Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : GCode (101)  

Feedback:   All (578)  |   Reviews (53)  |   Comments (100)  |   Replies (425)

Other:   Replies Received (309)  |   Trust Ratings (56)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit 21Sextury.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of about 39 network sites including solo, hardcore, lesbian, wrestling, DP, and/or almost everything else.
- Model index is stellar with labels by alphabetical, highest rated, and/or filters by many categories of attributes.
- Updates daily with a video and photo set.
- If you don't want to use a model index, you can break down navigation by scenes or categories with plenty of options to filter with.
- Newest videos from about Mid 2007 on are available in HD, around 1280 X 720 at ~4,500 kbps. Newer scenes are available in a variety of options with the highest being 1920 x 1080.
- Newest photo sets highest res is around 4250 X 2800. All are available via zip download.
- High download speeds.
- Good site design and navigation. Navigation can be a burden sometimes if on a particular site, more in cons.
- Quality streaming for videos since many are extremely large in the 'ultra high' category.
Cons: - As stated above, navigation is decent but when you have clicked on a particular site, you can easily forget you are just on that site once you move on. To get back to the main site, you have to remember to hit home and re-click on 21sextury to get all sites.
- While the videos are high in resolution, I just found them to not be as sharp as other HD videos I've seen. They are not horrible but they could look better for sure.
- Many sites are not updating anymore and may have at 2007 or before, so the scenes are not sharp. I found scenes around 2007 and before to be almost unwatchable but I'm probably spoiled with HD.
- While there are a wide variety of scenes, many seemed extremely cookie cutter. Even most of the male stars are used every time. It is a small quirk but worth stating, be ready for repetition.
- In site photo viewer could be better but it's a small quirk.
Bottom Line: This network showcases all aspects of the porn world. I believe the network obviously showcases some of the best in the business (mostly European) and presents them well in a variety of scenes. There appears to be a main core of women that are showcased more, so make sure you like them a lot because you will get used to seeing them. These include Sandy, Sophie Moone, Blue Angel, Aletta Ocean, and a few more. The plus is these women are all gorgeous so I personally don't mind.

The network can be broken down in to 21 sites. These sites include the popular ones that most will be eager to see like Club Sandy, Blue Angel Live, Cuties Galore, Lezcuties, Nude Fight Club, Pix and Video, and Sweet Sophie Moone. There are others obviously. However, there are more sites included which are considered 'Bonus' sites. A few highlights include Teen Bitch Club, Dirty Milf Club, and Squirting Files. The bonus sites surely don't showcase as many great scenes but are a nice addition which adds even more niches to the categories already.

This brings us to the scenes itself. The different video options are great with most newer ones available in wmv or H.264 format. Also, these are available in low, medium, high, or even ultra high quality. The ultra high quality scenes are extremely large and I personally found no difference in quality between the 1920 and 1280 scenes. As I stated in the cons, I just found most videos to be grainy. However, they are well lit and obviously professionally done with quality production equipment. Maybe it's the encoding, I'm not sure. But, don't get me wrong, the scenes are still HD and look good, so don't let it stray one away completely. Therefore, expect to have some extremely professionally done scenes in a variety of categories if you join the site.

However, this brings me to the repetition. Like many sites nowadays, the scenes surely follow a guideline. Many of the categories are really narrow in what they offer but a few really do show some different material. Stand outs are Nude Fight Club, Blue Angel Live, and Club Sandy. But, even Nude Fight Club can become the same old after awhile but the content is so different, I found that it stood out. The other sites I mentioned usually offer a few more scenes than just solo, hardcore, or lesbian stuff but interviews, behind the scenes, and/or different situations. So, I suppose what I'm trying to say is the solo and hardcore stuff is pretty generic. But, that does not mean you are not getting the cream of the crop in generic scenes because you are.

The site has an extreme amount of content to offer. There is a sister network site, 21sextreme, which features a bit more of the fetish stuff. This network is not available with your subscription to 21sextury. However, the site has managed to come up with a credit system if you want a few scenes from this network. You get free credits (10 credits per subscription day) or you can purchase them. Each scene averages about 295 credits. Therefore, it can get very expensive. Unfortunately, there is no subscription discount if you are a member of 21sextury already. So, you would probably be better of joining each site separately with TBP discount if you don't want to use credits.

So, the 21sextury network truly showcases one of the largest amount of models in a wide variety of scenes. If one is new to European models, joining would be like being a kid in a candy store. Even if you are a fan already and have a lot of scenes already, joining will add plenty of new scenes for your favorite model, sometimes even in the upwards of 10+ scenes. However, sometimes quantity can mean repetition for me and distract from the scenes quality. Meaning, seeing almost the same hardcore or lesbian scene of the same model in a different outfit does not do it for me. But, it is more content of your favorite model and I'm sure this network can provide not only your current favorite model, but also find you a new favorite model.

Therefore, joining the 21sextury network at least one time would never be considered a bust. You get access to about 39 sites with plenty of options and all are done quite well. If you are thinking long term, a new scene is added daily which would keep you satisfied. However, keep in mind many sites are not updating and they ones that are may not be too innovative. But, there are so many different models with plenty of different attributes that the masses of people should be extremely satisfied with the model index. Also, with the addition of a great search options and categories, getting this content is a great plus to subscribers because there is so much content. Overall, the network has much more going for it than not and is surely one of the more dominant producers in the porn world. If you are looking for lots of content, gorgeous women, a bit of variety, and a decent price with TBP discount; this could be a site for you.

08-12-11  11:38am

Replies (2)
Visit All Network Pass

All Network Pass

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Lots of content (~125,144 videos and 292,459 photos) with a wide range of scenarios like handjobs, stripping, dancing, straight sex, solo model sites, and anime.
- Exclusive and Non-Exclusive content.
- Easy navigation with a home page where you can jump to the site you want or categories.
- Advanced search option with plenty of options and the results are pretty correct.
- Model index to get all content from the various sites.
- Updates appear to come somewhat often but I'm not sure if it's recycled content. The network has so many sites not updating and I can't be certain any are still REALLY updating.
- A few extras like DVD scenes and live cams. I did not check the live cams out to know if they are even free. Plus, they are a seperate page and probably even a different company.
- A few different video options with most being WMV 640 X 480 at ~500 kbps. Yes, that low.
Cons: - The majority of the sites are not updating at all.
- Even the newer videos are pretty bad looking with a horrible res and bitrate.
- No zip option for images and they are quite small, around ~1024 res.
- While navigation is easy, the site design is pretty uninspiring. While it's simple to look it, it just looks like everything else you get from the site and that word is 'cheap'.
- I suppose the network has some interesting niches but just the overall quality is lacking. Plus, who knows how exclusive anything is. Plus, most sites just have like 4-8 scenes or image sets and then never updated again.
- Basically, every type of scene from the network can be downloaded at another network or site with way better quality and ambition.
- The site has some browsing problems, the sites lock up with a few windows/tabs open and you need to refresh them to get to that.
Bottom Line: Well, I joined this site with a special discount promotion that was even cheaper then the TBP discount. Regardless of the cheap price, I still feel the network was not worth that much. The network holds around 151 sites with probably 75%, if not higher, of the sites not even updating anymore. Plus, most of these sites only updated a few times when they were updating. However, if you are looking for a bunch of quantity over quality and want it quick, this network will fifull that wish. Why quick? Because the I actually got extremely high download speeds.

The content varies from site to site. As I stated in the pros, there actually is a lot of variation. The network claims to have reality based porn but a lot of it is just straight gonzo stuff. Most have little to no plot but the main central theme of the site is usually present. For example, FootJobModels will have exactly that, foot jobs with a few updates. I suppose a plus is some models return for other shoots for different sites, so the model index allows you to download all the specific model's scenes from the various sites on one page.

This brings me to another plus, there is a wide array of models to choose from, from professional to amateur. However, most scenes are just uninspired and the models/scenes appear to just be going through the works. Almost like a quick paycheck for the model and an easy update for the network. But, I can guarantee you will catch some models you know here and if it's exclusive, you will have a scene that you probably don't have.

Overall, I did not like the network much personally. The scenes are grainy, the pictures are whatever without zips, the content is uninspired, and the models are mostly going through the motions. On top of that, I'm not sure what is exclusive and it probably does not matter anyways because the scenes are so low quality that you don't even want to keep most of them anyways. While the site may have some cool search options and easy navigation, there are a few site flaws that make browsing a bit harder than it should be. There are just so many different networks out there with just overall better material, I would just pass on this one even if you get a really cheap discount.

07-26-10  12:18pm

Replies (0)
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive, Real Mature Content
- No DRM
- No Download limit
- Variance of content (Hardcore, solo, toyplay, and lesbianism)
- Photoshoots are not only video stills (they are included though)
- Above average resolution pics available in zip format with 2 sizes (1024 and 1536)
- Above average quality of videos available in 2 formats (.wmv: 640 X 480, 1089 kbps and .mpeg: 640 X 480 with higher quality, maybe around 1.5 - 2 kbps)
- Great model profiles including an original scan of the paper questionnaire they filled out
- 21 other video feeds including 6 HD feeds all in variance of content (from hardcore to solo) that are not in the mature niche
- Model index and search functions
- Updates 1-2 times a day with an average of 4 photo sets plus a movie (could be a hindrance in my opinion, more in bottom line)
- Active forum
- Bonus updates which are photosets from karups older women about every 3-4 days
- Simple design and easy to browse
Cons: - Niche makes it harder to find extremely hot models (more in bottom line)
- While videos are above average, they could be better with at least 1280 4kbps or widescreen
Bottom Line: I have rented a lot of Mature dvds and they almost never hit the niche correctly. This site, really does hit it right. The majority if not all, are over 30 and you can tell. However, true mature sites are scarce and so are very good models and I feel the need to update constantly has put a damper on some of the models here. While the majority are natural and of age which vary in where they live (from USA to Europe), there are quite a lot that are just not attractive. I mean, they were probably not even very attractive in their teens or 20's or so on. But, they are truly mature and this is obviously a plus and a con at the same time. By the way, don't expect those models from those 'milf' sites you usually see, these models are mostly all natural and are actual older women showcasing their true mature bodies.

The videos are great when it comes to content. They display most models in a hardcore scene but you almost always get them in a solo fingering scene or toyplay which can be downloaded in full scenes or scene clips (at least, the newer ones). While the quality could be better for this day n' age, they are alright. The videos can range from an amatuerish feel to being done professionally and I have noticed a lot of videos the camera man has traveled to their actual homes for the scene. There are some 'fetish' videos which might showcase feet or another area, but nothing gets too out of the ordinary. Plus, there are interview videos as well for almost every model if you are in to these. As of the date of this review, they currently have 1142 Videos.

The photo sets are great here. They showcase sets that are exclusive and are not just video stills. This means, these photo sets are good softcore sets showcasing their bodies that are not in video format as well. Plus there are plenty of these. They all vary in a type of 'costume' for the model which include showing them in an home enviornment doing simple chores and undressing. Another type is the "9 to 5 lady" which is usually the model in office wear and usually by a computer or phone. There are shoots of the models in regular attire that they would just wear out to a mall and they strip. Then, there are the "Elegent ladies" which displays the model in a nice dress and strip. Currently, as of this date, there are 381,690 photos.

