Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company F.E. Publishing
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-23 of 23  


1. FEMJOY (1)

skippy (52) 08-30-14  09:40am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
2 sets a day
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons: Navigation not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Site is not quite as reliable as some others.
Bottom Line: I've been a member of this site 5 or 6 times over the years and keep forgetting to write a review. It keeps drawing me back.

Here's the good and bad (absolutely no ugly).
This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open. I've never used this word in a review before. Delicious.

Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 3000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.

The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.

Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful unobstructed view.

So..what's not to like? Well...I know the webmasters are working on improvements, but there are a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best. I know they will be reading this so forgive me if I direct some of my points to them.
First, the navigation is a little off. there are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. Click back and you are taken back to the top of the gallery page regardless of where the image was that you clicked on. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I have been told they are working on fixing this and will happily report when it is fixed.

Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Joy Mii

2. Joy Mii (1)

Parsnip (12) 11-05-13  10:13am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-25-13  09:41am  (Update History)
Reason: Increasing amount of anal material on the site
Pros: - Very attractive models
- The site corporate style with brightly colored videos is refreshing
- Stunningly beautiful films, the "joy" in the title is well chosen
- All exclusive content, I think.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 2 MBytes/sec).
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, although I only ever download the highest. Recent videos are true HD.
Cons: - Earlier material had highest video resolution of 720p, but very good quality. EDIT - see below, all available at 1080 now.
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- I was going to say that so far Joymii has held the line against including ugly mysoginistic male-oriented material like anal. Sadly, they have just cracked, and are increasing the amount
- As someone else said, the photos don't quite match up
- Well known models, but all seem to be under different names which is irritating
Bottom Line: Joymii is another very good, genuine glamcore/heartcore site. They update pretty much every other day, not quite alternative photo sets & videos, but more or less. Most videos have accompanying photo sets. It features a mixture of BG, GG and solo material, a fairly even mix these days, all shot with the same bright sunny style.
It doesn't have quite the artistic quality and variety of, say, SexArt, but within its limitations, the films are beautiful to watch. There is some fairly wild sex, but it is all bright and happy looking. My wife generally prefers the BG films here to those on SexArt, this site was her favourite. It is simply reliably very good, with very few duds - I kind of prefer the riskier peaks & troughs of SexArt, but I liked both. We had planned on renewing, but have decided to cancel due to the inceasing amount of anal on the site. These sites need to understand that while anal, dp and similar gross-out stuff might appeal to men on their own, it is a HUGE turnoff for most women, and therefore to most couples. Having much of it will drive the site straight down to mainstream porn, it seems really silly of these sites to rob themselves of their USP.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Visit Joy Mii

3. Joy Mii (1)

otoh (54) 05-25-12  05:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Attractive, mostly natural models
- Good mix of US/European models, broad-ish age range
- Clean, modern design
- Videos and photos come in matching updates
- Consistent updates - 2 photosets + 2 videos per week
- Modern, tasteful, interior locations
- Atmospheric, well lit and creatively shot videos
- Some cute interviews
- At least as yet, no anal material (could be a con for some)
- 4 sizes of pictures, up to 5K+
- Quality improving
Cons: - Needs better filtering options
- Regional pricing
- Would like to see a few asian/ethnic models
- Some fake boobs
- Site too AJAXy - a bit glitchy with back etc
- Volume resets to max for each video
- Picture sets lose something that the videos have
- Video is 720; some folk may want 1080
Bottom Line: This site is a bit of a departure for me - I'm usually into softcore photography but every so often I have a hankering for a bit more action. However, I prefer something a little more... arty is the wrong word, because we're still talking about smut here - but perhaps balanced. There are a few of these contemporary, tasteful (again, previous comment applies) sites around now, such as X Art - I went for Joymii since at least to me it somehow seemed to have a bit more character, and focused less on the 18-21 models, I prefer a broader range.

A roundup of the content: this is hardcore/midcore content; a mixture of solo, GG and GB scenes. Each scene has one movie update - generally about 10 minutes, available in a few formats up to 720p - and one photo update, consisting approx 50-70 pics, a good online viewer and 4 sizes of zips up to 5K or so. Updates come fairly consistently at about 2 pairs per week, and there are approx 150 of each, featuring perhaps 70 models. The models are both US and European, with many popular girls - the former including Holly Michaels, Marie Macray, Dani Daniels, Shyla Jennings, Karlie Montana, Celeste Star (a favourite); the latter including Caprice, Eufrat, Ariel, Connie (Josephine here, another favourite).

