl-girl. I believe if they incorporated some type of tagging system to separate the non-porn videos from the masturbation videos, I'd add a few more points to the score. The biggest point reduction right now is there are a percentage, 20% or less, of models I don't like at all. I could see this site scoring a 90 or higher if a few things were fixed. I would recommend it for a monthly join. Especially if you like photos. I've looked over dozens of the photo sets and liked everyone of them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure
Cons:
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...)
Bottom Line:
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining the network gives you access to most of the sites in the Team Skeet network (the premium "Unlock" sites cost extra).
-One update per day to the network. The Solo Interviews site does not update.
-Choice of definition for the videos: hi, medium, low.
-1,000+ models in the network, many of them attractive teens or early twenties.
-2,000+ videos. Most with matching photo sets.
-The Team Skeet network has over 20 different niches.
-Excellent download speed. I get over 5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6 MB/sec.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
Cons:
-Cross-sale on join page.
-First page you enter the site is an advertisement, that you have to click through to get to regular site inside.
-There are several "Unlock" premium sites in the Team Skeet network. It costs an extra payment to access any "Unlock" site.
-Older videos at the site are of lower quality. And offer fewer choices for video download definition.
-The newer videos have no interview. They are basically a solo masturbation scene.
-The last site update was 2013-08-06. So it's been over a year since they updated the site.
Bottom Line:
Number of Scenes: 144
Site Description:
The name of the site, Solo Interviews, is slightly misleading. It seems to imply the videos will be an interview of the porn model.
In the earliest dated videos, the videos start off with a short interview of the girl.
However, they dropped that format, and in the newer videos, there is no interview. The girl might do a short strip, and then masturbate. The girl does put on a show for the viewer, to add an element of spice to the performance.
I think the old format is better, because it gives the viewer a chance to hear what the girl sounds like, maybe gives a flavor of the girl's character.
The site was launched around 2007. So some of the earliest videos are rather old, and the quality goes down as you view the older videos. And the video download file choices become rather limited.
The newer video updates are offered in a wide variety of definitions:
You can stream in 1080p, 720p, 540p.
You can download the videos in 1080p, 720p, 540p.
The girls are mainly natural teens. Very few fake boobs, very few tattoos. Not a lot of piercings.
Even though the Solo Interviews site no longer updates, it has 144 scenes.
And you also gain access to most of the Team Skeet network of sites.
Which offers you a lot of content: more than 1,000 models, more than 2,000 videos.
The models are late teen/early twenties girls, mostly attractive to very attractive, mostly natural.
With over twenty sites, you get an assortment of different themes that might appeal to your personal tastes:
schoogirl, babysitter, massage, anal, blowjob, etc.
Giving the site a score of 88. That is based on network access: the network has a lot of content, in different niches. The videos are professionally shot. Most of the girls are attractive teens. The network is basically easy to use. With a PU discount, the membership price is inexpensive at $17.87/month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Uses Epoch as biller. Very reliable and trustworthy.
-Decent size site with 176 videos and 221 zip downloadable photosets.
-The videos are 1280x720 and about 5000 kbps. Not the best I have ever seen, but more than adequate for my monitor. Some older videos are remastered to these specs and are not as sharp. The average length is about 15 minutes and about 600MB.
--The photos are 2000x1333. Again, I have seen better, but adequate.
-The models are natural, very unglam and have imperfections. Some have acne, skin discolorations, etc. They are clean, so I have can live with this. Overall they seem to be shown as real women and no attempt is made to make them more “porn”. For me this is a plus.
-Many models are attractive, some, maybe quite a few are not. This is obviously a matter of opinion and personal taste.
-There is a bonus site shefuckedher.com. The site states that in July they will be adding two new bonus sites MissDP.com and LuckyAmateurs.com.com
Cons:
-Updates are not frequent enough. There is one every five days, but alternate between videos and photosets.
-Some videos have ads for their other sites. Not obtrusive, but I don’t like this.
-Daily download limit of 20GB, which is 12-15 videos. I asked to have the limit removed and was given a yes in less than 30 minutes.
