| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted) |
| Cons: |
- Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years. |
| Bottom Line: |
As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.
If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.
For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.
However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.
The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.
Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.
Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.
My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments. |
| Cons: |
-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Public Flash!
Add Comment
|
RSS Feeds : All Public Flash Activity - Public Flash Reviews - Public Flash Comments - Public Flash News