The site itself is generally good - although note it has regional pricing; $20=£20 does not compute. It's odd since sister site Femjoy doesn't seem to; either way, I was somehow able to circumvent that - I have no idea how! The form just suddenly decided to offer me the $ price. Once joined up, the site has a clean, contemporary design; which actually hides a few shortcomings. It's a bit too AJAX-heavy (pages which change without the actual URL changing), which leads to glitchy back button behaviour and the like. Links time out so if you have a page open for a while you need to refresh for the download link to work. The filtering is also quite lacking; the only real choices being 'Popular' and '2-3 some' - the latter including B/G and G/G material, which for some folk is quite a big distinction; it could do with a few more options there.

What sets this site apart, though, is the quality of the videos. Although they don't go up to 1080p, they are really sharp; but over and above that, they are just so well done. Gone are the gaudy colours of most porn; these are well lit, bright, but muted and subtle. The videos usually start off with a little music; it's fairly unobtrusive and fades out after a few minutes. The camera angles are often creative and interesting; lending a bit more context to the scene; showing closeups where necessary - but not necessarily of the obvious bits, but better for it!

The locations too are good - I don't mean to come across all metrosexual, but I find the interiors (not *those* interiors) in most porn really offputting; all those chintzy bedspreads, or faux-deluxe regency-type interiors... here we have bright, spacious rooms, nice contemporary furniture, lots of natural light. And similarly, although the models tend to be naked more often than not, where they do undress the clothes are nice, casual and flattering - nothing tacky or faux-glam.

None of which gets in the way of the explicitness - there's plenty to see, but the hardcore is done to make both partners seem to genuinely equally enjoy it; if you had a likeminded partner, this is something that's easily couples-friendly to watch. And on top of all that, they seem to be getting better at it; the newer videos have more character, and although they still use toys, they are relying less on them than the earlier videos.

On the other hand, the photos, although I can't quite put my finger on it, are missing something. Technically they are good - the same locations, models etc, sharp pictures, well-lit and high resolution. But somehow they don't have the same atmosphere; they don't have the same creative angles, selective focus and closeups that the videos do. For instance, I like a bit of context, something that helps put myself in the scene - in one video the model is masturbating while on a steamy phone call, it's very exciting; the corresponding picture set features the same model, outfit, location; but no phone, and mainly just posing for the camera. The photos are obviously shot separately from the videos; I just feel they could could bring a bit more to them. But again, they are technically good and I found plenty to keep.

This, then, is an easy one to score, agreeing with both TBP and the previous reviewers; although let down on a few small fronts, I really like the content, and I may well be a convert to the genre. Suspect I shall find myself at Orgasms.xxx sometime soon!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Joy Mii

4. Joy Mii (1)

shroom (4) 05-18-12  12:58pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - exclusive content
- (very) good looking models
- regular updates
- each pictures set has its corresponding movie
- crystal-clear HD vids (WMV / MOV)
- handheld encodes
- up to 5MP pictures in excellent quality
Cons: - navigation could be improved
- models "bios" are lacking real portraits and a proper index
Bottom Line: joymii is one of the first attempts at making a X-Art look-a-like alternative, by the makers of Femjoy.
What is it, in a few words ? Hardcore done in an artistic, intimate way. Read : no closeups in your face all the time, no constant speak...

So let's get to the point : is it a success ?

Don't get me wrong, this is a very good site with very few flaws.
The main drawback is : as of today, it is yet another X-Art site, nothing more, nothing less.
So if you like the aforementioned site, then you will most likely enjoy this one.
The other "issue", for me, is the navigation. It is quite complete yet sketchy. You can't :
- filter the updates per month, year
- easily find a model without browsing all of them

What are the differences from its main competitor you'd ask ?

It's a pro site, content-speaking (not that X-Art isn't, far from that) but the atmosphere seems rather dull in comparison and the setting is often "dry".
Of course not everyone looks for that kind of ambiance, so you might enjoy this one better in the end.