-No ethnic variety to speak of as this site features models from the Czech Republic. There are a few that are from other European countries though. This negative is basically nitpicking as they deliver what you would expect from a European site.
-A few models have tattoos and very few are not shaved. I hate tats, but I would prefer unshaven.
-PU is not offering a discounted price at this time.
Bottom Line:
There should be many more sites like this. I have no idea why not, as nude sites are plentiful.
Porn usually uses the term gaping for anal, but here it is open vaginal in every video, every time without fail. The scenes start off as stripping from street clothes and sometimes from other outfits. Every strip is complete and these models then open wide. Sometimes they masturbate with fingers or dildos, however, an orgasm is not the focus. Putting on a show and spreading wide is always the priority. Sometimes they use speculums or lip spreaders( I don’t think this is the term, but I think you get my drift).
Watching these scenes, I could not help but notice that many models are not quite my taste. Many are plain and there is little use of makeup. The models are often mechanical in how they go through the motions. Some are quite attractive and I think with a site this large I can afford to ignore some videos. This site is very unglam and natural as there are few tattoos and no or almost no artificial breasts.
Basically the site works as advertised. There are very few sites that present models stripping, let alone how many have them put on a complete show. In some ways a comparison to In The Crack is of value.
ITC has glam models, much makeup and slick production values in great HD. The emphasis is on the butt and gaping shots are very common. There are many strip videos, but I find them very slow moving. There is a fair amount of speculum use. Great site and highly recommended.
This site is both similar and different. Unlike ITC, these models don’t smile and never seem to be having any fun at all.
There is no slick production here, what you see is much more standard and basic. The videos are of adequate quality, but not state of the art, unlike ITC. To be fair, I prefer the speculum use here as it focuses on the whole body. ITC speculum scenes are more like a gynecology class. Unlike ITC, the butt is not a focus.
I like the photos better than ITC also. While of lesser quality, I find them to be more erotic. Works for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 1,900+ exclusive videos, video streaming and downloads, quality up to 1080p.
- 1,200+ exclusive image galleries with tens to hundreds of images, quality up to 2000x3000, downloadable as zips.
- 600+ models including 28 models together as lesbians, 78 new models added in 2015.
Cons:
- Basic website, outdated
- Inconsistent tags (e.g. Big Breasts, Big Tits)
- Galleries, photo quality and inconsistency (e.g. exposure changes in set)
Bottom Line:
My first time on a porn pay site, after being hooked by an Aeryn Walker masturbation video on the internet. From the stars to the true amateur, from the imperfect to the blonde bombshell, Yanks features a range of models largely featuring in solo masturbation scenes at home with only the most daring in more public locations — from bush walking trails to public bathrooms.
Exclusive videos and photo galleries from Yanks are uploaded daily, with content from Girls Out West and ATK Exotics/Hairy padding out updates. New scenes and galleries of models are uploaded over weeks, making it tempting to keep your subscription to ensure you have all content from your favourite models.
Models are introduced through handwritten questions and answers before you get to know them and their masturbation habits a little more with on-camera interviews. You find out and hear the wildest stories from the models as they reveal their perversions, from first time anal, to their swingers club gangbangs. Once you get to know the model (or if you choose to jump straight in), you are treated to watching the girls in their bliss as they masturbate — with fingers, magic wands, buttplugs — in any way that brings them to real orgasms.
Models can be chosen by sorting through tens of pages, with a nice thumbnail of the model presented alongside their name, date added and member rating. Models can only be sorted alphabetically, by most popular and most recent. Finding a model by body type or ethnicity requires you to search videos and galleries and it is dependent on the suggested tags for a scene or gallery.
The recent masturbation scenes on the site are high quality with most running for at least ten minutes. Pick the right model and you will be engrossed in every little move and every little sound she makes from the beginning to as she orgasms.
Photo galleries feature a lot of shots, however many are similar and repeated. Photos aren’t the strongest point of the site but the models should still blow you away as they expose their personality and every part of their body to the camera.
The site offers bare basic functionality and can take time to get familiar with everything. Once familiar, it is fairly easy to navigate Yanks content.
