Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : graymane (33)  

Feedback:   All (754)  |   Reviews (19)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (726)

Other:   Replies Received (304)  |   Trust Ratings (30)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 304 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

I think you're being a little unfair to yourself, sir. As much as we all try to be objective when writing reviews the reality is that whether you like a site is usually a subjective decision - as long as the site isn't a fraud, of course. And in that light, the more reviews the better. Many will find your information more useful when they're trying to determine whether what Babes Network offers is to their liking. Any ay you look at it, people are far more likely to forgive a slow download speed or a messy site design if they like the porn rather than the other way around. A well-designed and run site that offers nothing you like is of no value to anyone.

Keep up the excellent work. Have a great Christmas too.

12-25-13  05:47am

Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
Reply of graymane's Review from rearadmiral:

Great review graymane. I must have received the same email offer that you did because, like you, I joined this site not realizing that it is a clone of Babes Network. I emailed Khan and he pointed me to a forum post where he explained that for unknown reasons Manwin doesn't want Babes.com listed.

I liked the site a lot and will likely score it higher than you did when I post a review. I also didn't have the same username/password issue that you mentioned. I got to pick my own.

12-24-13  09:09am

N/A REPLY TO #7 from LPee23: (graymane's Reply)

Yeah, that is true. The reason why pee is OK but sea water is not is that sea water is more concentrated than the saltiest pee that the body can make, so the sodium builds up to dangerous levels. Pee is fine for survival though. In the worst case, it is as concentrated as possible, and you just pee it out again with no gain in water.

12-16-13  02:53pm

Visit Erotica X

Erotica X
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

Thanks for your comments graymane. I hope someone finds this information useful!

12-16-13  02:36pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from LPee23: (graymane's Reply)

Yes, pee would require refrigeration, although it's best fresh from a lady. While it may seem dirty, pee is literally the most sterile fluid that the body releases. Spit and sweat both have thousands of different types of bacteria in them, and pee is almost completely sterile.

12-15-13  04:23pm

Visit Private.com

REPLY TO #2 from TheSquirrel: (graymane's Reply)

Thank you, your kind comments are always appreciated because I know you take time, and care over what you post too. There is a core of us who are proud of our contributions, and it's good to be a part of that. Stick around, and don't worry about the few who like to ruffle feathers.

12-07-13  05:16pm

Visit Private.com

REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (graymane's Reply)

Ditto graymane's comments. Excellent review. You are a major asset to the PU site. My trust rating almost 5 years ago continues to be reinforced.



12-07-13  01:52pm

Visit Perfect Gonzo

Perfect Gonzo
REPLY TO #3 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

Thanks for the kind words graymane.

11-30-13  06:12am

N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (graymane's Reply)

not just you but everyone who doesn't like toys

11-24-13  10:05am

N/A REPLY TO #9 from pat362: (graymane's Reply)

Cum play is definitely not something new and most of what is done today was done a lot worse a decade ago by companies like Extreme Associates. Just look at their Cocktails series for good examples.

JM Production also had plenty of movies with cum play as a common theme. These guys managed to hire some really hot looking women who could shoot amazing scenes but their choice of fetish made many of their movies unwatchable...At least to me.

10-29-13  05:40pm

Visit Casting Couch X

Casting Couch X
REPLY TO #1 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

Thank you for the glowing assessment, Sir.

One obvious problem with comparing me, as a "Butt-lover" to Roger Ebert, is that when I give two thumbs up, just what (or who) are those thumbs up in?

10-25-13  03:41am

N/A REPLY TO #15 from Denner: (graymane's Reply)

First, graymane - it's nice - again - to "talk" to old PU-friends. Yes, we agree on that full body-deal, for sure.
Not sure I understand the rest of your reply, but what I guess is your're still in good health and soon turning 80 - you probably got good genes and live to a hundred - if you'd want to...LOL. Take care, friend!

10-22-13  05:47am

N/A REPLY TO #12 from Drooler: (graymane's Reply)

"Bare with me please" is a great pun. Oughta be the title of a porn flick.

