Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : WeeWillyWinky (88)  

Feedback:   All (261)  |   Reviews (46)  |   Comments (35)  |   Replies (180)

Other:   Replies Received (197)  |   Trust Ratings (52)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
Cons: - Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
Bottom Line: I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.

Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.

There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.

Elvis and me, we'd be mates.

A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.

I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.

Follow-Up:
The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.

09-23-07  09:08pm

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit 18 Pussy Club

18 Pussy Club
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good-sized archive of attractive Euro models. I counted 262 models, some with several sets.
- All pic sets zipped.
- Pics of average to good quality, ranging from 821x1232 to 1067x1600.
- Fair amount of average-quality video, both hc and solo, with solo prevailing. All vids I dowloaded are 720x480.
- Member forum.
- Model list and various option for viewing it.
Cons: - Dead site. Last update 9/08.
- No search function.
- Ads for other sites on every page, with every click, slowing things down.
- Bonus feeds are the usual junk which only serve to remind you that you are not at a top-end site.
- It seems the majority of models do not have any vids.
Bottom Line: Yet another Euro-babe site which features some really cute girls in hum-drum, run-of-the-mill pic sets and vids. I was lured to the site via TGPs because I enjoy the cutesy, skinny-girl look, though I must say this gets boring pretty quickly here. The teeny-bopper factor is in full swing, with stuffed animals in a high percentage of sets and teeny-ish settings. A few of the solo vids featured the model playing with a stuffed animal on her bed throughout.

That being said, there is plenty of hc here, but nothing interesting and nothing to get excited about.

I wish the owners of dead sites would say as much on the welcome page. It is dishonest to claim that updates are coming soon when this is clearly not the case. I also wish that bonus feeds would disappear. They only reinforce the sense that you are not in Pornville's upper strata. Even more bizarre is the promise of *more* feed junk accruing with longer membership, which is insane being that a week here or less will be all that one requires to take everything on the site proper.

For young-looking, skinny models, in more or less teeny-style, you will be much better off at Nubiles, or YoungPorn. This is just anemic, characterless product for the most part. Not to impugn the models themselves, who have nothing to do with the site producers' laziness and lack of effort.

Unless you really have a penchant for cute, skinny euro-teenies in little cotton undies, don't bother.

12-14-09  04:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit Abigail 18

Abigail 18
(0)

75.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Abigail is bee-yoootiful.
- 5 bonus sites, yielding a good amount of content for price over-all.
- Abigail's tush.
- Good pic size (1700x1200 in newer sets)
- Abigail's breasts.
- Abigail's knee-caps, ankles, and spinal column.
Cons: - No zips.
- Videos are negligible.
- Sets are dreadfully monotonous.
- Most of the best pics are available at various TGPs for free.
- The site is anemic and seems to be strictly a commercial endeavor.
Bottom Line: My falling for this site was the result of developing a hopeless crush on Abigail and hoping - against all reason and totally contrary to experience - that I would be delighted and swept away once I got inside. This did not happen. I was mainly interested in seeing her videos, which, unfortunately, are nearly useless. Note: if you read a review of Abi's site at Porn Inspector you'll see that they claim the vids come in at 2620k and are 720x480! This is totally untrue. I didn't save any vids but I believe they are about 1100k tops and are not as big as PI claims. Not only that, the vids I checked are set to cheesy "music" and if there is any other audio it is drowned out by this semi-organized series of sounds which is sometimes, and purely for the sake of convenience, refered to as "music".

The pics, at least in newer sets, are decent (1700x1200 app.) and with 80 or so sets there are plenty of them. Unfortunately, not much effort was put into making the sets varied or interesting beyond the fact that a beautiful girl is in them. Cutesy is the order of the day, and the sets follow a predictable pattern: fully clothed, lift shirt, remove shirt, take off shorts, kneel, tug panties and show crack, show more crack, show full tush, fully naked.

The pics are soft and only rarely do you get a decent glimpse of Abi's precious peach, but that's alright since we all know what it looks like anyway, and besides, soft is what I was expecting.

There are five bonus sites on offer, all nearly identical to Abigail's: Lovely Anne, Lovely Irene, Erica's Fantasies, Jenny Reid, and Lovely Tera. All these girls are knock-outs, particularly Jenny Reid, but I simply couldn't get too excited over any of the material, for the simple reason that a good portion of it is available for free all over Netville, and the videos are mostly short, mid-quality yawnfests.

This, folks, is pure product with little or no personality. This network of sites is a money-making enterprise and while I have no problem at all with capitalism, I would like a wee bit more originality, more character, for my money, more high-end content, and less cookie-cutter material. Thanks.

P.S: Abigail is truly gorgeous. She deserves better.

08-29-08  07:30pm

Replies (1)
Review
4
Visit Angelitas.net

Angelitas.net
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Excellent picture quality
- Fidelity to niche
-Site is run by a woman and thus avoids silly and degrading terminology; plus the site includes pics and video of herself as well as sisters and friends.
- Good amount of content which seems to be increasing at a strong and consistent pace, including video, which is clear and of high quality.
- Nice attention to (as in, NOT a focus on)various fetishes, such as upskirts, feet, and even lactation.
- Simple but efficient navigation.
Cons: - A good amount of average-looking models. This is not a problem for me, but could be for some.
Bottom Line: The lovely woman who runs this site is obviously dedicated to boosting the amount of content on her site as well as keeping the quality high and maintaining her original standard of focusing on "real" Latinas. The models range from very plain to absolutely stunning, and all of them seem new to modeling and genuinely modest and yet they seem to enjoy what they're doing. All of this is a good thing if you are into amateurs, and especially amateur Latinas.