As a first timer to pay porn sites, I hesitate to make comparisons but if my impression is anything to go by, Yanks can’t compare to the biggest primarily amateur sites, however if you sign up at a discount price, you will find Yanks hard to beat.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Outstandingly beautiful models.
- Gigantic, colossal, mammoth (see thesaurus for more) amount of content. Site has been active since 2001.
- Fidelity to what they do. I don't know of any other site that has started with a mission and stuck to it as unwaveringly as ITC. My last join was in 2008 and even their front page has remained the same. Pristine, expedient, and efficient.
- Highest quality video, streaming and download. Dimensions offered for the latest vids are up to 3840 x 2160 at 3043 MB. When I click on this option, I get this message:
"The demands of 4k video (3840x2160) are very high. This technology is somewhat ahead of it's time and the great majority of viewers will not be able to play it..."
So I take the 1920x1080, which is crystal clear for me. I think I'd need a better pair of eyes to even be remotely interested in viewing the higher def vids.
- Zips for all pic sets. Dimensions are 1800x2400. Plenty big enough, unless we're in a biology lab.
-No crappy music!
Cons:
I was going to give the site a 99, but thought about it, and decided an 89 was more correct, because despite the fact that I think it's one of the best sites available for the kind of entertainment it provides, it could "improve" I think by stretching its horizons and being more creative. I suggest having the models DOING something more often, rather than just shuffling and clicking about on their heels on those amazing floors, or in those incredible outdoor environments. I dunno: do some cleaning, dishes, paint the walls, change a light bulb, rearrange a book shelf, fold some laundry, change a tire, make a Quiche Lorraine, hang some drapes, prune a palm tree, write a libretto, paint a picture, hang pictures, dust, write some memos, iron some shirts, do some plumbing, install a battery, clean the pool, split an atom — Something, besides just swiveling, swaying, sashaying and making me feel like a creep while I stare at every inch of their perfectly lovely beautiful girly bodies.
Bottom Line:
35 USD for a month's access to all this content is highway robbery. And what I mean by that is, we are robbing THEM. If you have an up-to-date machine or device, you can get 35 dollars worth of adult entertainment here in about a few minutes.
It would be fair if they said, "look, you give us the 35 clams, and you get 24 hours to take what you can from us, then you're done. You want more, you gotta pony up some more dough."
In 24 hours, with a good connection and/or PC or device, you could get, in one day, what you would have paid thousands of dollars for not that long ago.
My personal, subjective score for this site would be a 100, but I don't think that would fly with the owners of THIS site, or with my fellow PUsers. The 89 is my objective score, since I actually DO think they could be more imaginative and get the models to do other stuff besides what they currently do.
My bottom, bottom line is: this is the best value on the Internet that I know of for the kind of content that I like. My downloading speeds have been ridiculously fast, and I've had no problems at all.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
OK, I'm now in my second month. I like the site a lot and had a few chats with the webmaster that make me like it more.
See my first impressions in my comments when I first signed up. (I questioned the high ($35/month) price tag and whether it was worth it.)
After I got used to the unusual but efficient navigation, I'm finding a lot more good stuff than I expected initially.
-Easy to use search functions. It's got a decent user evaluation system and has user comments about each model/scene.
-Nice commentary is provided by the site for each scene. They even identify their idea of the best scenes by embedding a small check mark in the commentary.
- Gorgeous models and locales. Each set identifies the shooting location even though the locations aren't significant to the primary purpose of the site.
There currently are 1,077 sets (as of 9/4/15), each with, normally, 3 or four separate parts. Many models have just one full set but several also have multiples
Cons:
- Some of the scenes are slow (languid, almost) which is OK for a short spell, but they can be achingly boring. (How long can you watch a babe's snatch while she writhes around on her back?) Reminds me of the First Time Video site where they can spend a lot of time on a single activity that makes me go for the fast forward button.
To their credit, the site mentions such situations in their commentary so if you're like me (no patience), you'll like this aspect.
There is no multi-month pricing so make sure you can handle the $35 per month price tag if you plan on sticking around awhile. I'd love to but I'm afraid my budget cannot handle it.
