Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Public Nudity The category portal for a specific niche.

Public Nudity Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Teasers VOD (1) 92.0
2. Public Disgrace (2) 91.5
3. Naughty Country Girls (1) 83.0
4. Nude In SF (1) 65.0
5. Male Strippers Unlimited (1) 59.0

Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Public Disgrace (2) 91.5
2. Teasers VOD (1) 92.0
3. Naughty Country Girls (1) 83.0
4. Nude In SF (1) 65.0
5. Male Strippers Unlimited (1) 59.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Hidden Zone

1. Hidden Zone (0)

Pay
Newbie
91*
David19 (3) 04-14-14  11:50pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --This site certainly appears to be the real deal. It is a hidden camera site focusing on videos of nude women in places such as locker rooms and showers.

--The women, at least some of them, are reasonably attractive.

--It is very realistic. Most of the women give no indication that they know they are being filmed in the nude.

--Videos are fairly long and show everything and the technical quality is quite high.

--There is a certain amount of breast action as women fondle their own breasts while washing.

--Updates are fairly frequent and the varying appearances of the women--with some being quite attractive and others not so much--give the site a very realistic feel.
Cons: --One of the site's big "pros"--the fact that it realistically shows ordinary women--is of course also its biggest "con". The women are ordinary in appearance, meaning that a very few might be really hot, most are quite average, and there are certainly many overweight aging women in granny panties. But, of course, that is what you would expect to find in a real locker room spying on real women.

--The locker room and shower sections are the best--the other sections, which include dressing room, beach house, and "upskirt" shots, just didn't work as well for me.

--Another small drawback is that the videos need to be downloaded, which takes time--there is no way to stream the videos.
Bottom Line: With a hidden camera site such as this one, there is obviously no way to be absolutely sure whether the videos are real spy videos of nude women, or simply posed by models. However the very realistic appearance of the women certainly leads me to believe that this site is what it purports to be--real videos of women showering or dressing in the nude while being filmed by hidden cameras.

As such sites go, this one is of quite high quality. Moreover, the videos are ordered by date, and it is clear that the quality of the videos has been increasing, so we may continue to expect excellent work from this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Nude In SF

2. Nude In SF (1)

Pay
Active
65
rearadmiral (306) 04-29-13  06:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - One of only a few remaining American public nudity sites
- Low price
- Offers zips for photos
- Bills through CCBill
- May still be updating
Cons: - Small site
- Very few videos
- Video resolution is low
- Most video links are broken
- Updates may be recycled
- No recognizable models
- Photo sets broken into several zips
Bottom Line: This is a small site in a rare niche so I thought it would be worth joining at least once. The niche is public nudity in an American setting and those sites are getting harder to find, likely because the material is getting harder to make. Nude in LA doesnít even exist any longer, and the best American public nudity site Ė Teasers VOD Ė was ordered to stop producing scenes by the LA city government a while back so there will be no more updates from them.

This site is definitely small. There are only 33 models here with the look being more to the amateur side of the business. Thatís neither a pro or a con, but merely a fact. You wonít find porn stars here like you used to be able to at some other public sites. The models appear to be all in their 20s with varying body types and few with tattoos. Overall, the models are pretty attractive.

There is truth in some advertising, and the name of the site follows that rule: there is only one theme here: models in San Francisco shed their clothes and walk around in public areas being photographed.

For a video collector, this site doesnít have a lot to offer. Actually, thatís being far too generous. Of all the photo shoots it seems odd that there are only a dozen videos available. Thatís bad enough, but it actually gets worse. Of the video links less than half actually work. But that may be the best news because the resolutions are so poor that even what is here is almost unwatchable. The resolution is only 640x360 at 1200kb/s and 15fps. Subjectively they look terrible. They look so bad on a 23Ē monitor that the watermark is almost unreadable. The technical aspect of the videos is so bad that I havenít watched them so I canít comment on their artistic merit. I should also add that the videos are also short Ė most are about 3mins long.

Things are better with the photos. The number of photos for models varies from less than 50 to just over 1000. The average is about 300 photos per model. The resolutions arenít too bad with the majority at 1752x2628. Newer photos are higher at 3744x5616, but there arenít many of those.

The site allows download managers but they arenít really effective or necessary since the zip files are so small, with most being approximately 6MB. The problem is that for each photo set there may be 10 or more zips. If a model has a lot of shoots then youíll be downloading a lot of zips Ė one model has over 60 zip files for her photos. Some of the zips have only two photos in them.

There appears to be a relatively new feature called a ďNude MapĒ where the modelís route through public areas is mapped on Google Maps. This would be an innovative idea for a public nudity site but I canít figure out how to get it to work. There is some evidence that this feature isnít live yet even though it is being heavily promoted.