It's also a pro site, design-speaking. And there, it surpasses its main competitor with few more features, like a more evolved rating system.

In the end, is it worth your money ?
If you like what you see as a guest on the site, then yes, you'll like what's inside as the only thing lacking is the download feature.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


5. FEMJOY (1)

MisterMark (8) 02-13-12  06:47pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Overall solid photography and production values and a clean but simple layout.

- Attractive, youthful, slender models, mostly euro with some porn star cross overs.

- Good download speeds, with a nice variance of photo file sizes.

- Apps are offered for IPhone and Android.

- All material is exclusive.

- Large Model Data base.
Cons: - The search engine for models consists of A to Z or models name making it time consuming to searh the site in an efficient way.

-Some of their better models are shot in a very softcore way. Little use of lingere and too many straight birthday suits in some sets.

- Mild decline in the quality of recent models.

- Watch for upsell when joining, CCBill was slow to respond to issues.
Bottom Line: FEMJOY is an art nude site which caters to those who like young, generally pretty and natural women. It is softcore, so no insertions other than an occasional finger tip nor toy play and all of the material is exclusive. The current price for the site is 19.95 recurring which is a bargain if this type of site interests you and especially if you've never been a member.

You have several photo formats which is nice and all pictures within the last four years are high resolution. The zip files offered are small, standard (my preference) and large and the download speeds were above average for me.

I personally ran into to no download limits but I do not have a mass downloader. Still, I was able to pop out up to 20 plus gallery downloads per session with no trouble.

FEMJOY uses what I call mildly deceptive advertising where they want you to see the more and not the less. They claim up to 3 updates daily and up to 2 new videos per week. Well, I saw that happen just once in both categories. FEMJOY has a wide selection of models, up to 750. There has been a ton of brunettes and not enough blonde's in recent months and in my humble opinion, they haven't had those knock out main stay models since the last time I joined.

To clarify, I waited a solid two plus years between memberships and it took that long for me to justify joining again from simply following their updates and models.

The videos offer what is more or less a flash player and formats for windows are 640 x 360 or 1280 x 720. The smaller files were adequate for my tastes. They offer the same exact sizes for Quicktime and have an Ipod feature as well and even a small playstation portable. Also added are apps for Android and my preferred IPhone. but I found neither compelling enough to use or go through the mild learning curve associated.

The quality of the videos are good with nice production values but they are softcore for sure and some seem repetitive, especially if shot by the same person. The photo's are sharp and clear with not too much fodder in the sets, but like the videos and one of my main gripes, look the same when certain photo artists are used.

Some of the artists just have the same old style over and over and the same backdrops as well which gets boring quick to a true photo enthusiast. But quality is there which brings me to my main gripe and one that frustrated me greatly and dropped my rating several points.

The search features are deplorable for such a quality site. Forget typing in blond or red hair and blue eyes and such for it isn't there. And when you go to the models section your eyes will cross trying to pick out models that float your boat.

It is very clunky and difficult to pick through for the photos are not always reflective of the models you will see upon clicking on them. It took me the entire allotted membership time to dig out the models and zip files and vids I wanted to keep and this is just unacceptable for a site that should have a search feature that matches the overall quality of their productions.

You can search models A to Z or by name and we all know models names change from site to site and that is another gripe towards better model identification. The main stay models they do have, unfortunately are more PG, meaning no views of the real goods, save a shadow or two.

Another negative was when I joined it took three hours before I could log on which was a major turnoff, but all sites generally come with one glitch, so no big deal. However, it took CCBill five business days to respond to a complaint and had I been down that whole time, they would have been extremely slow to repsond to the issue.

That is not necessarily a problem of the FEMJOY staff who uses their services. They also offer EPOCH as a way to pay as well. There is one cross or upsell to watch for when signing up.

Overall, the quality of the models and photography and such is well above average, but in my opinion this site trails Met Art and especially MPL a site I now think sets the pace for art nude erotic photography in this niche.

I recommend FEMJOY for those interested in these types of sites and feel it is a very good site. I am a very picky purveyor and I found quality but not without some serious work and the aforementioned crossed eyes.

One telling thing for me which makes it clear it'll be another two years before I revisit was that in the entire month of the membership, save two days left, I downloaded 10 of 63 photo updates, which shows a slight decline in quality per average. I dowloaded the majority of 19 models content.

