All Fetishes Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 3 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Rubber Eva (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No more DRM-ed videos! The site formerly used DRM on all it's videos however they now appear to be free of DRM.
HD Videos
Lots of hot models (some well known) and Eva
Regular updates
HQ Galleries in Zip format
Scenes show some fantastic creativity
Long scenes
Lots of content
No download limits |
| Cons: |
Uncommon flash video format (f4v) that is not easily converted to more common video formats (.wmv, .avi, etc.)
Segmented scenes and galleries are spread out over one long page.
Heavy Rubber element may not be to most peoples liking.
Navigation can be tricky on some pages due to number of items available for download. |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line with RubberEva.com is that this site has improved a lot from what it used to be.
I have been a member of the site several times, and in the past I have found myself being disappointed
by the site due to the use of DRM in videos.
The videos now no longer feature DRM but are still in the uncommon format .f4v which is not easily converted to more common formats for easier viewing which is a slight negative.
This site is similar to Rubber Eva's other site The Rubber Clinic in that all scenes and galleries are segmented and split into multiple parts.
However unlike the aforementioned other site, the sets and scenes share a common title only distinguishable by the fact that it features a suffix which displays the part of the series within. The sets and scenes also feature a date of publishing to further aid identification.
The sets and scenes often show a great degree of creativity in a variety of settings, from outdoors to the clean white tiles of a clinic with many different kinds of latex outfits in a variety of colours.
Although the scenes are segmented once an entire set has been released then the sets can last up to an hour sometimes longer than that.
Overall this site is very good, and maybe a little bit on the expensive side at nearly €30 per month but now that the DRM-ed videos of old are gone the value for money has gone up in my eyes.
Things that this site could improve on are:
1) Changing videos to a more common video format
2) Releasing parts of videos and scenes one after the other instead of being released over course of several months.
3) Improving navigation by making several pages of content split by year/month rather than one long page or by
If all of these improvements I have suggested were implemented then in my opinion this would probably be the perfect site. It's a damn good site as it is but a few improvements would be gladly welcomed. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Sex And Submission (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers |
| Cons: |
-Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good |
| Bottom Line: |
Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.
The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.
Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.
Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.
Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.
This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Rubber Tanja (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-updates are currently quite frequent (about once every 2-5 days)
-high definition videos (.f4v, 1920x1080), version for mobile devices (.flv), sreaming option
-the models are very pretty with nice firm bodies
-vast range of different fetish outfits and settings |
| Cons: |
-only 5 galleries with pretty old sets
-no model list or background infos whatsoever
-only one video format, streaming option shows the whole picture only in full screen mode (strange)
-videos are split into many parts, unfortunately the video names are just numbers which makes it impossible to find the matching parts afterwards
-plain site with not much to explore |
| Bottom Line: |
At first I was impressed by their humongous range of fetish wear they are using in the shoots. They obviously use made to measure catsuits which fit the models perfectly (and are pricey), bizarre suits like the doll suit with condoms for each orifice, realistic doll masks, masks with dental dams, piss masks, gas masks, nurse outfits etc. It's also nice to see some of the girls dress up in the suits (from naked to completely rubberized). The scenes are usually two or three girls licking or caressing each other or using dildoes or strapons. There are also two pissing scenes if I am not mistaken.
Up to here it's all fine and I am quite happy that I have seen these beautiful girls dress up and polish their hot bodies. But there are some downsides which piled up after watching the videos.
First of all the splitting of the videos is awful. It feels like they did it to manipulate the update schedule since it naturally leads to more frequent updates. And, as I said, the videos are numbered so you have to sort them carefully by hand. I have already mentioned that the models usually look gorgeous but I have some problems with the shoots. I will give some representative examples.
First, most of the licking scenes are exhausting for the viewer because the active woman (mostly) BARELY touches the pussy with her tongue which in turn produces pre-orgasmic noises from the other woman. I don't exaggerate here. In one scene I was on the verge of a heart attack watching a string of saliva going back and forth but the tongue never touching anything.
Second, the slowness...usually I like shoots which are sensous and build up the tension with some steamy ending but in some scenes you have the feeling the video runs in slow-motion and (which is most problematic) the climax is missing. There is this huge contradiction between the kinky settings and the relatively tame action. If I have a smoking hot girl in the most kinky rubber outfit which sucks on a strapon I want her to deep throat it and not just lick the tip and pretend it's her most exciting moment. If I have a piss mask I want to see all the piss going in and give the girl some trouble breathing and not dribble out mostly at the sides.
I really missed the element of exhausted and satisfied girls after an orgy of ecstatic flesh (or rubber) here. All the ingredients are there but they are not combined in the right way. I had no problem with this if they would have stayed softcore but doing it like this it's neither flesh or fowl. I don't really blame the girls which appear to be amateurs and not pros, so maybe it's just a consequence of their inexperience or shyness. Maybe I had the wrong expectations here.
In conclusion if you want to watch some awesome girls dressing up in slick rubber and don't care if the action is limited and there are nearly no galleries or options this site could be for you. Since the site is very young it may turn out to be really great in the future. With these girls at hand I surely hope so. Until then I think "might recommend" is a fair rating. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
- Webmaster Replied!
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
