| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
LOL. Well, I had considered two more polls. One on the preferred fabric when it comes to lingerie, the other on the preferred garment but I get the feeling by your reply that you find the subject unmanly and embarrassing, so, maybe I won't. :-)
|
09-21-13 10:30am
|
Reply
27
|
My XXX Pass
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for your comments graymane.
|
09-09-13 03:14pm
|
Reply
28
|
Nubiles
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Thedebilman666:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you Graymane.
|
09-05-13 09:10am
|
Reply
29
|
Hustler Mega Pass
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Sir, you make me blush...
|
09-04-13 03:08pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turboshaft:
(graymane's Reply)
Hee hee...you said "first up."
:-)
|
09-04-13 03:53am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Thedebilman666:
(graymane's Reply)
I haven't bought a skin rag in over 10 years, and the last time I did they were $8.99 each, they lower the prices to compete with online porn?
|
08-31-13 02:25pm
|
Reply
32
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
I wasn't aware we'd broken up.
;-)
Have a great holiday weekend.
|
08-30-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
33
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
c'mon now, let's not go overboard.
Yeah, constructive criticism is one thing but saying we're sleeping when we're not is something else entirely. My remark about past support was only to think that, based on past history, we might have deserved the benefit of the doubt until your query about your "missing" review was answered one way or the other.
But be that as it may ...
Your participation here is always welcome. I'm not sure how many more ways it can be said. Obviously, no penance is needed or sought.
|
08-30-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
34
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
|
08-30-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
35
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Marcus:
My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...
Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina
|
08-30-13 12:54pm
|
Reply
36
|
Fame Girls.net
(1)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
from Khan:
Considering the level of support you've received here at PU, I am kinda confused by you implication that we're sleeping on the job.
But in reply to your accusation that we did away with your review or are somehow not doing our jobs ...
Your review is quite intact and you can see it at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/famegirls/
You'll note that this site (the page you're on) is for Fame Girls.net whereas the site you did a review for was Fame Girls (the .com site)
In the future, if you "lose" a past submission you can find it by looking at your past activity. (see the 'User Stats' section on your profile page)
I hope that addresses your concern.
|
08-30-13 12:50pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Yes that was my assumption ........!
Guess I am unsure about the rest.
|
08-23-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I didn't know that. I thought I had read that Pay Pal refused to work with adult websites. I might be looking into a Pay Pal account soon...
|
08-21-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Hi GM I searched everywhere and could not find any place Paypal was accepted searching I found many articles saying Paypal doesn't support adult sites. If anything comes to mind I would be grateful.
CT
|
08-21-13 08:05am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Can you name a few sites that used it, that would be cool Id like to check it out.
|
08-20-13 07:07am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Paypal is ok, but they don't do adult stuff right??
|
08-19-13 07:19pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
I don't know for sure, but I've read that Pay Pal refuses to do business with adult sites. Maybe others can confirm.
|
08-19-13 05:56pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Guess you fish with big bait, you get a big fish hehe
|
08-16-13 07:42am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from gaypornolover:
(graymane's Reply)
Heh heh oh Greymane you are such a sweet guy! I was only teasing - I don't mind at all! You phrase your questions however you like, I just specify what I mean when I vote is all.
The vast majority of users of this site are heterosexual males, I know that.
I don't go in for all this over-sensitivity and political correctness. I know when someone is trying to deliberately exclude or offend me and you could never do that!
|
08-07-13 09:23am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
hehe loved the response
|
07-29-13 08:34am
|
Reply
46
|
New Sensations
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wittyguy:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the positive feedback. I wish more webmasters would take our reviews to heart (at least the non newbie reviews anyway) but I doubt that will happen here. My instincts tell me that this is now just a place holder site and that most of the marketing and money at NS is going into their parody productions. While it's disappointing from a consumer's perspective it perversely makes good business sense ... if you can't or don't want to compete with what's out there today just keep doing what you're doing until it doesn't pay any more.
|
07-17-13 11:39am
|
Reply
47
|
Woodman Casting X
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words, graymane. I hear ya about being jealous of all the young lasses that Pierre gets to work with!
|
07-16-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(graymane's Reply)
LOL, graymane - just somewhat younger, guess I'd still go for "Old Geezer".
|
07-09-13 05:37am
|
Reply
49
|
21Sextury.com
(9)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TheSquirrel:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks Graymane, yes we both know it takes some time and effort to create a decent review. I wasn't going to do a review for 21 Sextury becaue of the cross selling, and had decided I didn't have much time to do them anyway. Then the raffle ended, so I figured I'd do one to muck in and keep things going. Things are quieter here at the moment.
There are signs that maybe 21 Sextury is occasionally trying to get some build up in, but it's not something they excel in, the Jalace video on Pix And Video for example. Nice idea, but build up should feature more of the girl and less of the guy's face. Then after a little build up and oral there's a fadeout and straight into anal sex. Oh well, nice try.
|
06-14-13 05:59am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
:wink, wink: :nudge nudge: Ain't life grand?!
|
06-12-13 07:02am
|