Bottom Line:
The site has a disarmingly large amount of content, which I'm still going through, but so far I haven't seen a single male doing anything to any of these babes. That's not to say they aren't working the hell out of a wide variety of "toys."
For those into solo peeing, there's quite a bit of that in this site. There are one or two scenes with two models involved in some water sports.
If you like seeing babes stuff unusual stuff up their twats you won't be disappointed. Ice cream, pearls, ice cubes, bananas (squished inside) and other stuff.
There are some scenes featuring creative uses for panties, stuffing and heavy duty wedgies, for example.
Out of the 1077 sets there are only 25 sets with any lesbian action and no males anywhere.
Being an aficionado of material that explores every inch of solo gorgeous babes in HD, I'm really OK with that.
My score reflects my personal preference for the content provided. I don't consider price in my evaluation but if I did I would dock them a few points for their comparatively high price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of videos
Lots of unknown amateurs, most very appealing
Fun content if you like solo webcam videos
File sizes are small, so lots of downloads for little hard-drive space
Part of AllofGFs network, so other content themes available
One of few sites I've found where non-pornstar webcam shows can be downloaded
Cons:
Video quality ranges from bad to atrocious
Video count is inflated - duplicate videos
Browse tools almost nonexistent
Bottom Line:
My score is a compromise between my subjective reaction (higher) and a more objective view (lower). Whether or not this site is worth your time depends very much on whether or not you enjoy videos captured from webcam shows. There are few things I enjoy more than a well done webcam show, so when another review site warned readers that some of the videos appeared to be webcam captures I jumped with the TBP discount. Sure enough, near as I can tell virtually ALL the videos are pulled from webcam shows from sites like Flirt4Free.
Pornstar solo sites are often including archive versions of their star's weekly camshows, but this is the first site I have found offering downloadable versions of webshows by the kind of everyday unknown amateurs you would find on a cam site (if anyone knows of another I'd love to hear about it). It's a question of taste, of course, but I love the informal feel of these videos, and their often "let's get down to business" directness. I'm probably much in the minority about this.
The downside to this is that webcam video quality is generally terrible, with fuzzy images and herky-jerky movement (I suppose if all webcam models started broadcasting HD then the bandwidth demands would crash the internet). Of course, this means the video files tend to be quite small also - rarely as much as 100Mb and often less than 50Mb. You could download hours of these videos for the space you'd need for one 10minute HD video.
I don't know for sure if these are supposed to be viewer submitted, if so that might explain why the videos have next to no information - no performer name, date etc. - making almost any attempt to sort/search the content futile. The only sort options available are one you would see on a tube site: Most recent, Most viewed, Best rated, Longest, Popularity.
Also, I noticed a sizable number of videos that appear to have been submitted multiple times - title may be different but the videos are identical, two, three and sometimes four entries of the same video. So the thousand+ videos they advertise are clearly overstated, by how much I don't know, though even allowing for this the quantity of material is impressive.
You do have access to other AllofGFs sites, so you can find a fair amount of boy/girl sex and some all too rare girl-girl, but all the same drawbacks are here - video quality is about the same, these also seem to pulled from camshows
So bottom line: worth a join for a month for someone of my taste, a lot less likely for anyone else.
The big head says "This site is really low quality" but the little head says "Show me more!"
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Video and Zip Gyno views of ass and cunnie. Fast downloads. Erotic places they shoot. Site is fast. Really a fun site. New look.
Cons:
I wish they had ne option to download the whole video shoot. I would really like to see some behind photo and video stuff. Interaction stuff like ALS. Girls being told what to do, if possible.