The big question I have about the site that I canít give a definitive answer to is whether the site is still updating. I think it is, but it appears that it is updating with mostly older material and whether that was shot a while ago and only made available now or whether it is recycled material I canít say. The latest update was today (April 29) and the copyright on those photos is 2013, but most of the more recent updates have copyrights in 2010 and older. The latest video was uploaded in February and it looks as bad as the rest, which may indicate that it was actually recorded a long time ago. But in fairness to the site, they do have a list of updates and there are updates added at least twice a month. Whether those are really Ďnewí photos though could be open to debate.

The site does actually offer a fairly good value, but only because it is cheap and not because it offers a lot of good material. They offer a $4.95 fee for a week of access that will rebill higher. The good news is that unless you still live with dial-up from the 1990s you can download everything they have in that time. With a decent internet connection you can have everything you want in under an hour. It also bills through CCBill so you can have some confidence that cancelling will be easy. (The page at TBP says that the membership is $4.95 for two weeks, but that isnít what the site is offering now.)

So can I recommend this site? Yes, but only to someone with a narrow interest in this niche who prefers photos. As a video collector I was badly disappointed, but the photos are decent. (Actually, theyíre not Ďdecentí since they feature young ladies naked in public, but you get what I mean.) The small site size and limited offerings are offset by the low price, so if you need a fix of photos of nude models in the streets, this might scratch an itch for you.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit I Love The Beach

3. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
David19 (3) 03-17-13  01:57am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is mostly focused on women's tits. Pros include the fact that there is a large amount of content--probably tens of thousands of still photos and thousands of videos. The models are generally very attractive and the site is updated frequently. The site does a good job of focusing in on the models' tits and also includes a fair number of videos with the models applying suntan oil to their tits. The quality of both the videos and the still photos is very high. The videos tend to be reasonably long--averaging about two minutes and up to about four minutes. A fair number of videos of models walking on the beach are also shown. There are some fully nude photos and videos as well, although those are not the predominant part of the site. The videos also generally have different resolutions, with different file sizes, for downloads. All sizes of tits are shown on this site although it does tend towards models with bigger tits.
Cons: The site does not include any hardcore sex--indeed it is very softcore. This is a bit surprising because there are other beach sites, perhaps with photography done in more private areas, that do include hardcore. The site is divided into several areas--such as eurobeach and 'south of france topless beauties--some of which are updated more frequently than others. The quality does vary a bit between areas.
Bottom Line: The basic premise of the site is to use ordinary women who happen to have their tops off on beaches as topless softcore porn models. The women have consented to be topless on the beach but not to serve as topless models on a for-pay porn site. The site will not remove the photos of women who appear as models on this site, even if they complain, because they did bare their tits in public. The site does a much better job than most voyeur sites--and even other voyeur beach sites--at portraying its models in a sexually provocative manner. It is clear from the content that all the women, although they may not know they are being filmed or photographed, clearly enjoy showing off their tits in public. Overall this is one of the best sites in its genre.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Nebraska Coeds

1. Nebraska Coeds (0)

Pay
artnoir (17) 04-12-14  07:12am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (1)

!

Love the site! Tired of all the "produced porn", you do provide some awesome stuff, so hat's off to you! However, I do have some complaints:

1. Model naming is very inconsistent. Choose one girl in one shoot, she's called another name in the next shoot etc.(I know it's hard to keep track of all the girls you and other's shot and then to then encode and publish it, but if you have the option to browse by model on your site, you might want to add some attention to that)
2. An option to disable autoplay of the videos when entering a model's page would be appreciative. It would save your bandwith as well I think.
3. Update the design. I don't care that much for it really, but it's looking old!
4. SPEED! Download speed is kind of slow (200-500 kb/s), and there seems to be a limit of simultaneous downloads.

Other than that, I'm a happy customer!

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nebraska Coeds

2. Nebraska Coeds (0)

Pay
littlejoe (23) 12-11-13  07:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)

video resolution?

so can anyone confirm what the video resolutions are? specifically the contest videos. i fear the contests are SD and the interviews are HD

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Flashing Dreams

3. Flashing Dreams (0)

Pay
doodoo (0) 08-07-13  01:13am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)

Very little content

At the moment there is about a half dozen photo sets and a few one minute videos. At the rate they are updating it won't be worth joining for quite a long time.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Amateur (42)
2. Reality (35)
3. Parties (2)
4. Swingers (0)
5. Voyeur (0)

View All : Niches


Public Nudity @ TBP
1. Bikini Pleasu... 85.0
2. I Love The Be... 84.0
3. NIP Activity 83.5
4. Ero Berlin 83.0
5. Nudist Video 81.0
6. Public Nude S... 80.5
7. Public Invasi... 80.0
8. Wet And Nude 80.0
9. Public Pickup... 80.0
10. Aziani Xposed 80.0
11. Berlin Public... 79.0
12. Public Violat... 78.0
13. Teasers VOD 77.5
14. Japanese Flas... 77.5
15. Flashing Drea... 77.0

View All : Public Nudity Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.12 seconds.