| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
So glad you have a sense of humor.
|
09-29-13 10:21pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from tangub:
(graymane's Reply)
Graymane your description of the "repetitious obligatory five" sums up perfectly the reason I got bored of hardcore porn several years ago and now only enjoy porn of the softcore variety involving only solo women sharing their beauty and bodies with us.
|
09-29-13 02:50pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
BTW, I originally wanted to respond to your comment--"hooks his finger into her vagina and gouges, twists, pokes, digs, and scoops away like he's expecting to find gold"--with Goldfinger, but I held back...at least for a day. :-)
|
09-29-13 10:32am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
I would like to point out my good sir, there is no plot, even if there is a dialogue set up. Fucking is not a plot. A plot must have, Aristotle says, a beginning, a middle, and an end, and the events of the plot must causally relate to one another as being either necessary or probable. At best, one could construe that these events are a thinly veiled subplot to a larger story but I doubt it.
Hell's bells, when screwing the babysitter, the moke never gets caught by the spouse and has to pay the consequence (ie, the wife joins in is about the best they can do - but usually that's in the middle).
That said, I'm not disagreeing with the first part of your post at all. It's boring (and one of the reasons I edit almost everything I keep to watch.) and I've been thinking about blogging my thoughts about porn on these pages as protest.
|
09-29-13 05:58am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
LOL!
That gives new meaning to the term "gold digger!"
Of course it may not actually be gold we're looking for, but it feels just as precious!
|
09-28-13 10:23pm
|
Reply
56
|
Jack Off To Me
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from NoFagsHere:
(graymane's Reply)
Not sure what the point of the question is. Lola is the star on the site. She just needs better direction. At least half of the content they produce with her is ridiculous (to me).
|
09-27-13 09:10am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(graymane's Reply)
I can't speak for the other sources of info but this one is attached to IAFD and they try really hard to have accurate information and there is no bias one way or the other
|
09-24-13 06:18pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
Don't you dare! *I* thought it was funny!!
|
09-21-13 03:47pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
LOL. Well, I had considered two more polls. One on the preferred fabric when it comes to lingerie, the other on the preferred garment but I get the feeling by your reply that you find the subject unmanly and embarrassing, so, maybe I won't. :-)
|
09-21-13 10:30am
|
Reply
60
|
My XXX Pass
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your comments graymane.
|
09-09-13 03:14pm
|
Reply
61
|
Nubiles.net
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Thedebilman666:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you Graymane.
|
09-05-13 09:10am
|
Reply
62
|
Hustler Mega Pass
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Sir, you make me blush...
|
09-04-13 03:08pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
Hee hee...you said "first up."
:-)
|
09-04-13 03:53am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Thedebilman666:
(graymane's Reply)
I haven't bought a skin rag in over 10 years, and the last time I did they were $8.99 each, they lower the prices to compete with online porn?
|
08-31-13 02:25pm
|
Reply
65
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
I wasn't aware we'd broken up.
;-)
Have a great holiday weekend.
|
08-30-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
66
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
c'mon now, let's not go overboard.
Yeah, constructive criticism is one thing but saying we're sleeping when we're not is something else entirely. My remark about past support was only to think that, based on past history, we might have deserved the benefit of the doubt until your query about your "missing" review was answered one way or the other.
But be that as it may ...
Your participation here is always welcome. I'm not sure how many more ways it can be said. Obviously, no penance is needed or sought.
|
08-30-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
67
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
|
08-30-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
68
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Marcus:
My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...
Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina
|
08-30-13 12:54pm
|
Reply
69
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Khan:
Considering the level of support you've received here at PU, I am kinda confused by you implication that we're sleeping on the job.
But in reply to your accusation that we did away with your review or are somehow not doing our jobs ...
Your review is quite intact and you can see it at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/famegirls/
You'll note that this site (the page you're on) is for Fame Girls.net whereas the site you did a review for was Fame Girls (the .com site)
In the future, if you "lose" a past submission you can find it by looking at your past activity. (see the 'User Stats' section on your profile page)
I hope that addresses your concern.
|
08-30-13 12:50pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Yes that was my assumption ........!
Guess I am unsure about the rest.
|
08-23-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I didn't know that. I thought I had read that Pay Pal refused to work with adult websites. I might be looking into a Pay Pal account soon...
|
08-21-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Hi GM I searched everywhere and could not find any place Paypal was accepted searching I found many articles saying Paypal doesn't support adult sites. If anything comes to mind I would be grateful.
CT
|
08-21-13 08:05am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Can you name a few sites that used it, that would be cool Id like to check it out.
|
08-20-13 07:07am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Paypal is ok, but they don't do adult stuff right??
|
08-19-13 07:19pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I don't know for sure, but I've read that Pay Pal refuses to do business with adult sites. Maybe others can confirm.
|
08-19-13 05:56pm
|
