| User Reviews (5) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive content
Simplistic & natural Beauty
Decent photo quality
Cheap membership
Simple site navigation
Daily updates |
| Cons: |
Website design (I know kids that have designed better websites)
Model navigation & naming convention (what you see in the sample pages is what you get in the membership pages)
As low as 6 pictures in a photo set (6-15 photos is not a real set)
No bonus site links |
| Bottom Line: |
Site focuses on woman aged 18-23. Stats are as follows:
Photos | Watermarks - Small strip on bottom of image, Photo quality - 1067 x 1600 & 2400 x 1600, Zip Files, Number of sets - Over 500 (06-60 per set), Update rate - Daily
Site Design | Search Engine - Model index & year, Simple design (Poor naming convention), No browsing categories, No real extra features (will not discuss the sites freebies)
Models / Content | Exclusive, Original, Models attractiveness - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Amateur models, Good Angles & Lighting
DOMAI is neither sexually orientated nor fine art. It is about the natural beauty of the model. I would not even categorize it as porn. This site is for the connoisseur of all that is beautiful. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Good price ($19.95 not rebilled or $14.95 rebilled)
+Good quality photos (1333x2000px)
+On average updated almost daily. |
| Cons: |
-No videos
-No search function
-Navigation is horrible (no models page) Everything is sorted by update. So while a model may have 6 different sets on there, there is no way to find out untill you get to that update.
-Evertyhing is sorted by year, then by update date. |
| Bottom Line: |
My main problem with Domai is the same problem I have with Femjoy, each model starts out nude. Or if she's not full nude, she will be within 5 images. Then you have 40 images that all start to look the same.
The navigation is horrible. You can't search for body type, hair color or even model name. Everything is listed first by year, since 2005, then by date that they were added. So if you find a model you like, there is no way to see her other sets or even to find out if she has other sets. Technically you can cheat and look at the web address to see what gallery you are in, then you'd know if they have any other sets
available. You can then change the gallery number to go to the other ones but frankly in 2009 you shouldn't have to do that to see the other sets. EAch model should have a main page.
Most of the models are pretty attractive and the photos are decent quality (1333x2000px) but there are no videos. No users forum. No bonus sites or anything. All you've got are 5 links on the side for update year.
Overall if you want nothing but full nude women, then you'd probably like Domai. But if you are the kind that likes the art of stripping, then I'd recommend you stay away. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy,
glamorous or exotic
-Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures
-Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site
-Easy entrance to site for members
-Navigation fairly simple and direct
-Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download
-Zip file downloading for photosets
-No download limits
-Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset)
-Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 Domai
photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site.
Alinda has 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels as model Alina, photoset named |
| Cons: |
Pros (continued): "Wonderful Time".
Amour Angels has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face.
(Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.)
The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at Domai and Amour Angels.
(If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.)
Cons:
-Photosets only. No videos. No live cams.
-Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few
photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually).
-The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cons(continued):
-offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers
than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder.
-Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man
-Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around
since 1997. So why so few pictures listed?
-No bio data on the models
-No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes
a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted.
-Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races.
Bottom line:
-On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files.
-Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at Domai. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Many attractive models
* High-quality photos and photography
* Fast
* Frequent updates
* No download controls (images are available as zips)
* Exclusive content
* Unseen models |
| Cons: |
* Softcore only
* Some models are less than pretty |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like softcore photos of pretty young women, DOMAI is a good site for you. The girls are mostly attractive and are well-shot, with good lighting and artistic angles.
In a perfect world there would be a sister site to DOMAI with hardcore shots of the same models, shot in the same style.
It's a good site to join once a year and pick up any updated sets. If you're not interested in hardcore, it's probably a good one to maintain a membership at. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All DOMAI Activity - DOMAI Reviews - DOMAI Comments - DOMAI News
