Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network (1)

RagingBuddhist (65) 01-05-14  03:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 site access
+ Files types: wmv 1080p, mp4 in 320p, 480p, 720p &1080p
+ Bonus material from other sites
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Searches with category filters and keywords
+ In browser flash for video
+ Live cams available
Cons: - Seriously quirky flash based picture viewing
- Inconsistent download speeds
- Some might like larger pictures
- Pictures need renaming
Bottom Line: This network started out with Wet and Puffy in April 2009 with We Like To Suck added at the end of May 2011 and Wet and Pissy the end of March 2012.

Wet & Puffy is basically the solo portion of their network. The girls start out clothed, get into a bit of tease as they shed their outfits, then it's on to plenty of showing off, fingering and insertions of toys and other objects. WeLikeToSuck is the hardcore portion of the show. Surprise! It all centers around blowjobs, with more than a few of the girls giving it all up for full penetration sex. Wet&Pissy, also not surprisingly, is the pissing fetish site. All solo action, including toys and insertions.

They added high definition video starting in February 2010. The videos are clear and sharp across the board and the camerawork is what I'd call above average. There are plenty of full body shots and closeups with a fair minimum of the can't-hold-still camera that I find distracting as hell. The choice of file types and sizes make it easy to get video that suits your needs.

As far as the pictures go, I'll start by saying that they're 2800 pixels long side and it does appear that the sets were handpicked to avoid too much repetition and out of focus shots. But that's where the good stops. I've never been a fan of flash based picture viewing because there always seems to be some issues that make the navigation slow and clunky. That's definitely the case here. Some of the newest sets pop up pictures that are smaller than what's available in the zip files. Some sets have the option to enlarge to full size, some don't. There are also times when the individual pictures don't give the option to right click and save. As I moved from page to page, the worst part of it was clicking on a pic, closing the popup and winding back on the first page. The last issue with the pictures is in the naming. Saving individual pictures (when possible!) all have the same name. The zip files don't include the name of the set and they all open to a folder named Images, with the pictures themselves simply numbered (001, 002, etc.) That required a lot of renaming work.

You get the typical tabbed browsing here so getting around the sites is pretty easy and intuitive. Nothing new with that. It's an easy jump from videos to pictures to the bonus content and on to anywhere on the site. The filters do a good job of narrowing things down to get you to just what you're looking for.

Download speeds were all over the place. Using a download manager, I got speeds that ranged from around 350 to 3200 kb/s. That meant that some of the one gig+ files took almost halh an hour to download.

The bonus content here is better than most I've seen. A dozen or more scenes from 7 well-known sites updated weekly. They're in 720p mp4 - decidedly better than the 1990's resolution flash seen on countless other sites.

Advertising is kept hidden behind it's own tab and behind a button on each page. Always nice to see that.

As always, I can't say too much about the live cams because I don't care for 'em. It appears you have to sign up separately to access them and that some are free and some require you to pony up some extra cash.

All in all, I really like the site and would recommend checking it out. The videos get a 92 from me and the pictures a 75. I averaged that out to come up with 83.5 rounded up to my score of 84

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


graymane (33) Exceptionally fine review, RB ....... but then I wouldn't expect less from you.
When they say "Puffy" are they referring to those lovely, swelled, lusciously protruding pussies? Cuz I do love'm puffed up like that!

01-05-14  08:05pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #1 - graymane :

Thanks, graymane.

I wouldn't say swelled up and protruding. They categorize the girls' "nether regions" in 3 groups: Puffy PEACH, what some people call "innies". Think Miela, if you know she is. If not, hit Google and you'll figure it out. Juicy CHERRY means more or less your average looking vagina and Big TACOs are the Labia Masters.

01-06-14  02:08pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) Great review, RB! I've been thinking about joining this site for a while now--well, really just Wet and Pissy, as those two words encompass nearly everything I seek out in porn--but if this is the same price for two additional sites, it's obviously the better deal. I guess I'll wait a little while on a review once I join (and don't want to risk carpal tunnel syndrome either!). Your comments on camera work are also a lot more than what I usually manage, the typically redundant "Me see naughty parts in video. Me get horny."

Also, your reply to graymane about use of the term "puffy," that "Big TACOs are the Labia Masters" is hilarious (though I would think the title "Labia Mistress" is more correct). If that were a real award or title it would be one I wouldn't think twice about accepting! :-)

01-06-14  05:40pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #3 - turboshaft :

Thank you as well, turbo. Yeah - it's definitely worth a join.

And, yes, you are correct. It should have been Mistresses. I'm turning in my Grammar Nazi badge (and arm band, of course).

01-06-14  07:34pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #4 - RagingBuddhist :

LOL Maybe you enjoyed this site so much it's turned down your rage somewhat?

Though to be honest I certainly hope it hasn't--I don't want to the sole rageaholic here!

01-06-14  10:27pm

Reply To Message


wetandpuffy (11)
Good morning ,

Wayne here from Puffynetwork.com

I would like to start by saying it is great to read such an honest and brilliant review.

It is nice to see somebody who appreciates the good and can also give such constructive feedback, it has been a pleasure to read.

At puffynetwork we are a very small team who want to make our sites special and be exactly what our fans and friends want and by reading reviews like yours help me improve what we have over here and make it even better.

We have already started looking into the comments regarding the pictures sets and have made contact with our host about the inconsistent speeds.

We host all our content on CDN which should mean everyone gets the very best in speeds but from reading your remarks we see this is not happening and want to make sure this is improved.

I would once again like to thank you for your great review and hope we can keep in touch.

Best Regards

01-07-14  06:08am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #5 - turboshaft :

LOL You can't be serious. Nothing - NOTHING - affects the rage. But even I have to admit that there are moments when things aren't red hot.
01-07-14  09:33am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #6 - wetandpuffy :

Hi Wayne. Glad you appreciate the review. It's always good to see the people from the sites chiming in here.

I joined your site some time last year and the layout has definitely changed since then. I can't put my finger on exactly what all is different, but I can't say I remember the flash-based picture viewing at all. While I'm sure there are people who like it, to me, in browser viewing has always seemed to be the most consistently glitch-free way to go. I think that giving the user a choice between the two would be a nice addition.

As far as download speeds go, I only reported what I saw. To be fair, the problem could be on my end. Hopefully someone else here will join and put up their findings.

While I have your attention, I would like to address something I didn't feel the need to include in my review. Please tell me you're getting away from putting those long music intros on your videos. I do notice that there are a lot less of them since I last signed up there and I think that's a definite improvement.

All in all, a really good site - one I'm sure I'll come back to from time to time. Thanks again for adding the personal touch by responding here.

01-07-14  09:52am

Reply To Message


wetandpuffy (11)
REPLY TO #8 - RagingBuddhist :

You are more then welcome. You are the guys that keep my sites alive and I thank you for it and thank you for taking your time to review and make my sites better.

Here is my answers below.

1) For the picture viewer , I can definitly do this and offer both types of viewer and a way to switch between them. What I will be doing in febuary is spending some time in my members areas tweaking and making them better, so any more points you have. please keep them coming and if they make the site better then they will be taken care off.

2) Music in videos , yes we are moving away from this as we agree it was a bit of a distraction to the video.

Thanks once again.


01-13-14  12:28am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.