That to me is a great value but I expected more in that I waited over two years between memberships. If this makes any sense, I was both a satisifed customer that was a little disappointed at the same time and I absolutely detested how hard it was to search the models for the material I covet.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


6. FEMJOY (1)

flst2000us (2) 05-20-11  07:32am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has some of the best looking women, as well the shear amount of pictures and video is why I signed up for a year long membership. Their updates are on a daily basis and that was another reason for my sign up.
Cons: The site design and the throttling:

There needs to be a search ability meaning like most sites you can search hair color / Breast size and so on. Have not found that here.

Throttling is insane, Meaning just surfing the site can cause the throttling to kick in and ban you for 3 Hours. Plus downloading does the same thing.

I understand the need to throttle people on downloads but not the site activity.

Suggestion to the site if they read this is to add a meter to the site on each users profile so the user can see how much data has been used and slow it down.

I have a very fast internet connection and its frustrating to get that your limit message even while looking at pictures on the site or streaming video.
Bottom Line: If you sign be prepared to go extremely slow and do not spend to much time on the site or you will get limited and since there is so much content is almost impossible to review without getting limited.

The Pictures and videos are really nice

Update. Sent email to webmaster concerning the throttling and they came back and said they are reviewing the throttling and possibly going to remove the restrictions. But the other statement that got me was leeching and their statement the throttle is set to keep people from leeching their site.

But the issue with that is I'm paying for access so leeching is not a true statement if it was free then I understand but this is a paid site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Joy Mii

7. Joy Mii (1)

anyonebutme (14) 12-01-10  05:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Quality photography up to 5000px in size
-high quality video encodes 720p/6mbps
-photos in zip files in 3 different resolutions
-4 updates every week (two matching photo/video combos)
-no download limits that I'm aware of
-minimal photoshop retouching of the girls
Cons: -site interface will need to be redone, the updates are just listed in a single long list, no model index pages.
Bottom Line: In short, Joymii is Femjoy with toys. Photosets vary from 30 to 70 photos per set, and videos are full separate scenes from 8 to 15 minutes in length (I didn't view any that were just recordings of the photoshoots). It's a style that I can't recall seeing elsewhere like this, artsy glamour masturbation scenes, I think they captured it very well.

Not a site for every porn viewer, but I think one will largely know going in whether this style will be exciting or not.

Just needs a little site redesign as they grow with more content making it easier to explore what all is in there.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


8. FEMJOY (1)

Bumble B (1) 04-28-10  02:17am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: + huge archive of models
+ natural looking girls
+ up to 3 daily updates
+ pics up to 4000 px resolution (available in 3 different sizes [hi, med, low])
+ HD vidz
Cons: - download limit
- unhandy search function
- uninspired/uncreative photo series
- only nude models (no undressing)
Bottom Line: If you are searching for young and innocent looking teens, Femjoy is the right place for you. It offers you tons of beautiful and naturally looking girls. But that is no longer a unique feature today.

So especially that fact makes Femjoy a little bit limited in my humble opinion, because you'll find 99 % outdoor sets and complete nude girls from the beginning of the photo series.

What you see is what you get: nude teens. If you're looking for something more, you won't find it here.

Bumble B
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


9. FEMJOY (1)

adrenalinrush (5) 02-02-10  07:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons: --- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line: After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.

Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.

They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.

Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.

Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.

Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


10. FEMJOY (1)

nbaby8 (8) 06-17-09  04:26am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Very natural looking models
- Classy, semi artistic and professional photography
- The atmosphere of the photos are very nice
- Constant updates to the site
Cons: - No hardcore
Bottom Line: Femjoy is not a site for everyone. It's not smut and not a blood pressure raising hard core site. The site studies the enigma of natural beauty itself and put it in place in softcore orientation. Although the term 'erotic' can be applied semi-heartedly, Femjoy can be catergorized as 'classical nude glamour softcore', something you would find in the photography sections of book stores.

In my mind, Femjoy is one of the most natural softcore photography sites I have visted. The models are usually in their most natural state, in many sizes and for some seeing, models with untrimmed pubes can be something we think back to in the 1970s and 1980s. The lack of using heavy makeup also brings the perspective of realistic beauty back to life. If you're bored of looking at nudes, also check out the scenaries of the photos.

