Network Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Reality Kings (0)
Network |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding models and hardcore action
I paid extra for downloads and have not had any problems downloading
The network navigation works as it should
There are videos and image sets to download
Reality style scenes but you will need some fantasy to see the reality
Good production values, would not call it the top of professionalism, but it is good |
| Cons: |
A questionable past almost made me skip Reality Kings, but so far – I have had no problems
Production would be rated higher, but here’s why it is not; some of the scenes seemed doomed from the start |
| Bottom Line: |
Paying extra for downloads is becoming a norm not an exception and because the total price of a site and downloads is still within a reasonable range, I do not see a reason to be negative about the sites who practice this.
Reality Kings is one of those networks that could get just about any man’s, maybe even woman’s attention. Their female models are what we see in America as “hot”. There does not seem to be any apologies for that, The models are beautiful to look at and look like they would cost me or you, a year’s salary to date for a week. There is a blinginess about the models. The best part of that is when you find one who is more down to Earth, you have likely found your new favourite.
The scenes across the network rely on a basic sexual fetish to work. They have Latina sites, MILFs, anal, attempted game shows, reality shows, it is everything we are tired of seeing on mainstream television, but it is a little different when there is a beautiful nude woman in the scene.
With downloads, I have not run into any limits, but admittedly – only download 4-5 scenes a day. There is still a newness for me. I am still hunting and pecking, so to speak. The network’s navigation is good. I like that I can click on a model’s names and see all of her scenes, as long as those are accurate, but I do not know the network or models well-enough to know if these search by name results are accurate. I do know the model’s name I clicked on was featured in all the scenes the results brought up.
Images are an important part of porn for me, but probably not as important as they are to image collectors. I have noticed older scenes often have way more images than newer scenes. The images offered are of high quality and are zippered.
I have used the streaming feature despite having downloads enabled. I have gotten to the point that I stream a little of a scene before I download it. See con two, I found 15-20% of their scenes seem to be miscasted and you have a female model who is not into the niche or theme. I am surprised we do not see more of that even though I am not a big collector of hardcore so it’s possible I just have not watched enough hardcore to see this problem.
The other knock against the production is when the scenes have a set theme, but within 4 minutes of starting, the theme is completely lost. While I like spontaneous and even unscripted porn, if I am expecting a theme, I want to see that theme.
The models are what they are supposed to be. The models will draw in customers. Most of them are excellent at doing whatever the set theme is and give great performances. The male models are stereotypical porn star males. That is not a negative. The network as a whole puts an emphasis on the attractiveness of the female models and that could be my favorite part about it.
That leaves me with the question of if I would recommend it? I do. I experienced no problems downloading, canceling and found a good amount of high quality porn. I am still relatively new to American porn models and think Reality Kings does an exceptional job of showcasing the various ethnicities of America in all their hardcore glory. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Old Nanny (0)
Network |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Old Nanny is one of the better Older and Younger networks
Updates weekly
Downloads are available, but some videos only stream
Intuitive website, it is a network of multiple sites
Great action, maybe that is the key to making believable, enjoyable older and younger porn?
I liked that the guys are not all that young. Most are in their 30s and the women are mostly in their 30s to 50s, a few 60+ thrown in for good measure |
| Cons: |
I would like to see more creativity in the scenes to show the females experience
Some of the sites aren’t updating and some only stream their videos |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to say this network jumped up out of nowhere and slapped me, but some of these women are too old to be jumping around! It’s an age joke, not that I’m that young myself. Old Nanny is a very good network and I believe it is because these women are great sexual performers. They are not the best looking models and the guys are mostly average guys. The scenes really are good. I mentioned in the cons how I would like to see more creativity in the scenes. If you’re going to convince me a 72 year old woman is keeping a younger man happy, I would have to believe her experience and knowhow would play a big part in that. As it is, there are great scenes on here, but they often end quickly or just don’t feel fleshed out.