While the models are amateurs the photography is polished and professional, sharp, and completely untouched. The content is softcore: ranging from lingerie, panties, stockings, to full (and I do mean FULL) nudity. There are many multiple-girl sets and some seemingly reluctant but playful forays into lesbianism.

What I like most about this site is its integrity. It delivers what it promises and makes no claim to doing anything but that. You won't feel tricked or cheated, just pleasantly warm and welcome. Hardcore fans need not bother with Angelitas. But if you like to admire female beauty in all of its natural splendor, and particularly the dark-eyed, exotic beauty of Latin women, then this could be the site for you.

07-27-07  12:11am

Replies (2)
Review
5
Visit Asian Panty Peeks

Asian Panty Peeks
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good looking models.
- High-quality pics.
- Vids look OK.
- Interesting style, lots of mirrors, costume-play.
- Regular updates.
Cons: - Navigation is terrible to practically non-existent.
- Use of the term "Lolita" in at least one set title, which I believe is considered unacceptable nowadays and should be.
- Sets are poorly organized and contain tons of the same shots over and over, some turned sideways, some turned upside down, just to beef up the quantity of pics and to tire your patience for no good reason.
Bottom Line: I need more characters to do justice to how poorly put together this site is. Navigation? What's that? You have what seems to be two main pages with thumbs leading to the galleries. Both pages are over-long. None of the galleries are numbered. There are no model lists or browse features whatsoever. Vids are offered on the right-hand sidebar of one of the main gallery pages.

All pic sets are contained on one page each, with big thumbnails. Some sets have over 200 pics. Every set I looked at so far is made up of a few choice views of the model repeated over and over and over, with tiny variations. These sets could be trimmed by seventy percent and you wouldn't lose anything. They need someone who knows how to coordinate photo sets.

To add to the tedium someone has decided to have each pic open in a new window. Maybe I'm just an idiot but I can't see how to change this. Each pic has to be closed out in order to view another one, unless you want to keep a thousand windows open. To make things even worse, each set is numbered identically: "b_001" to b_ whatever". Always a "b", never a different letter.

This site is way softcore and caters more to the voyeur than the panty/lingerie lover. "Peeks" is what you get most of the time. There is a truckload of tease and very little pay-off, though there are a few sets which contain full nudity. The quality of some of the pics is offset by the sheer tedium caused by this site's lack of organization and concern for the customer.

Follow-Up:
upped the score to 70.

09-05-07  08:09pm

Replies (3)
Review
6
Visit ATK Archives

ATK Archives
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Enormous amount of material
- Great search options
- Huge variety of model types
- Categorized sections
- Easy to navigate
Cons: - Much of the material is dated, with small pics and grainy video quality, but that's to be expected since this is an Archive.
- Vid clips are too small and scattered in a sometimes confusing manner.
Bottom Line: There is so much content on all of the ATK sites that even with a fast connection you simply can't get to all of it without an extended membership, and even if you had one for several months I doubt you could get through all of it, since they update so frequently. All you can do is dive in, come up with some kind of systematic approach to consuming the material, and hope you're not missing something.

Because of the amount of content, it would be nice if ATK had a member forum so people could give each other a heads-up on certain models or videos which are outstanding, or advice to one another about finding what we like. For instance, if you like panties, search for R. Williams; white cotton panties, R. Field; downblouse, upskirts, and panties, Marco P; in-your-face butt-shots, LIL, and so on. Each photographer has his/her own particular bent and style.

Twenty-five dollars is a drop in the bucket for this kind of feast. Don't under-estimate the Archives. There is a huge amount of excellent material here.

Follow-Up:
96 was too high. Always thought so, finally fixed it.

07-27-07  11:45pm

Replies (4)
Review
7
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics
(1)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge amount of material
- Most pics and vids are of high quality, though you won't find the same level of quality in the earliest material.
- Great variety of model types, within exotic niche.
- Hardcore and softcore sections clearly distinguished and seperate from one another
- Model bios, rating system, zips, and easy navigation, with primary links remaining on the left sidebar.
Cons: OK, there are cons, though I really hate to pick a nit with this company:

- Many "Best of the ATK archive" sets are in among the newer sets. Why not keep the old sets in the archive? Plus, some of these "Best of" sets are not very good.

- A lot of the sets here are from the "Natural and Hairy" site. Why not keep the sites seperate? If I come from the Hairy site to the Exotics site, I don't really want to see more hair. I might be tired of hair.

- Vids section could be better organized.
Bottom Line: The pics here are categorized according to ethnicity, nationality, and other personal criteria, and then cross-categorized by type of content, such as softcore/hardcore, feet, watersports, pregnant, toys, upskirts & panties, outdoors, action, blowjobs, etcetera. I'm a member here currently and plan on staying until I've investigated each category which interests me thoroughly.

The models range from very plain to drop dead gorgeous. The list of photographers is almost as impressive as the list of models, and each has his or her own distinctive approach. The search options are exhaustive. For instance, if you're looking for a skinny Asian girl with braces who doesn't shave and does watersports, you just might find one!

The videos need better organization and the three minute clips can be frustrating. The newer vids come with a small vid-cap to give you a better idea of the content, and the newer vids are of exceptional quality. Hardcore and softcore vids are in seperate sections, which I believe is a new feature.