As for the photography, it is professional and definately classic glamour. Some of the photo's artistic styles are cleary taught out from master glamour photographer John Kelly.

I would rank this site as one of the top 5 natural softcore sites on the Internet. Other than Femjoy, I'd also recommend MetArt, like what other reviewers have mentioned.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


11. FEMJOY (1)

lk2fireone (196) 06-14-09  09:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company
Cons: PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was.
Bottom Line: CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.

There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


12. FEMJOY (1)

propaGhandi (5) 01-28-09  04:45am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: · tons of new teens
· images up to 4000px
· hdv movies (several formats)
· 100 contributing artists
· clean and simple design
· good update frequence
· iPhone version
Cons: · speed occasionally low
· download limit
· worst search ever
· flip-book photography
· 99% nude girls from the first image
· 1-3 sets for most of the teens
Bottom Line: Like Met Art, Femjoy offers a good variance and tremendious amount of teen content.

You seek for young and innocent looking teens and natural photography, you're at the right place. Femjoy will blast you away with thrilling softcore and fulltime nudes.

I am personally overdozed with the teen-niché and seek for a site with real women now.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


13. FEMJOY (1)

Jeffrey99 (29) 11-04-08  06:00am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models
Cons: -Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them.
Bottom Line: I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.

While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.

The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.

Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


14. FEMJOY (1)

asmith12 (124) 10-01-08  12:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen)
Cons: -- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search
Bottom Line: After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.

But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.

Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.

Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


15. FEMJOY (1)

David1982 (1) 08-02-08  10:32am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Beautiful Girls
* Lots and lots of Girls
* Very High Quality Pics & Videos
* Download Different Video Formats
* Regularly updated
Cons: * Download limits do apply
* Lack of Creativity
* A little bit expensive
Bottom Line: * For those who are only willing to fork out a few months worth of membership, download limits do apply, 2 gigs an hour, might seem like a lot, but for those with fast and unlimited internet access, and a mind set to download a lot of content, that is really not much, (this is called leeching).
* Gorgeous naked girls, no doubts about it, young hotties, and a whole lot of them,(which might collide against my previous comment).
* Easy and simple to use menus.
* Above all, absolutely amazing and stunning girls, and well worth getting a membership, just sit back and relax, this site is surely worth it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


16. FEMJOY (1)

Mr Fountain (50) 04-21-08  05:58pm
Rookie Badge  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: # this site spoils pic lovers; models are shot either in lavish interior settings or beautiful outdoor settings.
#if you have a large flatscreen monitor, these Femjoy pics, vids will rock on that monitor
# beautiful woman in beautiful setting is mastered; probably the best aesthetic photography of its type.
# two updates per day; and 10 new HDV films per month.
# many video options: WMV 640 x 360;WM HDV 1280 x 720; Quicktime 640 x 360; Quicktime HDV 1280 x 720; iphone 320 x 240
# some of the pics made me gasp, simply beautiful
# some updates are marked best of to identify exceptional and popular shoots
# navigation is non convoluted, large magazine style avatars; simple to see what they have; you just click on the month of the year that you want on the left hand side.
# pics come in three sizes either 4000 X 2667, 4000x 2667 or 3500 X 2333, 2333 X 3500; and 1200 X 800, 800 X 1200 pics; 800 X 533, 533 X 800
# offers two months for $49.95 which is $25/ mo
Cons: # this is not atk style photography, no pussy play- just models posing.
# vids are models posing, are of lesbian models posing, dancing, walking in scenery, interacting in scenery- but not hardcore
# $34.95 a month is on the higher end for those who want to pay on a month to month basis
# models do wear clothes to start out the set, but most sets are strictly nude for those who want to see the models wear clothes
Bottom Line:
If you like enjoy the shape of a woman in the nude posing or being filmed in natural light of a beautiful indoor or outdoor settings. Then this site will interest you.

I recommend this site especially to those with large flat screen monitors - these pics are gorgeous. videos too. Previously, I had a flatscreen when I was a member a few months ago. I rejoined 2 months for $49. I currenlty have a small laptop so I don't have the advantage of seeing the full potential of these pics/ vids.