10-21-13  05:08pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Drooler: (graymane's Reply)

"Overtime closeups" is a good way of putting it. Sure have seen enough of those.

10-20-13  08:29am

N/A REPLY TO #7 from Thedebilman666: (graymane's Reply)

A creepy ass thing to bring up on a porn forum, just creepy

10-14-13  12:45pm

N/A REPLY TO #22 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

I certainly took your comments to be light-hearted and good-natured. And yes, in a pro versus con argument about anal I won't back down nor take any prisoners!

10-07-13  02:41pm

N/A REPLY TO #21 from beautifulrock: (graymane's Reply)

There is no ill intent here. Someone with any IQ at all would see porn as a buffet, and that you can take what you want and leave the rest. But I appreciate the implication of stupidity after reading two sentences that I wrote, and the connection between two entirely different measures. I guess you got it right in that they both are numbers. Good for you.

Also, I wasn't even replying to you.

10-06-13  11:01pm

N/A REPLY TO #18 from rearadmiral: (graymane's Reply)

Actually graymane, your reply to my comment has given me a thought about how to resolve this issue. I'll make this offer to all of my PU friends: if you think there is too much anal in porn today, send me what you have. I'll gladly accept it and give it a good home. you can rest knowing that your unwanted anal porn now has a loving home.

10-06-13  01:01pm

N/A REPLY TO #17 from jberryl69: (graymane's Reply)

Funny as always...

10-06-13  07:56am

N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (graymane's Reply)

Here Here!!

10-05-13  06:04am

N/A REPLY TO #18 from jberryl69: (graymane's Reply)

Thanks Graymane for those encouraging words.

I suppose the biggest issues at this point are how I'm going to get care after I leave the hospital - Friday I will ask this question, but it is a concern to my sister and had she not mentioned it I would never have thought about it.

Another issue is that I suspect they are going to shave a portion of my head but if that's going to happen I just as soon they shave the whole thing, so getting that done will be a priority.

You mention the IV which might carry drugs, but I suspect they will feeding food through it too (usually sugar water unless they changed it since the last time). I would be good to include vitamins in the mix.

I also would like to have access to a hypnotist to help with both stress and pain but that might be whistling in the wind.

With regard to prayer - One would think as an atheist, I would give a rats ass about prayer, but interestingly, I think prayer works. I don't care if you pray to God or a square block of wood I think the positive energy can only help and I thank you for them.

I saw once an article about prayer where a study was done. Forty subjects with AIDS were divided into to groups. I can't remember how many participated in the prayer group, but they were given one group with their photos. It should be pointed out that none of the prayer group knew any of the subject members. They prayed. The prayer group generally got better, while the other group had higher deaths. The recipients did not know they were being prayed for.

Oh - I went and did a search and found this book on Amazon that includes this study - Spiritual Healing: Scientific Validation of A Healing Revolution (Healing Research)

This does not validate that there is God.

10-02-13  05:28am

Visit Milk Enema

Milk Enema
REPLY TO #1 from TheSquirrel: (graymane's Reply)

Cheers gray one - good to see you're still here!

09-30-13  02:56pm

N/A REPLY TO #16 from jberryl69: (graymane's Reply)

So glad you have a sense of humor.

09-29-13  10:21pm

N/A REPLY TO #13 from tangub: (graymane's Reply)

Graymane your description of the "repetitious obligatory five" sums up perfectly the reason I got bored of hardcore porn several years ago and now only enjoy porn of the softcore variety involving only solo women sharing their beauty and bodies with us.

09-29-13  02:50pm

N/A REPLY TO #10 from turboshaft: (graymane's Reply)

BTW, I originally wanted to respond to your comment--"hooks his finger into her vagina and gouges, twists, pokes, digs, and scoops away like he's expecting to find gold"--with Goldfinger, but I held back...at least for a day. :-)

09-29-13  10:32am

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-75 of 304 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 3.13 seconds.