Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy (4)

Active
95
RagingBuddhist (63) 03-03-13  12:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + PU discount
+ Excellent video and picture quality
+ Clear and easy navigation
+ Access to 2 new W&P sites - wetandpissy.com and weliketosuck.com
+ Good download speed
+ Models categorized by Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry
+ Offered $19.99 nubiles at signup
Cons: - Music intro and outro on video override natural sound
- Lack of variety in settings
(Yes, only two cons!)
Bottom Line: LAYOUT:
Home page has typical tabbed navigation
Models - list of models in no apparent order with "Models by letter" option
Updates - Episodes in order of release
Requests - User feedback form
Extras - A small mix of picture sets, videos and monthly highlights
Bonus - The usual flash videos, these from various sites. Count at time of membership: 20
Cams - The usual free vids with option to buy private time.
Interviews - Short Q&A with models, averaging 2-5 questions each
Search - By Name, Pussy Type, Action (Anal, Blowjob, Lesbians, etc.) and Galleries or Video
Contact - Not surprisingly, contact info for the site

TECHNICALS:
Video:
HD MP4 1440x810 Average Bitrate 5700+ kb/s
WMV 1440x810 ~4800+ kb/s
MP4 720x406 ~1200 kb/s
FLV 640x360 ~1600 kb/s
Clicking on file type shows file size - nice!

Pictures:
Each set available in 2 sizes. Newest up to 2800x1867, oldest around 1600x1064. All are also available at 1024x769.
Watermarks on pictures are subdued and gray - not distracting at all
Zip files available

Miscellaneous:
Homepage lists number of models, scenes, pictures, videos as well as the hours of video online.
Download speeds seemed to range from 1 to 3MB/sec without download manager, moderate improvement over Save As downloads.

For as good as it is, there's really not much to say about this site. I think it's top notch in most respects. A fairly clean layout, simple navigation and quality video and pictures. My first impression was that it looks a lot like InTheCrack with less closeups and more girl next door type models. That was a nice touch for people like me who prefer amateurs to professionals. It features mostly solo action with heavy accent on toys, insertions and watersports. There are also a few lesbian scenes, some blowjob scenes and a couple of hardcore scenes. Most models have only one video with an associated picture set, a few have more. The only major issue I see is their having a music intro that plays into a video for about a couple of minutes then fading out. Same issue at the end of some video, with music starting in before the video ends. Once I got past the music intro issue, I was really impressed with the quality of the video - about as clear as I've seen anywhere. A lesser quibble is the lack of variety in their settings - everything looks like it's shot in the same house. A NICE house with a lot of rooms, but still the same house.

Something else that grabbed my attention was the watermark on the pictures. They stood out because they DON'T stand out. They're grayed out and don't detract from the picture at all. That's something I wish more sites would do. There's nothing that ruins a picture more than a bright splash of color to take away from the subject matter. Definitely not the case here.

So, with not much to criticize, it's obvious that I highly recommend the site. Solo action fans and watersport fans should definitely take a look at this one!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

gaypornolover (38) Superb review of what sounds like a superb site - I wish other sites would do something about watermarks - I knocked off 5 points for intrusive watermarks on my last review!
03-03-13  06:29pm

Reply To Message

2

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #1 - gaypornolover :

Thanks for the compliment. I try to spell it out the best I can.

I can understand wanting to brand your product - but not at the expense of the overall quality of your product. When your brand draws your subscriber's attention away from the subject - or worse, covers up part of the models - you're overdoing it. The Japanese sites seem to be the worst offenders I've seen.

03-03-13  06:45pm

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) Excellent review, RB. There seems to be some time between reviews from "we, ol' timers" here at PU - but this one seems to prove: better a few great ones, than "a lot of useless ones". And btw: I enjoyed the way you parted up bottom line - and it makes a fine, long review easier to read/overlook....this site could - also easily - be my next. Thanks.
03-04-13  05:17am

Reply To Message

4

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

Thanks and you're welcome, Denner. Making an easy to read review can get tricky. I've actually joined sites that I didn't review because I couldn't figure out how to write it up. I know how much I don't like reading a sloppy review, so I refuse to put one up myself.

As far as the frequency of reviews... I wish there were more sites that actually appeal to me. I basically go back to the same sites over and over again and there's really no need to put up a new review every few months. I'm looking at it as a race against time. Can I get my hardcore badge before I drop dead? Stay tuned, folks! : - )

03-04-13  05:46am

Reply To Message

5

Denner (233) REPLY TO #4 - RagingBuddhist :

Funny, strange, weird...and then again not: got the same feeling: been a member of quite a few sites, lately - and the same sites as earlier....but how can you repeat or even update a review without getting bored....?
03-04-13  05:54am

Reply To Message

6

lk2fireone (194) Great review. Fine overview, and lots of nice details.
03-05-13  11:44am

Reply To Message

7

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #6 - lk2fireone :

(going all 90s and singing)
This is how we do it...

Thanks :)

03-05-13  11:49am

Reply To Message

8

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #7 - RagingBuddhist :

An Irish Budda? The hat is for St. Patrick?
Your avatar has really changed over the years.
Somewhat frightening at first, but now almost friendly.
I'm hoping that reflects the change in your inner life. Lol.

03-05-13  12:20pm

Reply To Message

9

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone :

Just trying to keep it seasonal.
Change? Nope - I'm still a little guy with a bad attitude :) Roughly 3% more cynical and 4.6% more sarcastic now than last year.

03-05-13  02:00pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.