I have no doubt at all that this is the best place to come for exotic models.

07-28-07  09:13pm

Replies (3)
Review
8
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tons of content.
- True to the hairy niche. But see BL.
- Zips, but see cons.
- A few, but limited, video DL options.
- Good search function as with all ATK sites.
- Soft and hardcore content separated. This is an excellent advantage if, like me, you are sick of toys and/or masturbation stuff.
- Models run the gamut from 18 to nearly elderly, and from gorgeous to homely.
- Newer vids are offered in one big chunk rather than the standard 3 minute slices.
- Pics can be viewed in a variety of sizes. This is good for people with slow connections.
Cons: - Zipped sets broken into several bits. This is too much silliness and simply not worth the trouble.
- Pic size, on newer sets, seems to be app. 1000x1500 max. ATK has lagged in this area for a few years and it makes me wonder why.
- I would like to enable plain image links and have this work throughout my entire session without having to select that option for each set. This is an annoyance.
Bottom Line: I'm a huge fan of ATK and have been at the hairy site about four times, even though I'm not really into hair. As with all of this company's sites there is a spectacular amount of content on offer, and enlisting a long list of photographers keeps the material from devolving into a boring sameness which is the bane of a lot of other sites.

I have no problem with the "natural" niche at all, but this site borders on fetishism, as some of these models are so hairy they look simply preposterous. This being said they do keep the "scary hairy" models in a separate section.

I think the quality of the material needs to match the quantity of it at this point, but this is not happening.

The newest vid I downloaded (4/08) is 640x480, 1048 Kbps. It looks fine but not nearly as good as a great many other sites which are moving into HD. Some of the vids show higher bit rates - often significantly higher - but when played there is no significant increase in clarity or quality. I can't play the Quicktime vids (for some reason) but the file sizes for those are only a few megs larger than the WMV files, so I somehow doubt that the quality is much better.

As for pics, 1000x1500 is a good-sized pic but many sites are going much larger. The main strength here is the variety of photographers. Alexander B's material alone would be worth the price of admission. His sets are just stunning sometimes, even if the models aren't.

Recommended, but the quality could (should) be improved.

05-16-08  09:41pm

Replies (3)
Review
9
Visit ATK Premium

ATK Premium
(2)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - A lot of content up, both pics and vids.
- Zips.
- Very attractive models for the most part.
- Good navigation, categorization (solo/artistic/etc..), search function, ala ATK style.
Cons: - ATK has always had a somewhat confusing way of organizing the vid section, and this site is no exception.
- Emphasis is decidedly on the glamourous/artsy side of things which makes the 'A' in ATK kind of non-applicable here.
- Pic size decent (avg 1000 X 1500) but still not where it should be for a "Premium" site.
- Vids look decent (avg 640 X 480, 1200-2000+ kbps) but not as good as they should for a "Premium" site.
Bottom Line: I've been to all of ATK's sites and Premium most recently. If I had to live with only one of their sites to the exclusion of all the others, Premium would be my last choice. Why is this?

Well, what we like and don't like is a subjective thing. Two things that were always appealing about ATK were Amateurs and/or Teens, which is what the 'A' and the 'T' in 'ATK' abbreviate. At Premium, the models are hardly amateurs, and despite whatever their average age might be, there is an atmosphere of maturity present which steers quite clear of "teeny-ness" in most of its usual guises. Not that this is a problem necessarily, but it does seem like a bit of a turning away from the original mission of this company.

The impression I get is that this is ATK's contribution to the genre of classy, artsy nudes made popular by sites like Met Art and Hegre's. The women are beautiful and the settings equally so. For me this makes for a certain sterility as far as the libido is concerned, which impacts ninety-five percent of why I purchase subscriptions to these kinds of websites.

While I like the more intimate aspect of some of the videos, I found a few which seemed to show nothing but a model getting her make-up applied or her hair done. I suppose some might like this (and I wouldn't mind at all for a minute or so), but it was too tedious for me. On a positive note, some of the lesbian scenes were among the best I've seen.

Recommended, but with reservations.

04-15-08  09:35am

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Boob Study

Boob Study
(0)

87.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Naturally-busty models, including some stunners
- Lots of content up
- Zipfiles for pics
- Zipped pics up to 1200x1800
- No navigation issues
- Good, clear video (640x480, 2000-3000 bitrate), though not HD
- Not heavy on toys or masturbation (con for most, probably)
Cons: - Pics in browser are smaller versions than the ones in the zipfiles
- Many vids in small chunks rather than single files
- Needs more variety of action in solo vids: too many long periods with model doing nothing but playing with her breasts.
- Someone has a tooth-brushing fetish, which is a tad strange. Many models shown brushing teeth.
Bottom Line: All in all, this is one of my favorite boob sites, and I've tried a great many of them. Most of the solo vids are silent, meaning no music and precious little blather. Some find this a con, but it's a major plus for me. I also have to say that this site features some of the sexiest women in this genre, like April O'Neil, Holly Webster, Petra, and the amazing Alina. Not to mention Arika, who might not have a beautiful face but is sheer perfection from the neck down.

There is not a great deal of HC here, but there is some. All I took was solo content. Still, I ended up with 27 gigs of video and 10 gigs of zipfiles. There is a good deal of variance in pic size, going from smallish to 1200x1800. Most of the sets I've extracted look very nice.