This site really has a lot going for them. I enjoy the site a lot and always look forward to the new content. The real reason I just can't give them a higher score is the attractiveness of a lot of the models. Don't get me wrong, in the mix I have found A LOT of models that I love. But, when a site has a lot of less attractive models, I cannot give it the highest. But, they do stay true to the niche which is absolutely great. Plus, they do update a lot which will cater to most. However, I feel that if this place becomes a bit more discriminate in their models (even if it lowers updates) they will be the top of all mature sites. They are in the top 3 atm for su

04-01-09  01:23pm

Replies (5)
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of younger models in solo masturbation, insertions, gaping, speculum, lesbianism, and peeing.
- All models are shaved and quite petite, these models have breasts on the smaller size.
- Updates daily with mixed content.
- No DRM.
- No Download Limit.
- Picture sets are updating at excellent resolution (~3504 X 2336 or 1600 X 1067). These vary with updates, going a bit higher or lower. Older sets are all in the smaller size. All available in zip format. Watermarks are non-intrusive.
- Videos are updating in true HD quality in 3 different formats being DivX, mp4, and WMV (1920 X 1080, ~8000 kbps or 1280 X 720, ~4000 kbps). Older videos are being updated to higher res or just available in two formats (720 X 540, ~3200 kbps or 640 X 480, ~2750 kbps). There are other options as well, a lot of variation.
- Older stuff is being remastered to formats above, so the site is constantly updated the old with the new.
- Director's Blog area for news.
- Model Index.
Cons: - While navigation is easy, the site design has about 4 different formats that it has used in the past. These all stayed how they were at the time, so you get pages of all variations. A minor flaw, but these should all stay consistant for easier viewing.
- While I stated the fact that these models are petite and small breasted as a pro, keep this in mind when you join. There is a sister site, ALS Angels for more voluptuous models.
- While both the older photos and videos are being updated, the bulk of the material is still in the older formats at the time of this review. Just keep this in mind.
- There are a lot of videos of behind the scenes and photoshoots. While I see a purpose of these (more in bottom line), it is worth mentioning.
- The site updates models based on a voting system which is great, but in the older content it makes for downloading the picture set zips a bit awkward. Sometimes you get zips with only 1 or 2 photos in it or 2 to 3 different zip files for one set.
Bottom Line: ALS Scan has been around for awhile. The site boasts plenty of content at more than 70,000 pictures and over 1 TB of videos. Featuring mostly small breasted euro models, the majority of the models are extremely cute in nature. While I personally like my models a bit bigger in general, I cannot knock the site for wanting these type of girls here. The directors appear to create such a comforting aura with these girls resulting in extremely quality content that is both sexually arousing for the models and fun. It's one of the first sites in awhile that the models appear to be enjoying themselves for real and not just putting on a show for money.

The videos in the new format are the BEST I've ever seen to the date in terms of quality of clarity. Finally, a site using a true HD camera with the right compression. However, these files can get extremely large. But, it's worth it in my opinion. There are 3 styles of video content. These being BTS & photoshoots, solo masturbation, and lesbian scenes. The BTS & photoshoots are not there exactly for the pure sexuality, but I found these to be a great glimpse in to the model's personality. These display everything from gaping, speculum, peeing, to staged masturbation or lesbianism. The masturbation scenes are very well done in terms of the sexual energy and camera work. As stated before, there is a comfort level that these directors produce which makes for these models truly enjoying exploring their bodies. There is just a raw feeling in most of these videos that really struck me the right way. These videos are clearly potraying a young woman enjoying herself sexually in a real fashion. The lesbian scenes are quite raw as well. The models used for these scenes really appear to enjoy each others company and are truly attracted to each other. Lots of kissing and smiling, but intense fisting, fingering, and licking as well. I really don't gravitate towards lesbian content but I found these videos to be quite impressive.

The photography is top of the line and features mostly simulated masturbation and or extreme close ups or long shots filled with tons of props for insertions. The newer high res show off the model extremely well and are not photoshopped for fakeness. But, even the lower res photos look good. You will probably be downloading a few of these because the high res photo zips can be as large as the videos at ~500+ MBs for a scene.

Overall, with the mix of awesome photos and extremely great videos, this site is something else. The solo model content mixed with the girl-girl action is solid. Plus, there are scenes at vacation spots with 5+ featured models which are some of the best content I've ever seen at any site so far. I love those scenes. The site may be lacking in site design and the older content not being up to par with the new updates, but with the attempt to reformat those I believe these cons can be overlooked. The site is bringing new models in and upgrading the old. Recommended!

07-29-09  11:52am

Replies (4)
Visit Anilos


Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of older women doing mostly masturbation with fingers or toys and quite a bit of hardcore mixed in as well.
- No DRM.
- Updates daily with either a photo set or video scene.
- Videos are offered in a lot of different ways including in-browser streaming, in parts, and full scenes offered in mp4, mpeg, and WMV. Best and newest quality is WMV at 1280 X 720 at ~3650 kbps. Older videos are at 640 X 480 at ~1500 kbps.
- Photos are well done and available in two different resolutions (1200 X 800 and 2400 X 1600) with all the option to view in browser or download via zip.
- Solid bio pages for almost all models with a lot of information plus a model stats area for quick facts and info.
- Ability to add your on tags to sets and scenes for easier searches later on.
- Active forum for feedback and discussions.
- Model index for easier navigation.
- Great site design that is easy on the eyes.
- Wallpapers and niche (ass, tits, etc.) photos offered for each model.
Cons: - While most models are certainly considered 'older' women, they are by far not what I would be call true mature models. A lot are in the late 20's and lower 30's which can sometimes look like a model featured at almost any site and not a 'mature' site.
- While many are all natural, there is a solid mix of many models with fake boobs and other minor surgeries. While obviously present because many older models probably feel they need to be more 'tight' so they look more youthful, this can stray many away looking for natural aged bodies.
- I'd say the majority of the captured scenes are great quality but some are obviously the routine solo scene with a toy and there is no emotion present. Just a model sticking it in and out for 10 minutes and a blank stare on her face.
Bottom Line: Anilos is definitely in the forefront when it comes to one of the better sites that provides quality and real mature content to the masses. However, the site cannot be overly praised for this because I feel they have somewhat dropped the ball when it comes to finding true mature models. However, the site showcases extreme quality in a large number of traits that many sites lack. For example, the site design and navigation is awesome, the professional quality of the content is great, and the extra little features exhibits the people running the site care for the site and its future.

The models involved are usually dressed in a range of outfits but are staying within the dolled up glamour niche mostly. Usually a nice dress, lingerie, business suits, and/or everyday wear are featured. However, I'd say the majority are in dresses or business suits. A good amount of make-up is used and most of the hair is stylized. Overall, a good mix of outfits for each model.

The videos provided are well made when it comes to the technical aspects. Overall, Anilos offers a great resolution with great lighting, bright settings, and a decent range of long shots with close ups at the right time. When it comes to footage captured, I think Anilos demonstrates an honest attempt to record scenes that not only include the regular hardcore and solo with toy scenes but add sybian, machine, and bathing footage. However, the majority is still solo play with mixed results. Some models are obviously truly getting themselves off genuinely while others are going through the motions. While obviously this can be expected for most sites, I do believe there are more legit than non-legit. There are quite a few interview scenes as well which include a vocal interview and the model stripping during the scene as well. Overall, the site offers a great amount of mix it ups to create a quality amount of captured footage.

The photography is well done in terms of professionalism as well. Good lighting, a non-intrusive watermark, and range of shots make these photos something to look at. However, I did find a good amount of photoshopping which killed a lot of my favorite models pictures. These models are older and are still human so of course many have 'imperfections'. But, this is what makes someones model their favorite. Therefore, lets keep things natural. Besides that, the photography is extremely well done.

All-in-all, the site is well done and should be visited one time by fans of women in the 'older' range. While every model may not hit what many to think as a true mature model, they do have a lot of them present and they are extremely good looking. Expect plenty of great special features such as wallpapers, interviews, bios, photographer feedback, searches, tags, and dated updates which increase the overall experience. With that and a great mix of solo and hardcore footage with even a bit of lesbian mixed in, the site is above average when it comes to a mature model site.

12-12-09  11:52am

Replies (6)
Visit Areeya's World

Areeya's World

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True High Def Videos (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps)
- High res pictures (1500 X 1000)
- Considered one of the hottest ladyboy models online out there
- No DRM protection anymore
- Simple design but still looks great
- Easy to navigate
- Exclusive material
Cons: - 'Extras' are lacking and rarely updated
- Updates can be considered a bit slow (maybe once a week) for a solo site
- Videos can be lacking (more in bottom line)
- Pictures are stills from videos
- 3-4 GB Download limit (more explained in bottom line)
- A bit expensive even with the discount from loyalty sites
Bottom Line: This site showcases what might be considered one of the hottest or even the hottest ladyboy in the online industry to this date. The site focuses on her beauty and sexuality. However, there are hits and misses with the actual footage contained of her. Moreover, the site may become redundant to fans that are mega fans. Also, if you are a megafan, you could even be a bit dissapointed in her content and features within the site.

The videos are shot in one of the best high def quality that I've seen so far. The videos are compressed and keep quality so high, it's such a wonderful thing (300-700MB) at about 10-20 mins long each. The videos vary in theme, usually keeping a main theme of something like a schoolgirl to a army girl. Usually, she interacts with the props well which is a better attribute of the videos. She is usually quite enthusiastic during her videos which are primarily masterbation scenes. However, the greatest quirk I have with the scenes are the lack of cumshots. There are quite a few which conclude with these but I just don't see a point of shooting a shemale masterbation scene without ending in this. Seeing Areeya masterbate so sensually and in to it, then suddenly stopping, look to the camera and wave goodbye can be very dissapointing. Moreover, I can see these scenes getting a but redundant to ladyboy fans that want hardcore. There are two scenes involving another ladyboy but they are not hardcore at all. However, lovers of solo scenes will enjoy Areeya's videos, at least the ones she cums in.

The pictures are just stills of the videos. It's a shame considering they are great quality in rez and could be a great area of the site if she including photo shoots that are not just stills (this is your site, these are all YOUR fans, give them MORE).

There is a limit which seems to range from 3 to 4 GB's, or at least just under. I can download to about under 3.6 before getting the boot, however, the site says there's a 3 GB limit. I just wanted to mention this.

The biggest reduction of the overall score goes to the so called extras. The extra's area provides wallpapers, her DJ mixes, a diary, and a 'soon to come' web cam. However, nothing is updated at all. The last diary entry was early 2008 (a year) and I don't see this being updated soon at all. Also, I was a member when this site had DRM about 6 months ago and this site was saying the web cam would be 'arriving soon' then. Who knows when this will be up.

Overall, the site caters to Areeya's fan base and new comers to a certain extent. If you are a megafan, I'm sure you are dissapointed and to new comers, I say you may just want to join this site as a bonus from the other exoticgold sites because you get a discount. But, to me that seems still a bit pricy for this site. With average updates, lacking videos, and limited extras this is a site you may want to join for 1 month to add to your collection.

