Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit All Over 30

All Over 30 (0)

GCode (101) 04-01-09  01:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive, Real Mature Content
- No DRM
- No Download limit
- Variance of content (Hardcore, solo, toyplay, and lesbianism)
- Photoshoots are not only video stills (they are included though)
- Above average resolution pics available in zip format with 2 sizes (1024 and 1536)
- Above average quality of videos available in 2 formats (.wmv: 640 X 480, 1089 kbps and .mpeg: 640 X 480 with higher quality, maybe around 1.5 - 2 kbps)
- Great model profiles including an original scan of the paper questionnaire they filled out
- 21 other video feeds including 6 HD feeds all in variance of content (from hardcore to solo) that are not in the mature niche
- Model index and search functions
- Updates 1-2 times a day with an average of 4 photo sets plus a movie (could be a hindrance in my opinion, more in bottom line)
- Active forum
- Bonus updates which are photosets from karups older women about every 3-4 days
- Simple design and easy to browse
Cons: - Niche makes it harder to find extremely hot models (more in bottom line)
- While videos are above average, they could be better with at least 1280 4kbps or widescreen
Bottom Line: I have rented a lot of Mature dvds and they almost never hit the niche correctly. This site, really does hit it right. The majority if not all, are over 30 and you can tell. However, true mature sites are scarce and so are very good models and I feel the need to update constantly has put a damper on some of the models here. While the majority are natural and of age which vary in where they live (from USA to Europe), there are quite a lot that are just not attractive. I mean, they were probably not even very attractive in their teens or 20's or so on. But, they are truly mature and this is obviously a plus and a con at the same time. By the way, don't expect those models from those 'milf' sites you usually see, these models are mostly all natural and are actual older women showcasing their true mature bodies.

The videos are great when it comes to content. They display most models in a hardcore scene but you almost always get them in a solo fingering scene or toyplay which can be downloaded in full scenes or scene clips (at least, the newer ones). While the quality could be better for this day n' age, they are alright. The videos can range from an amatuerish feel to being done professionally and I have noticed a lot of videos the camera man has traveled to their actual homes for the scene. There are some 'fetish' videos which might showcase feet or another area, but nothing gets too out of the ordinary. Plus, there are interview videos as well for almost every model if you are in to these. As of the date of this review, they currently have 1142 Videos.

The photo sets are great here. They showcase sets that are exclusive and are not just video stills. This means, these photo sets are good softcore sets showcasing their bodies that are not in video format as well. Plus there are plenty of these. They all vary in a type of 'costume' for the model which include showing them in an home enviornment doing simple chores and undressing. Another type is the "9 to 5 lady" which is usually the model in office wear and usually by a computer or phone. There are shoots of the models in regular attire that they would just wear out to a mall and they strip. Then, there are the "Elegent ladies" which displays the model in a nice dress and strip. Currently, as of this date, there are 381,690 photos.

This site really has a lot going for them. I enjoy the site a lot and always look forward to the new content. The real reason I just can't give them a higher score is the attractiveness of a lot of the models. Don't get me wrong, in the mix I have found A LOT of models that I love. But, when a site has a lot of less attractive models, I cannot give it the highest. But, they do stay true to the niche which is absolutely great. Plus, they do update a lot which will cater to most. However, I feel that if this place becomes a bit more discriminate in their models (even if it lowers updates) they will be the top of all mature sites. They are in the top 3 atm for su

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


messmer (137) Nice and thorough review, GCode. Thanks for the information regarding the video quality. Reading between the lines I guess they're not quite up to "Anilos" standards yet.

If I may be allowed one observation, though, when it comes to the attractiveness (or lack thereof) of some of the models. I used to belong to a binaries usenet group before spam took over and invariably someone would speak up in connection with a posting and say,(not to me): "Can't you post anything better than these pictures of old frumps", while another would say about the same model: "Hey, thanks, for posting sets of this woman, she's been a favorite of mine for a long time!" I don't think a site can be judged by the attractiveness of its models when tastes are so dramatically different.

Just a casual observation accompanied by a mea culpa because I did the same thing. You may have noticed that I gave the site a slightly lower score than you, and in my case it was because of the terrible quality of the picture sets some of the photographers put out.

Imagine my surprise when one of my most despised photographers turned out to be someone else's highly praised favorite! :-)

04-01-09  04:05pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #1 - messmer :

I suppose you are right but this site has some downright hags :) I am quite open to all women and I even don't mind some more of the 'ugly' women going at it or you could even say plain janes. This site has a lot of beautiful older women and plain janes. However, I lump these two categories in terms of attractiveness together because I think they both have great qualities that most can agree on. I am not trying to sound superficial but I understand that concept of others finding certain qualities better than others. As I think I said in a post on the forum, I think the overall consensus of men know what an attractive woman is and can agree on what a total hag is. Were talking about porn here and I'm not gonna get in to personality cause that's a whole diff concept. For example, a plain jane can be totally hot to me cause she is totally down to earth and a playboy bunny can be totally disgusting to me because she's a downright bitch. However, in porn, I wanna see the playboy bunny and not the plainer jane if I have a choice. And by looking at anilos, I see this concept being put in to the place. That site looks great as far as the content is and I think they are on a great pace to give this place a run for their money. So I guess what I'm trying to say is if the standards were lifted just a little, I'd prolly give this a low score in the 90's, maybe it's opinion based but it's just how I feel. However, I prolly would deduct points if they went out and got these 20 something 'milfs' I see on all these other 'mature' sites. Maybe, if they would just not worry about updating so much, they can find better quality models. And by the way, I don't mind a 'lesser' attractive model being thrown in to the mix every once in awhile, just not daily :)
04-01-09  04:57pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - GCode :

You're right about those twenty-aomething MILFs, they should never be in the mature category. And I do agree that there are some downright "hags" on this site. But not that many .. not to me, anyway. :-)
04-01-09  06:15pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

To each it's own :) Thanks for the comments on the review! If you have any other questions about the site let me know.
04-01-09  07:18pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - GCode :

Thanks GCode, I was a member of this site only recently so my biggest and only question was: how is the video quality now? I know I was very disappointed at the time of my subscription and after a while only downloaded the interviews in order to get to know the models a bit better. I'd be back in a flash if they would upgrade their videos to "Anilos" quality. Everything else I held forth on above was just idle chitchat! :-)
04-01-09  07:30pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.