I would venture to say that most guys would find this site too tame, and maybe a tad silly. There is a monotony in what the models are actually doing in the vids: lots of tooth-brushing, showering, and continuous auto-booby-squeezing. For sites like this to be more interesting to the average perv as far as solo content, we need to think of getting the models to engage in a wider variety of activities. I love to watch beautiful women do mundane things so this actually isn't a huge problem for me.

I will probably join again in about six to nine months to get the updates.

09-24-09  10:00pm

Replies (4)
Review
11
Visit Brandi Belle

Brandi Belle
(1)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Site is original and unusual.
- Brandi is very cute.
- Multiple DL options.
Cons: - It might not be fair to state it here, but the trial is a rip-off.
- For every (or nearly every) vid there are links for vidcaps and "pictures". The "pictures" link simply tells you that there are no pictures available. Why do this?
- Brandi is sometimes too deadpan, too nonchalant, which makes her appear bored.
- The male participants often leave very much to be desired. They are sometimes dead bored, ugly, sleezy, or crazy.
- Vid quality (640x480/1048k) should be improved, since this is a video-only site. Vid caps are a negligible feature.
Bottom Line: I went into this site with high hopes, since I like the multiple-girl on one guy approach. The first vid I downloaded featured a tall skinny guy with big glasses getting "molested" by four or five girls in a shower room. It took at least half the video for the guy to even get it up, and he seemed totally uninvolved through-out, resulting in a complete waste of time. In another video we watch Brandi jerk some overweight guy off for about ten minutes and at the end the guy finally announces he can't come. Another complete waste of time.

I ended up downloading about twenty videos before getting bored with this site and abandoning it long before my sub expired. For this kind of thing to work well, you really need somebody like Peter North or Hubby from Wifeysworld, because, let's face it, what good is ten or twelve minutes of willy-yanking without a doozy of a climax? It's like waiting for an hour and a half in a fine restaurant and having the waitress bring you a Big Mac and an order of fries.

On the plus side, the best vid on offer features Brandi and another girl, who take turns exploring one another's naughty bits. And in case you haven't seen it, Brandi has one of the most plump and delectable naughty bits I've seen to date.

I wouldn't recommend this site except to handjob, femdom, and CFNM enthusiasts, and even then I wouldn't be surprised if they were disappointed.

07-07-08  09:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(1)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tons of content.
- Very cute models.
- Stays within the teeny niche.
- *Some* of the video content is top notch.
- Newer pics are decent at 800x1200, and there are quite a few, to say the least.
Cons: - What the hell does Seventeen mean?
- Way ! too expensive for us yanks. 40+ buckaroos.
- Choices are great, but this site overwhelms you with choices, causing navigational havoc. See BL.
- Pic size could (should) go up a notch. Older pics are just too small for the jaded collector of 2008.
- No zips
- "High" quality option for vid downloads not so high, at least for the vids I checked. In fact, at 604 kbps, it looks dismal at full screen.
- Pages take too long to load because of all the fancy but useless pic-frame borders and variously-colored backgrounds.
Bottom Line: I was turned down at first by this site but they took me on my second try. So here goes:

I'm disappointed. Main problem: the site needs Organization. Categories are a good thing, but this place is category mayhem. There are 35+ picture-gallery categories, and a few of these are split into "gallery" and "archive". Some categories have separate numbered archives. In the vid section (which is called Seventeen Cinema [I think] and requires another log-in) there are 42 categories, or "labels". The vids are taken from full-length DVDs which you can order and are not entities unto themselves. Most vids offer high and low downloads. Some offer "full", which means highest quality: 2100 kbps, 720X540. These vids look great.

For pic collectors like Willy, who has short term memory loss in spades, all these categories are too much: blondes, brunettes, redheads, wet teens, shaved teens, kinky teens, schoolgirls, highschool girls, dirty teens, anal teens, left-handed teens, vertically-challenged teens, teens who read Proust.... you get the idea. There are some great sets and tons of cute models, but while I'm browsing and clicking I keep wondering what I might be missing someplace else. There is a model directory, but each name I clicked on merely took me to a set of four or five pics: not thumbs leading to sets or vids, just pictures! What's the point of a directory if it doesn't direct you to the model's content?

I'm running low on characters. BL: save your dough, yanks.

02-07-08  11:29pm

Replies (7)
Review
13
Visit College Uniform

College Uniform
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Stays unswervingly true to the uniform niche
- Beautiful models who know how to pose
- Jana Mrazkova! Yum.
- Hi quality pics, and lots of them. 38 gallery pages plus 7 bonus pages. Pics average 1000x1500 and they weigh in at nearly one meg each.
- Zip files for pics: a must for this type of site
- frequent updates
- Member forum and responsive webmaster
- Classy site in every sense
- Inexpensive trial gives you plenty of time to peruse the content
Cons: - Vid section is still small and quality is not on par with pics: avg 770-880 kbps, 640x480
- Navigation issues: Top navigation bar not showing up most of the time for me. You will need your back button if you have the same problem
- Quite a few links not working, but webmaster will fix if notified
Bottom Line: The strength of this site lies in the photo sections, and, as with LVpanty, the only reason I didn't rate it a 90 or higher is because the video section is not on par with the quality of the pics.