03-11-09  03:08pm

Replies (0)
Visit Black TGirls

Black TGirls

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of mostly North American (there are quite a few Brazilian) ebony only shemales doing mostly solo work with some hardcore mixed in.
- Updates weekly with about six photo sets and videos, all on one day. These are usually a photo set and a video scene from one model equaling six updated models a week.
- No DRM protection.
- Video quality is reasonable from 2006 on (WMV only at 1280 X 720 to 640 X 480, ~2000 to ~4000 kbps). 2005 and under are understandably subpar (AVI, WMV, or even Real Media at 320 X 240, ~500 to ~1000 kbps). There is a lower quality option.
- Photo quality is professional with resolutions at 1280 X 800 in the present, 1024 X 680 around 2005-2007, and 760 X 570 or lower under 2005.
- Quality navigation with a model index, correct search features, and favorites tab.
- Active forum for suggestions.
- Good rating system and comment feedback for models and content to see what other members are thinking or saying.
- Excellent customer service.
Cons: - Photo resolution for a site that has been around for 10+ years should be extremely higher. 1280 is not cutting it, especially if the company claims to be in the premier of shemale content. However, the photography is well founded with good lighting and crisp pics.
- While some videos are updated at 1280 finally, it is still wishy washy. Some are still updated at 640 X 480 or 720 X 480. While the picture quality and cameras used are good, the res should just be higher this day and age.
- Updates are done a bit different than other sites, varying between strip teases, masturbation, masturbation with a cumshot, and hardcore action. The only quirk I have personally is the fact that not all solo shoots end in a cum shot or an attempt (obviously some models cannot cum due to hormones). Usually, when a solo scene in shemale content is done, it is a full strip to masturbation with cumshot shoot. Just takes a bit of getting used to.
- The price is a bit high at $35 without using tickets.
Bottom Line: I can express extreme gratitude to the guys at grooby for creating a site dedicated to showcasing black only TS models. I'm not sure there is another site doing this and they are doing it quite well. With 10+ years under their belt, the site details in mostly solo content which may or may not end in a cum shot with quite a few hardcore scenes as well. Plus, with this long time in activity with constant updates, the model quantity is substantial as well being in the upper 700's. As far as the content goes, there is a lot for everyone but I believe some can be hit or misses.

With that being said, the videos are well done. While the site showcases quite a few videographers/cameramen, some are good at both while others are better at just one thing or the other. Therefore, you get both sides of the spectrum when viewing the videos. While I believe they all use good cameras and provide adaquete lighting, different guys will talk more and even provide the dreaded POV cameraman sex/blowjobs. Also, some videos even have the flash for photos going off which in my book is a no-no during a video shoot. Interviews are provided for most models as well, if that's your fortay. The best thing about this is that they have these interviews usually as a seperate file in case you want to skip out on them. The actual content is stripping to masturbation either ending in a cumshot or not, with most being without. However, almost every model will get an update with a cumshot captured, just not usually the first update. Also, hardcore scenes usually with another man are thrown in the mix quite a bit as well. While not a bulk of the content, you can get some hardcore here.

The photography is usually done in a professional manner. No matter what, I think the site provides all around great photos. As stated in the cons, the res should be higher but all the sets can be downloaded via zip. Plus, some models may not even have video updates so in reality there is more photo content than video content. They don't provide too many repeat photos and the watermark is usually non-intrusive. There is usually no over use of make-up (which can be hard sometimes in TS content), the outfits vary and range from everyday clothes to glamour, and the models tend to be enjoying themselves. Overall, I can't say there is much wrong with these photos besides the fact they should be bigger.

This site is doing a lot more right than wrong. The first being they stuck to the niche and are doing it right by providing such a variety of different ebony models with all sorts of body shape and personalities. The second being that they provide a large amount of updates to keep you an active member if you want to. This is important because the price is pretty high for a site these days. Finally, the site caters to the shemale fan itself by providing all sorts of content in both the photos and videos. They provide active communication and appear to be enjoying what they do. I'd recommend this site.

11-06-09  03:10pm

Replies (0)
Visit Brandi Belle

Brandi Belle

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content of Brandi and others engaging in a variety of content including voyeurism plus conventional to unconventional handjobs, blowjobs, and sex.
- No DRM.
- Updates usually come once a week.
- An 'All about me' section where you can click on her body part and it shows a video of just that part.
- A few wallpapers and comics.
- Video files offered in MPEG and WMV for all updates. All videos can be download via full movie or in clips. However, the quality can be wishy washy with new ones updated at even 480 X 336. But, some do get updated at 640 X 480 at around 2000 kbps or lower. You really don't know what you are getting really which is unfortunate.
- Pictures and screencaps available for downloading. However, while there are two seperate categories for images; both are actually taken from the captured videos.
- Scenes have a different take of conventional porn with contests, myth busting, and more in bottom line. This can be seen as good or bad I suppose.
Cons: - Inactive blog with the last entry being 12/18/2007 at the time of this review.
- For a basic video only site, quality of videos is subpar.
- As stated above in pros, there are no actual proper photography images available and these screencaps are not available to download via zip.
- Site navigation is easy until you have to download a video. First, when clicking 'Download Movie', it takes you to a page with only clips available to download. If you want the full video, you have to click on "Download movie in 1 large file" which takes to you YET another screen which plays the videos in flash and has the links. Just too much of a hassle to get the full clip downloaded.
- Video names are not available in a meaningful naming process, they are random numbers.
- Site design appears the original with no plans to update it. Thus, it looks dated.
- When attempting to download, I get a lot of broken links that are sometimes working again later or not.
Bottom Line: Brandi Belle offers a solo model site which compiles scenes that are clearly out of the ordinary when it comes to content. While an occasional straight forward sex, HJ, or BJ scene can be updated; they are clearly in the minority. To clarify what is offered in the majority of the content, I will explain. Brandi appears to have fun attempting to 'discover' things such as myths or rumors by herself or to let her friends in on the action which will either be in the form of just watching or participating in various scenes. These scenes can include measuring penis sizes and then seeing which feels better, testing real pussies versus fake ones, or even seeing how far a guy can squirt his cum and how much. Some other examples include hidden camera sex, sex with 'fans', apparently mailed in footage of other couples having sex, lots of unconventional handjobs, and teaching others to do certain sexual tasks. This is just a few examples of what is offered which I think clearly demonstrates that the site offers some content that is extremely different than what other sites have to offer.

However, due to the site offering unconventional themes I believe that after awhile (as stated in a few other reviews) that some scenes are kind of repeat themed with a different perspective that in the overall midst of things; is the same scene over and over again. Also, since the content can be a bit off-beat or over the top, the actual scene may not express an extreme amount of erotism than a scene that is more conventional in nature. Plus, a lot of times there is an extreme amount of voyeurism present, with both males and females there just watching a scene (sometimes demonstrating no emotion or even involvement) which can be different for most people who are used to regular ol' scenes. In effect, this can create a peculiar sense of atomsphere in the scene because everyone is constantly being watched. However, this can be a solid plus for some who may particular like these kind of scenes. In addition, Brandi can sometimes appear to show less enthusiasm in certain videos which creates a dull experience as well.

While I state quite a few pros and cons about the actual content, the overall content is quite entertaining for a first time customer. Why? Because the content is so damn different and largely innvovative. Through the mix of somewhat dull scenes, I did find some great content that was entirely erotic and distinct.

Overall, the site is a good experience for a first time user. However, the site does lack stability for long time users. This includes an out dated site design, largely annoying navigation, wishy washy updates with video clarity as a guessing game, and the fact that most scenes may have been done already. But, if a scene with something new and as innovative as older material is updated, the content can be mostly well done and entertaining. So, I'd say this site boasts an above-average entertainment value with a lot holding it back to be awesome.

11-17-09  05:41pm

Replies (2)
Visit Brazilian Transsexuals

Brazilian Transsexuals

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of Brazilian TS models in mostly solo masturbation content but quite a lot of hardcore as well.
- Updates once a week on one day with 4 seperate model updates with each including a photo and video set. Plus, 2 videos are remastered as well.
- No DRM.
- Newest videos have a few options with the highest being at ~1280 X 720, 3,500 kbps. Other options are available. Streaming is available for recent updates in 2010 only. Drop in quality and less options as you get older in year, around 2006 and lower.
- Photos are all available via zip and newest ones are at ~1280 X 850 with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Navigation is solid with plenty of features like accurate searches, user tags, comments, blogs, FAQ, and 'my portfolio section'.
- Coming soon section with model previews.
- Rating system for models as well as sets to check out what others think is hot.
- There are some brief comments in models' profiles which can give some insight or facts.
Cons: - I got slow download speeds but cust service attempted to help at least.
- High price if you are not using ticket system.
- A slight con but really can't be helped is the drop in quality as you get lower in year. This is expected but at least they are remastering old videos which I don't think any other grooby site is doing.
- Some of the cumshot footage in solo scenes are taken from hardcore scenes either shot previously or for future updates. Sometimes, the footage is never put up but it's obviously not from that exact solo scene.
- Photos are lower in resolution for such a site that is considered in the upper echelon of TS sites.
- Some may dislike the fact the site updates once a week with all updates because they may miss out on a few updates if their membership expires.
- Some videographers do a little more chit chatting than others with the models which is usually not direction but just pointless comments about how hot or sexy a model is. Just uncalled for in my opinion.
Bottom Line: Brazilian Transsexuals really surprised me from Grooby. After using their ticket system and joining a lot of their sites, I really thought this one stood out the most. I'm actually surprised this one seems to be the sleeper when compared to all of their sites but I liked it the most. While many will see the same models they have seen on so many other South American TS sites, there was also a lot of new fresh ones I've never seen. Plus, there is A LOT of content which seems to be a great trend from most Grooby sites in general.

The videos are mostly solo masturbation footage but this site tends to focus a lot more on the cumshot than most Grooby sites. Therefore, you are usually get more than one video from a model with this shown but some are left out (if they ever existed). A great addition to the site is a lot of videographers use different camera angles when capturing the cumshot, giving a wide vary of footage including close-ups, full body shots, and medium shots of the same cumshot in one video. Most videos do involve a striptease and toyplay but most all end in a cumshot. Also, the site emphasizes on hardcore footage a bit more than most of the Grooby sites that are not actual sites with only hardcore. Plus, most of this footage can range from B/TS, TS/TS, G/TS, and threesomes or more. Therefore, there is a wide array of content that should keep everyone happy. However, plenty of the videos may have chitter chatter amongst the cameraman and models. Although, this unfortunantly is mostly from the camera man telling the model how sexy she is or whatever. I just always believe this is a no-no because it seems like it becomes the videographers own personal sex video instead of producing porn for the masses. But, overall, the majority of the videos are extremely well done and crisp; sometimes even innovative.

The photography is done great as well. While my quirk is that the resolution could be higher, the actual photography is well done. The photos are crisp, well lighted, average to great settings, and change frame to frame enough with no a lot of repeats. There are plenty of different positions with ass shots, tit shots, close-ups, and/or full body shots. Overall, these are well done but I'd expect a boost in the res department if they want to be put in the 90's.

This site is extremely well done. You know what you are getting and that is mostly quality. The customer service seems to care with attempts at finding the problem with the slow download speeds. While the issue was never resolved, I cannot say if anyone else will experience slow download speeds from the site. However, the only thing holding me back from giving this site a score in the 90's is the slow download speeds, an expensive monthly price, the chit chat in some videos, and the lower resolution for photos. Other than that, this site has it all. A great site design, awesome navigation, popular models, hot and sexy on camera footage, a large archive, and cool features.

