Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (42)  

Feedback:   All (1468)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (95)  |   Replies (1349)

Other:   Replies Received (662)  |   Trust Ratings (55)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 1349 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When I see a site with a great review on PU I check it out on TBP and the preview site. If it still looks like a keeper, I tag it for my favorites list and let it sit.

When I get bored with a site I'm currently subscribed to, I'll drop it then check my favorites list for a new one.

If I get an email deal on a "favorite" site, I may jump at it.

01-25-15  12:31pm

N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

These days I seldom sign up with a site unless it has a TBP/PU discount.

That said, I've found some sites that I wasn't expecting very much from that really surprised me how good they really were. To that extent it will affect my review just because I had a chance to experience the site.

01-12-15  01:01pm

Visit VIPissy

Reply of rearadmiral's Review

You said, "Newer scenes also offer a few options that may be of interest to some members. They have ‘bonus clips’ of a trailer, a cut with close ups and a wide angle cut. This may not be of much value to all members but it certainly shows the site’s attention to detail that they’d make three full-length videos of the same scene available. (I sampled a few of these and can say that there isn’t really much of a difference between the primary scene and the wide angle cut.)"

This is a great idea that I would like to see replicated in other sites. More than once I've seen close-up material that excludes some body parts that I would have enjoyed seeing.

One example is how on a basic fuck scene the camera is fixed on the guys tool as he's porking some babe with unwelcome closeups of his hairy asshole. You get an occasional glimpse of the babe's pussy as it's getting the workout. What would be great is to see a long shot of that same scene where the babe's boobs were flopping vigorously and we can see her face and its reaction to the action.

01-09-15  10:59am

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Copy that.

01-04-15  10:27pm

Visit Brazzers

Reply of benmar51's Reply

Unlike others, Brazzers seems to be straight shooters. Another site I joined offered a good price that was "lifetime" and required that I pay a monthly (low) rate to stay with the site.

Then, a year or two later they decided to split the site into two sites and "allowed" me to stay with just one of the two sites under the deal. Then, later, they split again and again offered the deal only with one of the three sites.

My experience with Brazzers (and with MetArt) are the exact opposite. Both are open and honest with their customers which, as demonstrated by the continued success of both sites, is sincerely appreciated.

01-04-15  11:00am

Visit VideoBox

Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I'm a 10 year continuous member from way back with the one update per day, through an update every 4+ hours to the 5 at a time daily updates.

I'm OK with the ratio of crapola to good stuff because there have been a few crappy updates with some really good stuff hidden away in them. For example a few weeks ago there was a really crummy video that had a pre-enhancement Venus Knight video where she "outnastied" her nastiest later stuff.

I just wish they would improve their accuracy in model identification, but that's a subject for another comment.

12-30-14  11:53am

Visit Brazzers

Reply of EverNight's Review

Good review because it says what I also think. I dropped Brazzers after a long spell and joined Bang Bros, primarily because BZ has far too many babes with breasts distorted by lousy silicone "enhancements."

12-30-14  11:41am

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Totally agree with Jay. Artsy fartsy camerawork and unnecessarily dark venues really piss me off when I want to check out the babe's basic assets.

Of the choices listed, I picked shower scenes just because they are seldom very erotic but it was a close call. Just show me PTA* in quality lighting and I'm a happy camper.

*PTA=pussy, tits & ass.

12-26-14  04:49pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I usually regret having too many subscribed sites because there's so many babes, so little time. Sure wish I had this problem with real life babes! ;->

12-24-14  10:57pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

And what about Saturnalia? Seems like a gang bang under the mistletoe would be a very appropriate way for pagans to celebrate the Winter Solstice.

12-21-14  05:12pm

N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I'm OK with it but I don't understand why Hannukah isn't represented.

What I find really offensive are scenes when nuns are doing it with priests.

12-21-14  09:41am

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm

Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
Reply of clubseventeen's Reply

Will clubsweethearts.com be listed on the PU/TBP site?

12-13-14  01:05pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll


My word would be FRAUDULENT

12-12-14  10:42am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

if a site looks good on the PU page and if the price is right, I always go to the TBP page to see details such as company sites, networked sites, update rate, DRM, negative comments, etc. It's just one click and TBP has a lot of good addl information.

12-06-14  12:11pm

Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
Reply of ievi's Review

I agree that the site has some great, probably exclusive, content. The one beef I have is with the less than easy to use navigation system which really makes finding what I want unnecessarily complicated.

12-02-14  11:28pm

N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

I check PU first just because it's quick and I like seeing what's new. Next is one of my favourite porn sites.

I wait on checking my email because once I start, I'm usually tied up for the rest of the day.

12-02-14  12:15pm

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
Reply of Kavalier2's Review

While I agree with the comment about older content, I'm quite happy that content continues to be available. The alternative is to take those scenes down making them unavailable.

11-28-14  10:20pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Firefox & IE

11-28-14  10:07pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm OK with them if not overdone.

If the site is clear, honest and uses no tricks about upsells, I actually like them. What I really don't like is what Naughty America is (was?) doing where they hid the fact that you were buying an upsell rather than just clicking on a content offering. You discover you bought an upgrade only after you see an unexpected charge on your credit card. I canceled immediately and refuse to sign up again.

Scoreland, on the other hand, has a lot of upsell opportunities but they make it very clear you are buying an upsell before you commit. That's fine.

11-27-14  01:07pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Reply

Ditto what LPee23 said.

11-24-14  02:26pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

The problem with a poll like this is that many sites are currently being gobbled up by large companies and will continue to operate as if they are separate companies.

I expect 66% will still be there, but probably only 25% of the current companies will still be inbusiness with the rest being bought out or closing up operations.

11-21-14  07:33pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not a chance. For the same reason I won't carry any porn on a thumb drive.

11-11-14  11:14pm

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

A brief BJ is OK, but a BJ that exceeds about a minute causes a fast forward. Cunnilingus, not a choice in this poll, is always worth a watch, especially if the labia lips are hanging down and available for nibbling.

Another fast forward situation is too much focus on a guys dick and/or hairy ass during the basic fuck makes me wonder about the sexual orientation of the cameraman.

I came to see the babe(s), not the dude(s).

10-31-14  05:22pm

Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

OK. So I thought I'd check out Babes.com and I read both the TBP review and Toad's review. That's when I discovered that the company owned Brazzers, Reality Kings and Twistys.

I dropped Twistys after 5 continuous years when their site turned south earlier this year. I also have been a Brazzers member off and on, and in one memorable lapse in judgment, I joined the Reality Kings site.

Brazzers could easily promote itself as the king of lousy silicone jobs and RK as the roach motel of porn (remember the old roach motel ad..."You can check in but you cannot check out.")

Toad's observations about their billing and business practices tell me that this company is one I can definitely live without, especially with all the other sites with outstanding customer service and with terrific content. (DDF, VideoBox, Perfect Gonzo and ALS Scans come immediately to mind as superior in both service and content.)

10-30-14  10:39am

Shown : 26-50 of 1349 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 2.74 seconds.