Bottom Line:
If you want inthecrack ass and cunnie stuff you found the site from day one they are true to their theme. ASS and the hole. Cunny too. Zip and Videos and easy site to navigate. Great exotic locations like going on vacations really nice places and the girls of course. They sure see some really exotic places. Why I don't know but the models are really slut and love to show it. the cunt and asshole and cracks. the site must drill into their heads that this is what they booked you do. I think the girls arrive all whore.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons:
Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line:
IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
***Edited Review to lower the score - see replies***
+ Video quality is good
+ Flash preview
+ Model index
+ Search by category
+ Advanced search by key tags
+ Screen cap preview for video
+ Zips for both picture sizes
+ Comment section on all updates
+ Download speeds very good with a download manager
+ No apparent download limit
+ PU discount
+ Extra sites (see bottom line)
Cons:
- Layout looks dated and cluttered
- Page to page speeds very slow
- Random order updates
- Picture quality seriously lacking - especially the large
- Some serious tattoos showing up (Yes, a personal dislike)
- Bonus video links not valid
- Signed out seemingly at random
Bottom Line:
TECHNICALS:
> Video is available in 5 downloadable formats MP4 HD 1280x720 @ 4500 kbps, MP4 720x406 @ 755, WMV 1024x576 @ 3100, 3GP 704x576 @ 1500 and 3GP Low 352x288 @ 1200. The in browser flash player features similar resolutions & files sizes.
> The pictures are available in two sizes and both in zip files - 1280 and 2826 long side. But the quality isn't up to today's standards. The larger pics look grainy, like they were upscaled with a basic photo editor. Now including a few Girls Out West picture sets, they're only available as small 1000 pixels long side.
> It's hard to get a fix on the update schedule or figure out how to explain it in print. Sometimes there are two releases on the same day with any mix of masturbation video, an interview, a "cum face" clip or a biography, sometimes it's any one by itself.
> The page-to-page speed looks like it's hampered by some sort of security. Clicking back or forward, I noticed seemingly random numbers preceding the page URLs. I think that also has something to do with my getting logged out at times. That caused some of the downloads I had in queue on my download manager to download to 35 kilobytes, meaning they had to be downloaded again.
EXTRAS:
Whispering Lily is one of the extra access sites listed as a masturbation social network and a place to chat with other members and browse personals. I'm not too interested in that sort of thing but tried to check it out for the sake of this review. Unfortunately, I kept getting logged out and getting a server error when I tried to get back in. I stopped trying.
ClubStroke.net is a masturbation site featuring guys. Not my thing, so no comments forthcoming. :grin:
SoloTouch.com is the place for masturbation stories - with referral links to still more sites. STOP WITH THE ADS!
The 31 bonus videos all date back to 2004-2007 and haven't changed since my last signup.
The bonus videos feeds show this message: "The website that brought you here is not authorized to link to this video feed". A real WTF moment.
THE BOTTOM LINE:
It seems I didn't wait long enough to sign up here again. The updates still include biographies, "cum face" short 20-30 second videos (like those on Beautiful Agony), and non-nude interviews. While I'm sure there are fans of these, I still don't call them update material - especially the bios which aren't called an update on any other site I've seen. They're still just four pages of questions and answers. It's a masturbation site and that's what I want to see. I'm not interested in knowing what her first time masturbating was like or about the waterfalls in Oregon. I also wasn't too thrilled with having to figure out whether a video was an interview or a full episode. They do list the time of each video, but you have to watch the animated gif preview or go to the screen caps to see what's what.
One of the biggest things that had drawn me to this site in the first place was the girl next door look to the models. I don't like glam, I like average looking. Tattoos, piercings and fake tits were almost non-existent. The latest models are now putting that to rest. Girls with full sleeves, large skull tattoos, nipple and body piercings are distractions I can do without.
I don't know if they've changed or I just didn't notice it my last time in, but the layout and navigation definitely need streamlining. If you can, picture this: The home page shows three columns, "Cumming Soon" preview thumbs on the left. In the middle are Recent Updates, Social Network links, What's Hot, Member Poll and some ads. On the right, Social network links (again), Most Popular Girls, another ad, Most Viewed and Most Popular updates and support links. Way too busy for my taste. There are too many links that jump you to different parts of their network - and far too often they link you to yet another offer to join another site. One minute you're in Yanks, the next you're in WhisperingLily. And damn if there aren't ads on every page. Stop trying to sell me something and give me what I signed up for! And that's what I see as the biggest shortcoming of the site. After over a year since my last time in, I only downloaded about a hundred masturbation episodes. That might sound like a lot, but they're about 10-minute average length and over a full year's worth of content. If the pictures were clearer, I might have saved a few more of those sets as well, but the quality just isn't there. As was noted in another review, this site has a lot of potential but somehow manages to fall short. Even with all the positive aspects I see, the cons really hurt the overall experience. The core material is really good, with (unlike another well-known masturbation site) well-lit, "see-it-all" scenes. I would only recommend this site to a first time subscriber or someone who doesn't mind waiting a long time for the full scenes to build up.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ PU discount
+ Excellent video and picture quality
+ Clear and easy navigation
+ Access to 2 new W&P sites - wetandpissy.com and weliketosuck.com
+ Good download speed
+ Models categorized by Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry
+ Offered $19.99 nubiles at signup
Cons:
- Music intro and outro on video override natural sound
- Lack of variety in settings
(Yes, only two cons!)