03-09-10  04:21pm

Replies (7)
Visit Captain Outrageous

Captain Outrageous

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Average place for picture buffs
- Hit the 'femboy' niche well
Cons: - Very limited video
- Low quality video
- No zip format for the pictures
- Updates are slower than most
- pictures are not the highest resolution
- Price is still a bit high at $15/month
Bottom Line: This site was one of the first ladyboy sites I came across. I stumbled upon pictures of 'Schoolgirl O' and found she was exclusively only on this site (at least, I have not found here anywhere else). It has a simple design with a model list and update list with picture sets within them. It just looks so dated and there is minimal effort to make it look better over the obvious years it's been around.

The pictures are divided in to a few categories. There is the schoolgirl 'O' area, which is only about 7 sets involving solo and some TG/TG action. There is another section involving Talisha, a well known star on plenty of other sites, doing solo sets and I think one hardcore one. However, these seem to be some dated sets and I don't believe they will be updated ever. The next section is the other various ladyboys. They are updated scarcely, maybe once a week or so.

The ladyboys on this site are primarily femboys. Most tend to be on the borderline cross dressing side, appearing to be able to pull off a dayjob as men and ladyboy by night. However, in the mix, you can find some average to better looking ladyboys. The photographer (Captain Outrageous) tends to pride his ladyboys in not getting fake tits and being 'all-natural'. But, the models he gets just fall short to the really great looking femboys I've seen out there. They are photographed starting in clothing and usually end in full nudity. However, there are rarely pictures of cumshots which kills the whole point of solo sets.

The pictures are in lower res and are not in simple zip format. I actually had to download an image downloader to just make this site somewhat worth going to.

I just don't see this site as worth the price of admission. I could see maybe $9.95 to join and get some femboys added to your collection for one month, but at $15 it's just high and a hassle.

03-06-09  07:27pm

Replies (0)
Visit Club Tug

Club Tug

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Joining the site gives access to a few other niche type sites including Cum Blast City, See Mom Suck, Over 40 Handjobs, Busty Direct, Teen Tugs, & few others.
- The site overall has a decent amount of content but I'm going to review the site as a network which contains plenty of handjob material with decent scenarios which are the essence of the network. I will elaborate in the bottom line.
- Content appears to be exclusive to the sites and network.
- No DRM protection.
- Photos are available to view or download in zip format.
- Navigation is straight forward and content is easy enough to find by showing updates viewed by date of update, rating, popularity, or name. Updates can also be viewed by a model index with the same views as above.
- Some other discounts to other sites not associated with the network can be used by clicking links on the site.
- Average scene descriptions with decent screen caps to know what kind of scene the video or photo will be when browsing.
Cons: - Videos as a whole on the network vary and range from poor to below average. However, nothing is above average in this category. We are talking about 320 X 240 to 720 X 480, most with ~2,500 kbps bitrate.
- Photos are small as well with some being actual photo shoots to just screen caps from the videos. There are usually just a few dozen pics in a set and highest resolution is around 1000 X 668.
- Site design is bland and there is no attempt to really be a top tier site in this category. However, navigation is easy enough.
- Model selection can range to absolutely gorgeous to sub par. It just shows how the site is as a whole which equals wishy-washy selections.
- Overall, there is not a lot of content for the network. This actual site has the most with around 202 at this time of review. However, the other sites are averaged around 60 scenes with even some only as much as 4 or 5 scenes.
- Some scenes are on other sites within the same network sites and only update once a week.
Bottom Line: First off, I want everyone to know that I am reviewing this site as a network. Therefore, I will review the sites in the handjob/blowjob niche because this is the main overall theme of this particular site and network.

Club Tug seems to be the main site of the network with a overall handjob theme as a whole. The scenes within this site vary from solo handjobs to group ones. I suppose I will say this next because it is the basis as to why I joined: these sites within this network are extremely niche orientated! Meaning, almost all the themes revolve around a story of a handjob or blowjob happening for a taboo reason, it is not just "hi, strip, handjob, cumshot, scene end" content. Therefore, the site has decent creativity which results in some steamy scenes. This site here has it all, from the little girl who gives her teacher a handjob to the stepmom giving her stepson a handjob before a big date so he's "relaxed". Overall, the directing is average and the dialogue can range from dirty/sexy to stupid/straightforward. Therefore, each scene has a life of its own which can range in theme and quality. It is by far not consistent which is its blessing and its curse.

Over 40 Handjobs is exactly how it is described. Like the other scenes in the network, it is theme oriented but features strictly older ladies. However, there are some scenes with a younger model who "catches" her giving a handjob and helps. But, it is mostly solo older models giving young men handjobs for some weird/taboo reason. Like the other scenes in the network, the acting varies and models do as well. I have seen some of the nicest natural older ladies to the old ones with the huge bolt-on titties. Looks range and it is all in the eyes of the beholder.

See Mom Suck is a site which features older ladies not only giving handjobs but blowjobs. Each scene usually consists of a younger model giving a blowjob, get "caught", and then the older model joins in for whatever reason and "teaches" the younger one how it's done. But, some scenes might just feature the older lady only without a younger lady, of course, blowing the young man for some taboo reason. The dynamic between the older and younger model can vary from great dialogue and sexy rapport to just overall embarrassing with one model outshining the other or them both just looking dumbfounded with poor acting. It all depends which brings me to the point I've made before, the consistency is well, non-existent.

Teen Tugs differs by bringing the younger model to the forefront only in a handjob scene. Sometimes it is a model by herself, with another, or even in a group. Of course, keeping with the overall theme, the handjobs usually occur with a taboo subject as to why she is doing it. This ranges from trying to get a good grade from a teacher to her getting revenge for a bad date from a friend. This is the newest of the sites and only contains a few dozen scenes.

Now that I've talked a little about a few of the network sites, I would like to comment on the overall stuff. Most of the models in this network are used again in each of the sites. So, when giving the tour to look at, if you like a most of the models on one site, then you are most likely to see them on all sites. Also, the themes tend to not vary. Therefore, if you have seen about a dozen types of scenes or reasons why they are giving a hj/bj, then it is usually repeated again with different models. So if you are in to theme orientated porn with a bit of a plot which results in quirky reasons why these models would be jerking or sucking some guy off, then you are at the right place. Therefore, that is what this network really is, theme oriented. You really have to be in to the reality type thing to appreciate the scenes offered here. This would probably be the main reason to join, as it was my main reason.

With that said, do not expect to be blown away by the content here. Yes, it has really steamy themes and decent models doing decent acting, but not all the time. Some editing can be poor and the dialogue excruciatingly bad which makes one wonder if any direction was done before a scene at all. Plus, the site Cum Blast City actually brings in a horrible fake penis which eventually squirts massive amounts of fake jizz on the models, but first makes them actually jerk and suck it like they are even remotely turned on. It creates this strange aura for the model which results in uncomfortable acting and cringe worthy scenes that are almost unbearable to watch. I avoided this site quickly and was pretty mad cause a lot of the better models participated in the site.

Overall, the network offers some great scenes that are niche orientated. The quality is low, so if you want to join, you better be ready for this. It's surely not for everyone and needs to be tweaked for the future. With the right changes, the network could produce really good niche and theme oriented scenes, but for now, only a selected few will be ready for the site.

12-27-12  08:34pm

Replies (0)
Visit Extreme Ladyboys

Extreme Ladyboys

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Decent to great quality videos
-Exclusive content
-Shemsle models range from femboy to feminine
-Exclusive models
Cons: -Site navigation is average
-4 GB daily download limit
-Some concepts are a bit unsatisfying
Bottom Line: Okay, to start off, this site is basically for people who are in to ladyboys and want some hardcore action. There are a few solo scenes but hardcore is the basis. As for the 'extreme' part in the title, there really isn't anything that I found overly hardcore, the closest thing I suppose to extreme would be food play.

As for the videos, they are in some decent quality. As for the content, well it just varies. I found some exclusive models I have not seen anywhere doing some great scenes. However, there are a lot of others I've seen doing okay footage. One of the things I just found unsatisfying and a bit lame, is a male star on this site who dresses as "The Shadow". He wears a skin tight nylon suit and goggles. He then proceeds to screw the ladyboys, I just found it a bit lame. It's give or take with the content here, I found like 25-50% of the scenes are really worth the watch. By the way, I added a bit more percentage out there because there are quite a bit of femboys, However, I don't feel these are the best, but I do know they are popular amongst others. But, I noticed a lot are not truly ultra femboys but more as crossdressing males that are shaved completely (not the small hormone titties, etc.).

The pics are usually stills of the shoots or just photo sets with no video to match. They are decent, not a huge factor and you may be disappointed as a picture buff. The res is okay and is available in zip format.

This site is free with other sites as a loyalty bonus with ladyboy-69, longmint, and the other exoticgold sites. You can also join as a regular member. However, I just never see this site as that. It seems to be a decent bonus site, I just never see it breaking through as a regular member site for the majority. Although, I do suggest you get this site as a pick for the bonus site if you have a chance, there is some good stuff here.

03-04-09  11:49am

Replies (4)
Visit Frank's TGirl World

Frank's TGirl World

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive and non-exclusive content of transsexual models in mostly solo stripping and masturbation action but also POV sex.
- No DRM.
- Newest videos look decent at 1280 X 720 at ~4,250 kbps. Videos usually downgrade around 2007 and the years before to 640 X 480 or lower. However, one scene is re-encoded every week to look better.
- Photos are well done around 1280 X 800 resolution. They are all available via zip format or in-browser viewer.
- Site design and navigation are quality. Everything is easy to find and easy on the eyes. No broken links and file names are relevant to the video or photo downloads.
- Updates once a week with about 4 to 5 video and photo sets but also a scene from other Grooby sites. Plus, the re-encoded video is updated once a week as well.
- Model index with search options is a great attribute to the site. Also, a tagging system is in place for users to add their own tags for scenes.
- There is a site forum for questions, concerns, or general chat.
Cons: - Extremely slow download speeds at any time of the day. I was averaging around 350 kbps when downloading one file and even slower if downloading more the one. It's obvious that there is a cap set at 350.
- Remember the site name when joining this site. Meaning, the site is Franks personal site and is really catering to his own escapades. While the users are taken in to consideration, the style of the scenes tend to be for his own personal experiences.
- Updating the way it does on one day may eliminate a user from not receiving a whole week of updates if they only signed up for one month.
- Photography is well done but the resolution is a bit small for 2011.
- Updating scheme may bother some but is in accordance to all Grooby sites (more in bottom line).
- A bit on the expensive side at $35. However, I believe the reasoning is that TS porn is considered a specialized niche so take it as you want.
Bottom Line: Frank's TGirl World is a transsexual site catering to showcasing the escapades of the site's owner, Frank. He is the cameraman, photographer, and I think editor for the site. Therefore, one better like his style before joining which I will explain later. In addition, the model list has become quite extensive over time and some are exclusive to his site only but many are showcased on the other Grooby specialty sites or other company sites. Basically, think of this site as a mash up of transsexuals from all over the world featuring only Frank and the model in sessions.