A too-brief pass through the material at this site can give you the wrong impression right from the start, as it did for me. A lot of the time the picture sets are broken up into separate galleries, with fully-clothed or mostly-clothed galleries coming first and the stripping content coming afterwards. There is plenty of skin here, though the only nudity is bare breasts. The undies are sublime. Upskirts and downblouse pics abound, and this site would be nirvana to a leg-man.

Subtlety is the key word here. It's decidedly on the soft end of softcore, and it's certainly not porn, at least not by my definition; but while the photos don't necessarily excite me they still manage to impress the hell out of me, and I'm not terribly interested in uniforms.

I posted a message about a misdirecting gallery-link in the forum at College Uniform and there was a response within two hours, as well as a fix. And this was on Christmas morning, no less.

I would highly recommend this site to people who are very interested in the niche, or just people who appreciate excellent photography and beautiful women. Those looking for anything beyond what the site promises will most likely be disappointed.

12-26-07  10:00pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Cute Panty Girls

Cute Panty Girls
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content
- Some excellent video content
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024
- good bonus site on offer
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site.
Cons: - Non-exclusive material
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss.
Bottom Line: I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions.

Cute Panty Girls is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better.

Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports.

Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.

Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics.

12-19-07  06:22pm

Replies (4)
Review
15
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
(0)

95.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Top-notch videos in multiple DL options.
- Top-notch pics in variety of sizes.
- Zips for all pic sets.
- Beautiful, professional models.
- Picture sets are well-edited, not fifty shots of same pose.
- Vids can be sampled in streaming format, with two quality options.
- Model index.
Cons: - Navigation is a bit odd. You can't get to video content without seeing at least the first page of the accompanying picture set.
- Pics are hyper-glamorous, with models in full make-up, and pics seem touched-up. This could be a pro for some.
- Not a huge amount of content for the price.
- Older pics are smallish.
- Some vids contain cheesy music.
- Set backgrounds are often unappealing, with some highly questionable "art" on the walls.
Bottom Line: A lot of websites could stand to learn a great deal about customer service by perusing the DDF site. User-friendly features abound, such as pics and vids in a variety of formats, and streaming video for sampling the video prior to download. The streaming feature alone can potentially save on tons of frustration, boredom, wasted time, and wasted disk space.

I haven't seen a site with more video options. Various levels of quality in WMV, DivX, and Quicktime, plus low quality mpeg for slow connections. I opted for the 2026k, 852x480 WMV, since I can't view a bigger size, but this was very satisfactory.

The picture sets are very well-done, well-edited, and come in two to three sizes, and all zipped. My tastes do not tend toward the glamorous, and I actually prefer amateur models, but objectively speaking you would find it hard to beat this site for what it offers.

A site like this, which is willing to put in the extra work in order to make things more convenient for paying customers, makes me wonder how some of the truly lame competition can survive for very long.

I highly recommend this site, particularly for those who have a bent for busty models, but even for those who don't.

01-19-09  02:23pm

Replies (6)
Review
16
Visit Dirty Lilly

Dirty Lilly
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lilly!
- Zips for pic sets (one file, not per-page)
- Single-file video downloads, HQ offered (943kbps), options for Flash, WMV hq/lq.
- Plenty of hardcore: should be plus for hc fans
- Good amount of content for the price, and good quality
- Lilly has a great sense of humor
Cons: - Diary section updated recently, but it seems comments are removed, since there are no comments for any of the entries save one: "hot body! i want it!" My kind regards were deleted (sniff...sniff...Lilly hurt Willy...)
- no email address in sight
- I'm pretty sure the vid and pic sections haven't been updated since I joined a few weeks ago
Bottom Line: Lilly stands out from the crowd of single-model site personalities because of two things: First, she has a great sense of humor which comes across in her videos as much as it does in her text entries through-out the site (if it's not really Lilly writing that stuff in her sweet, mixed-up English then shame on them and shame on me for being such a dufus). Second, she has a great rapport with the camera and beautiful, expressive eyes which I guarantee will imprint themselves in your memory if you give them the chance. That's quite a compliment when you consider it comes from someone who ganders at inaccessible female eyes an awful lot in his spare time and instantly forgets most of them.

Lilly is not drop-dead gorgeous unless she's in make-up, and she has a problem with her teeth which is the cause of one section of her site called "Donate me retainer". You can donate money to her so that she can get her "teeth-aid" and hence have a prettier smile. Yikes, either this is the tackiest thing ever or her site isn't doing well at all.

Lilly has spectacular breasts as well as captivating eyes and claims they're natural. I see no scars in sight. Vids are shot by her boyfriend and the two make a good team: he's well-endowed and the money shots are good; there's a lot of hardcore: sex, oral, insertions, toys, graphic close-ups, as well as softcore.

My polite comment in her diary got deleted. This seems to be their policy, however. That sucks. Points off for that.

Follow-Up:
The quality is better than 943kbps in a lot of the videos. Some go up to 1500+.

11-06-07  12:46am

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Full Bush

Full Bush
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of content on offer.
- Several good pic sets.
- Zips, but see cons.
Cons: - No browse features, zero, nada (see BL).
- Small pics: 684x1024 is about the largest.
- Site is still updated, but with sets dating from 2004. This is bullshit.
- Zips for each page within sets instead of all in one. As these sets are dinky in size this is also bullshit.
- Vids look lousy in mpeg or in wmv format, and are sliced into three minute bits. Can't tell you the bitrate since my Realplayer program died and Windows media player doesn't indicate it.
- Some sets are also from Aunt Judy's.
Bottom Line: Here's the kicker, folks: On the tour you get search options: you can look at the list of models, and/or search by letter. On the member's page, however, you get nothing of the sort. All the member's area offers is a single page with a giant list of text links for both pics and vids. Good luck if, like me, you were planning on searching for the work of a few photographers whose work you admire, or for a few particular models you've always liked.

