Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.



adrenalinrush (5) 02-02-10  07:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons: --- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line: After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.

Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.

They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.

Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.

Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.

Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Monahan (44) Thanks for your review. I was aware of this site but it was not on my radar until I saw your review. I'm interested.

The preview site says they add 2 videos a week. Is that accurate?

As a video guy, I shy away from photo sites that have a few videos because they are usually just videos of photo shoots (MetArt, for example).

But the preview site of FEMJOY has some excellent previews of videos that make me want to check it out and drain off their video content, but before I do I'd like your opinion of the video content (quantity and quality).


02-02-10  09:17am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Thanks for the review. I liked your "passionless presentation of the girls" because that sadly appears to be true in many sites these days. You just saved me some money! :-)
02-02-10  09:56am

Reply To Message


adrenalinrush (5) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

Since 2010 they seem to have irregular HD video updates. As far I have recognized it every 9-10 day now.

The release informations are public, check the site to see for yourself.

02-02-10  11:42am

Reply To Message


Monahan (44) REPLY TO #3 - adrenalinrush :


I went back as you suggested and found the update schedule. They had a total of 4 new videos in January, not quite the 2 a week they promised in their preview site. But the previews they offer for the four appear to be quite well done.

But my other question is, what is your opinion about the quality of the videos? With about 300 videos, I am ready to sign up for a month at $30.00 to drain off the good stuff but before I do I'd like your opinion. Does your "passionless" observation apply also to the videos?

02-02-10  11:55am

Reply To Message


anyonebutme (14) Just an FYI, you may have noticed, x-art is comprised of work done up by some of the same contributors to femjoy, so probably not the best site to site transition if you're seeking for a new look. I'd suggest checking out watch4beauty.com , or mc-nudes.com

Like on the flip side, I reviewed breath-takers.com and even though the updates come slowly, I felt the quality and passion in the girls is there, then the replies from others were along the lines of "yeah, but not enough updates". Some people want quality, others just want the massive quantity.

To the other questions above, their videos are dedicated scenes, unlike what Met-Art puts out. They are usually 5 minutes in length with a song playing throughout. They certainly lean more art than porn. Not saying it as a bad thing, they are good videos, just don't go in to it expecting something else.

02-02-10  12:38pm

Reply To Message


adrenalinrush (5) REPLY TO #5 - anyonebutme :

There is not much to complain about the quality of x-art, it's just the overall look for the most sites that sicken me.

mc-nudes.com is a good advice and a site I already know. They are one of the few that doesn't seem to care about the mainstream developments.

watch4beauty.com is too artistic for me and breath-takers too expensive for an update rate of 2 per week.

02-02-10  01:47pm

Reply To Message


adrenalinrush (5) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :

The video quality at all is good but the storystelling is mostly weak.

Good looking girls can never eat like normals or ending up making a mess. Another video I saw was a girl climbing on the roof, fully naked.
I think you know what I try to explain, the girls are beautiful but uncertain as long as they get instructed by someone behind the camera. Mechanic smiles and abrupted movements are routine in the videos.

Nevertheless, you should check the videos by yourself to build your own opinion. They seem to have a couple of full videos for promotional purposes online.

02-02-10  02:00pm

Reply To Message


propaGhandi (5) REPLY TO #6 - adrenalinrush :

adrenalinrush, thank you for your review - it´s in line with mine.

mc-nudes.com is my recommendation and red-hot favourite in that niche.

02-03-10  01:57am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.