When I joined this site, I wasn't sure that I'd like it. I was unsure about joining a nude site. But there are gorgeous updates like Koysusha, under the tree..or Larissa. some of the models arch their back and tilt their head back and let lose with their hair flowing in the breeze such as on top of a rock; or wade through a gorgeous field of yellow flowers or purple thistles, and it is gratifying to look at in a way that I didn't think was possible.

You can get your rocks off to this style photography believe me. This site proved to me that it can be done; and quashed the hardcore-is always-better theory. The gorgeous models in beautiful landscapes: mountains, shoreline, river, meadow can grow on you just the same as hardcore. So I would suggest this site for those who want to try it. There are many backgroundable pics in this site and very few wasted pics.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


17. FEMJOY (1)

exotics4me (463) 04-14-08  08:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality site that has a site full of content
- Videos checking in 1280 on high end over 5000 bitrates
- Pictures go as high as 4000 on high end and come in zip files as well
- Good download speeds for me, about 20% faster than my average download speed.
- Site navigation is good enough, which is important for a site with this much content
- Couple of updates per day
- Thank goodness, they have some models here that are well built, some of these artsy sites stick to those 102 pound models, but this one has some different sizes.
Cons: - Videos can be a little on the tame side, not quite as bad as Met-Art
- Something that I am not real fond of, starting out nude. This for me takes away part of the fantasy
- Nothing close to hardcore, though they don't advertise that they do, wanted to mention it for anyone reading this.
- Price is too high at $34.95
Bottom Line: I have mixed feelings about this site. I really like their quality, the large pictures and HD video, but keep in mind that the older sets of pics and videos are not this high quality. Also, if you are like me and like to see the girl clothed, then stripping down to nothing, you won't find much of that on this site.

I really didn't take much off my score for those negatives because the site is trying to stress the beauty of a naked female, not the beauty of a stripper!

The site navigation is easy, but you will still get the feeling that you are missing something, because there is so much content. I was happy with the download speeds, and the speed of the site, despite having so many things on each page.

I was also happy to see models that weren't tiny skinny, this to me is important when trying to show the beauty of a naked woman. And it was a worry I had before joining the site.

There also are some exotic looking models, which you rarely see on these art sites. Still, there could be more and need to be more. You will find some well-known models like Eufrat, Ariel and Suzie Carina. One slight complaint is that the g/g photo sets are just boring. I don't know how many more g/g sets I can look at of the women leaning against each other.

Oh and you can't use any download manager that I know of. I tried 3 different ones.

Overall for a month, I was satisfied, even with this high price, and I will recommend it for one month, maybe 2 times per year. Recommended!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


18. FEMJOY (1)

walter (0) 12-28-07  06:42am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the best Erotic Photo sites on the web.
Exceptional models and photography
Frequent updates
Good search tools
Cons: One of the highest priced sites on the web
Bottom Line: If you are willing to pay the price the qaulity will not dissapoint you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


19. FEMJOY (1)

jd1961 (95) 11-14-07  08:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - First Class Erotic Photography.
- Ton Of Material.
- Beautiful Models.
- Hi-Res Photos, Zip Files.
- No Download limit.
- Hi-Def Video, NO DRM Protection.
- Frequent Updates.
- Useful Member Interaction.
- Fast Download Speed.
- Very Attractive, Fun, Interactive Site.
- Exclusive Content.
Cons: - Expensive.
- No Hardcore.
Bottom Line: I couldn't wait to review this site because it may be the best one I've seen, and I've spent a lot of time there and haven't scratched the surface. A treasure trove of high class material. Photos go up to 4000px, available in quickly DL'd zips. Browse them by thumbnail or flash slide show. You can rate the sets, and leave comments, and add to favorites. Here's why this is great: there is an option to view what everyone else is picking as a favorite, it continually updates. It's fun, and you find great stuff that way by viewing someone's fave photo, which is linked to the set. It's easy to get lost here, there's so much stuff. The videos are great too, with a hi-def option of 1280x720 (wmv & QT), plus a more standard size of 640x360. You can preview a vid before DL. I'm not always a fan of the softcore vid, but these are very nice. They look great, and BTW, the girls here are gorgeous. So many of them, many well known, others not. Photography and videography is total first class, not some schmoe with a camera. It's fun just to be in the site, the search engine could be better, but Femjoy is well built. The price was recently increased to $34.95, the high end of steep. But if any site could justify this, I guess this one could.It updates frequently. You will not find any hardcore action here.It's difficult to know where to start, they do have a random selection link that brings up different sets each time. But you can get lost in this site and never find your way out.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