What possible reason could there be to include search options in a guest tour and leave them out in the site proper? This is just plain stupid. Stupid or lazy. Or both. Okay, both.

To add insult to injury, the site is updating with material that is at least four years old, as far as I can see, and the material is NOT high quality. Some sets have been imported from Aunt Judy's and, I would guess, from other company sites as well. Not much effort has been put into this site and it is far too expensive.

Some of the material is good enough that I would recommend a membership IF:

The welcome page sold the site as an unsearchable and dead-plain archive of older and sub-par material, and if the price were cut in half. Short of these two things, Full Bush is pretty much a waste of time and money.

05-30-08  09:44pm

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit G Queen

G Queen
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High volume of videos.
- Vids good quality.
- Frequent updates.
- All models are shaved (this could be a con for some).
- Pics are very nice, what few there are, though not big: 900x1350 on the high end. Many are much smaller.
- Masturbation vids are some of the best I've seen, if you're into that.
Cons: - If you access the English version of the site only, there are approximately 370 pictures. If available pics are rotated, as happens on some Asian sites, I will update review.
- Music tracks on many videos are a definite negative.
- Site frequently caters to what I will call the "girl unwilling/uncomfortable" fetish, which I find disturbing and offensive at times.
Bottom Line: The Japanese version of g-Queen, which you can access by manipulating the URL in the address bar and re-entering username and password, contains roughly 60 full picture sets (almost all NOT zipped), while the English version contains less than 400 pictures altogether.

The videos available seem to be the same in both versions. There are about 100 models with three to five vids each, and these are each separate episodes, often with different costumes and settings, rather than one long vid broken into bits.

These are not hi-def vids, but are nice enough. They come in at an average of 2000k, 640x480. The videos are lengthy, sometimes up to fifteen minutes. Music spoils most of the videos wherein a particular model is being introduced; but masturbation vids do not seem to have the music track - though I've only downloaded about a dozen of these.

There is one video featuring a beautiful model getting herself off on the edge of a glass table. This is hands-down the most erotic masturbation vid I've ever seen. Other masturbation vids seem genuine and quite graphic. Bear in mind I am no afficianado when it comes to masturbation videos.

I'v seen a few vids where the model is being poked, caressed, and digitally stimulated by an off-screen male. The models often feign discomfort and unwillingness, sometimes in a histrionic fashion, sometimes more subtly and convincingly. In either case it does nothing but bother me.

One video features a girl giving head to and then riding on a clear plastic dildo protruding from a male's open fly. This was erotic and strange, in a mostly good way. I have yet to see a straight girl-boy sex scene, though if I do I will update this review. There are 45 lesbian videos on offer.

The main thing to remember is that g-Queen is all about shaved girls, and these girls are made to appear almost uncomfortably young and naive. Also remember this is mainly a video site.

I would* recommend this site to video lovers who like Asians and are into tease/masturbation scenarios which take a long time to unfold and are DEVOID of anything street-oriented. Innocence and cute-ness are the order of the day.

Decidedly NOT recommended for picture lovers.

*The above recommendation applies only if you are willing to shell out about twice the price of the average adult site subscription. The truth is, g-Queen is way over-priced for what is on offer.

11-07-08  11:25am

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit Idols 69

Idols 69
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Overall, the most beautiful models I've seen on any site, bar none.
- Virtually no tats or fake breasts (I have seen none thus far).
- Tons of video content, and plenty of picture content, all excellent quality. Pics avg. at 850x1215, some smaller, some larger; HQ vids are usually 720x480, various bitrates.
- All pics zipped. Even vidcap-sets from videos are zipped.
- Three video DL formats: low, medium, high.
Cons: - Pics are named by number, same for each set, causing the need to re-name if you are not just taking the zipfiles.
-Pics open in new window, causing the need to contantly close it out. No nav features to avoid this as far as I can see.
- Vids dwell too much on groping, molesting, and too many vibrators, toys.
- Categories sometimes useless. I clicked "handjobs" for instance, and saw no handjob related pics or vids in what came up.
- Video is censored, though there is an uncensored section. The vagina is blurred out in the pictures also, as is all penis/penetration. Anus is okay (pictures of, not penetration), however. Hmm. I guess because we've all got one. But mine's not nearly as cute as the ones on these ladies, and I bet yours aint either.
- Pics are not being updated. If they were, I would remain a member indefinitely.
Bottom Line: I don't have enough characters to do justice to the jaw-dropping beauty of these models. I know it's a subjective thing, but I find myself just totally blown away by these girls, devastated sometimes. Part of this is due to the excellence of the photographers. The Japanese are the best at this, hands down.

Pic sets are non-linear and keep interest by showng the girl in various dress, settings. By and large the over-all atmosphere is sophisticated and decidedly non-trashy. This is NOT trailer-park porn, and these are not amateurs.

I've only downloaded a handful of videos, but if you are into a woman being brought to orgasm, especially by a plethora of vibrators and gadgets, then you might want to give this site a go. The girls are either very good actresses or they are genuinely getting off. It seems like the latter to me, though since these are pros, anything is possible. I haven't seen enough vids to give a comprehensive assessment of them, and please take my comments in that light.