The lesbian scenes are more creative and the addition there doesn’t add up. Why are the scenes between men and women not as creative? You’ve got an extra sexual organ with the male and female scenes. There are threesome scenes with two women and one male and those are the best ones.
You can download and the quality is very good, but I did run into some scenes I couldn’t download and I’m now seeing those are listed as bonus scenes. It’s that old complication problem so many porn sites still insist on using.
Navigation is surprisingly good. It’s simple and straightforward. You won’t end up looking at something you didn’t search for. The scenes are a bit mechanical at times, but similar to porn with older men and younger women, I think these younger guys may have their work cut out for them with these highly-sexual older women. I’m not saying that with any kind of gender bias. I just believe we may see more reality in older and younger porn.
There are videos with every scene and picture seat, but the pictures do take a backseat to the videos. I would even take a shot at saying maybe these older women are not as comfortable posing for still photos as they are for letting loose sexually in a video.
There is also a good promo price with TBP. It is worth $20 a month. It’s just high enough quality to fit into what we used to see as $29.95 sites. It does update once a week. That is across 8 sites. There isn’t a lot of updates when you view from that perspective, but their sites are relatively big. I think my favorite of the sites is Aged Love. The other sites are not far behind it and it gives a fairly good balance of hetero, lesbian, threesomes. As someone who likes older and young, and mature porn, I believe the balanced genres is important. I’m not old enough or risky enough in my own sexual life to have tried all these situations, but somewhere in my mind, older, very horny women are taking it where they can get it! And I’m sure older men are the same way.
It’s a good network and I’m glad I tried it out. I just hope the update rate doesn’t drop off anymore than it has. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Kink.com (0)
Network |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Once was my favorite network and it still has its strengths but changes have made it different
Mostly fun-natured BDSM network
You receive downloads with a year membership, which I have
The older scenes on some of the sites no longer updating are still excellent
The planning and creativity is still very high |
| Cons: |
I did not know this since I am on a year membership, downloads no longer are included with monthly memberships
They also have moved all the transsexual content to its own network and you must join it on top of the standard membership to access it
The transsexual scenes are mixed in with the regular content as a way to advertise the add-on subscription |
| Bottom Line: |
I scored Kink.com a 95 a few years ago and could have gone a little higher with that score and felt comfortable scoring it so high. While I do not watch or join as many transsexual sites as I used to - I do remember thinking Kinks transsexual sites, alone, were with a membership. Now, that is reality and I am okay with it, but when you are used to something coming with one subscription and it suddenly requires a second subscription, it of course – is not as good of a deal as it once was.
The good thing is Kink.com still has enough unique content with very high production values to make the split at least acceptable to me. I also find a lot of older scenes on their now not updating sites that I like. My favorite sites include Divine Bitches, Sex and Submission and Upper Floor. I do, however, find the advertising of the transsexual scenes to be annoying. I do believe the advertising adds to the functionality if you have memberships to both.
Where I am torn is if I will be as quick to join the two separate networks. I would have rather them raise the price on Kink.com and just leave everything as it was. I do believe both networks are strong enough to stand on their own, but on the other hand, I have noticed lately, I bounce between Kink.com and KinkTrans.
The download quality is good. It is not the highest quality, but I always figured that was because of how long some of the scenes are with some going over an hour.
The changes they have made do change my feelings towards a review score. I believe Kink.com is still a solid 90, but a lot of that is the inclusion of the old sites that are not updating. Even with years of Kink memberships, there is a lot of older content I had not seen. The other side is I believe KinkTrans is not as strong. I would score it in the lower 80s.
There still is a lot to like. It just does not offer the same user experience it used to offer. The newer scenes are good but the strength is still in the older scenes. From that perspective, it is not as good of a value or experience as it used to be. The last thing I will mention from my perspective is I do not download near as much as I used to. The change to no downloads with monthly memberships is not going to be a big downfall for me, but just in my experience here on Porn Users, I know that will bother some users.
I believe 87 shows, I still feel it's a worthy site to join but maybe with a little hesitation compared to a few years ago. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
