Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Wetscape

Wetscape (1)

Active
85
LPee23 (15) 01-20-14  12:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Wetscape.com is a site with history. It is the undisputed, original large pee site. Launched in 1998, Wetscape.com was the most prolific pee site in the early years. They paved the way for all pee sites that followed, and shot almost every type of peeing scene - solo, golden showers, indoors, outdoors, bondage peeing, wetting, naughty peeing, and drinking.
Their members section only seems to have a handful of videos from TheArtofPee.com, making it easy to think they are a site clone. There is a small link there for the Archives section - this is where basically the entire Wetscape site is located!
-great for photo fans
-523 photo sets with over 18,000 photos
-resolution is good for the era at mostly 600x800
-444 videos in 720x526 resolution
Cons: This site is only for a sub-set of porn users. You have to either be a dedicated photo fan, or have a real urge to see the original, classic pee site. Those of you who may have surfed the net for pee pics in the early 2000's will recognize a lot of these pics, even if you never joined Wetscape.com. Wetscape.com was so heavily pirated, they all but populated UseNet with pee pics. Those who do not realize this history may look at Wetscape.com and think it has a bunch of non-exclusive UseNet pics, but it is the other way around. These pics actually started off exclusive at Wetscape, but they totally lost control of their content. More than UseNet, there were entire paysites, some of which still exist, that based their content in part or exclusively on Wetscape.com pics. You will still get much more at Wetscape.com than you ever did on UseNet. Other cons:
-no zips
-there are scattered videos that are truly non-exclusive (less than 5%)
Bottom Line: Wetscape.com is one of a kind, and there will never be another site like it. It's creators were pioneers to put together the first large pee site. This is the type of site that you can't criticize for not updating - it is a work in completion. You can't criticize the 800x600 size of the photos - it was part of the era. As a photo lover I think 800x600 is not bad at all, and even with our 3000x2000 photos nowadays, I can still get a lot of enjoyment out of these older pics. No doubt, pee sites since have looked at these photos and had some inspiration.
I remember the first time I was a member at Wetscape.com back in 2002. I spent a month downloading all of their pics, and when I was finished, there was this great sense of accomplishment. Wetscape.com pics made up such a huge chunk of the free pics and even pics at other paysites that that time, that I felt like I had just downloaded a good chunk of all the peeing pics online. Wetscape.com did not watermark their pics, so it was only if you looked at their entire site that you would realize that a huge chunk of those early unidentifiable peeing pics without watermarks started out as exclusive content on Wetscape.com.
Unfortunately, I lost my original porn collection, so where was the first place I went to rebuild it? Wetscape. More bad fortune, I lost my collection a second time, but this time, in 2009, Wetscape.com had closed. If there was any doubt about it in 2008, their closure signified that the era of the first generation pee sites was over. This was a terrible disappointment, because I felt like my collection could literally never be complete without it.
Then, in 2013, something amazing happened. Wetscape.com was back up and running again, thanks to Tramp Stamp Studios! It is so rare for a site to come back from the dead, and for Wetscape.com to come back after 5 years, it seemed too good to be true! As I joined, I just hoped that it wouldn't be a thinned down version of the original, but I was not disappointed! It was all basically there. 98% of their sets were totally intact. Their oldest sets - absolute classics - were reduced to 1 photo each and complied by model into new sets so that a single model that originally had 20 sets would now have one set of 20 photos, each from a different original set. The amazing thing is that Wetscape.com was so heavily copied, that I can still today point anyone who is interested to other peeing paysites that still do have all of the classic Wetscape.com sets that were thinned down! So you can still in the year 2014 have all of the original photos from Wetscape, dating back to 1998!
So you can see from my review that I love this site. I would personally give it a score close to 100%, but in taking into account the general tastes of others and what I know people look for in a site, I had to give it an 85%. What brought it down a bit? The majority of users are looking for video over pictures, and Wetscape.com videos were never among the best - also some truly non-exclusive videos. In addition to that, while the site is 98% complete, and the other 2% can still be found elsewhere, I have to take some points from any site that removes their old stuff as a matter of principle. Also, the lack of zips makes this a time consuming site to visit. It was still totally worth it for me though. The bottom line is this - if you like pictures, peeing, and classic early 2000's material - this is the site for you. Wetscape.com was the first, there will never be another one, and I am glad to have it back!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheSquirrel (53) It's good to see someone reviewing sites which due to their nature, will have a limited market, and limited appeal on PU. Excellent review as well.
01-20-14  12:49pm

Reply To Message

2

graymane (31) I gotta say, Lpee, you certainly haven't let any grass grow under your feet inso-far as the short time you've been with us. That is to say you wasted little time jumping right onto contributing to all segments of PU's worthy projects, and done so admirably .
It is this kind of enthusiasm, loyalty, and partaking interest that we here hope to see in our newcomers.
Because I think, from what I've seen, that your presence and potential capabilities can, and will only improve on why this site is the best of it's genre.
Here one finds he needn't be reticent about particularly unpopular niches, (save those which are clearly outlined in written creed and bylaws) because the kind of support he finds here from PU's membership so overshadows that worry that it mindfully slips away.
I predict and enthusiastically hope you meld right in with our busy but happy group, wherein you'll discover an unmatched, unique, and special camaraderie that doesn't even come close to what we enjoy here.

01-20-14  03:56pm

Reply To Message

3

graymane (31) My apologies ..... but because I was forbidden to return and correct (edit) a crucial mistake on the last line in my initial message (Exceeded time lapse of ten minutes) .... the effect of which would reverse the entire meaning of what I meant to convey, thereby confusing the entire train of thought that was to convey my intentions.
Hereunder is the single word (in quotation) which I failed to include in it's proper order ....."elsewhere."

Below is the repeated paragraph which includes the intended word in question --appearing in (bold) and the order it was supposed to have been in .......

I predict and enthusiastically hope you meld right in with our busy but happy group, wherein you'll discover an unmatched, unique, and special camaraderie that "ELSEWHERE" doesn't even come close to what we enjoy here.

01-20-14  05:00pm

Reply To Message

4

TheSquirrel (53) REPLY TO #3 - graymane :

Yeah slightly irritating that 10 minute thing. Fell foul of it myself a few times. I read your original post and sort of knew what you meant anyway and I'm sure so did Lpee.
01-20-14  05:56pm

Reply To Message

5

LPee23 (15) REPLY TO #2 - graymane :

Thanks for the kind words graymane. It has been a lot of fun to get more involved here at pornusers.com together with you and the other regulars.
01-20-14  07:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.