After having surfed the adult web for eight years, and having looked at thousands of different types of models, I can safely state at this time that my dream girl is Japanese. I can't say enough about how beautiful the models here are.

Apologies for this mostly subjective review.

10-22-09  06:16pm

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content available.
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.
- Detailed descriptions for each video.
- No DRM.
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set.
Cons: - Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.
- That "fish-eye" lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell.
Bottom Line: Ever imagine what it might be like to have Eve Angel park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.

While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and Eve Angel wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.

As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you.

I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of Eve Angel winking at me on my desktop.

You can see her eyes too.

07-18-08  03:41pm

Replies (2)
Review
21
Visit J Sex Network

J Sex Network
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-18-09  09:13pm  (Update History)
Reason: Lowered score one point. They need to zip more of the sets.
Pros: - Gorgeous models, with very few exceptions.
- Excellent photo archives with highly professional, polished sets, ranging from cutesy to glamorous.
- Tons of full-length hardcore videos, offered in single files, often with a choice of servers.
- Many sets are zipped, but most aren't.
- Search function is serviceable.
- Navigation is okay, but could be improved.
- Large Urabon photobook archive.
- Large amateur photo archive.
- Large cosplay/panty-fetish archive, some 10,000 pics.
- Several nice softcore vids, but wish there were more.
- Updates come at a good pace.
- AV models are pure class, from head to toe. Very few tats, very few fake breasts.
- The photography is sometimes sublime, and the photogs deserve special notice here.
Cons: - Material is not exclusive. Saw a few Graphis watermarks, and many sets were at Idols69.
- Mosaics in vids and photos. I did not take away from the score because of this, as it's a legal issue in Japan, but mention it because some, if not most, regard it as a serious negative, and I must admit it is a bother in videos.
- Photo archive navigation could be improved, made uniform. There are too many formats, and often, with only a forward arrow to guide you, you have no idea how long the set will go.
- A few more strip/tease vids would be nice, to leaven all that hardcore.
- Download limit. Though I can't imagine why 15 gigs would not be enough for a single day.
Bottom Line: Obviously the mosaics are going to be a problem for many people here. It's been discussed at length at PU and for the most part I side with jd1961 that since it's the law in Japan it would be pointless to hold it against them. That being said, I find the HC vids are a bit bothersome to watch at times, though the eroticism is usually still very high.

It deserves mention that the Japanese seem to be keen on the reverse gang-bang theme, which I find very erotic. There is one vid featuring ONE male with ONE HUNDRED women. Holy crap. If that isn't a fantasy to reckon with, I don't know what is.

The pics are censored at this site also, but I don't find this a problem. The models are spectacular and the sets are varied and beautiful to look at, even if they aren't always titillating; but oftentimes the girls are so stunning - and the sets and wardrobe so high-class - it's exciting just to see them naked.

Besides, some of these JAV models are like higher life forms to me. I realize this is totally subjective.

Pic quality and size vary to a great degree. Some are small, as in the Urabon and Amateur pics, and some of the Gravure pics are big, up to 2000+ on the big side, though these seem to be fairly rare.

I don't care for hardcore porn, but I took a few of the uncensored Maria Ozawa vids and was surprised that I could watch and enjoy them. The eroticism was high and the sex was sensual and non-aggressive, though I will admit that a great deal of the other videos here seem to veer quite decidedly towards the darker, or simply weirder, side of sex and sexuality.

Most of the vids here seem to be 640x480, so we're not talking HD, but they look very good to me. Bitrates must be higher than what the Windows info-balloons are telling me.

Thus far I'm having a great time, and this is one of my all-time favorite sites. My staggered first-impressions have been tempered quite a bit, but I'm still impressed, and I'm far from bored. If I wasn't so in love with Japanese models I would probably not be as happy here as I am, so bear that in mind.

I **highly** recommend this site to anyone who likes JAV models, but if you have a problem with mosaics, don't join. The only reason I didn't give this a score in the high 90's is because of the fact that the material is non-exclusive, and because of minor nav issues.

11-14-09  08:22pm

Replies (4)
Review
22
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge amount of content, both pics and vids.
- Zips for photosets.
- Search engine
- Model rating system, plus section for highest rated models and sets.
- Pics viewable in two sizes.
- Hard and softcore content separated.
- Several updates per week.
- Navigation is good.
Cons: - High-res pics offered but at 1500x1000 they are still a tad behind some high-end sites.
- Most softcore vids seem to begin with an interview/chat session, which is a negative for me. Would rather have interview sessions separate. This is a minor nit, of course.
Bottom Line: Karups HA is undoubtedly one of the best sites going, with amount of content vying with just about anyone at this point. To give you an idea of how much material there is here: in the softcore video section alone there are twenty-four vids per page, and there are seventy-one pages. The photo sections are just as impressive.

That aside, the site has all the bells & whistles one might expect at a premium site, which I listed in the cons. The drawing point for me is the photo archive. Though I could be wrong, it looks to me like a few well-known photographers had sets here in the old days: Toby from ATK, and Donovan Philips from DonnysGirls, to name two. If I'm wrong on this I'd be very surprised.

The newest vid I downloaded is 640x480 and shows a bitrate of 2683k. Newest pics come in at 1500x1000, which is nice, but 1600x1200 would be even better. Once again, a minor nit.

