| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(graymane's Reply)
AAH! But I have given up the determinded search because no such thing seems to exist, graymane. I am now waiting (as reflected in my Forum post under Happy New Year) for someone to build a site like it and for TBP to bring it to my attention. Nice try, old friend. :-)
|
01-01-13 06:40pm
|
Reply
27
|
Milk Enema
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you, kind sir!
|
12-29-12 04:54am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
here, here!
|
12-18-12 04:34pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
Reminds me when I am using my external for downloading I have a small fan that blows on it to keep it from smoking LOL
|
11-19-12 08:08am
|
Reply
30
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you, sir!
|
11-07-12 01:32pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
graymane said: "Since I've been tagged as the "inspiration" for this poll question, I think it is only fair that the source please step forward and explain how that came to be."
It has been mentioned before, we rerun polls from time to time. When we re-run one submitted by a user, it's noted again. That's what happened here and perhaps why you don't recall it.
On this specific poll:
On 13-Feb-2011, you submitted a poll. That poll ran on 7-March-2011.
As you were notified (via email) at that time, "We had to re-word both the question and the answers but the question is basically what you asked." I don't have the exact wording of your original submission but the fact that this poll (both times it ran) say, "Inspired By" rather than "Submitted By" indicated the wording was changed significantly though the subject was retained.
So, to answer your direct question, YOU are the source but I was happy to explain how that came to be.
Thus, another of life's mysteries solved.
;-)
|
11-06-12 01:59pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
You know I was joking right GM ?
CT
|
11-06-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(graymane's Reply)
We took a poll GM, and you were almost not picked by the popular vote, but the electoral votes put you in. LOL
I thought you made the poll that's interested and sounds ironic as well.
|
11-06-12 10:25am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
It's just one of my life stories that holds itself out for it's singularity and novelty of the situation. One interesting side note, until I noticed, I actually was enjoying myself. One of those situations where had I not been able to actually process the information things might have been different.
|
10-26-12 06:22am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from gaypornolover:
(graymane's Reply)
Aww graymane you're so sweet and such a good guy! I really appreciate the effort you make!
|
10-25-12 08:37am
|
Reply
36
|
Naughty Country Girls
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks graymare,
Really it was more I had to do the reviews while I had the time before all the other commitments of life kept my from logging in. Even replies have had a back seat the last few days.
|
10-21-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(graymane's Reply)
As mentioned above, a PUerview is an sort of forum interview we ran with a few of the regulars. I think there were a total of five done.
If you do a word search (in the forum) for the term "PUerview" you should find them. Or you could just use this link.
:)
I thought they were a great way for users to get a better feel for the person behind a name. They were intended as a fun addition to the day-to-day discussions.
We let them drop after a number of the regulars declined our invitation to participate. Seems they feared they'd leak some tid-bit of info that would let the world discover their PU secret identity ... or something like that.
Anyway, back to this poll.
I posted it to see if there's any general interest in seeing a few more interviews in the future.
|
10-19-12 07:31am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
Hah! Got my fill of that, though it was mountain land in Colorado. It's just I've never paid for it except via the indirect method. Yes, you always pay for it one way or another. No value judgements though.
|
10-18-12 07:14am
|
Reply
39
|
Sugar Paradise
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
Thanks for the support, graymane.
By the way, you current avatar is certainly eye-catching. Lol.
|
10-17-12 07:12am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
I saw your sawbucks and it's still been a long time. As you well know there is more than one way to pay for it.
|
10-16-12 03:39pm
|
Reply
41
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(graymane's Reply)
Just join Blacks on Blondes and then you'll still get access to all of the other sites but you won't have to think about Dogfart. Mind you that title also doesn't make all that much sense since there are plenty of non-blondes on blacks on blondes. I overlook the name of the network because I really like their style of porn.
|
10-15-12 05:17am
|
Reply
42
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank You for the compliment but I can't actually take all that much credit because my style is actually stuff I stole from all of you guys. All I did is look what others did and the way they did and I incoporated those things into my reviews.
I can't remember which member said that he did his review on a Word perfect spreadsheet and then transfered the info to the site but that was something that I had never thought about doing and which I know always do.
|
10-15-12 05:14am
|
Reply
43
|
Playboy Girls
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TheSquirrel:
(graymane's Reply)
I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should.
For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does.
Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.
|
10-14-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
44
|
Playboy Girls
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from TheSquirrel:
(graymane's Reply)
Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here).
I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring.
I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.
|
10-14-12 06:18am
|
Reply
45
|
Playboy Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from TheSquirrel:
Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.
|
10-10-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
46
|
Playboy Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
from slutty:
Nice review graymane, I totally agree with your points, I made the mistake of joining here, or one of their many offshoots some time ago and was regretting almost instantly.
|
10-09-12 12:17am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jberryl69:
(graymane's Reply)
Hot damn, good to see a post from you pard!
|
09-23-12 05:38am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from shoury032:
(graymane's Reply)
Agree with you.
|
08-22-12 05:31pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(graymane's Reply)
I think graymane speaks for at least some of us elder PU members.
|
08-18-12 09:48pm
|
Reply
50
|
Hailey Young
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(graymane's Reply)
Thank you for your kindness. I'm going to review the entire network. Unfortunately I don't think there will be a single site your interested in. They don't deviate too much from each other.
|
08-15-12 04:43am
|