This brings me to what is in the scenes. Usually, the first update of a model consists of a scene with a small interview or random questions. However, a language barrier is usually present with the Thai Ladyboys or the South American models. Take it for what it is. Then, the model will strip and various sections including positions of the body will be showcased with long shots and close ups. However, a common turn off (or turn on?) is that he has a groping problem. Frank has a tendency to want to grab a body part while holding the camera which reinforces that the scenes are made for his pleasure. Plus, sometimes you can even see Frank in a mirror. But, these acts have cut back in comparison to the older content but can still be prevalent. Anyways, after some stripping and body shots in various ways, the model is usually given a dildo of some sort and masturbates with it until the end, with no cumshot for the conclusion. But, sometimes some POV sex is involved but this content is usually within the next update. There is always a photo set with the same outfit and most of the content matching this scene as well.

This brings me to the second update of a model if there is one which 90% (maybe more) of the time there is. The second update is usually in a different setting and outfit. The start usually consists of a model stripping just like the first update. Then, the model will once again have her body showcased in various shots and positions. However, after this, the model will usually masturbate without a dildo or be shot in a extremely poorly edited hardcore POV scene with Frank. To clarify 'poorly edited', I mean it is not a true hardcore scene. You get some random positions for like a minute, then cut to another, then maybe another. Meaning, it is not a true and lightly edited hardcore scene but just random shots of some blowjobs or penetration in various positions for a short while. However, these scenes usually always end with a cumshot by the model and mostly all will feature various camera angles and/or positions. This is a nice touch and I commend Frank for these shots. But, these cumshots are usually edited in very quick at the end and the actual masturbation may only be prevalent for a few moments before the cumshot. So, no build up may occur to the conclusion which can hurt the sensuality of the scene. Also, each one of these updates has a matching photo set as well. So, if a model has updates after these two, the new updates will follow this same format again. Meaning, maybe the first updates of a model was in 2007. So, in 2010, the same update scheme would be used again.

So, each scene usually follows a format. But, each scene with different models at least change in appearance with locations and outfits. Many are in just a hotel room (mostly the Thai updates) but that is standard. But, the technical aspects are usually very good. Lighting is well done and the right shots are taken. It's the editing that irks me and the personal touch Frank takes when creating a scene. But, many may find this style to be what they want so I have to take that in to consideration. Just be clear before you join that that is what you get.

I kind of went in to this site thinking the model index Frank would be taking the 'cream of the crop' from all the other Grooby sites but this is not always the case. While I believe he usually picks the models from the other sites that are more 'promising', he also finds some his self and showcases them. However, when it comes to the 'World' part, the models are primarily from South America and Thailand. The North American and European (or other parts) models are definitely in the minority. So, if you like the look of the models from these locations, then you will like the site's model index.

Overall, the site to me is seen as pretty standard. Frank picks some really sexy models to shoot but flaws the scenes with quick editing, groping, talking, and not a large variety in world location for models as advertised. However, the shots are nice, well lit, include gorgeous models, different camera angles for certain shots, and lots of updates. So, it is all about weighing your options before joining the site. If one likes POV style hardcore shots, a personal edge to the scenes, South American and Thai models, the update scheme while not minding slower downloads and/or wishy washy edits then the site will cater to you.

07-24-11  10:23am

Replies (20)
Visit Futanaria


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of real females portraying anime style futanari or shemales in both videos and photos.
- No DRM protection.
- No Download limit.
- Updates often, usually twice a week with either a photo shoot or a video.
- Price is decent at $16.95 for a one month stay and goes down in price afterwards.
- Videos are available in WMV format (720 X 480, ranging from 984 to 2004 kbps) and quicktime MOV format for download only. At the time of the review, there are currently 32 different videos.
- Pictures are in an average resolution at 1000 X 667, with one of the most non-intrusive watermark I've seen (it's extremely small). At the time of the review, there are currently 35 shoots totaling about 2,950 photos.
- Diary entries for dated updates with a small captioned story describing the scene.
- Model bio page with some comments describing the model and stats such as height, weight, boob size, and cock size.
Cons: - Photo sets are not available in easy zip format for downloading.
- Photo sets are accompanying photos of the videos. While they are true shoots, they are almost identical in terms of location, content, and outfits of the videos.
- Site navigation is a bit dreadful, while once you figure it out you can find the content easy, but there is a 10-15 minute learning curve to find it.
- No bonus features or scenes at all.
- No forum for communication. This would be a perfect feature for user input in to the scenes because it is so fantasy based.
- Model index bio page is nice but there are no links to their content from there, an easy model index would really help navigation.
Bottom Line: Futanaria portays real female models as dick girls in anime style futanari ("new-half, shemale") scenes. The penises are obviously fake and stay true to the anime style by being extremely exaggerated. Yes, these prosthetics are so big that they can usually suck them. Plus, they are actually molded quite well and look quite real. They do not look like just pieces of plastic attached to the model. Also, staying true to the anime style, these prosthetic penises actually shoot a load and boy, do they shoot a lot. If you have ever seen futanari style or even anime hentai, the ejaculations are usually largely exaggerated. This place stays true to those type of cumshots with them spurting massive amounts of white substance. But, they do go in to the cornfactor by giving some models in sets this extremely large boob vest. I know that they are trying to stay somewhat true to anime because a lot of anime girls have extremely large breasts, these 'boob vests' bring in too much humor and corniness that it actually destroys some sets in my opinion. But, they actually spray 'milk' which may add to the fantasy.

A large perk of the site that I was pleasantly surprised was the attractiveness of the models. I really thought that models that were willing to be involved with this type of site would be far in between, they actually picked up a few hotties. While there is not a huge index, the site does contain 9 with bios and a few new ones without one up yet. I'd say around 10-12 at the time of this review. The models do a pretty good job at acting and are really in to the scenes which is a plus. I really thought they would be laughing and doing a poor job doing these scenes, but they are actually quite erotic.

The videos vary in content with some solo masterbation scenes and girl on girl. A large plus for the site is they take certain themes and do a good job at portraying them. Some examples are a wedding night with two futanari girls, mud wrestling, and geishas having sex. The sex is always with two girls with the fake cocks and they do have sex with these massive cocks. The videos, while being a bit low in bitrate, actually look pretty good in terms of low grain and average lighting. While they are a bit amatuerish in style, there is no extreme jiggling of the camera or a lot of chitter chatter amongst the camera man and model.

The photos are average. I can't say they are the best or the worst I have ever seen. They could be a bit larger but the watermark is almost non-existant. Since they are accompanying sets, they are almost identical to the videos so you get almost the same content.

This site is strictly fantasy based and actually interesting if you are a fan of anime style porn and would like to see it portrayed in real life. The props are well made, the models are in to the scenes, and can actually be highly erotic. It's the technical stuff that kills this site such as no zips, bad navigation, below average res of photos, and bitrate of vids.

06-04-09  11:45am

Replies (5)
Visit Gyno X

Gyno X

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content featuring gynecology type videos and photos with some extra stuff not in english but subtitles are in videos.
- Extra stuff includes Nurses doing naughty things in videos and photos, a few doctor and nurse sex scenes, nurse lesbian scenes, pregnant women exams, behind the scenes candids, and different 'fetish' type content.
- Newer videos are in great quality (WMV: 1280 X 720, 5000 kbps) available in whole files and split (if split, 720 X 404, 2000 kbps), while older videos are in lower quality only available in split files (WMV:720 & 640 X 360, 1600 kbps; AVI: 720 X 404, 1600 kbps; 384 X 288, 850 kbps).
- Photos available in zip format in high resolution (2000 X 1328) in newer sets while older sets are lower resolutions (1100 X 731 and 1000 X 664).
- No DRM protection.
- No download limit.
- Active forum but it's dated in style.
- Updates every other day but they are parts of videos and photos, averages to about 3 different girl's exams a month.
Cons: - Expensive at $29.95 a month. Plus they want you to pay an extra $19.95 to get access to older photo and video archives. Why charge more for old and crap quality content is beyond me.
- Some of the extra areas have no zip format available for easier downloading.
- Forum is this old looking board that's pretty hard to navigate. It's basically set up to say comments and maybe reply, but it is actually quite active.
- Subtitles can be a bit bad but it is not too drastic, they are basically just the doctor and nurse giving instructions and asking for things.
- There is also a chat program but no one is ever on, I wouldn't utilize this but it's worth mentioning for everyone else.
- Let's be honest here, content can get a bit 'dry' because the strive for realism is quite high, so the sexuality is a bit low in terms of the girl in the videos.
Bottom Line: Gyno X is catering to anyone with a medical fetish or who want to see some attractive models showing their goods from top to bottom. Basically, you get to see an exam of suprisingly mostly attractive woman in a fake gynecology exam that strives to make realism a huge factor in their content. However, the strive for realism is so high, it creates some dull and monotone scenes that will bore the average user just trying to see something different. The updates come often and the site holds about 62 different models available for the initial charge and maybe about 60 or 70 more if you want to pay the extra charge for more content.

The videos and photos are great in quality with the newer content and average to substandard with the older stuff. The photos contain a lot photos (in the 300 to 900+ range) within the zips and is about the same in content as the videos. The main content is a realistic gyno exam usually involving a male doctor and female nurse (this can switch with a female doctor and nurse or just a female nurse). They do it all here, from measuring the model, pressure readings, speculums, breast exams, anal exams, heartbeats, and so on. Now I'm nowhere near an expert in this field so I don't know if anything is contrived but you can tell some things are obviously put in place to make the scene obviously not completely real. Besides the fact that the usual doctor I've seen on some old n' young sex sites, some things are just out of place. For instance, the girl will do a pee sample but piss in a huge beaker and spray it everywhere and the douche's are basically a enlarged turkey baster. However, the setting is quite real. They have the gyno chair for spreading, the walls are white, and there is equipment with devices everywhere. It adds to the realism these scenes bring but they can get a sense of feeling too real. But, most scenes can be downloaded in parts if you find certain things to 'dry' and would rather not even view them. While I may find this a bit too much personally, I do commend the creators for giving a true sense of realism and the strive to make them this way. They have definently completed this goal and I cannot knock them too much for that. But, I need to stress this point to others who may have seen other speculum type scenes or hospital stuff, these scenes spurt almost no sense of sexuality at all. While they do have a segment where they 'take readings' while the doctor fingers the model too see if everything is 'alright' when they are in a sexual state, everything else is a step by step attempt at recreating a true gyno exam.

The largest plus that I can stress is that they do have some attractive models and you get to see these models from head to toe in great close ups and in ways I've never seen displayed before. I went in to this site after seeing a few speculum scenes from other sites and wanting more but left this site with a sense that it was a bit too much. Interesting site but probably not for the masses.

