Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.



exotics4me (463) 08-27-11  10:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A site that is only about nude photos, no videos here and most of the photos are non-sexual poses. The selling point for me to join was that I liked several of the models and the price is right at $9.95 per month.
- Really nice pictures, I like the lighting, they also come zipped.
- I personally didn't have any problems with navigation and thought it was very easy to use. It's one of those sites where you start at A on the model index, click A, scan through those models, go to B, and so on.
- If you are interested in photography, I would say this site would be a nice place to start. It's very artsy.
Cons: - Well, if you're coming here to find anything that doesn't require some imagination to enjoy from a sexual standpoint, you're out of luck.
- This is actually a con based on the sister site Goddess Nudes, the photos could be bigger, most of what I have downloaded top out at 1999 long end. I've not scanned through all of them, but the majority have been around the 2000 long end range.
- There's not much tease or strip here. The model I was most interested in, Zulfija, doesn't have a clothed picture on the site!
- I personally think Goddess Nudes, ran by the same company, is a better site if you at least want some sexuality in the photos and the photos are bigger, plus it's only $4.95 a month.
Bottom Line: I don't think I can write much more about this site than the pros/cons cover.

This site has been around a long time. The content to me is softer than what I consider softcore. This can be a problem since most of the models start out a set already nude, but never really show anything more than they do in the 1st picture of the set. I do respect that this is the style of site Domai is, but I just can't get that excited over looking at sexy, naked women staring off into space.

There are bright spots here though. The quality of the photos are very good, lots of natural lighting in the outdoor shots, good price, daily updates and if you like using your imagination, this site will really let you do that.

It has been said before so I won't go into it too deeply. There are no videos.

One other thing that is probably just me being used to larger photo sets, the photo sets I have downloaded seem to average between 40-60 photos.

On the positive side because I am going to recommend this site to those looking for softer content, artistic content. The choice of models is very good. I will add that there are some sets that have photos topping out at 3000 long end. If there are others that are bigger, I haven't found them.

There is a package deal to join both Domai and the sister site Goddess Nudes, but the offer I received was for $44.95 for both for 3 months. I just joined Domai for $9.95/mo. then joined Goddess Nudes for $4.95/mo. which equals out to the same price as the multi-month option.

I really can't suggest anything to change except the size of the photos. I'm sure they have established a fanbase that loves this style of nude photos and respect that. As I said in the cons, I would recommend Goddess Nudes over it in a head to head comparison just because the photos are a little more sexual and have higher resolutions. Makes a nice pairing of sites for $15 too.

So, if you're not wanting videos, not wanting anything real sexual and are just looking for some nice quality nude photography, I would recommend it based on the low price. If you're looking for anything more than very soft softcore, I wouldn't recommend it.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) A very helpful review, Exotics.
Thank you.

I thought it was missing out on the striptease.
I think that is a great shame, as nude at start takes away progression, anticipation & tease.

Is the situation any better at Goddess Nudes?

Cap'n. :0/

08-27-11  11:35pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) I'm in a nit-picky mood, so feel free to ignore this.
But I don't think this is an artsy site. I think it's more like a simple, natural site, very low-key photos. A lot of lovely models, and models that are less lovely but still nice. A lot of simple photos of women that can be lovely or pretty or just nice-looking. Not artsy or glamour-style photography, more like a "natural" style photography.

08-28-11  09:55am

Reply To Message


exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Hey Cap'n,

Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!

But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.

08-28-11  12:41pm

Reply To Message


exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Hey lk2fireone,

No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!

08-28-11  12:49pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #3 - exotics4me :

Yes, I am sure a lot of us do appreciate the near lost art of the striptease. I just wish more websites dealt with the subject properly.

Fully clothed shots to set up anticipation.

Slow strip & tease to full coy & more explicit nudity.

It really isn't that difficult!

Cap'n. :0/

08-28-11  01:51pm

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) I don't think I'll ever understand the appeal of photo-only sites, but I can see it's more popular than I expected on this forum and I guess compared to magazines, these sites are good value.

Good review - there seem to be very few equivalent gay sites but I can see how after hardcore video a site like this might be kind of refreshing. I think if a site told me a lot about the person, it might do more for me.

08-28-11  07:21pm

Reply To Message


exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #6 - gaypornolover :

A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
09-12-11  10:59pm

Reply To Message


exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but no model, in my opinion, did the tease as well as Eve Angel in her older sets. She's lost most of it now in her newer content, but her content from say 2004-2008, the striptease would last for, on average, half of a video. And you could tell she thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen some of her newer content, the tease has been cut in about half. I don't know if that's the new producer's fault or if Eve is just getting tired of the business.
09-12-11  11:23pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.