Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.



propaGhandi (5) 01-28-09  04:45am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: · tons of new teens
· images up to 4000px
· hdv movies (several formats)
· 100 contributing artists
· clean and simple design
· good update frequence
· iPhone version
Cons: · speed occasionally low
· download limit
· worst search ever
· flip-book photography
· 99% nude girls from the first image
· 1-3 sets for most of the teens
Bottom Line: Like Met Art, Femjoy offers a good variance and tremendious amount of teen content.

You seek for young and innocent looking teens and natural photography, you're at the right place. Femjoy will blast you away with thrilling softcore and fulltime nudes.

I am personally overdozed with the teen-niché and seek for a site with real women now.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (364) I am curious how you feel about comparing femjoy and metart. Which do you prefer and why?
01-28-09  10:12am

Reply To Message


propaGhandi (5) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

It's okey to compare MA with FJ because both play in the same niché.
MA = 83 points / FJ = 81 points - all we're going to face right now is just my personal taste.

Both sites offer so many contents that anybody can find a girl he or she adores. The only reasonable comparison can be made in the overall packaging and or quantity of contents.

MA is part of internet-history, came along a long run and is still on the stampete. FJ instead is a bit more flexible and has benefitted from the envelopement and the new technologies of the web-evolution.

I personally would stay with the tradition of MA. *I am oldschool and like to get my expectations fullfilled :D
The higher update frequency justifies the price and raises the chance on getting my taste hit more then on FJ.

01-28-09  12:04pm

Reply To Message


nutcrackr (10) I've been looking at recent Femjoy sets and I find the models and photo quality generally very good. Also 2 updates a day is good for the price.

The thing that definitely bothers me, that you touched on in your review is the fact that so many models are nude from the first image which I find greatly lowers the tease factor. The problem is many members are expecting Femjoy to be 100% nude, but it's preventing me from subscribing.

03-27-09  04:50am

Reply To Message


Horndog (0) I am a current Femjoy member. A couple of items in this review need to be addressed. First, a thumbs up because although the 4000 px standard is still the norm, I've recently started seeing some sets as high as 5000 px. Second, the "99% nude girls from the first image" statement is no longer true. The site changed about 3 years ago and went through a major watering down (A BIG thumbs down in that respect). The site is now more like 75% nude from the first image. They have gone so far to the other extreme that I have seen pics where the model is completely clothed. I've been a member for a while simply because I haven't been able to find any other sites with more extreme nudity.
04-28-09  08:07am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.