Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.



MisterMark (8) 02-13-12  06:47pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Overall solid photography and production values and a clean but simple layout.

- Attractive, youthful, slender models, mostly euro with some porn star cross overs.

- Good download speeds, with a nice variance of photo file sizes.

- Apps are offered for IPhone and Android.

- All material is exclusive.

- Large Model Data base.
Cons: - The search engine for models consists of A to Z or models name making it time consuming to searh the site in an efficient way.

-Some of their better models are shot in a very softcore way. Little use of lingere and too many straight birthday suits in some sets.

- Mild decline in the quality of recent models.

- Watch for upsell when joining, CCBill was slow to respond to issues.
Bottom Line: FEMJOY is an art nude site which caters to those who like young, generally pretty and natural women. It is softcore, so no insertions other than an occasional finger tip nor toy play and all of the material is exclusive. The current price for the site is 19.95 recurring which is a bargain if this type of site interests you and especially if you've never been a member.

You have several photo formats which is nice and all pictures within the last four years are high resolution. The zip files offered are small, standard (my preference) and large and the download speeds were above average for me.

I personally ran into to no download limits but I do not have a mass downloader. Still, I was able to pop out up to 20 plus gallery downloads per session with no trouble.

FEMJOY uses what I call mildly deceptive advertising where they want you to see the more and not the less. They claim up to 3 updates daily and up to 2 new videos per week. Well, I saw that happen just once in both categories. FEMJOY has a wide selection of models, up to 750. There has been a ton of brunettes and not enough blonde's in recent months and in my humble opinion, they haven't had those knock out main stay models since the last time I joined.

To clarify, I waited a solid two plus years between memberships and it took that long for me to justify joining again from simply following their updates and models.

The videos offer what is more or less a flash player and formats for windows are 640 x 360 or 1280 x 720. The smaller files were adequate for my tastes. They offer the same exact sizes for Quicktime and have an Ipod feature as well and even a small playstation portable. Also added are apps for Android and my preferred IPhone. but I found neither compelling enough to use or go through the mild learning curve associated.

The quality of the videos are good with nice production values but they are softcore for sure and some seem repetitive, especially if shot by the same person. The photo's are sharp and clear with not too much fodder in the sets, but like the videos and one of my main gripes, look the same when certain photo artists are used.

Some of the artists just have the same old style over and over and the same backdrops as well which gets boring quick to a true photo enthusiast. But quality is there which brings me to my main gripe and one that frustrated me greatly and dropped my rating several points.

The search features are deplorable for such a quality site. Forget typing in blond or red hair and blue eyes and such for it isn't there. And when you go to the models section your eyes will cross trying to pick out models that float your boat.

It is very clunky and difficult to pick through for the photos are not always reflective of the models you will see upon clicking on them. It took me the entire allotted membership time to dig out the models and zip files and vids I wanted to keep and this is just unacceptable for a site that should have a search feature that matches the overall quality of their productions.

You can search models A to Z or by name and we all know models names change from site to site and that is another gripe towards better model identification. The main stay models they do have, unfortunately are more PG, meaning no views of the real goods, save a shadow or two.

Another negative was when I joined it took three hours before I could log on which was a major turnoff, but all sites generally come with one glitch, so no big deal. However, it took CCBill five business days to respond to a complaint and had I been down that whole time, they would have been extremely slow to repsond to the issue.

That is not necessarily a problem of the FEMJOY staff who uses their services. They also offer EPOCH as a way to pay as well. There is one cross or upsell to watch for when signing up.

Overall, the quality of the models and photography and such is well above average, but in my opinion this site trails Met Art and especially MPL a site I now think sets the pace for art nude erotic photography in this niche.

I recommend FEMJOY for those interested in these types of sites and feel it is a very good site. I am a very picky purveyor and I found quality but not without some serious work and the aforementioned crossed eyes.

One telling thing for me which makes it clear it'll be another two years before I revisit was that in the entire month of the membership, save two days left, I downloaded 10 of 63 photo updates, which shows a slight decline in quality per average. I dowloaded the majority of 19 models content.

That to me is a great value but I expected more in that I waited over two years between memberships. If this makes any sense, I was both a satisifed customer that was a little disappointed at the same time and I absolutely detested how hard it was to search the models for the material I covet.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


gaypornolover (38) Superb quality review very well-written and comprehensive. Well done!
02-13-12  08:09pm

Reply To Message


MisterMark (8) REPLY TO #1 - gaypornolover :

Thanks for your input.
02-14-12  05:16pm

Reply To Message


otoh (54) MisterMark, as per gaypornolover, thanks for an excellent and comprehensive review. This site is vaguely on my shortlist, it has sets of a lot of models I like, so it's good to find out a bit more about it.

You mention it trails behind Met Art in terms of features and quality - do you feel it has any more eroticism to it? I felt Met Art lacking in that respect; not to do with the degree of explicitness per se, but more that there is little tease or cheekiness in it.

02-19-12  10:29pm

Reply To Message


MisterMark (8) REPLY TO #3 - otoh :

I think both sites lose that "spirit" in some of their sets and or there is a lack of enthusiasm. The bottom line is it both sites are soft. For me, FemJoy is a site I would check in with every two years but I am a photo buff but came away somewhat underwhelmed by the lates experience. It's a very streamlined site that would work better at 14.95 or so IMO. They don't offer the "Live" girls or search features that it's comp does. Of the three art nude photo type sites, it is clearly at the bottom of the list. There was a 99 bucks offer for year when canceled which is to me a waste of money. Like I said, I treurned after two years and found only a moderate amount of savable new material. If you are looking for explitiness, this site will disappoint and bore you quickly.
02-20-12  10:33am

Reply To Message


otoh (54) REPLY TO #4 - MisterMark :

Thanks for the reply! It's not so much explicitness that I'm looking for (although it doesn't hurt...) - more a sense of tease and eroticism. I've seen plenty of non-nude material that's more exciting than I found Met Art, I suspect they have strict guidelines on how cheeky/sexual the models can be regardless of how naked they actually are. Sounds like Femjoy might be similar...
02-20-12  03:34pm

Reply To Message


BrockLion (5) They do have a download limiter. After downloading their videos rather aggresssively using the downthemall addon to Firefox, I got a message that I had been shut off for three hours. I think it mentioned "3GB in 3 hours" as the problem. I never got the message again and was able to download all 392 (I think that was it) videos in less than a day and a half.

I don't know yet if I will have a go at grabbing the photosets. Maybe just the brunettes. :-)

I agree that this is definitely a softcore site. More pussy exposure than Domai but less than many other sites, for example, I did not see any "spread the lips" shots.

I only joined this site because one of their former models told me she had two photosets there. I joined, found the model list and her sets in only a few minutes.

I did inadvertantly also subscribe to their much more explicit sister site joymii which has less total content and fewer updates.

02-25-12  11:03pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.