05-18-09  07:16pm

Replies (0)
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content of mostly Amateur girls masturbating until they reach authentic orgasm.
- Content explores the realist orgasms you can find with focus on contractions, writhing, suddle noises, and facial gestures.
- HD movies available in HD mp4 (1280 X 720 with ~5,000 kbps), HI-Q mp4 and Wmv, med-q Wmv and m4v with roughly 400 videos available in HD.
- Updates at least one video daily.
- No DRM.
- Site navigation is quite straight forward.
- Site design is easy on the eyes and sleek enough.
- My IFM section includes total downloaded overall, amount downloaded that day for download limit monitoring, login dates and times, and you can select server for greater speeds.
- Active forum.
- Model index with some good info like age, where the model is from, favorite books, favorite music, favorite cinema, and a few random words they want.
Cons: - Most models are attractive but do not expect the majority to be fake and plastic barbie dolls. Most models are women you see on a daily basis at like a grocery store enjoying their bodies. Plus, some are so called 'hipsters' and may not shave and so on.
- There is a focus on showcasing 'genuine orgasms in a tasteful way' which I agree with but some content can be considered too artsy which results in low lighting, static cameras, and non-preferred views.
- The attempt to make models the most comfortable as they can be results in real orgasm but mostly in one position and not a huge amount of camera presence.
- Model index is labeled as 'artists' which the artists are considered the models in the scenes, which can actually be hard to find and may be overlooked.
- Most videos are split up as seperate updates and makes for daily updates but repetitive content.
- 6 GB download limit.
- no pictures or screens but understandable to an extent due to comfort level attempts.
Bottom Line: This site dedicated to showcasing authentic female orgasms. The site delivers in this aspect because I rarely saw any of the fake moans and non-movement you see on many sites that are supposably showcasing female masturbation to orgasm. These girls here actually writh and contract while making noises no one would ever expect to come out of a female mouth which is exactly what happens with a real female orgasm if you have witnessed one first hand. You won't get the classic porn 'ohhs' and 'ahhs' here, but full out chest turning red and dolphin noise making orgasms; all caught on video for you.

However, with that said there are some things that detracts from the site. For one, the sites dedication to real orgasm does not mean lighting has to be so dark. A female does not need to be in darkness to achieve full orgasm and many of the studio videos are filmed in extremely low lighting. However, I do understand the camera presence may detract from comfortableness so the camera may stay a bit static for the shoot. This does not bother me as much as the lighting but keep in mind about the static camera which mostly stays overhead looking down on the model, usually full body shots. But, I will admit that many videos will end up going to other angles eventually which is a nice touch and improvement but it is not always present.

The sites models are overall nice but I believe you have to be a fan of amateur models to fully enjoy the content. Personally, many of the models to me were just too average looking and detracted from my overall fantasy. However, there are some gems present in the bunch even for the most jaded. However, I cannot stress this enough if you are thinking about joining.

There is a few different types of content present. You have studio made content, home made content, interviews, lesbian footage, and 'diary' footage. The studio and home made footage are quite self explanatory. However, interviews and diary footage can be a bit different. This footage usually involves none to very little nudity and a lot of talking. The lesbian footage is quite erotic but the model selection reminds me of what real lesbians mostly look like. They are usually quite hipster with shorter hair and less shaving but are actually extremely passionate. An interesting difference in content that may be enjoyed by others.

Overall, the sites focus is well played and you will get what you are looking for, the real female orgasm. However, the site does fall short in regards to the overall delivery. Attempts at changing location turn in to artsy settings and the overall location is just a static, poorly lighted bedroom. But, I can give justification for some of these aspects due to the site trying to make these models the most comfortable to reach full and real orgasm. However, some footage seems to go a bit too far with the lighting, static camera, and setting. All-in-all, you will get a lot of great footage and they are probably the best at authenticity.

06-29-10  11:05am

Replies (4)
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content.
- No DRM Protection.
- No Download limit that I experienced.
- High Def Videos (some of the best I've seen) available in WMV at 1280 X 720, 4000 kbps or 852 X 480, 2000 kbps, older wmv videos are 640 X 480, 1500 kbps. Flash streaming, Quicktime format at 860 X 540, 2000 kbps, and MPG in parts at 448 X 256, 1000 kbps.
- High def pictures (1333 X 2000, smaller sized available for viewing if you want) available to download via zip plus in browser slide shows.
- Gorgeous euro models that are mostly all natural.
- Great solo scene content ranging from fingering, toys, to peeing (more in bottom line).
- Updates daily with one picture set, one video scene every other day unless on sundays.
- Great and accurate search feature which can break down scenes to which type, where the scene was shot (location), and model features which include hair color, body type, breast size, and amount of pubic hair
- Good model index for easy viewing, plus image and scene index.
Cons: - Picture sets are accompanying photo shoots that contain the same outfits and locations of videos made at a different time (meaning, these photos and videos are basically the same content).
- Some of the older material videos are smaller in resolution, but they are still average quality, they seem to have jumped to higher res quickly and there is not much of these.
- I heard model names differ here from the usual models' names so finding a model you already know can be a bit of a burden.
- Would be nice to add a forum for active communication and community.
- You can rate episodes but there is no way to view the scenes in rated format to see which were most popular and so on.
Bottom Line: This site is by far in a class of it's own. I know this is really my first taste of Euro women showcased in a site but I can't recommend this more for a start or an addition. They update well and I have not seen an unattractive model on this site yet. While being mostly solo with a few lesbian type scenes, I think it's up there in the solo euro women niche. The models are stellar (I think they are all mostly well known in the euro porn community) and there are a lot of them, about 159 different models at the time of this review.

The videos are caught in high quality definition and are done very professionally. There is no chitter chatter amongst the camera man and the model. The models are dressed in very colorful and stylish clothes while being shot in well lit and warm colored locations (if inside). The outside locations are well thought out and are usually always shot on a bright, sunny day. The content can vary in content, while the majority being a solo scene involving a toy or their fingers, while there are fisting scenes, pissing, and speculums. The solo scenes are done great with the model stripping then masterbating till orgasm. They seem pretty realistic but I'm sure a few are faked (what can ya do, it's porn) but overall, they are really hot. The fisting scenes always involve another female doing the fisting to the model and never get too extreme. They usually start the same, with a strip, some masterbation, then the fisting. The peeing vids are usually quite quick, with the model already nude, and peeing somewhere. The speculum's are usually the same, but some are full strips then speculums, however, a lot just get right in to it. There are quite a few sybian scenes as well, shot like the others, a strip scene then sybian action. The scenes are focused (pun pun) well and shot correctly, expect some of the hottest and best solo stuff here and a lot at 13,460 scenes.

The picture sets are in great quality but are mostly the same content from the videos. So, the outfits and locations are the same as the videos. It would be great if the could get some seperate shoots besides these. Plus, the fact that they are so well shot and great in quality, this would make this site so superior that I don't think many would have any complaints. The amount should be the same as the video scenes for photo sets.

I like this site a lot and I think it is set up nice in design, being easy on the eyes and in navigation. For the true porn collectors, the fact the the video names when downloading can be a burden to some due to the fact that you may have to rename because they are named in numbers originally, the overall content is superb despite this. This and the fact that the photos are close in content to the videos are why I can't give this place a 100. They update daily with new models plus ones returning and the videos are shot absolutely stunning, this place is highly recommended for lovers of all young woman, not only just euro models.

04-17-09  10:37am

Replies (8)
Visit Kelly Shore

Kelly Shore

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive and non-exclusive content of North American TS star Kelly Shore in varying content including solo, hardcore, and fetish material.
- No DRM Protection.
- Updates once a week with either a photo set or a video.
- Two options available for purchase. These include joining the site by itself at $19.95 or as a network at $35.00 including 6 other popular North American TS stars (details in bottom line).
- Videos are mosty available in three formats of WMV (High: 1280 X 720, 4000 kbps; Medium: 1280 X 720, 1500 kbps; Low: 640 X 480, 600 kbps).
- Photo sets available in zip format at 1600 X 1074 resolution with a non-intrusive watermark.
Cons: - 4 GB Download limit.
- Exclusive content so far is fairly limited and a lot of the videos appear to be candids or home shot videos in horrible quality.
- She appears to be more of a 'top' (does the screwing) rather than a 'bottom'. Therefore, a lot of her hardcore stuff is her screwing men and is not my taste. I like variety when it comes to this.
- No active forum for communication or ideas. This is always great for a solo model site.
- Update schedule of upcoming scenes and sets are never filled in, however, there is a section. Either take this area away or fill it in. Leaving it blank is just pointless.
Bottom Line: Kelly Shore is a fairly attractive North American TS model that launched her site around september of '08. The site is in the company that includes Shemale Club and Private Transsexual and this content of her is added in to the updates on this site. This can be looked at as both bad and good because not everthing is exclusive but you do get all the content of her in one shot instead of joining these other sites for all her content. The site's content can be accessed by being billed for the site alone or for $15 more, you join a network site including 6 other North American TS models including TS Foxxy, Kelly Shore, Kimber James, Mia Isabella, JesseTS, and Arabic TS Mariam. While still being quite expensive, the second deal is obviously the better choice because you get a lot more content.

The videos are pretty straight forward and are categorized in to three sections including 'solo', 'hardcore', and 'fetish'. The solo stuff includes 7 videos. These videos are mostly masterbation videos but two are candid or homemade videos. These are both very grainy and horrible videos. The bulk of the site is in the hardcore section where she appears to top men in all the videos. While there are a lot at 17 videos, they are mostly non exclusive videos and were rather dull when watching them. Of course the fetish area is her topping men with a more domination feel, they are practically the same as the hardcore section and even a few videos are repeated there. While they are quite good in clarity, professionalism of camera work, and resolution; I found that the content was quite routine with just a different male doing the same exact thing every video. If you don't mind TS model's screwing men then this is where the bulk of the videos are. While the solo stuff is good, I don't know how often she will make exclusive content in this area.

The photos are broken in to the same sections as the videos. While they are mostly accompanying photo shoots of the videos (meaning, they are quite similar in dress, content, and location) there are some sets that have no similar video provided. The solo stuff is mostly glamour shoots and there are 16 at the time of this review. The hardcore stuff are accompanying shoots of the videos so you get the same amount as the videos provided. The sets are done nicely with great crispness and at a decent resolution. Plus, the watermark does not appear to affect the photo.

The site has been running for awhile now but the updates just seem lacking to me compared to the other sites in the network. She is a quite attractive model but when TS top all the time it takes away the feminine characteristics. When these are compromised, the model becomes less attractive. I don't mind content like this every once in awhile but it appears that she will be updating with this more often than other stuff. Some will enjoy this site but I'd say it's in the lesser echelon if you join the network. Joining it by itself is not recommended.

06-11-09  09:09am

Replies (0)
Visit Ladyboy 69

Ladyboy 69

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content.
- Very Frequent updates.
- Great models, some of the best I've seen.
- HD quality videos and great picture sets.
- Great model info including contact information.
Cons: - 4 GB Download limit.
- If your looking for hardcore, this isn't a huge site for it.
- A bit high on the price, but includes loyalty sites at a discount
Bottom Line: Bottom line, if you have the cash and want to check out Ladyboys, go here. They have some of the most gorgeous models I've seen on a site and updates are frequent with great old ones returning and new models entering.

The videos are great with HD quality and are mostly masterbation scenes. However, the majority, if not every time, the Ladyboy will cum. Some are better than others, but you cannot avoid that due to hormones and such. But, the camerawork is great and the music (which can be seen as a hindrance to some) is actually great. Often times I found myself captivated with the girls even more due the music playing.

There are some hardcore scenes which include TG/Boy, TG/TG, and TG/Girl. However, these are mostly older videos but are actually good, but not the bread n' butter of this site. There is a good site within this company that has a main focus on hardcore action that you can get free through loyalty.

