Voyeur Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Webcam Hackers (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.) |
| Cons: |
- Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)
Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.
Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.
So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?
Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.
Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.
More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)
P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
2. British Doggers (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked) |
| Cons: |
- Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour
The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.
The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.
The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.
So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.
Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.) |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Public Expose (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- $5.95 2-day trial membership with no restrictions
- Bills through CCBill
- Approximately 120 videos
- Multiple video download options
- Some attractive models
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Mediocre quality videos
- Videos are all short duration
- Very small photo sets
- No photo zips available
- Small site
- Not part of any network to improve value
- No known models (to me, anyway)
- No updates since January 2010 |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m a big fan of public nudity and I’m always looking for sites with good material. Unfortunately, Public Expose isn’t one of the better ones I’ve seen. It’s small, with only about 120 videos. The TBP review says that there are 148 videos, and it is correct that there are 148 videos on the site, but for some reason, there are many duplicate videos that even use the same name. There are approximately 120 unique videos here.
Having access to 120 public nudity videos shouldn’t be anything to complain about, but these videos are all quite short. They range in length from under one minute to just over five minutes. Most of the videos follow the same format in that an Eastern European woman is seen in some sort of an outdoor setting (fully dressed) and she flashes for the camera. If full nudity exists on this site, I’ve yet to see it. There are several scenes of two women flashing and making out a bit.
This may be subjective, but I found the scenes to be almost un-erotic: the models are mostly shy about flashing and many of the shoots are simply outdoors near other people. When I contrast some of the Eastern European public shoots available on ALS Scan and Public Disgrace, those on Public Expose come off looking pretty shabby. Certainly the women on Public Expose aren’t bad looking, but they aren’t great either. I don’t follow many Eastern European models, but I still didn’t recognize any of them.
Technically, the site was probably average when it was started several years ago, but it is well below what the average porn customer would expect today. Video resolution is quite low. It varies depending on which type of file you want and ranges from a low of 320x240 for a very low-res mpeg4 to ‘high’ of 720x540 (at 128kb/s) for a DivX avi file. I downloaded the DivX files simply assuming that since they were the largest they’d give the best quality, but if this is the best, it isn’t very good.
There are photos available, but the photo sets are very small – less than two dozen pics in some cases. That may be good news, though, when you learn that there is no zip option available.
If there is any good news about this site, it’s that they have a full trial available for just $5.95. Given that there are only 120-ish small videos on the site anyone with a half-decent internet connection can download every video in the five day trial period. And further taking from the value is that the site hasn’t updated in over a year.
Unless you’re a huge fan of public nudity and want to add this notch to your belt, I’d avoid it. It isn’t a bad value at the trial price if you go in with your eyes open and realize that you don’t get much for that fee. Just remember to cancel your membership before the trial ends. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