Bottom Line:
LAYOUT:
Home page has typical tabbed navigation
Models - list of models in no apparent order with "Models by letter" option
Updates - Episodes in order of release
Requests - User feedback form
Extras - A small mix of picture sets, videos and monthly highlights
Bonus - The usual flash videos, these from various sites. Count at time of membership: 20
Cams - The usual free vids with option to buy private time.
Interviews - Short Q&A with models, averaging 2-5 questions each
Search - By Name, Pussy Type, Action (Anal, Blowjob, Lesbians, etc.) and Galleries or Video
Contact - Not surprisingly, contact info for the site
TECHNICALS:
Video:
HD MP4 1440x810 Average Bitrate 5700+ kb/s
WMV 1440x810 ~4800+ kb/s
MP4 720x406 ~1200 kb/s
FLV 640x360 ~1600 kb/s
Clicking on file type shows file size - nice!
Pictures:
Each set available in 2 sizes. Newest up to 2800x1867, oldest around 1600x1064. All are also available at 1024x769.
Watermarks on pictures are subdued and gray - not distracting at all
Zip files available
Miscellaneous:
Homepage lists number of models, scenes, pictures, videos as well as the hours of video online.
Download speeds seemed to range from 1 to 3MB/sec without download manager, moderate improvement over Save As downloads.
For as good as it is, there's really not much to say about this site. I think it's top notch in most respects. A fairly clean layout, simple navigation and quality video and pictures. My first impression was that it looks a lot like InTheCrack with less closeups and more girl next door type models. That was a nice touch for people like me who prefer amateurs to professionals. It features mostly solo action with heavy accent on toys, insertions and watersports. There are also a few lesbian scenes, some blowjob scenes and a couple of hardcore scenes. Most models have only one video with an associated picture set, a few have more. The only major issue I see is their having a music intro that plays into a video for about a couple of minutes then fading out. Same issue at the end of some video, with music starting in before the video ends. Once I got past the music intro issue, I was really impressed with the quality of the video - about as clear as I've seen anywhere. A lesser quibble is the lack of variety in their settings - everything looks like it's shot in the same house. A NICE house with a lot of rooms, but still the same house.
Something else that grabbed my attention was the watermark on the pictures. They stood out because they DON'T stand out. They're grayed out and don't detract from the picture at all. That's something I wish more sites would do. There's nothing that ruins a picture more than a bright splash of color to take away from the subject matter. Definitely not the case here.
So, with not much to criticize, it's obvious that I highly recommend the site. Solo action fans and watersport fans should definitely take a look at this one!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many top-notch and popular models
Excellent quality videos
Most videos are full 1080 HD
Good photo sets
Good navigation
Wide variety of models
Lets and lots of masturbation...
Pussy classification system is a hoot!
Lots of details about many of the models
Cons:
Not much variety of activities or sets
5 point voting system seems a bit off
Sort order on many pages seems random
no extra large images (2800x1867 max)
Not much depth (i.e. most models in only one set)
Models are often a little...un-made-up.
Many models don't interact with the camera much
Bottom Line:
Well, the best way to describe this site might be "Forget the foreplay, let's get to it!"
There is very little posing, no glam photography (i.e. not much make-up), not a single "naked girl in the woods" just a whole lot of "Here's a girl. Watch her masturbate!" And masturbate they do! Every single girl! Usually with multiple devices in each photo or video set.
