| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
NOBODY picks on you Graymane without some retort, rest assured. I thought he was a little over sensitive with all the "prove it" language - maybe his GF is beating him up. Hell, maybe she even wrote it.
|
05-10-13 11:20am
|
Reply
2
|
Nubile Films
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the support!
|
05-09-13 04:57pm
|
Reply
3
|
Babes Network.com
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from otoh:
(graymane's Reply)
Many thanks, GM! Am blushing to receive such commendation from such an esteemed member of the community :)
|
04-30-13 10:37pm
|
Reply
4
|
Wow Porn
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words, graymane.
If you like glamcore/heartcore, I think you will enjoy the Diesel Acess network. X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two fine example of that niche.
But if you don't like glamcore, you might find those sites disappointing.
Also, both X-Art and Diesel focus on teens. So if you want a broad range of ages, or slow-strip tease, or something else, you could be disappointed.
Having said that, there is plenty of hardcore action at these sites, with some models that are absolutely stunning or even beautiful. They are truly a feast for the eyes, and fingers, and any other body parts you can imagine.
|
04-25-13 10:24pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
Excellent thesis, friend
|
04-24-13 01:42pm
|
Reply
6
|
Give Me Teens
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words, graymane. I'm glad you are well enough to participate at PU again. Like many PU members, we really wish you well.
|
04-21-13 02:40am
|
Reply
7
|
Wow Girls
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from elephant:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks Greyman
Yeah toys for some reason just bore the hell out of me, just not sexy at all to watch, some people must love them I guess as they are still around. In lesbian porn though I've not met many people who like them.
|
02-12-13 01:02am
|
Reply
8
|
Wow Girls
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from dieselman:
(graymane's Reply)
Nah, it's not that bad. We dont have that much scenes with toys to call it overkill and usually we use unique toys, not like typical toys.
|
02-11-13 08:49am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Jay G:
(graymane's Reply)
"Meals on wheels"......hmmmmmmmm....more time for porn LOL
|
02-07-13 06:25am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
You mean as it happened more than once and not always with the same people or in the same State?
|
02-04-13 09:34am
|
Reply
11
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
Ah sir, the fault most likely results from my ever poor spelling. I've included a useful link for what I was trying to reference. It's the line structure that Shakespeare used in most of his writing. (if I'm not mistaken it's also called blank verse).
http://shakespeare.about.com/od/shakespe...e/a/i_pentameter.htm
Thank you as always for the discussion-
|
01-25-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
12
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
lol. Very good sir.
|
01-23-13 01:40pm
|
Reply
13
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
You are a sick, sick man, graymane!!! :-)
|
01-23-13 11:07am
|
Reply
14
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from Capn:
Always interesting to see your take, G. :0)
I have to agree with a lot of your points, but for me it is the only subscription I have at the moment.
That says volumes for the lack of choice in our favoured genres.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-23-13 09:15am
|
Reply
15
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
GM,
Thank you again for an excellent review. I particularly like the Shakespeare reference in the reply section :)
The Bard would be proud, know if you could only have it all in iambic pentameter and include a pun :)
Hope too see more reviews from you again soon-
|
01-22-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
16
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
Ooooh, gross! That picture is going to stay with me all day now. But your answer also gave me a bit of insight as to why the site is doing well despite the leg hair. I was honestly convinced that it was despised by the vast majority of subscribers. As I said only yesterday, learn something new every day. :-) Enjoy the hair, gm!!
|
01-22-13 09:56am
|
Reply
17
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from otoh:
Great review, GM, thanks for all the useful info. I far prefer unshaven models, so keep an eye on reviews for the hairy sites - but I guess the search continues for one which isn't a) leaning toward scary hairy; and b) is actually erotic!
|
01-22-13 08:50am
|
Reply
18
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheSquirrel:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks Graymane, it's reciprocated. Your contributions are always entertaining, as well as informative.
I guess like most of us, I look in but don't contribute as much nowadays, unless there's something I just have to get off my chest. There's not enough time at the moment to post here, or view porn, but at least I don't get jaded as some do.
Been a porn fan since I was 8, so I suppose I'm never going off it, but I could do with some more customer oriented networks. There's only a limited influence PU can have, and currently the mainstream market is very homogeneous, for a number of reasons. All we can do is register our opinion.
Happily today is a day and night off, so I can spend some time putting together a review.
|
01-22-13 08:50am
|
Reply
19
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from messmer:
Hey, graymane, I always enjoy your reviews. How did you like all the hairy legs?
Us old timers tend to wax sentimental over the good old days before the models shaved but we think mostly of the pubic bush, while this site has evolved into a true fetishists dream.
As you stated "hair, hair everywhere" - hair on the nipples, hair in the pits, hair on the legs, hair in the cracks. However, one thing in their favor I do believe that their statistics might very well be right on.
This site has been around for a long, long time, therefore between 8 - 10 picture updates a day, with most sets containing at least a hundred pictures, it is not beyond belief that they have as many sets and models as they say they have.
I recently quit with two months to go, not because they lied to me, but because I found most updates either too hairy for my taste (the legs) or too bland or for the "vaginal over exposure" as you put it so nicely. But you know me, looking at a set without the girl at least wearing some sort of erotic lingerie, is the epitome of boredom.
|
01-21-13 07:01pm
|
Reply
20
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from TheSquirrel:
Thanks for the entertaining review Gray one. You happened to pick out a couple of big irritants as far as I'm concerned. First of all the ever present genitalia closeups. Then there's the constant moving about. You get to the point where they finally show the whole girl in all her glory, then they have to change her position and it's back to the closeups.
The cameraman goes to sleep on the closeups, but the minute they finally focus on the whole body they have to move. You just cannot get to experience the glory of the whole body. It's like they do it deliberately just to piss off porn viewers. "Ner ner ner, you paid for this, but you're not going to see anything stimulating, oh no, we can do this all the time to the end of the video you know." And they do.
|
01-21-13 06:11pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
Gee Graymane, I feel your pain.
|
01-21-13 07:13am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(graymane's Reply)
I think the nub of it is the interaction element.
It is a step further when, instead of being a viewer, you are talking in an intimate erotic way to another person who isn't your SO ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-19-13 02:37am
|
Reply
23
|
Fame Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
I don't know Graymane - I probably won't go looking. I've subscribed to Met-Art's newsletter in the past just to take and edit some of the photos to go on labels of my DVDs. I've shown some of them in other posts but that's about my extent of my still photo interest.... oh, except some ripped photos from videos of throating to the balls of some models that I play with just cause I can.
|
01-17-13 08:09pm
|
Reply
24
|
Fame Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from jberryl69:
After reviewing the site, I have to say, based on your current poll question, Sandra is the hottest in my book. Shame she has no updates and has "retired", whatever that means.
|
01-17-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
I am going to go with GM on this one, why a nice natural set is awesome,
the reality is you can separate and attractive woman from a sexy one
by her legs above all else.
|
01-17-13 08:40am
|
