Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.



RLane (16) 12-08-11  07:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Stunning models
-Great variety of models
-Quick download speed
-Some 3000x1999px images
-Great price for amount of content
Cons: -No videos
-A lot of sets don't have images higher than, 2000px
Bottom Line: Overall this is a great soft core porn site with a great selection of models; although, it's sister site (GoddessNudes) has better image sizes then this one. It has a really good navigation model list, but when you go to a letter of models, you'll have to go back to the member's page. They do update everyday and they have a good selection of bonus items on the bottom right of the model index. Overall, I would recommend this to anyone.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) To be honest, you can't mark down a photo site for not having videos.

If it didn't have zips, yes.

Cap'n. :0)

12-08-11  11:33pm

Reply To Message


RLane (16) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

I didn't actually mark it down for no videos, I don't really care too much about videos, but it was for the image sizes compared to it's sister site.
12-08-11  11:55pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - RLane :

No perhaps not, but you listed it in 'cons' without a rider on it.

Welcome to PU BTW !

Cap'n. :0)

12-09-11  05:25am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #2 - RLane :

For the record ...

You *may* use whatever standard you wish to come up with the score you assign a site. Of course it does help if that standard more or less follows what other apply or you at least explain anything unique about how you arrived at your score.

While some other users may not feel it's fair to mark off for certain things, it's really your call.

Welcome to PornUsers

12-09-11  07:02am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled)

I actually thought this site would have rated higher the your other
review. This site seems to have very nice quality photo's at least in the tour section. It takes practice to get reviews down to how you like them done yourself. Like Staff said it your call how and why you rate something. I do like that gave a few details in the end about the sites.

If you are not able to find more to put in a review, look at others that may have posted many reviews.
And letting people know cost, how many photos or video etc.
Remember the reviews often get people to go take a look based sometimes on what you out in a review, so the more you give in details the more a person gets info about the site you are / were a member at .

Welcome to PU

12-09-11  10:59pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.