This is also one of those sites where you are so drawn in by the masturbation scenes that you won't notice some of the other features right away. There are a lot of interview transcripts that seem reasonably genuine, but the translation from Russian seems a little too perfect to be 100% correct. They are entertaining, though. There are both "bonus" and an "extras" sections that contain additional sets, some of which are from other sites. Ah, yes, there is a LOT of cross selling advertising going on, but thankfully the webmasters have kept the ads to small banners except at the very bottom of some of the pages. The sites that are advertised are all quality sites and a few have "special offers" that one would not get if one were to go straight to, say, Twisty's. (The offers are about the same as the discounts the PU.com...)
There are a couple of bonus sites: "We like to Suck" and "Wet and Pissy". If that doesn't paint a picture for you, quit sniffing glue. Thay have basically the same layout and quality but are a little more specialized. Not really my cup of....whatever.
The webmaster and photo teams do a really good job of creating a genre and sticking to it. The scenes are well lit, well focused and generally good quality. They are all entirely indoors, apparently in a hotel bedroom or bathroom with a few scenes in a home someplace. In some of the sets, one of the videographers, who I'm pretty sure is not exclusive to this site, gets into the action a little by putting a finger in various orafices of the models. I'm not sure I like this style and can't tell if the models do either.
The models are for the most part, right out of ALScan or Twisty's. The top models here are on those other sites, too. Generally pretty, with maybe a few that are not. Oh, and the "real factor" is pretty high here. Make-up is minimal. Lot's of very shiny faces and plenty of pimples visible just about everywhere you can imagine. One girl has a boot shaped bruise right across her butt! If you like "real" this is the place for you!
The "acting" is OK. Female orgasms in porn is like watching professional wrestling. Is it real? Who cares! It's entertainment!
The stats, curiously posted across the top on th ehome page to make it really easy for me to reference, are:
Models: 507
Scenes: 640
Videos: 622
Pics: 39,138
That is not a lot of material compared to some other sites and it doesn't take a math wiz to see that over three quarters of the models only have one photo set and one video. The price isn't bad, though, so I would say it is worth it.
Navigation is pretty straightforward. You can sort models alphatically or on popularity...but the order of the models seems to change and the ranking system, wich goes to 5, seems a little narrow and somewhat inaccurate. There are two image download sizes and a handful of video format options. There are also a few page preferences like number of thumnails on a page. I would like to see larger image options and the ability to download things directly from the model or scene summary page.
OK, bottom line: If you are into solo mastubation videos, this site is certainly worth a visit.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The video quality is excellent, especially with the newer videos! Models are very attractive and young (18 to 25). Photo sets are very good quality, and do not appear to be vid caps. Site navigation is good. Updates with 2 new models a week on average. The site is a little different than most porn sites. They claim to be the only pussy classification site on the web, which is probably true, although I think maybe there should be more than 3 types (LOL). The 3 categories they have are the "puffy peach" (model has fat labia majoria that hide her clit and labia, and create "pussy cleavage"), the "big taco" (model's clit and labia are visible in a standing pose), and the "juicy cherry" (model's clit and labia are long and hang down). Each model starts out with one video and one or two photo sets. The videos involve a sexy strip and then some pussy play, either with fingers or toys. I had no problem logging into the two bonus sites.
Cons:
Many models have only one video and one photo set. I don't understand why--maybe they dont book them for a full days shoot. I would definitely like to see more sets of many of their models shot in their style. The videos do seem to get a bit repetitive and similar after a while. It would be nice to see more of the girls masturbating to orgasm. There is a little more pissing than I like--thats not something I'm into.
Bottom Line:
Excellent video quality with attractive young models. A lot of archived content. Some of the bigger names in Euro porn stars can be found here including the gorgeous Caprice. A few of the things you will find here with regularity are pussy close ups, pussy pumps, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, anal beads used up and down on the pussy, and pissing. A pussy focused site that is pleasantly different from the standard photo/video porn site. That along with the beautiful girls and high video/photo quality make Wet and Puffy definitely worth joining for a month. The free tour is pretty good if you've never been there before.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week.
Cons:
- All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link.
Bottom Line:
Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.
Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.
Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.
There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