One thing I found here that I don't find often is some Post-Op's. The pictures and videos include masterbation to hardcore. Just another reason that if your a ladyboy lover, this site is for you.

The pictures are great quality and are not always just photo shoots of the videos. This is great for picture lovers who can get exclusive pictures that are not just stills of videos that you already watched. Also, these are all in easy downloadable zip format.

To be honest, I have been to my share of shemale sites and I really do love this one. With the download limit, I can see some wanting to stray away. However, the content IS worth it. Highly recommended.

02-23-09  10:39am

Replies (2)
Visit Ladyboy Blue

Ladyboy Blue

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - No DRM Protection.
- Primarily a photo site, these pictures have a few available in zip format.
- Somewhat interesting extras, inculding ladyboy jigsaw puzzles, a 3d video with purchase of 3d glasses, a 360 degree angle video of a ladyboy, and some other novelty stuff like news articles.
- Easy layout.
- No Download limit.
Cons: - While they have videos, they are sparse and come in a wide range of extremely bad resolutions and quality (AVI: 720 X 480, 500 X 376, and 352 X 240) with the majority the last two.
- Photo resolution is sub par by todays standards at 800 X 536 with large watermarks and not every set is available for easy download in zip format.
- Site has no longer updated since beginning 02/09.
- Inactive forum.
- Navigation is so simple that you can tell the site is over with with no signs of making it better.
- While extras are okay, they are scarce and will no longer be updated as well, so in reality, they are not really worth anything now.
- Webcams offered are obviously never going to be up, since the site is dead.
- Price would be okay if the site was at least updating, but even with that, the actual content is below the standards offered from almost every other site.
Bottom Line: I found this site through a website search and I had TBP add it because it was a primarily photography site of ladyboys which are quite scarce these days. While the preview looked good enough, I noticed there were no dated updates. I took a stab since the price was a bit lower than most to maybe stumble upon a gem. Unfortunantly, this was a complete backfire but at least I can explain why this site should be avoided to anyone that may be interested.

While this site appears to be a primarily photography site, it looks like it might have been a great site a few years ago. However, it looks like they had plans to renevate and improve but other ladyboy sites blew them in the dust and they gave up. A clear abrupt stop with no explanation on the news page or on the forum. It's unfortunate that they do not at least advertise it as a archive site but what can ya do, risks are risks in plenty of porn sites.

As for the actual photography, the resolution is below average from even the past few years and the quality is just average. It is all solo photo shoots which usually end in a masterbation cumshot. The watermarks are fairly large and being on a smaller res picture can ruin the overall quality greatly in general. The place attempts to advertise the content as being on the 'kinkier' side of things but I have yet to see anything that made me squirmish and I am not a huge fan of much S&M or so on. The most kinky thing I have seen is maybe a bit of leather, loose rope, or tape over the mouths of the models. The photographers skills are okay, not too many extreme close ups or extremely similiar photos that make the average of about 100 way too large.

I suppose they are okay to add to a collection years ago but right now at this price and the resolution, this site should be avoided. They do offer quite a bit of models that I have not seen on the wide range of ladyboy sites there are today but they are primarily femboys and/or not ready for the prime time sites just yet. With a decent amount of models at 180-200 but these are guesstimated with quite a few repeat in later sets, it might seem tempting with the sheer amount offered. However, as stated before, the majority are not the quality stars you will get in the more recent site. Plus, if you are familiar with the site captain outrageous, these models and content are greatly similar in content.

The videos are extremely bad. It looks like they wanted to make this a part of the site in the later stages of the site but they just could not hang. They are almost all less than 10 minutes and extremely grainy displaying masterbation. There are a total of 33 videos varying in res size with only 5 at the higher res.

The site was probably a great site at least 4-5 years ago with quick updates. However, the site is dead and they are still charging the same and advertising as updating still. Therefore, this site should be avoided unless you really want some older, different photo sets to add to the drive

05-03-09  11:33am

Replies (0)
Visit Ladyboy Gloryhole

Ladyboy Gloryhole

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of Thai ladyboys engaging in masturbation, blowjobs, and sex in a bathroom with a gloryhole. Also, plenty of TS/Guy sex or straight masturbation scenes.
- No DRM.
- Updates at once or twice a week but the updates are misleading (see cons).
- Videos look great at 1280 X 720 resolution at ~4,000 kbps. Overall, they are doing great job in the video department.
- Pictures look well enough with a non-intrusive watermark and most available via zip at 1280 X 720 resolution. However, some scenes are considered bonus/quickies and will only have videos.
- The models are overall more professional looking than what you get on most ladyboy sites. Most of these models have transitioned for a long time.
- There is usually a small and somewhat humorous description of the scene. Some may find it pointless but others may like it.
Cons: - TBP states $35 for the site but I got it at $29.95. $35 seems a bit high for this site.
- The site name is misleading in the fact that not all content updated on the regular schedule involves a gloryhole. Meaning, the site updates about twice a week but it may not even be one gloryhole scene.
- Regular updates that do not involve the gloryhole which is ~50% of the overall material may or may not have photos to download or even view.
- Site design is what you get in the tour. There are basically no changes in the members section and it is quite sub-standard for a new site. The material is easy to find but it a boring site in general when it comes to design.
- No model index in the design and sometimes the models' names are different from most sites if you recognize them.
- "Next Updates" section is supposed to show the next 3 updates but it has not changed since I was a member. It may update later but it just shows laziness from the webmaster/s in my opinion.
Bottom Line: This site is awesome in the fact that I have yet to see a gloryhole scene involving ladyboys on a website, let alone a site that dedicates itself to showcasing this content. However, the site falls short in this promise by updating plenty of what should be regular updates on this content with scenes of sex and solo masturbation. But, if you can get past the fact that you are not going to get a gloryhole scene every update then you may be pleasantly surprised. Why? because these other scenes are actually well done if you like hardcore and solo masturbation.

The videos are well done and provide adaquete lighting with well done camera work. The settings are basically the same involving what appears to be the same bed for the sex and masturbation scenes and the same overall look for the gloryhole scenes. The gloryhole may have different or same writing in seperate scenes but the overall look is similar. In the gloryhole scenes, the model usually starts off with masturbation when the stunt cock comes through the hole. Usually, the model will give a blowjob and then have sex doggy style with the stunt cock either cumming from sex or the usual BJ/HJ cum on to face/tits routine. However, a great addition to the scene is the fact that after this the model will usually masturbate to orgasm as well and provide a cumshot of herself as well. As far as the sex scenes, they mostly involve a man (usually the same guy) and a ladyboy but sometimes two ladyboys. They are quite standard in terms of sex scenes with the man usually being the top. I don't recall seeing him bottom for a scene. Also, as well as the solo scenes, you get the standard lay on bed with masturbation to cumshot scene usually resulting on the stomach. Overall, the videos are the bread n' butter of the site and I believe they are doing them right.

The photos seem to me to just be like a bonus. They are well enough but not all scenes have them. Plus, they could be bigger for a site starting off. The lighting is alright but it does not appear to be as clear as they could be if they are proper photos. I'm still debating if these are vid caps or proper photography based on the overall quality of them. However, at least pictures are provided if you enjoy them.

The site appears to be doing some right things mixed with some wrong things. Therefore, resulting in mixed feelings by me and giving the site an average score. The videos look great and I liked the video scenes a lot. The models are extremely sexy and some of the super star ladyboys make an appearance. However, I did not like that not all content when it came to the regular updates involved a gloryhole. These other scenes are marketed as 'bonus' material but they are updated more than the gloryhole material. I think the overall vision of the site is different than what they are marketing as which could have been fixed from the beginning. However, the site has some good stuff and I could recommend a one time visit if you enjoy hardcore.

01-19-10  04:18pm

Replies (0)
Visit Ladyboy Gold

Ladyboy Gold

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of Ladyboys from Thailand in stripping, masterbation, and hardcore scenes.
- No DRM Protection.
- No Download Limit.
- Updates about twice a week with both a photo shoot and video shoot.
- Newer videos starting around mid June '09 are offered in higher resolution but also lower (WMV: 1280 X 720, 3128 kbps; 720 X 406, 4128 kbps; 480 X 270, 3128 kbps; 426 X 240, 2128 kbps)
- Picture sets starting in mid June '09 are offered in 2000 X 1333 resolution with a non-intrusive watermark, sets before that are in 1600 X 1067. Available in zip format but there is a twist (Info in Cons).
- Plenty of extras including a great guide to hotspot bars in Thailand with lots of info, an Amateurs section including 69 photo sets of other ladyboys not featured on site, and about 200 extra photo sets of shemales from the Americas.
- 'Casual' section including Ladyboys in their own enviornment including pics and videos of them just doing anything on the streets, bars, or pageants.
Cons: - Zip format are only available to download after a one month stay with the site.
- Site is set up a bit different in terms of models and updating. Meaning, the site specializes in showcasing a smaller model base with a large amount of content instead of showcasing a large model base with maybe one or two sets or scenes. May be a downfall for people looking for a huge model base.
- With that said above, make sure you check out the preview of the models displayed and be interested in them because that's all you get.
- Older videos before mid June '09 are below average in terms of quality of clarity and resolution (WMV and Real Player formats, Highest WMV format: 640 X 480, 1017 kbps). Believe me, these videos clarity are horrendous and is extremely unfortunate.
- The site, starting June '09, started to add more models than the original 8 but none since then have been updated in the original 8. It would be great to see the original models in the new higher res photos and videos.
Bottom Line: For starters, I have some information about the site and how they are set up which is new starting around mid June of '09. Before, the site featured about 8 models but only a limited amount of content was available for these models. Then, as the site updated, more and more of these same models' content were updated. However, this was old material presented as new. Obviously, this format is prospective from a business point of view, while it is bad for the customer. But, the site has a new format. They made all this older material available now upon joining and have started to increase their featured models and updating them in higher quality for both the photos and videos. Currently, there are now 16 different models and keep the same motto in terms of updating a small amount of models with a large amount of content.

Ladyboy Gold starts off quite exciting when you first join but hits some rocks on the road after awhile. The first being, the fact that you have to stay for two consecutive months before you can download the photo set zips. This is regrettable because the site features more photo sets than videos and they are done pretty good. The photos are well done in terms of professionalism. They are well shot, well lit, differ in dress, and change locations. Plus, these photos display various of activities including pose and undressing, food play, masterbation, and hardcore. This is where the bulk of the good content is with the older content because the older videos are just downright bad.

The older videos before the change to higher qualities in mid June '09 are borderline unwatchable in terms of clarity. However, the camera work and content is not bad at all with both the older stuff and newer stuff. The content includes mostly masterbation and hardcore scenes. The older stuff tends to display a lot of undressing without masterbation, dancing, and blowjobs. The newer scenes display much more masterbation and hardcore, sometimes doing both in just one scene. Most of the time these models cum during masterbation but not every time. Plus, the hardcore scenes tend to be shot where the male models face cannot be seen. So, most of the hardcore stuff is POV angles or when the model is on top, the males head is cut out. Being mostly POV, make sure you like this type of content for hardcore when joining. The new videos look pretty good in terms of clarity but I have seen better. However, they are an extremely large imrovement from before and with a build up of these over time and if they update the older models with these, they might even top the photography.