This is one of a small handful of sites which I have stayed with for a second month. Even with a fast connection it would take a long time to collect it all, and then you'd be very busy indeed.

Anyone interested in adult media would be remiss not to sign up here at least once. I seriously doubt that many people would find it terribly disappointing.

10-20-08  09:54am

Replies (0)
Review
23
Visit LBFM

LBFM
(0)

78.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A lot of material up. 100,000+ photos of 400+ models and over a thousand video clips (See cons about clips), some in HD. Newer pics go up to 1277x1920, but the majority of them are smaller, at around 960x1280 and lower.
- Attractive models.
- Navigation easy enough.
- Fairly regular updates.
Cons: - Much of the material seems to be non-exclusive. Saw most of their schoolgirl sets on Schoolgirls Asia (same company), and a lot of the sets featuring what appear to be Thai models have appeared elsewhere.
- No zipfiles.
- Vids come in small one-to-two minute clips, making them useless.
- Site has an amateurish look, not re the models, but the design. Ugly purplish background all through.
- Toy-obssessed.
- PU user mentions something about a DL limit. I wouldn't know because to DL one gig of video here in one day would border on masochism.
Bottom Line: Two major drawbacks to this site are the lack of zipfiles and the fact that the vids are broken into tiny bits. The ones I saw averaged at 5 megs. I'm sure the HD vids are much larger, but I didn't bother with them, since I can't play 1280 anyway.

First, the lack of zips is a deal-breaker here, since the photo sets are often very long and padded out with multiple shots offering hardly any variation. Don't let the high pic count fool you. Most sets could be trimmed by fifty percent without losing anything.

Second, there is no good reason to break up the videos into tiny bits, except to frustrate the customer and greatly diminish enjoyment of the site.

Also a problem here is the depressing feeling of looking at young ladies who are simply trying to earn money. I end up feeling sorry for them more often than not. There is virtually no personality or charm exuding from this material, at least from my perspective. My impression from what little HC I looked at is that the performers are merely doing a job. Passion seems to be zero.

I would recommend the site if 1) photo-sets were edited and more varied, and zipped; and 2) videos were offered whole instead of being broken up.

Unless you are really into South-east Asian models, I would say skip it.

11-08-09  03:15pm

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Little April

Little April
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - April is very cute and is nice to look at in every way.
- Pic quality is decent: 803 by 1200
- "teeny" niche held to faithfully.
Cons: - The site is dead, and has been for a while.
- Only 40 pic sets, avg 36 pics
- 50 or so vid episodes broken into sections, some as short as one minute. Quality is fair to lousy and does no justice to this girl.
- Masturbation scenes are as uninspired as they are uninspiring, for those of you who might be into that.
Bottom Line: I wanted to see what these teen-revenue sites were all about since I've been seeing these girls on TGPs for years. Hopefully I will do a review of each of them.

There is no point at all in joining April's site by itself, since if you like her you've probably collected most of the pics already. The vids will be of interest only to those who have an inordinate crush on April.

Impressions: April comes across as an innocent, decidedly non-trashy young lady who most likely did this to earn some money - which evidently she did and is still doing - and then moved on. She seemed semi-sleezy to me from the TGP pics only because I expected there to be harder content on her site which the free pics were only a teasing sample of (hey, if you can't end a sentence with a preposition on a porn-review site, where can you?).

Conclusions: As cute as she is, her pics have been floating around for so long, and the site has been inactive for so long, it seems a bit dishonest to sell it as a stand-alone site worth dropping twenty dollars on, which they are still doing despite the fact that her site is included in the teenrevenue network, which is all of ten bucks more.

The extras at April's site are negligible: Teenagepink, PrivateL TV, and Panties Down are little more than small archives of old and oft-circulated pics which have a mildewy smell about them, although there are a few gems among the rubble.

11-19-07  10:26pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Little Lupe

Little Lupe
(0)

87.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Lupe is gorgeous
- Lots of content
- Large, good-quality pictures
- Decent quality videos
- Hardcore and softcore content
Cons: - Highly visible and intrusive watermark in pics
- pic sets are repetitive and predictable
Bottom Line: This is easily the best from the teenrevenue group of sites. Pics are plentiful and range from vid-caps to 1800x1200. Lupe looks great from any angle, and is about as modest as Bill Gates is poor.

Vids look good and range from teaser stuff to hardcore. Good quality offered though not top end: 640x480, 1100 kbps. There are app. 65 vids. Features some of the best girls-kissing suff I've ever seen (though there is not too much of it), as well as masturbation, BJ, and boy-girl.

One gripe about vids: why must Lupe stare into the camera while she's going at it? I've seen this a lot and I don' get it. It's as if to say, "See, look, I really am a horny little sexpot. See? Look what I can do..."

Lupe looks young but in my opinion it's not a problem. Look at some of the other girls in this network: they have them playing kid's games, even coloring in a coloring book for goodness' sake, in addition to all the other teeny-trappings. Lupe looks young but acts her age, in a manner of speaking, and I never felt creepy watching her stuff.

About the males in these clips, which the other reviewers mentioned: One of the things I hate about modern porn is that the guys look like street thugs and seem to hate women. In the clips I saw the guys looked pretty passive compared to some of the net-garbage I've seen. I only viewed about one third of the clips, however, so it could be the other reviewers are right. They are extremely well-endowed. That's certainly true.

12-19-07  05:46pm

Replies (3)

Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.6 seconds.