20. FEMJOY (1)

ramscrota (12) 07-04-07  05:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lovely girls
Girls presented in an extremely erotic and tasteful manner
Great picss
Lots of pubic hair
Love the fact that shoots are in intersting places eg outdoors, in the woods, on a railway line, etc
Cons: Scenes too much the same -they all start nude. no sense of the tease by an erotic strip
Videos very dull (for the same reason)
Too softcore for my liking
Bottom Line: An extremely good niche site for people who like softcore high quality nude pics. If that's your niche, then this site's for you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


21. FEMJOY (1)

Drooler (220) 05-31-07  06:43pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Regular updates of 2 photosets per day from Nov. 2006; one per day before then
+Usually very beautiful European women and great photography
+Exclusive content
+Archive from June 2004
+3 pic sizes: 800, 1200, and 3-4000px, in zip or singles for photosets going back to May 2005 or so; earlier sets max at 2-3000px
+More recent videos at 1280x720 in WMV or Quicktime
Cons: -awkward navigation (but you can get used to it, and some features you might come to like)
-occasional excessive darkness or light, or blurriness where you don’t want it
-middle size on earlier galleries is 1000px
-a few galleries are only 25 or so pics
-“Best of” links are just to sets that were published earlier, but first-time members might like them being pointed out
-sometimes a sluggish server response, but it’s been improving
Bottom Line: FemJoy has become one of best softcore nude photography sites out there, pretty much on a par with MetArt. The models include Nikky Case, Susana Spears, Bambi, Peaches, Jana Mala (here as “Jane”) … and others with aliases too numerous to mention.

Since I first joined in Sept 2005, it’s had a makeover: a more visually appealing design and better organization. The navigation is a learning experience, though.

As a member, you open to the latest updates. Click one, and the next page has links to rate the gallery, download zips of it, make a comment on it, or just go somewhere else in the site! But what about that gallery, which you haven’t even seen yet? Why not just go straight to it, and put the gallery-related stuff in it?

The actual gallery opens in another window of one to several pages, or you can “View All” on a single page.

Choosing pic sizes depends on where you click on a thumb (top = largest, middle = 1200px); this feature I like now, but for a while I didn’t even realize that the little thing at the top of the page was a “visual” explanation of it. (Too cryptic? Your call.)

Another thing is the models index. You can either search by name, or FemJoy name, or you can view ALL of the approx 400 models at once, alphabetized, on one page! Even if they just put them in A-D, E-H, etc. visually separated sections, there would less “overload.”

FemJoy: excellent quality content + some interesting features + a few quirks.

Since I wrote the above review, they've recently changed to a more tasteful and visually appealing design that's also easier to use. Just wish they had more ways of searching for models, like, say, ATK Galleria does. The model list is so long, it's staggering. (Kinda like being in the orgasmatron in Barbarella.) One thing is clear: they are doing a lot to make this site better.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


22. FEMJOY (1)

Bacchus (30) 01-27-07  01:19pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: *High resolution pics
*Models are stunning
*Content is updated frequently
*Did I mention the models are hot?
Cons: *Video section is an after thought
*No hard core content
*Navigation is cumbersome and sluggish
Bottom Line: Femjoy seems to be a knock off of Met-Art but the content is fresh and on a lucky day, you find dozens of extremely attractive nubile models to drool over. The video section is not very exciting and imho, if you want videos on your site, do a 100% effort and make it worth the subscription price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


23. FEMJOY (1)

kotatsu (3) 01-23-07  07:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: very good quality of pics
nice models, even if not all the models are worth
some models not nice
not nasty
boring boring boring videos
Bottom Line: If you like simple nuduty this is for you, otherwise look for something else!!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-23 of 23  

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (6)
2. 21Sextury.com (5)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. Blacked.com (3)
5. Wow Girls (3)
6. Team Skeet (3)
7. DDF Network (3)
8. X-Art (3)
9. Brazzers (3)
10. Bangbros Network (3)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.19 seconds.