Ladyboy Gold does some things right and some things bad. In terms of extras, they offer plenty more than most Ladyboy sites. The hotspot with info and pics on the bars was a great addition. The renovation of the site has added an extreme amount of points but the wait to download zips, no forum, maybe no updating of older models, and bad videos in the past make the site wishy washy.

07-08-09  10:48am

Replies (2)
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of mostly Thai TS models but also other Asian models doing mostly solo masturbation but hardcore and stripping as well.
- Updates once a week but with 5 models showcasing usually a video and photoshoot each.
- No DRM.
- Videos are quite good in quality with newest ones averaging at 1280 X 720 with ~ 2,500 kbps or 640 X 480 with ~2,000 kbps. These are common for files between 2006 to present. Years lower are available in parts and avi or rm only.
- Streaming is now available.
- Photography is professional with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Nice site design with easy enough navigation.
- Search features that appear accurate with the option to add tags for yourself to find files quicker.
- Voting system and comment area for models and content.
- Active forum for communication and discussion.
- Extra comic section for entertainment.
- Coming soon section to see what updates are about to happen for the month.
- Girl of the month feature for 'hotter' models.
Cons: - Photo resolution is still low with newest images updating at ~1280 X 800. If the site went up to a more updated res at about 1600 or higher the site could go in to the 90's for me. However, the photography is still good but is in a low resolution.
- As with most sites that have been around a long time, quality diminishes around 2005 and lower. There appears to be no plans to revamp this material so it is what it is.
- Price can be considered quite high at $35 but can be discounted through a ticket system.
- Some videographers/photographers are a lot better than others. Therefore, some content may be more lacking than others but this is all opinion.
- A lot of ladyboy sites have contact information for models but this site does not. This does not bother me but it may for others.
Bottom Line: Ladyboy-Ladyboy is a grooby site that contains all sorts of Asian ladyboys but mostly Thai. However, there is an honest attempt to create a mix which is almost unheard of with a site showcasing ladyboys. The model selection is plenty and range in features from the classic femboy to all out post ops. Plus, another great thing is the site has been around awhile and many models return, so it's almost like their transformation is documented as their looks change. Overall, the site has a lot of content and a huge model selection.

The videos are good quality if you get them at the right year. Mostly all videos from 2006 and up are available via full scene in different qualities. The footage captured is usually a strip to masturbation scene. However, this site gets many more points from me because almost every update showcases a cumshot which the other Grooby sites kinda stray away from with all their updates. Meaning, this site features way more cumshots from models than the other sites from the company. The settings are usually located on a bed in either a hotel or home and the lighting is fine. However, the location rarely changes so get used to beds. Plus, there is sometimes quite a bit of chitter chatter and groping from the videographer. A big no-no for me when it comes to videos but this is not the main vision of the whole content. Meaning, most of the videos do not feature this. However, it is present. Also, there are quite a few hardcore scenes involving mostly TS on TS models which can be quite hot. They are not updated every time but they do come quite often. Overall, the site gives a nice mix of content for offer.

The photography is well off but the res is way too low for a site in 2010. But, I cannot knock the images for being bad. They are usually shoots taken around the same time of the video. So, most are shoots that accompany the videos. Meaning, the sets locations and outfits are the same but they are not vid caps. The images are all available to download via zip for every set at one resolution.

The site offers plenty but the price can still be seen as high in my opinion. However, the videographers here tend to focus more on the climax of the scene (cumshot) which is great news in comparison to the other sites within this company. There is a wide variety of types of models and many of the superstars as well as unknowns are featured here. Plus, the site contains plenty of extra features that makes navigation a lot easier because the model index is so large. Many might complain that they update everything on the one day of the week but at least it is more than one photoshoot and video per week. Honestly, they should get the resolution of the images higher and keep the same quality while stabilizing the resolution of the video updates when it comes to which will come out by creating a standard. Then, the site would probably get in to the 90's in my opinion. I'd say check the site out once if you are a fan of ladyboys, for sure.

01-06-10  12:07pm

Replies (2)
Visit Ladyboy Player

Ladyboy Player

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive material
-No DRM Protection
- High quality video available in two formats (.WMV, 1280 X 720, 5487 kbps and .MPEG, 848 X 480, Medium quality)
- High quality pictures (1360 X 910) and lower quality pictures (850 X 569) available in .zip format
- Updates are once or twice a week
- Hits all niches of ladyboy qualities, from totally fake silicone fems to femboys
- Mix of scenes, not just solos but hardcore and bj's
- Bonus video and pictures section
- Simple design with easy navigation
- Great search system with great tags
- Stellar guide to Thailand's ladyboy district
- Average to fast connection speed
- Free loyalty bonus sites after 1 month of subscription
Cons: - Older videos are only in medium .MPEG quality
- Pictures are stills of video scenes
- Inactive forum
- 2-4 GB download limit (more explained in bottom line)
- Only POV camera work in hardcore and bj scenes
- Descriptions of videos can vary in humor and can be quite clever but is a bit like reading a high school girl's blog
Bottom Line: Well, I can pretty much account for this site being a breath of fresh air. The content is different than what is usually seen and the concept is fresh with the genre being from the POV of the camera man (or in fantasy land, you). The design is easy on the eyes and the navigation is very simple to find what you want. It includes a great search with over 20 tags and a model index to get what you want quickly.

The videos are in great quality if you pick .wmv and vary in the quality of the content. I can pretty much say a lot will be happy in the fact that there is a lot more hardcore content that is seen than on most ladyboy sites. Almost every scene the ladyboy gives the camera man a bj and occasionally there is sex. However, this is not a total hardcore site so don't come in here thinking you will get a huge amount. Also, almost every video the ladyboy cums but there is not a lot of cumshots from the camera man, even when he's getting a bj or has sex. This can be a burden to some who wants to see the ladyboy get a popshot from someone other than themselves. The camera work is okay with some good closeups and direction (even though he states his Thai is horrible). This sometimes comes back to haunt him leading to just a ladyboy sitting still in a solo scene on a bed. Overall, this is the bread n' butter of the site, they are above average videos and the quality is superb. There are currently 113 videos with about the first 15 being in only lower .MPEG quality.

The pictures are just stills of the video episodes and this always makes me give a site lowered points. Videos are great, but a lot of people want some exclusive photos that are not just stills. Being in some decent quality, this would be a great section of this site if this was taken in to account.

The bonus stuff is not bad. It includes 33 extra galleries of ladyboy photo shoots that were done before this site was up. This includes some superstars which is a great addition. There are also 10 extra movie scenes that are approved from Shemax that seem to be quite random, from dvd's and other sites.

While finding the content is easy and great, getting it is quite annoying. There is a download limit that is not stated anywhere of supposably 4 GB a day. However, after many dealings with the support, I fail to believe this. I downloaded up to the limit and got booted. I waited 24 hours and downloaded again. I made it to 2.5 GB and didn't understand what was going on. Support emailed me back my usage and it was all wishy washy, saying I downloaded on days I didn't even log in. Therefore, I think their limits reset at certain times that are unknown or the limit is not right. Therefore, I download between 2 to 3 GB's on certain days. This is very disapointing and will be a huge burden once the site gets a bit larger.

All in all, this site is above average. It caters to every niche within the ladyboy genre. Recommended for everyone in to the ladyboy scene who may enjoy POV action.

03-19-09  10:04am

Replies (0)
Visit Ladyboy Pussy

Ladyboy Pussy

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content of about 20 post-op Ladyboy models in mostly solo masturbation and stripping but some hardcore as well.
- No DRM.
- One photo and one video update per week.
- Latest videos are high def at 1280 X 720, ~3,175 kbps. Scenes before that vary at about 720 X 540, ~1025 kbps.
- Latest photo shoots are available via zip download and highest are at 2000 X 1333 resolution. In fact, I think all sets are available in this format.
- New models don't come often but when they do, they are usually top of the line. There is a nice variance in the models as well, skinny with small tits, skinny with large tits, or a bit thicker with different attributes.
- These are some authentic looking models, if you are looking for prime post-op models which will probably fool anyone; this is the site.
- Price is fair if using discount but a bit on the high side if not using it. Be sure to use it to join.
- Supposedly, you can contact models for chat but I'm not sure if this feature is up to date.
Cons: - Small model selection. Like the sister site for pre-op Ladboys, Ladyboy Gold, this site focuses on featuring one or two models for a month or two and then moving on to a few more. Therefore, this results in lots of content for one model but a smaller selection. So, take a look at the featured models and like them before joining!
- A minor flaw, but some of the re-constructive surgeries are better than others. It is what it is, but a bad surgery CAN ruin the model in a way.
- The site mentions you can email the models but a forum for special shoots or webcam shows would make the site a bit more 'intimate'.
- Some videos can be cut short. However, seeing the same 'in and out' routine with a dildo or striptease can get repetitive; a happy medium would be awesome. It just seems a video is either too long or too short.
- Bonus content is not really a bonus, just filler to make the site seem better. Old candids, decent bar info, and non-exclusive videos just make it all pointless IMHO.
Bottom Line: Ladyboy Pussy is one of a kind in its genre. I've seen a few featured post-op TS models on a few sites but never a site dedicated to only these models. The end result of most of these transitions really result in some stunners! Besides the fact that surgery to this day cannot re-construct a perfect snatch, I would bet some good money that anyone would not know the majority of these models were transsexuals, especially with clothes on and/or in photos/videos.

The content is really solo model focused with the majority of the content resulting in striptease and solo toy play. The content with a male involved is usually a handjob but some penetration is present. However, the focus is primarily solo stuff. Even a few post-op on post-op action is present, but it's all in the minority.

The lighting is well done and the outfits are amazing. They change from cosplay type outfits, dinner date dresses, and even just regular 'going out' clothes that the models would wear. They really spend a good amount of time making these models look pretty and it results in some credible content. If you are looking for photos, these really shine here. Photoshop is little to not used, the images are large, vary, and look crisp. I really think the site is photography based because the videos are a bit average in comparison. However, the videos are not sub-par by any means the grand scheme of things, but they are clearly not as good as the photos.

The largest quirk I have is the model selection. I know these kind of models and of this caliber are probably far and few but the way the site updates irks me. While the small selection is a bit disappointing, it is how they update. For example, old models are rarely brought back for an update and new models content all comes basically at one time period. Once the models content is showcased, say goodbye to the model. It's a shame because some models I loved and I knew I'd never see how they look now or later...or ever again. Many may enjoy a smaller based model selection with tons of updates of one model which isn't bad if they brought old ones back every once in awhile.

Anyways, overall the site is top notch in the technical aspect, model selection, and change of settings/clothing. But, I have some quirks with the updating scheme and model selection quantity. Also, the site has this feeling of just not being 'intimate' enough. As in, the site just has no personal edge to it. There is no communication between members, models are not personalized, and members just seem to have no part of anything in the site; besides viewing the site's content. However, this is quality content in the specified niche. Not all sites need the 'intimate' qualities to succeed and I don't think the 'lack there of' breaks this site. It may improve an already above average site and that's all. This site surely creates a standard if any other sites want to specialize in post-ops only and deserves a high score, even if it could be better in a few ways.

06-08-11  08:33pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.58 seconds.